• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Eurostar e320 / Class 374 "Velaro"

Status
Not open for further replies.

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,593
They'd probably have to do some massive power upgrades on the GEML for it to cope with 373s
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Olaf

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2014
Messages
1,054
Location
UK
I can't see anyone else wanting a small fleet of complicated, 400m long, British loading gauge high speed trains that have been worked hard for over 20 years.

Are n't they being preserved so that they can be deployed to HS3 when that opens so as to keep Northern moaners fully employed into their retirement?
 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,254
It sounds to me that running and maintaining a 373 for domestic use would be not be cost-effective at all.

It's not. If it was, the NoL sets would've been in demand. As it was, GNER ditched them as soon as they could get away with them. Only SNCF wanted them and they're ditching them now.
 

Alfie1014

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2012
Messages
1,126
Location
Essex
Is it just me or does it seem to make sense that they are going to be coming out of service and AGA has recently been quoted as saying they want to eventually replace the Mark 3 coaches and 90s. ( even though they are going to be refurbed just to a slightly limited scope compared to some MK3 refurbs)
Those 373s could be shortened and cascaded with modifications etc far cheaper than a brand new train and they are already correct loading gauge for geml, as its wide enough for the larger containers

373s are probably the most inappropriate train for the GE. The lack of capacity has already been mentioned, but simply don't have the ability to accelerate quickly enough at slower speeds. 373s are the marathon runner of the railways whereas the GE needs sprinters that can can accelerate quickly, with distributed power.
 

34D

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2011
Messages
6,042
Location
Yorkshire
Is it correct that all the LOL 373/3 sets have been scrapped now?
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,817
Location
Epsom
Is it correct that all the NoL 373/3 sets have been scrapped now?

No, those are for the most part still in store - probably already in the scrap line somewhere though.

It's the three full length 373s that SNCF used domestically that have already been scrapped - apart from the trailers from one of them which are being used to test refurbished power cars.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,243
Location
St Albans
373s are probably the most inappropriate train for the GE. The lack of capacity has already been mentioned, but simply don't have the ability to accelerate quickly enough at slower speeds. 373s are the marathon runner of the railways whereas the GE needs sprinters that can can accelerate quickly, with distributed power.

So they need a lot of 150/156s? Northern are a good source. :)
 
Joined
9 Jul 2011
Messages
777
No, those are for the most part still in store - probably already in the scrap line somewhere though.

According to the SNCF Society back in January, the NoL's have been moved to Amberieu pending disposal.
They also said that the spare half set was still at La Chapelle at the end of December, but this may have been moved now.


 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,673
Location
Croydon
I went past Temple Mills last night - about 21:30 and could only see one pair of 374s (one train) rather than three pairs. It was alongside the long shed but only just visible beyond a parked pair of 373s.

As I have usually seen two pairs late morning or three pairs on my rare late evening passings I assume two pairs (maybe only one pair) were out to play on HS1.
 

55z

Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
183
The 100 mph is the speed limit for eurostars whilst the Eurotunnel shuttles are 80 mph am not sure as to the reasoning. The height of the overhead wires vary - there is the British domestic, the LGV's (including HS1), French domestic (25kv & 1.5 kv) Eurotunnel height (which is considerably higher) and any other country that the trains will operate in. The pantograph height tolerances are constrained depending on which system they are operating on. So going into the Channel tunnel the pantograph is dropped reconfigured and raised again to go through the tunnel and similarly on the other side.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,817
Location
Epsom
Why are the Euroshuttles restricted to 80mph anyway when the locomotives are designed and rated for 100mph; does the rolling stock have a lower restriction?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,448
Why are the Euroshuttles restricted to 80mph anyway when the locomotives are designed and rated for 100mph; does the rolling stock have a lower restriction?

The complete train is designed for 100mph. Does the lower service speed allow for recovery time, or to save on excessive wear to the rolling stock?
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,492
Why are the Euroshuttles restricted to 80mph anyway when the locomotives are designed and rated for 100mph; does the rolling stock have a lower restriction?

How much difference would that 20mph make to the amount of power that the train draws from the overhead?
 

DownSouth

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2011
Messages
1,545
How much difference would that 20mph make to the amount of power that the train draws from the overhead?
Over 50% more.

The energy required to accelerate from a stand to cruising speed is proportional to the square of the cruising speed, as is the simplest form of aerodynamic forces affecting the train.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,817
Location
Epsom
Over 50% more.

The energy required to accelerate from a stand to cruising speed is proportional to the square of the cruising speed, as is the simplest form of aerodynamic forces affecting the train.

Does that take into account the long downwards gradients when entering the tunnel?
 

TheJRB

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2011
Messages
1,207
Location
Ashford, Kent
Well I'm surprised that it's me that's putting it on here first :lol: but the e320 has escaped in daylight hours today!

I was on the 09:43 from Ashford and passed what was unmistakably an e320 on a test trip to Paris. It also worked up from Paris earlier in the morning. It doesn't look like any photos have appeared yet though.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,046
Location
UK
I bet if it ended up full of migrants at Calais it would wind up in at least one paper!
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,817
Location
Epsom
Yes, 4017/8 did a test run from St Pancras to Paris and back earlier today using the existing paths for service numbers 9020 out and 9041 back.

Probably just moving back to Temple Mills
 

glbotu

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2012
Messages
644
Location
Oxford
The words "test run" in the post above yours suggest not ;)

But the post above said it used up paths for 9O20 and 9I41. Those are in service paths aren't they (because they become 9020 and 9141 service numbers in France)?
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,817
Location
Epsom
Just to be clear: Eurostar use existing paths with which they aren't currently running a timetabled service for their tests, crew training and any positioning moves. They keep the same reporting number when they do this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top