MCR247
Established Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 9,593
They'd probably have to do some massive power upgrades on the GEML for it to cope with 373s
I can't see anyone else wanting a small fleet of complicated, 400m long, British loading gauge high speed trains that have been worked hard for over 20 years.
It sounds to me that running and maintaining a 373 for domestic use would be not be cost-effective at all.
Is it just me or does it seem to make sense that they are going to be coming out of service and AGA has recently been quoted as saying they want to eventually replace the Mark 3 coaches and 90s. ( even though they are going to be refurbed just to a slightly limited scope compared to some MK3 refurbs)
Those 373s could be shortened and cascaded with modifications etc far cheaper than a brand new train and they are already correct loading gauge for geml, as its wide enough for the larger containers
Is it correct that all the NoL 373/3 sets have been scrapped now?
373s are probably the most inappropriate train for the GE. The lack of capacity has already been mentioned, but simply don't have the ability to accelerate quickly enough at slower speeds. 373s are the marathon runner of the railways whereas the GE needs sprinters that can can accelerate quickly, with distributed power.
No, those are for the most part still in store - probably already in the scrap line somewhere though.
Why are the Euroshuttles restricted to 80mph anyway when the locomotives are designed and rated for 100mph; does the rolling stock have a lower restriction?
Why are the Euroshuttles restricted to 80mph anyway when the locomotives are designed and rated for 100mph; does the rolling stock have a lower restriction?
Over 50% more.How much difference would that 20mph make to the amount of power that the train draws from the overhead?
Over 50% more.
The energy required to accelerate from a stand to cruising speed is proportional to the square of the cruising speed, as is the simplest form of aerodynamic forces affecting the train.
Does that take into account the long downwards gradients when entering the tunnel?
This picture appeared on Twitter earlier of the set at St Pancras.(Not mine)
https://twitter.com/mattjuler/status/613613723035533312
They'd probably have to do some massive power upgrades on the GEML for it to cope with 373s
So, did it run in passenger service?
The words "test run" in the post above yours suggest not
But the post above said it used up paths for 9O20 and 9I41. Those are in service paths aren't they (because they become 9020 and 9141 service numbers in France)?