1st one was great, 2nd one was boring as mentioned...
Going to watch Fridays tonight, hope its better
Without giving anything away, I thought it was back on a par with episode 1!
1st one was great, 2nd one was boring as mentioned...
Going to watch Fridays tonight, hope its better
Without giving anything away, I thought it was back on a par with episode 1!
Possibly worse ? - shows the company in a poor light if it cancels services so easily.
But they were cancelling services in Ep1 as well (Due to a lack of drivers, not buses admittedly). Why they didn't put a few coaches out on schools to keep services running is what I'm wondering.
The programme makers like to give the impression this is an independent company that has been family-owned for generations. We all know this is being economical with the truth. Why companies allow such programmes is baffling - but then Easyjet is still operating after the series showing all their failings at first hand, so maybe bad publicity is better than no publicity. Anyway, it shines a good light on most of the employees, struggling manfully to maintain services,even if showing an out-of-touch owner and, probably, senior management. Now where else is that true? Answers on a postcard.
EYMS was previously part of the National Bus Company, but as part of deregulation it was privatised in 1987, and is part of EYMS Group Ltd which was formed by its Management Team, it's now owned by Peter Shipp, who's been with the company since 1980.
Such a shame, to the general viewer it will give the impression that only one of the big bus groups is able to offer a decent service these days except for 'niche' services like the other open-top service in Scarborough. Perhaps the reality, though, is that this getting closer to the truth than ever before as well-regarded independent operators either call it a day or sell out to one of the groups. If one of them came along with a half-decent offer for EYMS (and subject to the usual regulatory garbage) would EYMS's owners really resist for long?
Peter Shipp wants to keep the company as it is for as long as possible. Presumably that would only change when he felt that he was ready to retire.
It's 8 episodes? Five would have been better off with 6 episodes and have no padding. It's an interesting series but it does seems like padding some times.
The most recent episode featured two roving inspectors. One lost his rag when accused of not handing back the ticket he'd just checked and things escalated. Whatever happened in detail, we can judge only on what is broadcast and it seemed vindictively OOT to involve the police and ban two passengers from ever riding again. Why didn't he say immediately something like "Yes, I did give it back to you, but anyway it doesn't matter because you'll not be inspected again on this journey, so even if you don't have one it won't matter", then walk away, rather than get involved in a nasty confrontation?
The most recent episode featured two roving inspectors. One lost his rag when accused of not handing back the ticket he'd just checked and things escalated. Whatever happened in detail, we can judge only on what is broadcast and it seemed vindictively OOT to involve the police and ban two passengers from ever riding again. Why didn't he say immediately something like "Yes, I did give it back to you, but anyway it doesn't matter because you'll not be inspected again on this journey, so even if you don't have one it won't matter", then walk away, rather than get involved in a nasty confrontation?
The most recent episode featured two roving inspectors. One lost his rag when accused of not handing back the ticket he'd just checked and things escalated. Whatever happened in detail, we can judge only on what is broadcast and it seemed vindictively OOT to involve the police and ban two passengers from ever riding again. Why didn't he say immediately something like "Yes, I did give it back to you, but anyway it doesn't matter because you'll not be inspected again on this journey, so even if you don't have one it won't matter", then walk away, rather than get involved in a nasty confrontation?