• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Euston - Birmingham NS stock

Status
Not open for further replies.

RichW1

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2010
Messages
400
Location
Harrogate
So I made a return trip to Birmingham yesterday on business. Both trains were voyagers!!!!! An electrified route using these tatty undignified things. Anyone know why? What happened to Pendolinos? (They are crap too but it's about defrees of crap and I'd prefer the Pendolino very marginally to these Voyagers).

They joined at Birmingham NS. With one half in the platform, people piled on the 5 cars. The second part joined after. It was a mess.

This did not feel like an Intercity.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,933
Sounds like you got the one where the Shrewsbury portion joins, or is this just another dull Voyager bashing thread.
 

shaun

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2009
Messages
207
So I made a return trip to Birmingham yesterday on business. Both trains were voyagers!!!!! An electrified route using these tatty undignified things. Anyone know why? What happened to Pendolinos? (They are crap too but it's about defrees of crap and I'd prefer the Pendolino very marginally to these Voyagers).

They joined at Birmingham NS. With one half in the platform, people piled on the 5 cars. The second part joined after. It was a mess.

This did not feel like an Intercity.

Those probably would've either been Shrewsbury trains or through Euston - Glasgow/Edinburgh via NS services. The answer is there are simply not enough Pendolinos to run them all (and Shrewsbury is diesel) with the 390s being concentrated on the faster Trent Valley-routed services. VTEC also still run some HSTs on fully electrified services, so it isn't just the WCML doing it.

The Voyagers are bad Intercity trains, could really do with at least being refurbished to resemble the Meridians (sorry for the bash!).
 
Last edited:

RichW1

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2010
Messages
400
Location
Harrogate
So I just got very unlucky then! Ouch. Never again will I take those services. That leaves the question... 140mph (no don't worry I'm not starting this again so keep reading) won't be possible if 125mph diagrams are made to go for such long stretches with a rolling stock shortage.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
2 x Class 221 has more standard class seats than a 9 car Class 390 (and about the same as an 11 car). Just sayin'...

Plus the 221s have the all-table (Coach D when in 5 car formation).
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,024
Location
here to eternity
So I made a return trip to Birmingham yesterday on business. Both trains were voyagers!!!!! An electrified route using these tatty undignified things. Anyone know why? What happened to Pendolinos? (They are crap too but it's about defrees of crap and I'd prefer the Pendolino very marginally to these Voyagers).

They joined at Birmingham NS. With one half in the platform, people piled on the 5 cars. The second part joined after. It was a mess.

This did not feel like an Intercity.

Bring back a rake of Mk II or Mk III coaches hauled by a Class 81-87 or 90. Sorry Mr Branson but those of us who remember the good times cannot accept this plastic rubbish as an improvement. :(
 

fishquinn

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
4 Oct 2013
Messages
6,643
Location
Warwickshire
Bring back a rake of Mk II or Mk III coaches hauled by a Class 81-87 or 90. Sorry Mr Branson but those of us who remember the good times cannot accept this plastic rubbish as an improvement. :(
All well said except one small part. I've crossed that out in the quote ;)
 

route101

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
10,612
2 x Class 221 has more standard class seats than a 9 car Class 390 (and about the same as an 11 car). Just sayin'...

Plus the 221s have the all-table (Coach D when in 5 car formation).

I recall going on a voyager and sitting in coach D , is that an ex first class coach or something? I usually travel along so not a big fan of a table of 4 (ok when its quiet but i find it awkward facing someone )
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,933
Bring back a rake of Mk II or Mk III coaches hauled by a Class 81-87 or 90. Sorry Mr Branson but those of us who remember the good times cannot accept this plastic rubbish as an improvement. :(

Apart from the speed increase and massive growth in people using it no improvement at all....
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
You also get Voyagers on Euston-New St shuttles. It's just optimal use of stock, that's all, as there aren't enough Pendolinos to use on all services. The rejig made a lot of sense and has reduced overcrowding north of Crewe on Scottish services, as well as adding direct journey opportunities. Good all round.

The data on RTT as to which is which is reasonably reliable in this case if you want to avoid Voyagers.
 

Harbornite

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2016
Messages
3,634
As has been said here, the majority of VTWC services via Birmingham are operated by class 390s, with 221s doing some Edinburgh/Glasgow trains and all services to Shrewsbury.
 
Joined
9 Apr 2016
Messages
1,909
I would personally recommend taking London Midland (350) or Chiltern Railways (165/168/172) in the future than you can avoid the 220/221/390 altogether.
 

NSE

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2010
Messages
1,728
Too many people on here sit with their rose tinted specs, moping after MK3's. I'm not saying as enthusiasts we shouldn't fondly remember the old stock we loved so much that has now gone.

But, the railways have a purpose.

The Pendo is modern stock designed to tilt to lower journey times. Since the inception the usage has increased, as has safety. And yet all people do on here is moan. Rolling stock is just following the whole way our society is drifting, with everything designed for speed, stack 'em up, cram 'em on, do everything as conveniently as possible and shift in bulk'. Not saying thats wrong or right, its just the way it is.
The London Overground 378 is a perfect example. No latitudinal seating, just longitude, for mostly standing room, cause that is what is needed.

Sure, the Voyagers are too short. That much is evident. But I really don't find the under floor engines that bad, or the seats too uncomfortable. Their purpose is to move people around, not host rose tinted gatherings for enthusiasts to dream about the days of yore.
 

RichW1

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2010
Messages
400
Location
Harrogate
How do I get on the Chiltern Mainline with mark 3's? I tried twice to be honest in the past and could only take a turbostart type unit that called itself 'Mainline' too. It was not clear to me when the mark 3's run. Peak times only?

With the Voyagers and Pendolino's, it isn't rose tinted specs so much. With new stock, they should not be noiser than the old stock. From banging sounds under the carriage, rattling blinds and rattling plastic elsewhere, not to mention the whining sound from outside, they are not as good as tj stock they replaced. That's my problem with them. Like you say, pack them on, though the engineering in terms of sound and comfort is worse than anything from the 1980's on Intercity. Speed is a bit of a joke though. 125mph after 3 failed attempts at 140mph is embarrassing, and over 4 hours to Edinburgh from London for the distance is nothing to proud of. Trains used to run faster than now in the 1970's and 80's as even hst drivers will testify!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
How do I get on the Chiltern Mainline with mark 3's? I tried twice to be honest in the past and could only take a turbostart type unit that called itself 'Mainline' too. It was not clear to me when the mark 3's run. Peak times only?

Have a look at this thread above where you will see Chiltern LHCS Diagrams.
Don't know what this has got to do with Euston to New St stock though.

Frequently Requested Diagrams Thread'
 

NSE

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2010
Messages
1,728
How do I get on the Chiltern Mainline with mark 3's? I tried twice to be honest in the past and could only take a turbostart type unit that called itself 'Mainline' too. It was not clear to me when the mark 3's run. Peak times only?

In the timetable look for the ones which have 'MS' at the top of the column. Stands for Mainline Silver, and is the one which is hauled.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Sure, the Voyagers are too short. That much is evident. But I really don't find the under floor engines that bad, or the seats too uncomfortable. Their purpose is to move people around, not host rose tinted gatherings for enthusiasts to dream about the days of yore.

I generally don't find Voyager engines too noisy. But I took a Meridian earlier on, and the racket was unbelievable. It was also tatty and damaged inside (even in 1st) compared with the Voyagers, and had three fogged window panels on the same coach. Very un-Stagey.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
How do I get on the Chiltern Mainline with mark 3's? I tried twice to be honest in the past and could only take a turbostart type unit that called itself 'Mainline' too. It was not clear to me when the mark 3's run. Peak times only?

They are highlighted in the timetable as "Mainline Silver" trains (MS).
 

NSE

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2010
Messages
1,728
I generally don't find Voyager engines too noisy. But I took a Meridian earlier on, and the racket was unbelievable. It was also tatty and damaged inside (even in 1st) compared with the Voyagers, and had three fogged window panels on the same coach. Very un-Stagey.

Shame it looked a bit scrappy, guess thats down to the individual maintenance I suppose. I've only been on Meridians three times, so I'm not that well experienced on them, but I seem to recall I thought they were ok.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Shame it looked a bit scrappy, guess thats down to the individual maintenance I suppose. I've only been on Meridians three times, so I'm not that well experienced on them, but I seem to recall I thought they were ok.

They usually look well presented, but this one was extremely tatty and un-cared-for. It was also mucky on the outside.
 

Chrism20

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2013
Messages
1,347
So I made a return trip to Birmingham yesterday on business. Both trains were voyagers!!!!! An electrified route using these tatty undignified things. Anyone know why? What happened to Pendolinos? (They are crap too but it's about defrees of crap and I'd prefer the Pendolino very marginally to these Voyagers).

They joined at Birmingham NS. With one half in the platform, people piled on the 5 cars. The second part joined after. It was a mess.

This did not feel like an Intercity.

Voyager diagrams for last year from the allocations thread, I don't think things have changed much if at all.

I think the others have covered everything else.
 

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,422
Location
Milton Keynes
Amusing to see someone suggesting London Midland as an alternative. Two hours on a Voyager seems infinitely preferable to 3-4 hours on a 350/2.

The Chiltern LHCS is the most comfortable offering between Birmingham and London by far. It's not nostalgia so much as just comfortable seating and smoothness. But Pendolinos and Voyagers definitely deliver an intercity journey experience for me. I find Voyager seating more comfortable than the Pendolinos mainly because I don't have to awkwardly rest my arm on the window ledge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top