• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

BTP finally make arrests over silly pensioners protest in SY

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aldaniti

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Messages
669
The extra police and NHS expenditure from the "night time economy" is largely (if not wholly) met by those partaking, through alcohol duty.

It doesn't even come close.

HMRC and The Institute of Alcohol Studies will give you all the figures you need.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Class377

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
444
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-27976912

Two men bailed and court date set for 7th July.

Two people have been charged with obstructing police following a protest by pensioners at a South Yorkshire train station.
British Transport Police said George Arthur of Church Street, Barnsley had been charged with obstructing a police officer and fare evasion.
Anthony Nuttall of Honeywell Grove, Barnsley is charged with obstructing a police officer.
The pair have been bailed to appear at Sheffield Magistrates' Court on 7 July.
Forum meet-up anyone? Popcorn at the ready!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NorthernSpirit

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
2,184
It's a fair point - if groups of teenagers or twenty-somethings went on weekly "Freedom Rides" (boarding trains without a ticket, refusing to pay, singing Civil Rights songs, acting like the rules don't apply to them, haranguing any officials e.g. those who don't let them board the train without a ticket) then we'd be seeing complaints about it ("young people these days have no respect" / "a spell of National Service would do them good" / "it's Broken Britain" / "I blame lack of discipline in schools" etc)...

...but when pensioners do it, they get a free ride (both metaphorically and literally), with Northern declaring "free" days, since they were too scared of the negative headlines of standing up to these hoodlums.

However, as the other "South Yorkshire OAP" thread shows, the minute you try to point out that this free train travel (inc to Leeds and other stations in West Yorkshire) is a luxury that local taxpayers cannot afford any more, you get the bleeding heart "oh, so you'd take away our bus passes too, would you" stuff from those who've had free travel for so long that they have no concept of its value/ cost.

Again, exactly. Its the mentality of the typical South Yorkshire pensioner. If they are so wound up about not having free rail travel why don't they write to their beloved Labour party, after all its them who rushed the entire scheme through.

If I was SYPTE I'd scrap the senior ENCTP scheme in South Yorkshire completely and by explaing that there is no money to fund it anymore. Yeah they'll be mass protests but again the millitant un-socialists will want it their way, again. I'd cuff the lot of them and give them five years for theft. As not paying your fare to me consitutes as theft.
 

ralphchadkirk

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
5,753
Location
Essex
The extra police and NHS expenditure from the "night time economy" is largely (if not wholly) met by those partaking, through alcohol duty. It is unfairly subsidised by those who drink and don't cause trouble, but not by every taxpayer in the country.

Money raised through alcohol duty never makes an appearance in the NHS or police pots. From my personal experience, alcohol stretches these services to breaking point every weekend night.
 

neilmc

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2011
Messages
1,032
Why not, Bring Valid Tickets Though :roll:
gets coat

Indeed, don't be like those worthless fare-dodging old Yorkshire folk.

P.S. Anyone know any really really good Routing Guide dodges that will get us all to Sheffield for less than a fiver?
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,499
Good old ASLEF, supports fare evaders, sh*** on BTP, tries completely randomly to implicate (likely RMT member) RPIs... So much for the railway family. ;)

Mick Whelan, general secretary of ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, has spoken out after distressing scenes of frail pensioners being brutally manhandled by burly British Transport Police officers during a peaceful demonstration at Sheffield station were posted overnight on the internet.

Online critics have condemned the ‘disgraceful behaviour’ of officers – who come from the same area as those South Yorkshire policemen condemned for what they did at Hillsborough and Orgreave – who used the provocative and controversial tactic of kettling, first used by the Met on students protesting over tuition fees, to corral Freedom Ride pensioners demonstrating peacefully about savage travel cuts.

Mick said: ‘From reading the witness statements, and reviewing the video evidence, it is apparent that the police used excessive force. We don’t believe that this is the proper way to deal with a peaceful protest by pensioners.

‘The train company has a lot of questions to answer. Were they a party to the police tactics? Were their revenue protection officers involved in manhandling the protesters? Do they approve of the actions of these officers?

‘If they do, they should come out and say so. If not, they should condemn what went on. What they cannot do is keep schtum and sit on the fence.’

Pensioners say a private security firm aided and abetted BTP officers to abuse them.

I'd be interested to know how Mick Whelan got access to all the MG11s?! Local ASLEF LLC broke into BTP Sheffield and got them for his inspection? :roll:

ASLEF, the peoples champion! For everyone, including fare evaders, but against everyone who works on the railway that isn't an ASLEF member... Though most already knew the latter point.
 

unlevel42

Member
Joined
5 May 2011
Messages
543
Hear, hear....

The vast majority of this thread is driven by the envy of those who haven't paid into the system for very long against those, like me, who have paid into it for a long time (47 years in my case - and I'm still paying, via double taxation of my pension) without taking anything out of it.

Free travel (bus, in my case) is just small recompense for the vast amount we have paid in. Save your venom for those who have paid nothing in and are taking vast amounts out. You know who I am referring to.

I suspect that if a 16-25 free pass was suddenly introduced - to encourage the use of public transport perhaps, and a 26 - 55 free pass for the sake of equality then this thread may not exist at all.

It all comes to those who wait!

But some will wait a lot longer than others.
These men would not be entitled to an ENCTS pass if they were 64 now.
These are truly selfish people who have no concern for their fellow pensioners who will be paying for and losing services so that they can have free trips to Leeds.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,387
Location
Bolton
‘The train company has a lot of questions to answer. Were they a party to the police tactics? Were their revenue protection officers involved in manhandling the protesters? Do they approve of the actions of these officers?

‘If they do, they should come out and say so. If not, they should condemn what went on. What they cannot do is keep schtum and sit on the fence.’

What nonsense... How is any of this Northern's fault? The pensioners have lost access to the services of TransPennine Express, CrossCountry and on a very rare occasion East Midlands Trains too. What's it got to do with any of them how the BTP deal with fare evasion or anything else (including a peaceful protest). Surely they'd simply be trusting their professional judgement and expect them to handle the situation as is their job? This is not 'keeping schtum' or anything else. The decision also has nowt to do with any of those TOCs. It's SYPTE who decide what the budget is spent on, not them.

Having said all of that about that infuriating article, what is happening does seem very harsh. Would I be correct in saying that while West Yorkshire residents can still use their 'Concession Singles/Returns' at 50% of the adult fare, anyone in South Yorkshire now has to pay full fare (unless they have a senior railcard, so it's only really reducing the discount). By comparison residents of Greater Manchester retain the free off-peak travel on trains and trams, in addition to buses.
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,288
Location
Leeds
Good old ASLEF, supports fare evaders, sh*** on BTP, tries completely randomly to implicate (likely RMT member) RPIs... So much for the railway family. ;)

I'd be interested to know how Mick Whelan got access to all the MG11s?! Local ASLEF LLC broke into BTP Sheffield and got them for his inspection? :roll:

ASLEF, the peoples champion! For everyone, including fare evaders, but against everyone who works on the railway that isn't an ASLEF member... Though most already knew the latter point.
Does this mean that if I protested against fares (£10.50 single from Hastings to Wadhurst for a journey of 39 minutes, SYPTE take note) in the south east and boarded without a ticket, I could get ASLEF to back me on claims of "police brutality on young girl" when the BTP carry out their duties in accordance with the law?

distressing scenes of frail pensioners being brutally manhandled by burly British Transport Police officers
I refer the writer of that piece to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram.

The way the police restrain them looks intimidating, but it's designed to minimise the risk of injury to both the police officers and arrestee. I speak from experience here. ;) As for "frail pensioners", I know people in their early 70s who could punch like Mike Tyson!
 

aleph_0

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2010
Messages
171
Here's another video from the same protest:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBeg6bhJq-c

I think it shows a different person arrested from the sheffield star video. I'm not sure it can be described as peaceful - most, if not all, the incidents of physical contact are initiated by the protestor.
 

PowerLee

Member
Joined
24 May 2014
Messages
39
Here's another video from the same protest:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBeg6bhJq-c

I think it shows a different person arrested from the sheffield star video. I'm not sure it can be described as peaceful - most, if not all, the incidents of physical contact are initiated by the protestor.

I bet the Daily Wail wouldn't link to that video ;)

Nice to see members of the public shout abuse at the Police doing there lawful duty, idiots like that should be given a talking to.
 
Last edited:

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,387
Location
Bolton
I bet the Daily Wail wouldn't link to that video ;)

Nice to see members of the public shout abuse at the Police doing there lawful duty, idiots like that should be given a talking to.

I'm not entirely sure that's fair. I'm not condoning their actions - because we don't know what they are exactly (and that video doesn't exactly clear it up) but there seems to be a failure to be able to see this from both sides in this thread. But then... should I be surprised at that...?
 

theblackwatch

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2006
Messages
10,713
I bet the Daily Wail wouldn't link to that video ;)

Nice to see members of the public shout abuse at the Police doing there lawful duty, idiots like that should be given a talking to.

And if it was a 'yoof' who was shouting like that in front of the police and a camera, all the OAPs would be moaning about how the younger generation have no respect for the law.... :|

(And before anyone accuses me of being one of the younger generation, I'm far from it - I'm about half way through my working life which makes me middle aged!)
 

khib70

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2011
Messages
236
Location
Edinburgh
I'm not entirely sure that's fair. I'm not condoning their actions - because we don't know what they are exactly (and that video doesn't exactly clear it up) but there seems to be a failure to be able to see this from both sides in this thread. But then... should I be surprised at that...?
No you shouldn't. Some of the ignorant, reactionary, ageist posts on this subject are among the worst I've ever seem on this board. Well done ASLEF for taking a stand. Who's next target for the keyboard warriors then? Haven't done disabled people for a while have you?

Jeez, the amount of vituperative angst that can be generated by an alliance of rail staff and enthusiasts makes a lot of football forums seem civilised. If these pensioners had been anti-HS2 as well, you'd be calling for the death penalty.....
 

bussnapperwm

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2014
Messages
1,510
I say that the police did what they could as best as they could and handled it well.

The OAPs in this case were clearly abusive and personally I'd love to see the Judge throw the book at them.
 

Class377

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
444
I don't have any views either way on the issue of whether they SHOULD have free travel, but surely you agree that those breaking the law should be arrested for doing so?
 

khib70

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2011
Messages
236
Location
Edinburgh
I don't have any views either way on the issue of whether they SHOULD have free travel, but surely you agree that those breaking the law should be arrested for doing so?
It's called civil disobedience, and it's how a lot of the rights and freedoms we have today came about.....
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,499
It's called civil disobedience, and it's how a lot of the rights and freedoms we have today came about.....

So if every passenger in the country engaged in disturbances like that with the end result being that nobody paid to travel on the railway, you'd be alright with that too? The Police shouldn't intervene, anarchy should succeed and the tax payer should pick up all the passengers tabs?

Or is it just old people who are allowed to break the law with impunity while every other fare paying passenger pays for their free rides gained through 'civil disobedience'?
 

khib70

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2011
Messages
236
Location
Edinburgh
Not in general, but people protesting against unfair treatment shouldn't be treated as criminals. Except in countries where apparently rational internet posters are wetting themselves and making puerile jokes about tooled up authority figures manhandling the elderly, apparently....
 

Class377

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
444
Not in general, but people protesting against unfair treatment shouldn't be treated as criminals. Except in countries where apparently rational internet posters are wetting themselves and making puerile jokes about tooled up authority figures manhandling the elderly, apparently....

You're right, nothing wrong with protesting.

But protests have to be legal. A "freedom ride" - fare evasion to everyone else (something which can be prosecuted under 2 pieces of legislation) is NOT legal, and so people in that boat SHOULD be treated as criminals.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,679
Location
Redcar
Precisely what is unfair about removing a benefit which is more generous than most other OAPs get in their local areas? If you were making their travel entitlements worse than anywhere else I could see the 'fairness' argument but in this case?
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,499
Not in general, but people protesting against unfair treatment shouldn't be treated as criminals.

Nah, people breaking the law shouldn't be treated as criminals, particularly when they're breaking the law to obtain free perks that most people in the country don't have and don't expect to get.
 

khib70

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2011
Messages
236
Location
Edinburgh
Nah, people breaking the law shouldn't be treated as criminals, particularly when they're breaking the law to obtain free perks that most people in the country don't have and don't expect to get.
So if you don't get it, nobody should? And no one is advocating random lawbreaking. But the railway, and BTP's reaction to this was totally over the top, and more suited to the Soviet Union and the UK. Pensioners are an easy target - BTP and RPI's are much harder to find when gangs of youths are terrorising staff and passengers and blatantly fare-dodging. But bullies and cowards are generally the same people...
 

PermitToTravel

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2011
Messages
3,044
Location
Groningen
I don't have any views either way on the issue of whether they SHOULD have free travel, but surely you agree that those breaking the law should be arrested for doing so?

Arresting someone for a railway ticketing offence is a silly waste of resources unless there are other aggravating factors making it necessary (violence, threatening behaviour, failure to give details, etc)
 

aleph_0

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2010
Messages
171
Not in general, but people protesting against unfair treatment shouldn't be treated as criminals. Except in countries where apparently rational internet posters are wetting themselves and making puerile jokes about tooled up authority figures manhandling the elderly, apparently....

They have many legal ways to protest.

You're right, they're entitled to also choose the civil disobedience route. Y'know, choosing to do something illegal because you feel the laws are wrong or unjust. But then you can't be surprised when you get arrested.

The amount of force in the video, to me, seems reasonable *if* (we don't know) the person was resisting arrest.

I would say ASLEF are on very dodgy moral ground. They're criticising BTP officer actions based on little evidence, but they (rightly) wouldn't be very keen on one of their members being judged based on an out-of-context youtube video.

Whilst I'm not sure the appropriation of the term "Freedom Riders" is really appropriate, I fully support the concept of their protest. Doing an arrestable crime because you believe something is wrong shows an admirable commitment. But you can't then complain when you get arrested.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,679
Location
Redcar
So if you don't get it, nobody should?

That's one way of phrasing the question. I'd phrase it as why should they get a benefit which no other OAPs get? If you've got a ENTCS pass in the North East you don't get free train travel. Why should the pensioners of South Yorkshire when SYPTE are looking at having to make savings?

Again I could see the fairness argument if their travel entitlements were being made worse than anywhere else but they're not. They're being reduced to the same level as everywhere else. How is this unfair?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top