• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Train company branding: "Trains" vs "Railways"

Status
Not open for further replies.

37 418

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2010
Messages
201
Location
Dingwall, Scotland
It'd be interesting to know whether the same distinction between trains and the railway exists in Gaelic, given that the brand is bilingual.

Trains would be trèanaichean, Rail(way) is rèile, although the older version is rathad-iarainn (compare with Irish Iarnród). You would only use the latter when referring to the railway as a whole, but the former would be used when referring to the tracks or as a service. :smile:
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

frediculous

Member
Joined
23 May 2017
Messages
110
If anything, it makes it easier for TOCs to distinguish themselves from predecessors, since there are only so many geographical names you can come up with for a TOC providing a service in a particular area of the country.

A good example would be the franchise for trains in the South East (or the South West):

South East Trains
South Eastern Trains
South East Railway
South Eastern Railway
Southeast
Southeastern

That's about it - and some of these are so close to each other it would not make sense to replace one with another. I guess one could append "London &" to the front to add further differentiation.
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
581
A good example would be the franchise for trains in the South East (or the South West):

South East Trains
South Eastern Trains
South East Railway
South Eastern Railway
Southeast
Southeastern

That's about it - and some of these are so close to each other it would not make sense to replace one with another. I guess one could append "London &" to the front to add further differentiation.

How about "Network South East" as a TOC name, different to the usual Railway/Trains? It was sort of a TOC name in BR before privatisation.

Probably too confusing for Joe Public due to "Network Rail" prompting complaints about infrastructure problems to the beleaguered TOC!

Rail South East is another one...
 

Ianigsy

Member
Joined
12 May 2015
Messages
1,111
"Passengers", whilst traditional, makes us sound more like luggage than people - I know there's the "passage to India" sense of the word, but "passengers" has a connotation of inconvenience to me.

These days "passenger" also has a negative connotation -in the workplace at least- meaning somebody who turns up but doesn't do their share of the work.
 

A Challenge

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2016
Messages
2,823
All trains in the south west are operated by GWR and XC.

edit: SWR run to Exeter, so them as well actually, despite my point
 

Calthrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2015
Messages
3,305
These days "passenger" also has a negative connotation -in the workplace at least- meaning somebody who turns up but doesn't do their share of the work.

Its associations in ornithological circles are not too positive, either -- we know what happened to the passenger pigeon...
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
581
It isn't always easy to agree on a suitable word for something as there will always be alternatives.

In regards to passenger/customer/rail user/traveller etc.

"Rider" may sometimes be heard on American public transport, is this a good alternative? I know we Brits can get prickly about American vocabulary!

Horse riding can spring to mind also it also can mean doing the dirty deed in Ireland...
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,080
It isn't always easy to agree on a suitable word for something as there will always be alternatives.

In regards to passenger/customer/rail user/traveller etc.

"Rider" may sometimes be heard on American public transport, is this a good alternative? I know we Brits can get prickly about American vocabulary!

Horse riding can spring to mind also it also can mean doing the dirty deed in Ireland...
We don't need an alternative to passenger. Certainly not Rider.

Being on a train filled with Fellow Travellers sounds like something from a John le Carre novel.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,422
Regarding Railway/train stations, this has got me thinking about the broad use of stations to describe various things, such as fire/police, etc.

A bus station is where a bus stops, and a railway/train station is where a train stops. What happens at a work station? :)

Don't buses stop at bus stops?

:D
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,422
Historically, a railway station is a place the railway industry is based (“stationed”); the Stationmaster would have had a much bigger operational role in the running of the service than they do now, with a team of staff including porters and booking clerks even at smaller stations, I don’t think it’s anything to do with a train stopping there. Hence also the terms fire station (where the fire service are stationed), police station, etc. This is the reason I believe the term “train station” makes no sense in a British context, as we have a “railway industry” and not a “train industry” or “railroad industry” as they say in the USA.

This. :smile:
 

Chris M

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
1,057
Location
London E14
<cough>Island Line</cough> :smile:
But the Island Line is on the east coast of an island in south east England. Nothing south west about it!

I suppose to be ultra geeky and pedant like none of the TOC's run a railway except perhaps, almost, kind of, maybe, Scotrail. The TOC's run a train service but I doubt it matters
The Island Line part of SWR definitely run a railway.

To be accurate, the road isn't dangerous, it is drivers of motor vehicles who are careless or reckless that are dangerous.
The road shouldn't be dangerous, but it often is - potholes being the most prominent example.
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
581
The Island Line part of SWR definitely run a railway.

That's interesting about SWR running Island Line's infrastructure, I thought this is overseen by Network Rail as over on the mainland?

The Island Line seems to be a special case, I've never known a TOC can be responsible for the railway other than Network Rail perhaps other than NI Railways/Translink in Northern Ireland? Anybody welcome to correct me on this!
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,441
Location
Farnham
I feel like “Railway” has a more traditional approach. Whereas “Trains” is nice and modern.

Same with flights.

“Airways” old and traditional.
“Airlines” new and modern.
 

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,631
Location
Gateway to the South West
That's interesting about SWR running Island Line's infrastructure, I thought this is overseen by Network Rail as over on the mainland?

The Island Line seems to be a special case, I've never known a TOC can be responsible for the railway other than Network Rail perhaps other than NI Railways/Translink in Northern Ireland? Anybody welcome to correct me on this!
Island Line is the responsibility of the TOC. They happen to contract Network Rail to do some (all?) of the maintenance but could in principle get anyone else to do it, or do it 'in house'. Signalling staff are Island Line (SWR) employees.

I believe (but may be wrong on the detail) that the line Bristol relief line is leased in its entirety by GWR and operated and maintained by the TOC.
 

DavidGrain

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2017
Messages
1,236
Chiltern Railways over their long franchise have been responsible for a lot of infrastructure work.
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
581
Thanks pdeaves & DavidGrain.

As with Chiltern & possibly GWR, there are probably more TOCs overseeing infrastructure elsewhere in the country that don't come under NR.
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
581
I feel like “Railway” has a more traditional approach. Whereas “Trains” is nice and modern.

Same with flights.

“Airways” old and traditional.
“Airlines” new and modern.

+1 agreed.

Also someone already pointed out, whenever there is a franchise changeover then the new TOC may use "Railway" if the previous had "Trains" or similar.

As "Railway" seems classy/traditional, this works with GWR particularly with their current image that it seems a little peculiar when applied non-traditionally like SWR, LNR and WMR also not forgetting WMR's unusual "Double Decker chocolate" livery!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,784
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Why do some franchises call themselves 'Trains' (South Western Trains) and others 'Railway' (South Western Railway). Same service, stock, area etc.

Are both right? Are both wrong? Potentially confusing for the general public?

It seems to be generational to some extent. Original franchises wanted to get away from "British Rail" and were in a new generation of trains but not infrastructure companies. Nowadays the trend seems to be to hark back to the olde worlde, which First have done particularly well with the GWR branding, though SWR less well by using a classic sounding name but a modern branding.

"X Trains" with a red dot on the I has become a Stagecoach signature brand so that has tended to stick with them.
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
581
Have you never looked at the side of a Scotrail Train? "Rail Scotland" is exactly what is says! (Rèile na h-Alba).

Very true, "xxx Scotland" in the English language may sound clinically dull like Police Scotland so "ScotRail" would look catchier as a brand.
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
581
It seems to be generational to some extent. Original franchises wanted to get away from "British Rail" and were in a new generation of trains but not infrastructure companies. Nowadays the trend seems to be to hark back to the olde worlde, which First have done particularly well with the GWR branding, though SWR less well by using a classic sounding name but a modern branding.

I am still so annoyed with SWR, as my local TOC, for having a dreary monochromatic theme which LNR and WMR have more interesting & unconventional designs.

The sight of grey SWR trains passing through the rolling green Dorset countryside on a blue sky day would be pretty depressing though much worse on overcast days especially for hard pressed Waterloo commuters!

What the heck FirstGroup were thinking of after the success of the GWR brand?

"X Trains" with a red dot on the I has become a Stagecoach signature brand so that has tended to stick with them.

Also "Virgin Trains" which Stagecoach also have involvement with. This also applied to Arriva when they had Northern in the past and ATW is a "living relic" from the past which is due to disappear soon.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,657
Location
Another planet...
My personal feeling is that "xx Trains" sounds juvenile or cheap, whereas "xx Railway" or even just "xx Rail" sounds classier. But as the second post on this thread succinctly pointed out, it doesn't actually matter- it's just something to muse about when one can't sleep!

Regarding stations and taxis, I regularly use minicabs to get to "Dewsbury station" and about 50% of the time the driver will ask if I mean the bus station or the train station. I'm always tempted to reply "the RAILWAY station, please" but doing so would be pointless and rude, even if it is technically correct!
 

Western Lord

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
782
I feel like “Railway” has a more traditional approach. Whereas “Trains” is nice and modern.

Same with flights.

“Airways” old and traditional.
“Airlines” new and modern.
"Airlines" new and modern? The term has been around as long as "Airways", mainly in the USA. In any case, an airline is a company which operates aircraft for hire and reward, and an airway is what the aircraft fly along. Of course, in the USA the term "airline" was also applied to railways, indicating a line which was the shortest route between two points. There was even a company called Seaboard Air Line, which merged with Atlantic Coast Line to become Seaboard Coast Line and is now subsumed into CSX Transportation.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,080
My personal feeling is that "xx Trains" sounds juvenile or cheap, whereas "xx Railway" or even just "xx Rail" sounds classier. But as the second post on this thread succinctly pointed out, it doesn't actually matter- it's just something to muse about when one can't sleep!

Regarding stations and taxis, I regularly use minicabs to get to "Dewsbury station" and about 50% of the time the driver will ask if I mean the bus station or the train station. I'm always tempted to reply "the RAILWAY station, please" but doing so would be pointless and rude, even if it is technically correct!
Minicab. Now there's a word I've never understood. Is there a maxicab, from which it is a shrunken version?

I always say taxi, whether Hackney Carriage or Private Hire.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,657
Location
Another planet...
Minicab. Now there's a word I've never understood. Is there a maxicab, from which it is a shrunken version?

I always say taxi, whether Hackney Carriage or Private Hire.
I'd never really considered it, it was just the name I've always used for a private hire taxi (as opposed to a Hackney Carriage)... but now that you mention it, it is a bit odd.

Though at least one of the drivers for my local firm actually does drive a Mini (One of the mutant 4-door versions) so it does work in his case!
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,422
I'd never really considered it, it was just the name I've always used for a private hire taxi (as opposed to a Hackney Carriage)... but now that you mention it, it is a bit odd.

Though at least one of the drivers for my local firm actually does drive a Mini (One of the mutant 4-door versions) so it does work in his case!

The name "minicab" I believe originated because the first private hire vehicles were smaller than the traditional hackney carriage black cabs.

Think 1960s Escort v 1960 Black Taxi.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,657
Location
Another planet...
The name "minicab" I believe originated because the first private hire vehicles were smaller than the traditional hackney carriage black cabs.

Think 1960s Escort v 1960 Black Taxi.
I was thinking something along those lines: 3/4 seats as opposed to 5 in the classic London Taxi.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,422
do you go to the bus station or the road station?

I go to the bus station. To access the services of the bus company/ies.

I go to the railway station. To access the services of the railway company/ies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top