• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Aldershot to Waterloo: why are Penalty Fares not issued for sitting in 1st on Std tickets?

Status
Not open for further replies.

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
Over the last couple of months I’ve been using first class on SWR from Aldershot to Waterloo. With no exception people with standard class tickets sit in first and then pay the difference on the rare occasion that their ticket is checked. How come penalty gates aren’t enforced?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,722
Location
Yorkshire
Who has checked the tickets?

If this route has commercial Guards, who are not authorised Penalty Fare collectors, then there's your answer!

If the tickets have been checked by revenue protection officers then that is surprising.
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
Who has checked the tickets?

If this route has commercial Guards, who are not authorised Penalty Fare collectors, then there's your answer!

If the tickets have been checked by revenue protection officesr then that is surprising.
On all occasions it was the latter. I didn't realise they couldn't do this. Maybe that's why it is so prominent as there is little incentive to pay for first class until prompted
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
And on the 17.25 ex Waterloo to Alton the commercial guard simply ejected a child to standard class for not having a first class ticket
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,722
Location
Yorkshire
There isn't much more they can do; a Guard's priorities are safety first, then timekeeping etc. Revenue collection is bottom of the list.

If someone is unable or unwilling to pay the fare, what else could the Guard realistically do?

An RPO would be equipped to issue a Penalty Fare or report the customer for prosecution.
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
There isn't much more they can do; a Guard's priorities are safety first, then timekeeping etc. Revenue collection is bottom of the list.

If someone is unable or unwilling to pay the fare, what else could the Guard realistically do?

An RPO would be equipped to issue a Penalty Fare or report the customer for prosecution.
But they're collecting revenue from those who pay. But yes, I get your general point about safety, but why bother checking at all then?
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,722
Location
Yorkshire
But they're collecting revenue from those who pay. But yes, I get your general point about safety, but why bother checking at all then?
The London area inner suburban workings have non-commercial Guards, so they don't check.

But for outer workings, where there is sufficient time between stations, the company must have decided it makes more sense to check tickets, because if there are times when the staff would not otherwise have any specific duties to perform, why not collect revenue?
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
The London area inner suburban workings have non-commercial Guards, so they don't check.

But for outer workings, where there is sufficient time between stations, the company must have decided it makes more sense to check tickets, because if there are times when the staff would not otherwise have any specific duties to perform, why not collect revenue?
Fair enough
 

paddington

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2013
Messages
964
I spent April and May travelling the entire SWR network, from the London locals to the long-distances, and never once encountered a proper ticket check. The guards did nothing more than glance, and passengers without tickets who made up excuses (left it at home, booked it online and going to collect it at the next station, sure...) were let off. I usually have 4 or 5 tickets with me and have to fumble about to find the correct one for the current journey, but it seemed like just seeing a flash of orange was sufficient for many guards
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,773
Indeed, I've accidentally shown just my Basingstoke season on a train that doesn't even stop at Basingstoke on more than one occasion and not had the guard notice (I semi-regularly travel down to Southampton in the evening peak, and so buy a Basingstoke to Southampton return which I use in combination with my season).

However, I definitely can't fault the frequency of ticket checks - I imagine that more than other things would put off the "casual" fare evader.
 

Brucey

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2010
Messages
671
I'm surprised you ever get your ticket checked on the 17:25 or 17:55, I certainly don't.

Maybe the guards target first class?
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
But as I keep moaning on about, they may as well sit in first class as there is no penalty if they do
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,773
Surely common sense to do so. In my experience on long distance routes, First Class is always checked first. Some of today's younger rail users have an exaggerated sense of entitlement. If Standard is full or even just a little crowded, go sit in First.
Younger? I've encountered people of all ages trying to try it on in first class.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,347
Location
Bolton
But as I keep moaning on about, they may as well sit in first class as there is no penalty if they do
You've asked your question and it has been answered several times now. If you view SWR's policy as being too customer-friendly and you dislike that, then why not take it up with them?
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
You've asked your question and it has been answered several times now. If you view SWR's policy as being too customer-friendly and you dislike that, then why not take it up with them?
I shall. But I may ask one more time here if the fancy takes me
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
3,602
Well
There isn't much more they can do; a Guard's priorities are safety first, then timekeeping etc. Revenue collection is bottom of the list.

If someone is unable or unwilling to pay the fare, what else could the Guard realistically do?
Although some guards manage to do a lot more than others.
 

boxy321

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2016
Messages
449
I find it's more often the middle age business types.
Quite a few 'suits' think if they have the right garb on they will be allowed in 1st as a free upgrade. When challenged, they pay up, pretending they intended to do so to avoid embarrassment which is a hefty sum on VT!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,371
On all occasions it was the latter. I didn't realise they couldn't do this. Maybe that's why it is so prominent as there is little incentive to pay for first class until prompted
This doesn’t seem correct. “The latter”, as Yorkie suggested, being proper revenue protection staff.
Hence “former” would have been the way to describe the first possibility Yorkie raised, that they were commercial guards. Could you possibly clarify?
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,048
Location
St. Albans
This doesn’t seem correct. “The latter”, as Yorkie suggested, being proper revenue protection staff.
Hence “former” would have been the way to describe the first possibility Yorkie raised, that they were commercial guards. Could you possibly clarify?
Apologies, I meant the former. Needless to say, I've been known to get my left and right mixed up too!
 

district

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2011
Messages
1,098
Location
SE16
A lot of the non-commercial (not ticket trained and have no power to sell tickets) do check first class, but only ask standard passengers travelling in first to move as they have no powers to do anything else.
 

sammyg901

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2009
Messages
326
Same on LNWR - 18.52 (peak train) - barriers were open at Euston in the peak which is just ridiculous.

There was a ticket check between Leighton Buzzard and Bletchley - one guy who had boarded at Euston bought a ticket onboard Leighton Buzzard-Bletchley which the guard happily sold. Another girl had an off peak ticket - all he did was tell her it wouldn't work the barriers at Bletchley for another 20mins - which of course were open.

So next time I feel like not to bother spending the extra 20 quid pp on the correct tickets as there aren't any concequences to not having them and getting "caught"
 

221129

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2011
Messages
6,520
Location
Sunny Scotland
Same on LNWR - 18.52 (peak train) - barriers were open at Euston in the peak which is just ridiculous.

There was a ticket check between Leighton Buzzard and Bletchley - one guy who had boarded at Euston bought a ticket onboard Leighton Buzzard-Bletchley which the guard happily sold. Another girl had an off peak ticket - all he did was tell her it wouldn't work the barriers at Bletchley for another 20mins - which of course were open.

So next time I feel like not to bother spending the extra 20 quid pp on the correct tickets as there aren't any concequences to not having them and getting "caught"
Apart from all the times that there are....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top