• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Thameslink Services/Timetable from May 20th 2018

Status
Not open for further replies.

otomous

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2011
Messages
444
I accept there is only so much you can do and no i don't want to be lied to. BUT if a member of staff comes over as genuine i will give him more respect than someone who treats me as a moroon.

I could give you 2 examples but as we are going off topic, i won't.

The only thing i will say is that i have been around railways nearly 50 years now so i know a bit more than the average punter but not enough to drive a 700, lol.

As for getting no back up from your employer, thats where the union should come in tbh.

I fear unions are less powerful than people believe. Can you imagine the reaction if exasperated platform staff went on strike? Who would sympathise? I wouldn’t want their job.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Stampy

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2014
Messages
377
Location
Peterborough
As a driver you *cannot* leave a train on a running line (ie anything other than a terminal platform). If you were due to be relieved but the relief wasn’t present you would have to terminate and run ECS to a depot/terminal station to get it out of the way.

This is what i witnessed at Finsbury Park on Thursday.

Driver STAYED with the train until (in the train i'd just left's case - an off duty driver) the replacement turned up..

And as I posted earlier, this was at the start of the rush hour, with the train already signaled out, blocking the main line...
 

otomous

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2011
Messages
444
That’s all fine, however others don’t need the exciting new destinations and value a reliable and dependable service, which Thameslink simply doesn’t offer.

So run a 50/50 core/non-core service to all destinations and everyone is happy.

But the point was to move stoppers out of termini to expand their capacity within existing confines. Where would the northbound services terminate now that L Bridge has been rescoped for this purpose? The problem at the moment is one of staff shortages in essence. If the timetable can’t be made to work once all the resources are in place, it’s time to think again. I agree there are issues with the trains too - entirely DFT created incidentally, and these could be solved with eventual refits or retro fits.
 

NorthKent1989

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2017
Messages
1,907
Yesterday was the worst day to travel with shameslink for me. Most thameslink services to abbey wood from gravesend were cancelled so i then decided to get a SE train to Dartford to see if they were any SE trains going to abbey wood but nothing. So then i saw the next thameslink train to abbey wood but guess what, cancelled.

So then i decided to rely on the buses and bloody hell what a nightmare that was. So stressed right now. Thanks a lot for your useless service shameslink.<(

I’ve been going via Victoria most days I’m not risking going to Blackfriars or London Bridge for the fear that there won’t be a Rochester train for six hours, even when I have been based in Shadwell I will head To Victoria as I cannot trust Thameslink to run the service and it has a knock on effect on South Eastern.

Surely they cannot keep using this timetable!
 

Steve Harris

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
895
Location
ECML
I fear unions are less powerful than people believe. Can you imagine the reaction if exasperated platform staff went on strike? Who would sympathise? I wouldn’t want their job.

Who said strike ?

There is always more than 1 way to skin a cat !

You just have to be as smart as you employer. i.e. use any company proceedures/polices to your advantage.
 

Mutant Lemming

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2011
Messages
3,194
Location
London
If this is accurate, its shocking. I can't comprehend how senior management at GTR and DfT could have been:

a) unaware of the situation
b) stupid enough to think that the new timetables could be implemented under these circumstances

It seems likely that there will be no short-term resolution whilst the operators continue to attempt to implement the new timetable. They're likely to have as much success as in attempting to push wet spaghetti up a cat's arse. It would be a fantastic acheivement, but the chances of success are slim.

The only solution (if they're serious about delivering a service to passengers/customers) is to revert immediately to the pre-May timetable and throw RailPlan 2020 in the bin. Nobody wanted it anyway.

It's the "yes man" mentality that currently pervades - no negativity and a can do attitude will get the job done .People who raise issues are 'putting obstacles in the way of progress'. 'There is no place in this organisation for negativity'. Hence managers are afraid to contradict ludicrous or over ambitious plans or ideas and we end up with this kind of mess.
 

otomous

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2011
Messages
444
Who said strike ?

There is always more than 1 way to skin a cat !

You just have to be as smart as you employer. i.e. use any company proceedures/polices to your advantage.

That’s the problem. When front line staff do follow procedure they end up being abused. They have to grow a shell to survive. For example dispatch staff can’t start looking at an iPad to find train info whilst dispatching. If they do there will be a manager somewhere waiting to pounce. Even if they are happy to help. So they essentially have to ignore people or ask them to wait. People think they are being rude. The whole management culture needs to be changed but I won’t hold my breath.
 
Joined
24 Mar 2009
Messages
592
I also find the East Grinstead service through the core fantastic - going straight to STP instead of via the Victoria or Northern lines is brilliant.

Ok, so that's three people. What about the thousands of people who've been Royally screwed by the disaster that's unfolded over the past three weeks?

Obviously, being able to avoid using the Northern or Victoria Lines in rush hour is a benefit, but it isn't a neccessity. Being able to get into London from Arlesey, Hitchin, Harpenden, Flitwick etc, where there are no alternative means IS a necessity.

I don't see why those passengers' lives should be dislocated just so you don't have to use the tube.
 

NorthKent1989

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2017
Messages
1,907
Speak for yourself. I’d find a service from Cambridge through the TL core immensely useful.

Ditto. Cambridge to Blackfriars/London Bridge directly is fantastic for me.

Thats all fine and dandy but how many trains from Cambridge have actually made it through the core since this shambles begun? Meanwhile on other parts of the network some stations have had no rail service since it began, and some services have long gaps between services operated by Thameslink.
 

Steve Harris

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
895
Location
ECML
Ok, so that's three people. What about the thousands of people who've been Royally screwed by the disaster that's unfolded over the past three weeks?

Obviously, being able to avoid using the Northern or Victoria Lines in rush hour is a benefit, but it isn't a neccessity. Being able to get into London from Arlesey, Hitchin, Harpenden, Flitwick etc, where there are no alternative means IS a necessity.

I don't see why those passengers' lives should be dislocated just so you don't have to use the tube.

Not quite true, as 2 of those people could just walk from Kings Cross to St Pancras.
So no need for tube.

Or am i missing something?
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
Interesting about some of the issues raised.

I was on the 1251 London Kings Cross - Cambridge train yesterday. It was left open on the previous arrival (when it was expected to form the 1221). Someone made an announcement that the train had no driver around 1215. (It was a class 700)

Later 4 drivers got on. One ask another if they expect it to go anywhere. Response well it isn’t set up yet so who know.

I don’t know where the drivers were going, or if they were on duty. But let’s say they were on duty and using the train to get to their next working. That could soon be 4 trains cancelled. I suspect that is why things are getting worse. Drivers need to take trains between duties. GTR don’t like running trains.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
Not quite true, as 2 of those people could just walk from Kings Cross to St Pancras.
So no need for tube.

Or am i missing something?

Yes. Most trains are cancelled on GN. Places like Sandy have no trains to anywhere. Take yesterday. No stopping service out of kings cross for 3 hours. Effectively closed, Welwyn North, Knebworth, Ashwell and Morden, Foxton, Meldreth and Shepreth.

Same thing recently on Peterborough route. Cancellations and skip stopping result in the effective closure of station on that route.
 

Stampy

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2014
Messages
377
Location
Peterborough
Drivers need to take trains between duties. GTR don’t like running trains.

Exactly what happened on Thursday, an "off duty" driver volunteered to take a train back to PBO as the relief driver wasn't there!!!

What next - driver's "dumped" at various locations on the GTR route as "spares"???
 

Teflon Lettuce

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2013
Messages
1,750
That must be close to a dozen times you've mentioned "unions" now, despite people including drivers explaining there's no industrial dispute causing this disruption.
I haven't mentioned anything about a dispute... my question was is the level of training a legal requirement or is it due to union agreements. And perhaps if people didn't keep on wilfully misreading my question for their own personal agenda I wouldn't have to re- ask the question would I?
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
365s back on Ely services today! 1147 and 1247 to KGX both 2x365 sets.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,055
Location
UK
But those logons are unlikely to be available to platform staff I'm guessing?

Staff can open a cab door on a 700, use the guards panel to open or close the doors (as they must to shut down a train) and also make a PA or cab to cab call. But while they have to do this to shut down a train, I am not sure if they are allowed to open a train before a driver does.
 

Steve Harris

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
895
Location
ECML
Yes. Most trains are cancelled on GN. Places like Sandy have no trains to anywhere. Take yesterday. No stopping service out of kings cross for 3 hours. Effectively closed, Welwyn North, Knebworth, Ashwell and Morden, Foxton, Meldreth and Shepreth.

Same thing recently on Peterborough route. Cancellations and skip stopping result in the effective closure of station on that route.

I think you are getting a little confused. I was referring to The Box Photter's post about 3 people who want the service through the core. When everybody else just wants to get to London first !!

I am fully aware of the gaps in (thameslink and GN) services as i live in a Cambridgeshire village with a town with a railway station nearby which has seen a 3 hour gap in services!
 
Last edited:

SPADTrap

Established Member
Joined
15 Oct 2012
Messages
2,352
I haven't mentioned anything about a dispute... my question was is the level of training a legal requirement or is it due to union agreements. And perhaps if people didn't keep on wilfully misreading my question for their own personal agenda I wouldn't have to re- ask the question would I?

Yes it is legal and regulated heavily. If I took a train I wasn't qualified to drive on a route I wasn't qualified to drive upon then I'd find myself in serious trouble and likely within a prison if something went wrong. You have to sign your name against traction and routes meaning you are responsible for your actions on them and liable for when it goes wrong. You can stop asking now :).
 

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,504
It's the "yes man" mentality that currently pervades - no negativity and a can do attitude will get the job done .People who raise issues are 'putting obstacles in the way of progress'. 'There is no place in this organisation for negativity'. Hence managers are afraid to contradict ludicrous or over ambitious plans or ideas and we end up with this kind of mess.
Yes I worked in a place with this kind of idiotic mentality. Brought a formally great place to work down on its knees and most decent staff left.
 

the Rat

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2015
Messages
59
Yes it is legal and regulated heavily. If I took a train I wasn't qualified to drive on a route I wasn't qualified to drive upon then I'd find myself in serious trouble and likely within a prison if something went wrong. You have to sign your name against traction and routes meaning you are responsible for your actions on them and liable for when it goes wrong. You can stop asking now :).

Nice one!

Now we can get back to the business in hand, namely discussing the cut and thrust of the new timetable - and, let's face it, it's nearly all cut and very little thrust!
 

GoatSarah

Member
Joined
20 Feb 2018
Messages
103
Thats all fine and dandy but how many trains from Cambridge have actually made it through the core since this shambles begun? Meanwhile on other parts of the network some stations have had no rail service since it began, and some services have long gaps between services operated by Thameslink.

Almost none, but you're missing the point. It was claimed that nobody wants the Railplan 2020 services. Plenty of us want those services.

The fact that GTR's attempt to implement them has resulted in complete meltdown of their east coast mainline services is independent of whether they'd be useful services that people want if they were actually able to run them.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Thats all fine and dandy but how many trains from Cambridge have actually made it through the core since this shambles begun? Meanwhile on other parts of the network some stations have had no rail service since it began, and some services have long gaps between services operated by Thameslink.

Well, when they *do* start making it through the core on a regular basis, it is something I'll still be very much looking forward to.

You claimed nobody wanted RailPlan 2020 (the completed, fully working version). I did and still do.
 

GoatSarah

Member
Joined
20 Feb 2018
Messages
103
Well, when they *do* start making it through the core on a regular basis, it is something I'll still be very much looking forward to.

You claimed nobody wanted RailPlan 2020 (the completed, fully working version). I did and still do.

I've been waiting for through trains from GN pretty much from when they first mooted Thameslink 2000.
 

Southern

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
502
Location
Folkestone, Kent
I didn’t think they still did those.I remember there being one many years ago which I used to catch to go to Dreamland Margate.

Been running every summer for the last couple of years - current route via Greenwich is a new one though as it used to be a simple extension of one of two of the Charing X - Gillingham via Blackheath services.

On a side note, see a few cancellations reported for the Thameslink services on the Penge East line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top