• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Go-Op developments...

Status
Not open for further replies.

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,631
Location
Gateway to the South West
While I wish them luck, I'd suggest that until you see a track access application on the ORR website

and an operator's licence. Public consultation for these lasts four weeks minimum so if there is no consultation by early November they cannot start in December whatever else may or may not happen.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AlexNL

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2014
Messages
1,683
and an operator's licence. Public consultation for these lasts four weeks minimum so if there is no consultation by early November they cannot start in December whatever else may or may not happen.

Let's not forget about train paths, either. Shouldn't those have been requested by now already so that NR can properly evaluate and allocate?
 

OMGitsDAVE

Member
Joined
12 Jun 2009
Messages
734
Location
Hartlepool, England, UK
Hello all!
Has anyone heard anything further regarding the GO-OP OA applications? Their latest news only shows 2017, and that they've submitted the application.

I've been watching their progress (or lack of) for a while now, and things seem to have gone quiet!
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,773
I think the moment I realised this was never going to happen was when their trials with the Parry People Mover on the Mid-Hants fell through. It's unfortunate, because I think there's definitely a gap in the market for low-cost, community-driven heavy rail services using low-cost vehicles and presumably minimal infrastructure. But them concentrating on their "mainline" route instead of further exploring branch line options seems like a dead end to me as it's now a gap largely filled by TransWilts Rail.
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,421
Location
Nottingham
One of the very first threads I read on this forum 10 years ago was about these guys and their plans. I'm really surprised they haven't given up yet.
 

Jorge Da Silva

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2018
Messages
2,592
Location
Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire
Go-Op has submitted an application to the Office of Rail and Road to run new service from December 2020. Any thoughts?

https://orr.gov.uk/__data/assets/pd...mic-equilibrium-test-form-go-op-june-2019.pdf

Either [Cheltenham – Stroud – Kemble] or [Newport - Severn Tunnel Junction – Bristol Parkway] – Swindon – Chippenham – Melksham – Trowbridge – Westbury – Frome – Bruton – Castle Cary – Then either [Yeovil Pen Mill – Yeovil Junction – Sherborne – Gillingham] or [Taunton – Tiverton Parkway – Exeter St Davids] or [Yeovil Pen Mill – Thornford – Yetminster – Maiden Newton – Dorchester West]

No more than every two hours; southbound from Swindon at xx08, northbound from Westbury at xx15. First departure from Westbury after 0530, last arrival at Westbury before 2130.

Class 158 or similar, subject to confirmation of availability.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,376
They’ve been suggesting “something” for almost ten years. File under never likely to happen, IMHO.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,376
Though I think this is the first time they have submitted application to the rail regulator isn’t it?
Wouldn’t like to say. I doubt available online records exist for the whole period they've been trying. They claim to have applied to ORR in 2016.
 

twpsaesneg

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2009
Messages
417
From that application it seems to suggest a possibility of 6 different routes (Cheltenham-Exeter / Gillingham / Dorchester or Newport-Exeter / Gillingham / Dorchester) - is this normal? Seems a bit difficult for the ORR to assess as one application.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,376
From that application it seems to suggest a possibility of 6 different routes (Cheltenham-Exeter / Gillingham / Dorchester or Newport-Exeter / Gillingham / Dorchester) - is this normal? Seems a bit difficult for the ORR to assess as one application.
I expect if you listed every station that has ever appeared in a GO-OP press release you’d have an incredibly strange combined route map. It all just seems so random, haven’t they included going as far as Nuneaton or Moor St in the past?
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
If they can't bloody decide what they want, they might as well give it up. The only logical service there based on the 'core' route of Swindon - Westbury, is from Cheltenham / Gloucester. What traffic they expect to generate between Swindon and Taunton / Exeter every 2 hours when frequency and connections are better via Bristol remains to be seen; the best option I suspect is to run into Yeovil Junction to connect with other SWR stuff.

Huge punctuality risks with a lot of what they're suggesting as there's a lot of reversals.

Considering they wanted to go up via Oxford and Banbury to the likes of Nuneaton, this looks like a lot of clap trap.
 

twpsaesneg

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2009
Messages
417
I expect if you listed every station that has ever appeared in a GO-OP press release you’d have an incredibly strange combined route map. It all just seems so random, haven’t they included going as far as Nuneaton or Moor St in the past?
It’s the first time I have seen that in an application
I'd not be surprised if the application is returned with a post-it saying "Try again when you've made up your minds where you want to run"! :D
 

NorthernSpirit

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
2,184
I doubt I'll ever see a GO-OP class 230 at Trowbridge. I'm very sceptical that this will happen as originally GO-OP stated that they have it running by 2017 or whatever the year was - they didn't.

If GO-OP really want to get things going why not a Bradford Interchange to Weymouth service with class 170's? Firstly it'd give them a proper route to have a go at (I can't see anyone wanting to go to Nuneton from the South West) and secondly the route through Denton and Reddish South would see some addtional passenger servies passing through, likewise with the Bristol avoid line between Dr Day's and North Somerset? Junction.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,744
Location
Yorkshire
I doubt I'll ever see a GO-OP class 230 at Trowbridge. I'm very sceptical that this will happen as originally GO-OP stated that they have it running by 2017 or whatever the year was - they didn't.
I agree; It's not going to happen.
If GO-OP really want to get things going why not a Bradford Interchange to Weymouth service with class 170's? Firstly it'd give them a proper route to have a go at (I can't see anyone wanting to go to Nuneton from the South West) and secondly the route through Denton and Reddish South would see some addtional passenger servies passing through, likewise with the Bristol avoid line between Dr Day's and North Somerset? Junction.
But feel free to discuss their actual proposals here; if you wishes to discuss ideas for an open access service, this needs to be posted in the Speculative Ideas section please.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,376
I'd not be surprised if the application is returned with a post-it saying "Try again when you've made up your minds where you want to run"! :D
I suspect that’s what’s happened before. I’ve been searching through their news archive page, and I’m pretty sure there are more mentions of “applications to ORR” than have ever made it to ORR’s website: http://www.go-op.coop/info/archive/
 

Brissle Girl

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
2,605
Utterly bizarre. All the talk until now has been for a service west of Swindon to Oxford, which at least improved connectivity. The new proposals are far less compelling, and suggest that they are clutching at straws.
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
2,482
Rather amused to see the ‘Class 158 or similar’ - presumably they’ve given up on the 769 or 230 options?

Be right back, just looking for my flying pig animation.
 

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,631
Location
Gateway to the South West
Rather amused to see the ‘Class 158 or similar’ - presumably they’ve given up on the 769 or 230 options?

Be right back, just looking for my flying pig animation.
Maybe they could propose using a fleet of these:
43106-COURTESY-OF-BOB-SWEET.jpg

(locomotive nicknamed 'flying pig')
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,376
Rather amused to see the ‘Class 158 or similar’ - presumably they’ve given up on the 769 or 230 options?

Be right back, just looking for my flying pig animation.
This is the whole problem. The news item they issued in early March had a completely different route and service pattern, and definitely referred to 769s. Their plans change like the weather...
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,316
This is the whole problem. The news item they issued in early March had a completely different route and service pattern, and definitely referred to 769s. Their plans change like the weather...

Much as I would like then to do well with a service running, it does currently give the impression that they don't have much of an idea. Personally I think doing something simple and easy to plan (like their early suggestion of a service on the Watercress line) would be a good start and then look to build on that to then do something on Network Rail system.
 

Brissle Girl

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
2,605
I don't understand why they don't just concentrate on Westbury (maybe started back further west if feasible, but if it's going to compromise the chances of getting it accepted) to Oxford. There is a local demand for a more frequent service through Melksham, and Swindon to Oxford direct would stand a good chance of demonstrating it's a new service, and not just abstracting value from existing services. A Class 769 could help with pathing on the GWML too. A 2 hrly service would nicely fill the gaps on the TransWilts.
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
2,482
I don't understand why they don't just concentrate on Westbury (maybe started back further west if feasible, but if it's going to compromise the chances of getting it accepted) to Oxford. There is a local demand for a more frequent service through Melksham, and Swindon to Oxford direct would stand a good chance of demonstrating it's a new service, and not just abstracting value from existing services. A Class 769 could help with pathing on the GWML too. A 2 hrly service would nicely fill the gaps on the TransWilts.

Anything between Swindon and Didcot is a total non-starter from December, the route is almost totally full with GWR's enhanced intercity timetable and freight traffic. Unless they're planning to run services in the middle of the night.

I suspect this penny has finally dropped and the OA proposal is desperately looking for an alternative raison-detre.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top