edwin_m
Veteran Member
The walking route to Moor Street and other places would have been much longer if they had put a "paid" route across the "a" end of all platforms. The simple answer is to head for the "b" end exits if changing trains.
The 60s/70s/80s trend of putting massive concrete office blocks/shopping centres/arenas/car parks on top of stations was definitely bad design. So many stations have been reduced to cramped, dingy, dark caverns filled with diesel fumes.
Manchester Victoria is one of the worst for this, not helped by the various delays to electrification plans. The third pair of through platforms that were lost in the rebuild would be very useful right now with the mess that is the "new & improved!" timetable.
platform 1a at Sheffield: massive bottleneck caused by walled off never used empty space by the lift entrance.
A far more recent example is nearby Birmingham New St - never a great station to start with, the modernisation means that it is no longer possible to change between all platforms via the stairs/escalators at the 'a' end without passing through two ticket barriers. Not helpful if you arrive at that end of the platform on a late train and are wanting to make a connection.
The 60s/70s/80s trend of putting massive concrete office blocks/shopping centres/arenas/car parks on top of stations was definitely bad design. So many stations have been reduced to cramped, dingy, dark caverns filled with diesel fumes.
Ah but it was the money. The air space above railway stations in cities is valuable stuff.
Mirfield West Yorkshire, is an odd layout, 3 platforms with P1 & P2 being an island platform, with P3 being a side platform, but the platforms location means you have to go out of the station & cross a road to get from the side platform to the island platforms.
Moorfields. Where else would you go up in the air (along what can be a bottleneck of a single escalator) before heading underground ? Admittedly a result of the 1967 Shankland Plan and ludicrous plans for 'streets in the sky' in Liverpool, but I often feel that Moorfields would have been best accessed by retaining the Exchange concourse and installing entrances from it to the underground
Oh, plus the entire concourse at Euston
Blackburn, now that the barriers are installed.
The main entrance leads to a corridor from which platforms are accessed by stairs; P1/2 on one staircase upwards, and P3 from another, at the other end of the corridor. Opposite each staircase is a lift. The ticket office is (or was) located on P1/2. The corridor then leads to the carpark. Therefore there are 2 entrances to the station.
Northern have recently installed barriers. And new TVM. The barriers are Infront of the lifts (a glass divide keeps the area separate) and by P1/2 stairs, with a divider allowing you to walk along to P3. The TVM is by P3, near the carpark entrance.
Therefore, if you enter from the carpark to catch a train from P3, you can buy a ticket at the tvm, then walk all the way along the corridor to the barrier, then all the way back again to go up P3 stairs.
I think the barriers should be added to the P3 end, at least.
If I get around to it, I will draw a picture to show you what I mean.
I don't believe the east bridge ever accessed the platforms - just carried a right of way across the station.Telford with it's massive overbridge (currently being rebuilt I believe?)
Nottingham is an arse for changing trains as well since the east bridge was removed in the 80a. 4B to 1C or 2 is a massive yomp.
You can exit via platform 7 past the car park on the south side, and up to the tram bridge or down to Station Street on the north side. This is the route of the public right of way since it was diverted for demolition of the east bridge.Nottingham is also a bit weird.
You have a footbridge in the middle on the platforms but it doesn't actually allow you to exit the station.
There's the half platforms and a bay(?) at one end... just not very neat.
Are there any other examples where a platform can't actually be reached from the main concourse, without having to leave the building?
It's a bit awkward, but I wouldn't say it's a terrible design- just a lack of coherent design. Many unstaffed minor stations use public roads to cross between platforms and also have staggered platforms meaning the road needs to be crossed.Mirfield West Yorkshire, is an odd layout, 3 platforms with P1 & P2 being an island platform, with P3 being a side platform, but the platforms location means you have to go out of the station & cross a road to get from the side platform to the island platforms.
The side platform at Shrewsbury, I forget the number.
You will be pleased to see the new doorways, being installed this week.platform 1a at Sheffield: massive bottleneck caused by walled off never used empty space by the lift entrance.
Another one for Birmingham here.
(Snip)
Have no idea why it wasn't organised with a central atrium, barriers, platforms in a nice rectangular-ish shape, like it sort of is on the continent.
I have to defend the much maligned Angel Road here, as it's current situation is due to a combination of the late 80s/early 90s upgrade of the section of the A406 North Circular Road that passes the station and the growth of Stansted Airport.Absolutely everything about Angel Road station.