Harlan Cage
Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 75
At the risk of going off-topic, why is that, please?
My apologies as I did not intend to drift off topic. I thought I saw a 390 with one pantograph but I must have been mistaken.
HC
At the risk of going off-topic, why is that, please?
My apologies as I did not intend to drift off topic. I thought I saw a 390 with one pantograph but I must have been mistaken.
HC
The train involved wasn't actually stopped in the neutral section. It stopped due to a change of aspect in a signal and stopped close to the neutral section section but not in the 'dead section' and when OHL staff arrived on site and confirmed this the driver reset the VCB and the train moved without assistance.
Not an expert, but at a guess
1) avoid using two pantos because the front one would create waves in the wire that would adversely affect the ability of the rear one to maintain contact
2) when using only one, make it the back one as it's out of the air turbulence created by the front of the train.
I'm not entirely sure why it should be the rear one! I was always told the knuckle on the pants should be facing the direction of travel, as i read it on an incident report it may of played a part in a dewirement
The train involved wasn't actually stopped in the neutral section. It stopped due to a change of aspect in a signal and stopped close to the neutral section section but not in the 'dead section' and when OHL staff arrived on site and confirmed this the driver reset the VCB and the train moved without assistance.
Perhaps I'm being dense (okay, almost certainly I'm being dense) but was it not possible for the driver to determine this for him/herself?
Perhaps the filament in the Line Light on the driver's desk had blown ...
For those who don't know what one looks like, see here:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/SectionInsulator.png
Tell tail signs are the magnets on the sleeper ends either side of the neutral:
http://www.railway-technical.com/Track-Magnet-at-Neutral-Section.jpg
And the lineside signs to look out for are:
http://www.engine-driver.com/static/article/cb94c0b0-3088-4d48-be1e-1df6c151f944.jpg?width=640
I had heard that the reason the rear pantograph was used was so that if the train were to lose a pantograph due to some obstruction on the OHLE then the other pantograph should be beyond that obstruction and so the train can continue. Similarly for a neutral section the other pantograph is beyond the neutral section so there is no problem pulling away. If you use the front pantograph then the other pantograph needs to get past the same place that stopped the first one working.
So we were stopped for an hour for no reason??
Isn't the idea of using the rear one that if there is a de-wirement, the train will be rather tangled and only one pan will be damaged?
The driver would have believed they were in the OHNS. The two VT services behind were set back to Willesden North Jn to crossover so an assisting 350 could rescue your train but the OHL team arrived at site first and confirmed the train was actually not in the dead section.
This is not meant to imply criticism, but had the driver got out and looked, would it have been apparent to which part of the Neutral Section the train's pantograph was connecting?
I ask that in view of the physical description given of the OHLE Neutral Section further up the thread at post #4.
No, it all looks like wire. Perhaps if you looked very closely you could see what is live and 'dead' but I've certainly never been shown this. If I'm inside the APC magnets I'm in the NS.
Sometime within the last few years on a Sunday an East Coast train stopped with the loco pantograph stopped in a neutral section near Ardsley, Leeds due to tresspases on the line as the driver was in the DVT at the front she didn't realise the position of the pantograph (no reflection on this driver just one of those things) train rescued by thunderbird BUT the following Leeds to London train was an HST which was driven by her husband and was diverted to run via Hambleton. No doubt words were said at home later.
Would the Line Light normally be lit if the VCBs are open?
This would suggest that it is fed straight off the pan, as I thought the APC gear opened the VCB to prevent the driver taking power? I suppose in the case of train that is pan-gapped it makes do difference.
The APC does open the VCB. If the VCB is open no line light will be lit. However with multiple pans being up (ie double/treble units) the 25kv does not move between units so a driver would see when passing a NS (on a double unit) line light out, VCB light on and then line light on, VCB light on.
Just to upset that theory the line light on a 350 stays on when passing through a neutral section when the VCB opens.
Really? How can it as the line light indicates electricity reaching the unit by either OHL or 3rd rail. Is its in a NS then it can't possibly be getting any power. Unless it's to do with the computer being too slow to update the indicator?
The line light must be connected (very indirectly) to the pantograph side of the VCB.
From the replies from drivers to this thread, it would seem to differ class-to-class.