• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR Class 800

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Thatcham Xing

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2016
Messages
173
Reports elsewhere (unconfirmed) that pan was raised at 105mph in an area where pan raising and lowering not permitted?
 
Last edited:

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,571
NR on twitter have stated that damage was caused by the train, not vandalism or OLE failure so that seems about right

So not the trains fault either. Human error. However it is all speculation at the moment.
 

GB

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
6,457
Location
Somewhere
Hitachi have imposed a ban on 802 units running on electric until the unit involved has been examined.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,325
At this time it is looking like the problem was not due to a GWR or NR error, I'm not at liberty to give any more details unfortunately.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,287
At this time it is looking like the problem was not due to a GWR or NR error, I'm not at liberty to give any more details unfortunately.
As the unit involved was not yet accepted, then it is nothing to do with GWR. If it’s not NR, then it must be Hitachi and/or its contractors.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,354
As the unit involved was not yet accepted, then it is nothing to do with GWR. If it’s not NR, then it must be Hitachi and/or its contractors.

The original cause given last night while dealing with all this was that neither the unit or the infrastructure were at fault

There has been some suggestion today, after the fact, that there may have been a unit fault - and to be clear the two aren’t mutually exclusive.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,490
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
I can't quite get my head round why there are areas with overhead where pan raising is not permitted.
K
Specific tensions. IETs currently only raise/lower their pans at high speed in the Moreton Cutting area, where the OLE is specifically tensioned to allow this to take place. It formerly took place at Maidenhead (when that was the Limit of Wiring), and will probably take place west of Newbury, just east of Chippenham, and at Bristol Parkway once the wires there are authorised for passenger service.
If the train is stationary or running at low speed (I forget how low), they can, as @Saj8 says, be raised/lowered anywhere.
 

DidcotDickie

Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
159
Location
Oxfordshire
Specific tensions. IETs currently only raise/lower their pans at high speed in the Moreton Cutting area, where the OLE is specifically tensioned to allow this to take place.

Apparently not (reported elsewhere by a GWR insider). The Series 1 OLE is set to a standard tension throughout and the only reason there are specified locations where pans can be raised at speed is so that NR can monitor the contact wire for wear and/or damage easily/more frequently. Also you wouldn't want to be raising the pan at 100+mph on sections of wire overlap or at junctions/crossings. Hence the area east of Moreton Cutting for switching from diesel to electric on the up lines for IETs not stopping at Didcot.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,490
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Apparently not (reported elsewhere by a GWR insider). The Series 1 OLE is set to a standard tension throughout and the only reason there are specified locations where pans can be raised at speed is so that NR can monitor the contact wire for wear and/or damage easily/more frequently. Also you wouldn't want to be raising the pan at 100+mph on sections of wire overlap or at junctions/crossings. Hence the area east of Moreton Cutting for switching from diesel to electric on the up lines for IETs not stopping at Didcot.
Ahhh, I hadn't realised that. Thanks for the clarification!
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
2,488
To add to the list - there will also be somewhere to the west of Steventon (is it Butterfly Lane area?) where IETs will lower/raise the pan to allow passage under Steventon Road Bridge without being subject to the 60mph PSR until the difficulties associated with the bridge / nearby level crossing are sorted out. Presumably on the eastern side of the structure the Moreton Cutting location will be used?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,662
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Presumably the ECML's 80x will need to do less switching on the move at speed than GWR's, maybe none at all?
Most of the bi-mode workings will have a convenient station to stop at (eg Newark, Doncaster, Stirling).
TPE's 802s will no doubt switch while stopped at Manchester Victoria and again at York.
Hambleton Jn might be an interesting switching location for LNER 80x routed into Leeds that way.
Even the GWR switching on the move will decline significantly when the wires reach Bristol TM/Cardiff/Oxford.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,396
I can't quite get my head round why there are areas with overhead where pan raising is not permitted.
K
This incident should be all you need - BR cheap Headspans and pan raising at high speeds and multiple pans don't mix.
 

fflint

Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
121
Moving on from the dewirement.
Railway Herald reports in today's edition that the ORR ( Office of Rail and Roads)
has suspended authorising further class 800s due to safety concerns. It goes on to say it is due to issues with the inter vehicle electrical connections that could be used to access the roof.
The problem had been brought to the attention of Hitachi before introduction but goes on to say that further work is required before authorising of more units.
They also report that Hitachi have taken on 4 roads st Tyne Yard to store sets.
Will this be another spanner in the works?
Please excuse if I haven't put this on the correct thread.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,413
Moving on from the dewirement.
Railway Herald reports in today's edition that the ORR ( Office of Rail and Roads)
has suspended authorising further class 800s due to safety concerns. It goes on to say it is due to issues with the inter vehicle electrical connections that could be used to access the roof.
The problem had been brought to the attention of Hitachi before introduction but goes on to say that further work is required before authorising of more units.
They also report that Hitachi have taken on 4 roads st Tyne Yard to store sets.
Will this be another spanner in the works?
Please excuse if I haven't put this on the correct thread.
Story is already well covered in the LNER Azuma thread, you need to go back about 10 days or few pages though, where the Rail magazine version of the same story is quoted:
https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/lner-azuma-class-800-801.170436/#post-3669206
 

corsaVXR

Member
Joined
22 Oct 2007
Messages
90
Reports elsewhere (unconfirmed) that pan was raised at 105mph in an area where pan raising and lowering not permitted?
What currently stops a driver doing this as a train goes through a station? Is there any interlock system?

I wouldn’t particularly care for being whipped by overhead wires tbh.
 

Sean Emmett

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2015
Messages
498
Specific tensions. IETs currently only raise/lower their pans at high speed in the Moreton Cutting area, where the OLE is specifically tensioned to allow this to take place. It formerly took place at Maidenhead (when that was the Limit of Wiring), and will probably take place west of Newbury, just east of Chippenham, and at Bristol Parkway once the wires there are authorised for passenger service..

Q1. Is it no longer possible to change over from diesel to AC (and vv) at Maidenhead?

Q2. Are the specially tensioned sections authorised for both mode changes (i.e. AC to diesel and diesel to AC), or only one (down line from AC to diesel and up line from diesel to AC)?

Q3. Presumably the changeover at Cocklebury Lane (3/4 mile East of Chippenham) will be on the move? It would be at around 50-60 mph for stopping services, but will it be the full 125 for passing services (South Wales diverts etc)?

FWIW Thursday's 19.12 PAD BRI with 800s 034/020 ran on diesel throughout in the aftermath of the Hanwell incident i.e. no pan up at Maidenhead, nor when stopped for signals at Ruscombe while the 19.00 IET was stopped at Twyford with 19.03 HST stuck behind it.
 
Last edited:

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,728
Location
81E
Q1-Q3: no idea

The day after the dewirement there was a blanket ‘diesel mode only’ restriction on all 80x between Paddington & Reading.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,870
Location
Plymouth
Q1. Is it no longer possible to change over from diesel to AC (and vv) at Maidenhead?

Q2. Are the specially tensioned sections authorised for both mode changes (i.e. AC to diesel and diesel to AC), or only one (down line from AC to diesel and up line from diesel to AC)?

Q3. Presumably the changeover at Cocklebury Lane (3/4 mile East of Chippenham) will be on the move? It would be at around 50-60 mph for stopping services, but will it be the full 125 for passing services (South Wales diverts etc)?

FWIW Thursday's 19.12 PAD BRI with 800s 034/020 ran on diesel throughout in the aftermath of the Hanwell incident i.e. no pan up at Maidenhead, nor when stopped for signals at Ruscombe while the 19.00 IET was stopped at Twyford with 19.03 HST stuck behind it.
Q1 - to changer over at maidenhead would require reducing speed to below 20mph
Q2 - yes there is a specified area however changing onto diesel it doesn't really matter if drivers stick to it or not.
Q3 - when the power changeover point officially moves to cockle bury Lane or wherever , it will be possible to change over to electric at 125mph yes.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
Q2. Are the specially tensioned sections authorised for both mode changes (i.e. AC to diesel and diesel to AC), or only one (down line from AC to diesel and up line from diesel to AC)?

I gather these areas don't have different wire tensions, they are simply monitored for extra wear?
 

Jeremy B

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2011
Messages
69
Location
Newcastle
A brief look at my spreadsheet here in Dorset, with regard to ticket checks on an IET on GWR would see them as minimal - you get the odd member of staff wander through, but would appear to be going from one end to the other rather than engaging with customers. 800s and 800/3s. The trolley - often double-staffed, drifts through from time to time. The double-staffing does not prevent collision with seats at times. I may be, and am, ex-staff and need to show them something - it just seems that nobody, in general, really cares. Why? Before anybody chips in, it would be fair to say that most major GWR stations are gated - yes, but - I could have joined a train at Mortimer, changed at Reading and Temple Meads and hopped off at Nailsea.
Been on the things 3 times & had my ticket checked twice. Last time was between Slough & Paddington with The Train Manager still checking as we rolled in. He caught two scammers in my coach as well as giving my Senior card a good checking out. Most impressed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top