• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern Line extension

Status
Not open for further replies.

philjo

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Messages
2,892
I saw a report in the Evening Standard last night saying that it was proposed that the new stations on the Battersea Northern Line Extension would be placed in Zone 1 as this would enable the developers to market the new properties as being in central London. Kennington station would be in zone1/zone2 boundary.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

cjohnson

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
597
There's a small document on the public enquiry website about it. Makes sense for Kennington to be 1/2 if the two new stations are zone 1, although who knows how that will end up looking like on the tube map.
nle-tube-map.jpg
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Will Clapham Junction and Vauxhall be moved to Z1 as well as they're quite close to the stations proposed for ythe unneeded move from Z2 to Z1.
 

cjohnson

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
597
No - the document proposes that the only existing station to change would be Kennington.
 

Tibbs

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2012
Messages
886
Location
London
Will Clapham Junction and Vauxhall be moved to Z1 as well as they're quite close to the stations proposed for ythe unneeded move from Z2 to Z1.

The outcry if Clapham were moved into Z1 would be huge, I'd imagine. If they did that it would eliminate most routes avoiding Zone 1 that travel through that area. At that point there would be no point using the WLL etc, and Z1 would become even more crowded.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
12,621
Location
Yorkshire
The outcry if Clapham were moved into Z1 would be huge, I'd imagine. If they did that it would eliminate most routes avoiding Zone 1 that travel through that area. At that point there would be no point using the WLL etc, and Z1 would become even more crowded.

Unless it were moved into Z1&Z2.

Will Clapham Junction and Vauxhall be moved to Z1 as well as they're quite close to the stations proposed for ythe unneeded move from Z2 to Z1.

Given Vauxhall is already Z1 and Z2 that would make fares either unchanged or more expensive.
 
Last edited:

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Why does TfL feel need to muck around with moving the zones? Surely they're okay as they are?
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,933
Seems a bit bizzare to say the least. Here is an even stranger one though. Battersea Sattion will be in Zone 1 yet Battersea Park 250 metres away will be in Zone 2.
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,775
Location
West Country
I used to assume that zones were determined by the relative distance from a set point, but it seems it's a far more arbitrary system than I thought.
 

gottago

Member
Joined
15 May 2012
Messages
61
It'd be interesting to see how they'd mark that on the already crowded in-train tube maps given that the zones go in order along the bottom. Perhaps the Battersea branch would loop back into zone 1.
 

duncanp

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2012
Messages
4,856
If they are going to permanently split the current Northern Line, they might as well give each branch a separate name to distinguish the two, and have a new colour for one of the lines on the tube map.

Any suggestions for the name of the new line?

Following the logic used for the Bakerloo Line, it would be called the "BatNet" line, but somehow I don't think that will catch on.
 

JamesRowden

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
1,715
Location
Ilfracombe
If they are going to permanently split the current Northern Line, they might as well give each branch a separate name to distinguish the two, and have a new colour for one of the lines on the tube map.

Any suggestions for the name of the new line?

Following the logic used for the Bakerloo Line, it would be called the "BatNet" line, but somehow I don't think that will catch on.

I think that a possible pair of names would be the 'Charing Cross Line' and the 'Bank Line'. These are the names that people associate with the branches.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Perhaps the 'Bank Line' could be in Gold on the tube map.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
12,621
Location
Yorkshire
I think that a possible pair of names would be the 'Charing Cross Line' and the 'Bank Line'. These are the names that people associate with the branches.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Perhaps the 'Bank Line' could be in Gold on the tube map.

And Charing Cross a Charcoal colour?
 

duncanp

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2012
Messages
4,856
Perhaps the "West End Line" given the area that it serves.

Alternatively you could name it after a character from history such as the "Churchill Line", or the "Elizabeth Line" after the Queen.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,880
Location
Nottingham
Perhaps that should give some pause for thought to those who suggest HS2 stations should be put underground when they don't like the proposed surface option. Remembering that HS2 stations are several times bigger than Tube stations.
 

anme

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
1,777
I saw a report in the Evening Standard last night saying that it was proposed that the new stations on the Battersea Northern Line Extension would be placed in Zone 1 as this would enable the developers to market the new properties as being in central London. Kennington station would be in zone1/zone2 boundary.

That would be a nice little subsidy! But are central London property developers really the most deserving cause?
 

simple simon

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
651
Location
Suburban London
At one time this was known as the Mordon - Edgware Line. When the split comes it wont even be possible to travel between the two without changing.

The question of line colours is complicated because of the need to ensure that people who are colour-blind can tell them apart. Which is a far cry from many decades ago when the subsurface lines were all just green in colour.

Gold might to be near yellow? If so then the confusion would preclude it.

Simon
 

Nozzacook

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
24
Keep the colour the same just have one line solid black the other one black and white.
 

joeykins82

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Messages
601
Location
London
The convention for non-solid lines on the underground map is clear though: a dotted section represents a limited service and a tramlines style outline refers to a non-tube rail service (DLR/LO)
 

DJL

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2013
Messages
310
Do lines that are easily differentiated by other means need to have contrasting colours?

The circle line is clearly identifiable by it's shape - even though it's no longer a true circle, certainly you wouldn't confuse it with a north-south line?
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,237
Location
West of Andover
If they are going to permanently split the current Northern Line, they might as well give each branch a separate name to distinguish the two, and have a new colour for one of the lines on the tube map.

Any suggestions for the name of the new line?

Following the logic used for the Bakerloo Line, it would be called the "BatNet" line, but somehow I don't think that will catch on.

How about the Elizabeth Line?

Beaten to it by duncanp
 
Last edited:

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,078
Surely the most contentious part of this proposal is that Morden trains will only run via Bank, so passengers to and from West End will have to change at Kennington. The Charing Cross branch must be three or four times busier than the City branch in evenings and for most of weekend. Run it as a shuttle and why not an interchange at Vauxhall with the Victoria Line and Southwestern Trains to Waterloo? The section from Morden to Stockwell is already packed to bursting in peak hours and mustn't lose any frequency.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
12,621
Location
Yorkshire
Surely the most contentious part of this proposal is that Morden trains will only run via Bank, so passengers to and from West End will have to change at Kennington. The Charing Cross branch must be three or four times busier than the City branch in evenings and for most of weekend. Run it as a shuttle and why not an interchange at Vauxhall with the Victoria Line and Southwestern Trains to Waterloo? The section from Morden to Stockwell is already packed to bursting in peak hours and mustn't lose any frequency.

Morden currently only gets a very limited service via the West End (Charing X)- except when there is disruption there are no trains betwen 0915 and 1530 or (except for a couple of very late ones) after 1915. At other times on weekdays around 1 in 4 trains goes that way. On a weekend the number of trains timetabled to do that is in single figures all day. All the rest of the Charing X trains start/finish at Kennington.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top