• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Blackpool - Manchester Electrification

Status
Not open for further replies.

Joseph_Locke

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2012
Messages
1,878
Location
Within earshot of trains passing the one and half
I had a quick check through the photos but didn't see anything, but presumably there was a fairly normal six foot drain laid in the tunnel before the ballasting started? Although I expect the actual tunnel lining will be fairly waterproof though, so perhaps there might not be a need for anything major?

A fairly huge sixfoot drain that runs all the way from Moses Gate ...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,413
You can see the catchpits though?

Yes, outside the tunnel the blue gratings are showing, so that should have confirmed for me that the normal setup would be in place. I was just originally wondering why there had been nothing visible around about (for example) picture 5422d and its neighbours, I'd have thought a few catch pits might have been visible there as well. unless they don't bother with them within the tunnel?

Not a big deal though, no need to drag this point out really...
 

LDECRexile

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2014
Messages
2,149
Location
Southport, UK

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,730
Location
Leeds
Many thanks to all photographers and to LDECR as compiler.

It wasn't until I looked at these most recent pictures of Joe's that I noticed that the temporary services bridge at Cemetery Road has gone.

Looking back I see it's already missing in 5454e and g taken on 2 Dec.

As luck would have it you then have to go back to pictures of 25 Nov such as 5422a-b and 5418m to see its presence or absence (it was present). As the caption comments, you can see in 5414i that most or all of its services have gone.

Its removal is probably the reason for the hitherto mysterious nocturnal visit of the big crane in 5438i-m.
 
Last edited:

LDECRexile

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2014
Messages
2,149
Location
Southport, UK
Farnworth Station to be Renamed "St Clements" Shock!

Joe has followed through on his shots from yesterday by noting that Photo 5462k includes 28 Orangemen and one Lemon Man.

I reckon he's gone bananas.

Good to have you back Joe.
 

mr_jrt

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2011
Messages
1,408
Location
Brighton
Random question. In most of these shots the lines into the new tunnel look to have slight curvature; the alignment of the line that currently passes through the small tunnel will have when realigned though the new tunnel even more so.

Is this just a trick of perspective, and if not, I was just wondering why the platform was not cut back to permit a straighter alignment into the new tunnel whilst that side of the station was closed given that the new tunnel is much, much straighter and 100mph-proof?
 

Joseph_Locke

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2012
Messages
1,878
Location
Within earshot of trains passing the one and half
Random question. In most of these shots the lines into the new tunnel look to have slight curvature; the alignment of the line that currently passes through the small tunnel will have when realigned though the new tunnel even more so.

Is this just a trick of perspective,

Yes. The current single line alignment is extremely tight and couldn't be run at a much higher speed that the current 15mph, whereas the new alignment is much closer to straight.
... and if not, I was just wondering why the platform was not cut back to permit a straighter alignment into the new tunnel whilst that side of the station was closed given that the new tunnel is much, much straighter and 100mph-proof?

The platform has been completely rebuilt. If you went further there would still need to be a reverse from the Kearsley end straight into the tunnel and then back again onto the straight to Moses Gate.

Since the highest achievable speeds for trains stopping at Bolton are a midges under 100mph at Farnworth station and the current design alignment fits through Phythians at 100mph anyway, why make it a longer, flatter, reverse? That would just entail more work, more disruption and more cost.
 
Last edited:

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,730
Location
Leeds
Is this just a trick of perspective, and if not, I was just wondering why the platform was not cut back to permit a straighter alignment into the new tunnel whilst that side of the station was closed given that the new tunnel is much, much straighter and 100mph-proof?

The platform has been completely rebuilt. If you went further there would still need to be a reverse from the Kearsley end straight into the tunnel and then back again onto the straight to Moses Gate.

As evidence that the platforms have been realigned, just look at the kink in the present route throught the narrow bore, and reflect that wasn't there before the current work started!
 

HowardGWR

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
4,983
As evidence that the platforms have been realigned, just look at the kink in the present route throught the narrow bore, and reflect that wasn't there before the current work started!
I assume the track is canted for the maximum speed?
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,160
When the line is electrified, what will the max speed be between Bolton and Salford Crescent, how long should a journey take and how much quicker will it be than in the past?
Thanks!
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,664
Location
Mold, Clwyd
First run round for a few weeks.
I was just getting ready to repeat the "no progress" mantra when I realised there were actually 4 masts up just south of Adlington.
They are complete with registration gear, and on the Down side at least.
So somebody somewhere is getting on with the job.
I always think when the masts start going up is the sign that things are really happening.
Hooray!

(I expect Mr Locke will be along shortly to say they have been up for ages...)
 
Last edited:

Joseph_Locke

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2012
Messages
1,878
Location
Within earshot of trains passing the one and half
First run round for a few weeks.
I was just getting ready to repeat the "no progress" mantra when I realised there were actually 4 masts up just south of Adlington.
They are complete with registration gear, and on the Down side at least.
So somebody somewhere is getting on with the job.
I always think when the masts start going up is the sign that things are really happening.
Hooray!

(I expect Mr Locke will be along shortly to say they have been up for ages...)

I had heard that they (Carillion) might be doing some trial erections (titter ye not) in this area but I had no idea when. There may not be any more going up until January now.
 

LDECRexile

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2014
Messages
2,149
Location
Southport, UK
First run round for a few weeks.
I was just getting ready to repeat the "no progress" mantra when I realised there were actually 4 masts up just south of Adlington.
They are complete with registration gear, and on the Down side at least.
So somebody somewhere is getting on with the job.
I always think when the masts start going up is the sign that things are really happening.
Hooray!

(I expect Mr Locke will be along shortly to say they have been up for ages...)

Yippee!

Lots of trades swarming on Farnworth station, tarmac going down, bushes being planted, all sorts going on.

Final brickwork being laid on southern parapet of Cemetery Rd bridge, but one green services conduit still outside the bridge to the north. Green conduit, but contains wires.

No work in progress in the tunnel, Down (northbound) track laid through the tunnel, it ends at the tunnel's ends. Orange Inspection party doing the rounds, body language not negative.

A 'Stump' in place where I think the signal will go southbound immediately north of Cemetery Rd bridge, will a signal post be stuck on it?

I asked a supervisory Orangeman "OK for Monday?" he smiled, nodded and said "Yes."

Visited Joe who says work is going on 24/7, he can feel it as well as hear it and see it!

Moses Gate looks close to ready, handrails being installed, everyone else was having their snap.

Orlando St bridge, all the clearing up I photographed last week is done. Now very little to see, as the works are all up top, screened by solid boundary fences and high parapets.

Photos later.

PS: Reminder- track and signalling being connected this weekend. I won't be around to shoot any of this one-off work.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Joe has kindly sent this:

http://www.cornerstoneprojects.co.uk/index.php/tag/underground-pipe-colour-codes/
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,730
Location
Leeds
Final brickwork being laid on southern parapet of Cemetery Rd bridge, but one green services conduit still outside the bridge to the north. Green conduit, but contains wires.

That reminds me, is the services bridge at Blackrod still there?



There seems to be some variation in the code. For example this was once posted by user "boing_uk" on SABRE:

Yellow for Gas.
Grey or Green for telecommunications companies
Black or Red for Electricity
Blue for Water
Purple for mixed communication and related power supplies
Orange for Street Lighting and Traffic Control
 

ALX400

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2009
Messages
324
Location
Bolton
Blackrod is pretty much boxed off now, just a few civils to re instate and road re surfacing again as there seems to be an issue with some service covers in the road and it keeps sinking, not on the bridge just off.
 

Philip Phlopp

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2015
Messages
3,004
Anybody ID the trees being planed at Farnworth in 5484w ? They surely aren't a deciduous species, I hope. What sort of growth rate would they have (so how long before they could upset the new OLE) ?
 
Last edited:

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,263
Location
St Albans
Anybody ID the trees being planed at Farnworth in 5484w ? They surely aren't a deciduous species, I hope. What sort of growth rate would they have (so how long before they could upset the new OLE) ?

No smiley shown on your post. Those trees are about 7-10m from the platform edge so even if they were leylandii or willows, it would take many years of total negligence for them to impinge on any thing at 25kV.
 

Philip Phlopp

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2015
Messages
3,004
No smiley shown on your post. Those trees are about 7-10m from the platform edge so even if they were leylandii or willows, it would take many years of total negligence for them to impinge on any thing at 25kV.

It's not just about them impinging on the OLE, they can be blown over or branches can fall/be blown into the OLE or pantographs, and more immediately, wheelslip in leaf-fall season at a station as a direct result of trees planed at that station during rebuilding is something only the railway in this country could manage.

It's tiny little things like this that add up to big bills and trip up the railway big style.
 

ironstone11

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2013
Messages
217
Anybody ID the trees being planed at Farnworth in 5484w ? They surely aren't a deciduous species, I hope. What sort of growth rate would they have (so how long before they could upset the new OLE) ?

Since they have no leaves at this time of year, I would say that they are deciduous.

As for species, some type of maple perhaps?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top