Same here, I got my response the other day. I was disappointed but I didn't get a great feeling after the interview. To be honest it's probably the most unstructured interview I have ever done. Absolutely nothing to do with why I wanted to even be a train driver or anything else I researched and planned for. They were more interested in things that had nothing really to do with finding out how suitable I actually was for the job. Just silly little scenario questions about things I'd have thought would be more in the MMI or things you'd cover in your training anyway. I mean to not even be asked why you wanted to become a train driver was crazy in my mind. Probably a bit bitter at the moment not sure if ever try again in the future after that experience. I never bothered asking for feedback as I don't think you'd get it. Let me know if you get any. I just don't see how they're getting the best people for the job with their interviewing technique and questions..... I suspect maybe quite a lot of internal applicants tho and they have to advertise these positions so sometimes might be your luck at the time. Good luckWell I got the thanks but no thanks for Edinburgh yesterday following DMI. I'm curious, anyone know if you can get feedback? I've emailed HR to ask...
Same here, I got my response the other day. I was disappointed but I didn't get a great feeling after the interview. To be honest it's probably the most unstructured interview I have ever done. Absolutely nothing to do with why I wanted to even be a train driver or anything else I researched and planned for. They were more interested in things that had nothing really to do with finding out how suitable I actually was for the job. Just silly little scenario questions about things I'd have thought would be more in the MMI or things you'd cover in your training anyway. I mean to not even be asked why you wanted to become a train driver was crazy in my mind. Probably a bit bitter at the moment not sure if ever try again in the future after that experience. I never bothered asking for feedback as I don't think you'd get it. Let me know if you get any. I just don't see how they're getting the best people for the job with their interviewing technique and questions..... I suspect maybe quite a lot of internal applicants tho and they have to advertise these positions so sometimes might be your luck at the time. Good luck
Same here, I got my response the other day. I was disappointed but I didn't get a great feeling after the interview. To be honest it's probably the most unstructured interview I have ever done. Absolutely nothing to do with why I wanted to even be a train driver or anything else I researched and planned for. They were more interested in things that had nothing really to do with finding out how suitable I actually was for the job. Just silly little scenario questions about things I'd have thought would be more in the MMI or things you'd cover in your training anyway. I mean to not even be asked why you wanted to become a train driver was crazy in my mind. Probably a bit bitter at the moment not sure if ever try again in the future after that experience. I never bothered asking for feedback as I don't think you'd get it. Let me know if you get any. I just don't see how they're getting the best people for the job with their interviewing technique and questions..... I suspect maybe quite a lot of internal applicants tho and they have to advertise these positions so sometimes might be your luck at the time. Good luck
It’s interesting you say that. I work for Scotrail. I was talking to a few internal applicants about their interviews and a couple said the very same thing as you. Scenario based questions and nothing to do with why they actually applied for the role. Internal interviews are actually regarded as being ‘harder’ as we are meant to know a lot more and will be quizzed on it. But there was nothing of the sort in those interviews. Another person I was talking to had a completely different interview and was asked all sorts of operational questions and why they were applying etc. Needless to say the ones who received the same style of interview as yourself were unsuccessful. There are a few unhappy internal applicants at the moment.
Well I agree that the role is very much about safety. But to be asked how you would deal with a drunk person banging on the train did not really seem that relevant to safety or an emergency situation as once you've had your training you'd follow procedures that you were taught to deal with that type of situation. I didn't get asked anything to do with any scenario that would be an emergency situation. My career has involved constantly working in extremely dangerous environments, and probably much more dangerous than anything I'd ever have to deal with as a train driver. I didn't get the chance to get that across during the interview which is why I didn't like the way it was structured as they didn't seem interested in what you'd actually done in your career which is what I'd say an interview is usually about to find out what you've done in your life in detail. It was all based on what I knew about the company in quite deep depth. And as far as everyone only applying for the salary I'd say possibly for a lot of people but not for myself at all. So you'd think that makes asking people why they want to be a train driver more important as of people are only applying based on pay then they need to try weed out these people and find people who are applying for other reasons. I'm making much more now than I'd ever make as a train driver and above it was all about a new challenge and a lifestyle change due to having a young family. So not everyone wants this role just for money. Yes the pay is very good for working a 4 day week and being home a lot. I think if you only want the pay you could end up with a lot of people who aren't actually that interested in the role. Anyway I probably used the "silly" word in the wrong context so probably I'd say not silly just not required questions at that stage of the whole process.... Thanks for your input tho I take everyone's view on board nobody is right or wrong in my view ..Hi,
Having been involved in the recruitment process in the past perhaps I can shed some light on this. Firstly the "why do you want to be a train driver" has become somewhat irrelevant. Yes, there are some people to whom this is their dream job, but for the majority it is the salary. The single most important part of a train drivers role is dealing with dangerous/out of course situations and incidents which could endanger life. Therefore the "silly" situational questions are actually utterly relevant. How you deal with an out of course incident is probably the most important part of the job and is what you are regular assessed on at the simulator and rules days. In a nutshell the interview is designed to assess if you have a "safety critical" mindset and how you would deal with safety critical incidents. Why you want to become a train driver isn't that important. The whole railway culture is based around safety and that's literally the main thing you need to focus on at an interview. Not why you want the job. Hope this helps.....
congratulationsHi all, first post on railforums.
Got confirmation this evening that my contract is in the post for trainee driver role for edin/bathgate. Start date 22nd October. If any other new starts are on this thread well done and I’ll see you at the training centre. Looking forward to the surge of information and learning coming my way...after 16 years in my current role the change is most welcome!
Hi all, does anyone know of any update for the Dundee driver position? As far as I can see from reading on here there's a number of people like my self who are still sitting at under consideration. I know a few people heard back for the Perth roles but not sure if anyone has had the "no thanks" for Dundee yet? My thinking is they maybe did hire from the internal pool but plan to hire more later this year so are keeping us under consideration until that point. That's a complete guess though so I may well be wrong. Any thoughts appreciated.
Perth link 2 drivers sign Perth to Edinburgh (via Ladybank and via Leuchars), Perth to Aberdeen, Perth to Queen Street (via Croy) and Inverkeithing to Glenrothes (the Fife Circle). Link 1 signs the above plus Perth to Inverness and Perth to Queen Street via Cumbernauld, and some sign the E&G. As a new start you’d go into link 2.
Taxis for working the circle??Thanks. Very informative. So how would you end up in link one? Can you choose to stay in link two? And if you change is this based on your manager? And can this change. If so how often?
Are you offered taxis if you work the fife circle?
I think you have went into the interview convinced it would pan out a certain way and started to flap when it never.Well I agree that the role is very much about safety. But to be asked how you would deal with a drunk person banging on the train did not really seem that relevant to safety or an emergency situation as once you've had your training you'd follow procedures that you were taught to deal with that type of situation. I didn't get asked anything to do with any scenario that would be an emergency situation. My career has involved constantly working in extremely dangerous environments, and probably much more dangerous than anything I'd ever have to deal with as a train driver. I didn't get the chance to get that across during the interview which is why I didn't like the way it was structured as they didn't seem interested in what you'd actually done in your career which is what I'd say an interview is usually about to find out what you've done in your life in detail. It was all based on what I knew about the company in quite deep depth. And as far as everyone only applying for the salary I'd say possibly for a lot of people but not for myself at all. So you'd think that makes asking people why they want to be a train driver more important as of people are only applying based on pay then they need to try weed out these people and find people who are applying for other reasons. I'm making much more now than I'd ever make as a train driver and above it was all about a new challenge and a lifestyle change due to having a young family. So not everyone wants this role just for money. Yes the pay is very good for working a 4 day week and being home a lot. I think if you only want the pay you could end up with a lot of people who aren't actually that interested in the role. Anyway I probably used the "silly" word in the wrong context so probably I'd say not silly just not required questions at that stage of the whole process.... Thanks for your input tho I take everyone's view on board nobody is right or wrong in my view ..
5 days at training school wont be 9 to 5 as 36 hours per week. When doing front end turns You will do 4 days with a driver. Dont book a summer holiday until you are guaranteed your time off.Do you know how training works as in is it five days a week 9-5?
5 days at training school wont be 9 to 5 as 36 hours per week. When doing front end turns You will do 4 days with a driver. Dont book a summer holiday until you are guaranteed your time off.
Im sure you get a break in the mornings too...anyway youll have more than t breaks to think about very soon so I wouldn’t worry about that.I imagine it would be 9-5 as an hours lunch a day is 35 a week. Unless it’s half hour? Just wanted to get the jist of times. When do you go out with a driver is that usually after 12/13 weeks?
Im sure you get a break in the mornings too...anyway youll have more than t breaks to think about very soon so I wouldn’t worry about that.
First FET for me was after 3 or 4 weeks at the school this was about 8 years ago though but may have changed slightly.
5 days at training school wont be 9 to 5 as 36 hours per week. When doing front end turns You will do 4 days with a driver. Dont book a summer holiday until you are guaranteed your time off.