• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Accident at Wool Level Crossing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
15 Sep 2008
Messages
105
Location
Royston, Herts
About 2 years ago someone posted the Network Rail emergency number on my mobile phone and fortunately until today I haven't had to use it.....
..... but today while taking a few days holiday in Wool in Dorset, getting off the train from Weymouth at 15.35 as my wife and I were leaving the station when I heard the level crossing siren sounding again expecting to see another train coming through heard a loud bang and saw a large double deck coach "rocking" on the crossing as it went over. Walked down to the crossing noticing the train I was expecting to see was held at a red in the station although it was not expected to stop at Wool. When I got to the crossing two barriers either side were up and two were stuck down and was worried about the queue of vehicles building up. Remembering I had NR's emergency number on my phone, used it immediately and was able to report the incident to a very helpful member of staff, who contacted the police while we stayed to protect the crossing. So glad I had the number and suggest all members make sure they have it too.
0845 711 4141
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DaveHarries

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2011
Messages
2,298
Location
England
Nice one. Presumably the coach had hit / been hit by one of the barriers. If not then OOI why the bang and the rocking of the coach?

Just as well that the OD did its job too.

Dave
 

AndyPJG

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
423
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-29385114

A coach has crashed at a level crossing in Dorset causing "considerable delays" for motorists, police have warned.

It happened at Wool on the Lulworth side of the crossing at about 16:15 BST.

Dorset Police said no injuries had been reported and Network Rail had been informed.

Officers urged motorists to avoid the area as traffic was backing up from the level crossing to Monkey World and Bovington.
 

GearJammer

Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
897
Location
On the Southern
Nice one. Presumably the coach had hit / been hit by one of the barriers. If not then OOI why the bang and the rocking of the coach?

Just as well that the OD did its job too.

Dave

If the driver of the coach hit the brakes hard then I expect the coach was just rocking on its suspension, which I expect was air suspension.
 

stopblock

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2014
Messages
12
The crossing keeper would have also noticed this as his/her box overlloks the crossing.
 

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,281
Location
Yellabelly Country
Dorset Police said no injuries had been reported and Network Rail had been informed.

Officers urged motorists to avoid the area as traffic was backing up from the level crossing to Monkey World and Bovington.
Never mind Monkey World. What about significant delays to rail passengers?

It would be CCTV monitored though...
If it is an OD type level crossing they aren't monitored the same as a CCTV level crossing.
 

Hardcastle

Member
Joined
21 Dec 2013
Messages
358
Location
Preston
Glad disaster was averted ive bookmarked the number to my phone you never know what might happen.
 

Bigfoot

Member
Joined
2 Dec 2013
Messages
1,118
Is there not yellow crossing phones to contact the signaller direct? Always the best way, via a call centre always takes longer.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
Is there not yellow crossing phones to contact the signaller direct? Always the best way, via a call centre always takes longer.
I'm not sure about MCB-OD crossings, but conventional full barrier crossings don't usually have phones for public use. They are always provided at AHBs though, and some other crossings, and do indeed provide the quickest means of getting the job stopped. In this case, if congratulate the OP on his forward thinking in storing the number, and using it where appropriate. Even if it becomes apparent that the situation had already been made safe, it never hurts to be sure. I'd just reiterate, though, that a (public) direct line to the controlling box is always preferable, where provided.
 

nowananorack

Member
Joined
15 Aug 2007
Messages
59
Location
Colden Common
I go across that crossing twice a day, four days a week. <(<(
There is another one, I think full barrier, approx 1/4 mile towards Dorchester and two others, one full and one half, between Wool and Wareham. The anoying thing is that just after the crossiing on the Dorchester / Lulworth side there is a T junction, with priority going towards Dorchester. Get stuck with a closed gate coming from Lulworth direction can be a nightmare once the gate lifts. I've been stuck there over five minutes trying to get out, with the quantity of traffic backed up whilst the gates were down. Gates seem to be down a long time before a train appears. This is worse than when the crossing was manned. The wig-wag aimed towards Lulworth could do with a bit of re-aligning as its good from a distance but not so good right on the junction. I went through a yellow once because I hadn't noticed it. I thought the traffic had stopped to let me out.:oops::oops:

I hope no one was hurt in the accident.
 
Joined
15 Sep 2008
Messages
105
Location
Royston, Herts
About 2 years ago someone posted the Network Rail emergency number on my mobile phone and fortunately until today I haven't had to use it.....
..... but today while taking a few days holiday in Wool in Dorset, getting off the train from Weymouth at 15.35 as my wife and I were leaving the station when I heard the level crossing siren sounding again expecting to see another train coming through heard a loud bang and saw a large double deck coach "rocking" on the crossing as it went over. Walked down to the crossing noticing the train I was expecting to see was held at a red in the station although it was not expected to stop at Wool. When I got to the crossing two barriers either side were up and two were stuck down and was worried about the queue of vehicles building up. Remembering I had NR's emergency number on my phone, used it immediately and was able to report the incident to a very helpful member of staff, who contacted the police while we stayed to protect the crossing. So glad I had the number and suggest all members make sure they have it too.
0845 711 4141


To follow up, was phoned by a very pleasant man from BTP who has asked me to complete a witness statement and has told me that the driver has admitted to the accident and will be charged with dangerous driving.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,332
To follow up, was phoned by a very pleasant man from BTP who has asked me to complete a witness statement and has told me that the driver has admitted to the accident and will be charged with dangerous driving.

Excellent result, well done.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
Seconded - anything that helps to secure a conviction relating to level crossing misuse is, in my view, a very good thing, so very well done indeed.
 

maniacmartin

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
15 May 2012
Messages
5,395
Location
Croydon
I wouldn't be calling an 0845 number from my mobile. I have a geographic number for them programmed in my mobile which I have used once.
 

Bigfoot

Member
Joined
2 Dec 2013
Messages
1,118
I wouldn't be calling an 0845 number from my mobile. I have a geographic number for them programmed in my mobile which I have used once.

This post annoyed me rather alot. I don't usually bite, but what you are basically saying is that you won't spend a little money to potentially save lives. 0845 is maximum 40p a min from a mobile. Not everyone has the non geographical number, and this post suggests that because it would be horrendously expensive to call from a mobile you would advise others not to. You would be on the phone for maybe 5 minutes max. £2! Two british pounds. If you can't willingly spend that to potentially avert disaster then I'm not sure I want to live in the world anymore. Or maybe I just have different morals.
 

Nozzacook

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
24

This post annoyed me rather alot. I don't usually bite, but what you are basically saying is that you won't spend a little money to potentially save lives. 0845 is maximum 40p a min from a mobile. Not everyone has the non geographical number, and this post suggests that because it would be horrendously expensive to call from a mobile you would advise others not to. You would be on the phone for maybe 5 minutes max. £2! Two british pounds. If you can't willingly spend that to potentially avert disaster then I'm not sure I want to live in the world anymore. Or maybe I just have different morals.

Totally agree the cost of the call would be my last thought.
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
I wouldn't be calling an 0845 number from my mobile. I have a geographic number for them programmed in my mobile which I have used once.

Well that's your mobile companies problem - land line phones now include 0845 in their inclusive minutes.

It's not permitted for a company to earn money from an 0845 - all the money goes to the phone company.

I get it a lot at work. We are an 0871 number and calls usually last 2-3 mins at 10p per min (from a Landline) - so 20p for someone to get you a custom itinerary. Or you can get all the info for free on our site or free app (though you'd have to look through the info yourself). Doesn't stop them complaining! Once had someone kicking off that a private (ie one in a building) payphone was charging him £5 per min. That's not our fault!
 
Last edited:

Strat-tastic

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2010
Messages
1,370
Location
Outrageous Grace
sTrades Union Congressk :s

What's wrong with 'sTrades Union Congressk'?

:o :o :o

:s :s :s

Just tried using the word and it came up with that. What's offensive about it?

Why can't I post the word s t u c k?
 

Hyphen

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Messages
504
Location
Swansea (previously Nottingham/Sheffield)

This post annoyed me rather alot. I don't usually bite, but what you are basically saying is that you won't spend a little money to potentially save lives. 0845 is maximum 40p a min from a mobile. Not everyone has the non geographical number, and this post suggests that because it would be horrendously expensive to call from a mobile you would advise others not to. You would be on the phone for maybe 5 minutes max. £2! Two british pounds. If you can't willingly spend that to potentially avert disaster then I'm not sure I want to live in the world anymore. Or maybe I just have different morals.

(outraged text size smallened)

I don't see what's wrong with maniacmartin's statement. If he has a geographical number stored to call the same place, what's the harm?

The difference would be if he point blank refused to call them because he only had an 0845, which isn't what was said. I'm sure if that was the only number available, he wouldn't hesitate. But I don't see what's wrong with saving yourself £2 to meet the same ends. I do it all the time with my bank (who still only publish an 0845 number publicly).
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Well that's your mobile companies problem - land line phones now include 0845 in their inclusive minutes.

Name me one landline provider who provides 'minutes'!

Virgin only provide inclusive 0845 calls in their XXL package (£30.99/mo), BT only include them at weekends as standard, or you can choose to pay more for them to be included at weekends or any time.

Line rental on all those options are more expensive than I pay monthly for my mobile, so I simply don't have a landline. And people wonder why they're dying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top