• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Leeds Station Improvement

Mordac

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2016
Messages
2,309
Location
Birmingham
I see in a Christmas 'gift' NatWest have removed three of their cash points from the North concourse. Soviet style queues were already building up at the one remaining on the South concourse with any money left.

Given NatWest already own the other three, wouldn't it be nice if some of the other players in our feckless banking industry stepped in to fill the breach. Barclays, this means you.
Surely Yorkshire Bank would be more appropriate? :D
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,299
Location
Fenny Stratford
A new bridge from the bay platforms in the north west of Leeds station over to the TPE platforms in the south west wouldn't solve the problem of the muddle of people congregating around the area immediately inside the barriers - they wouldn't use such a bridge - it'd only be useful for the minority making connections like Harrogate to Castleford. You'd have to close the whole western throat for a while (days? weeks?) to install such a bridge over all of the lines, just for the sake of people who can't do a couple of hundred yards in ten minutes - such people exist, I'm not denying it, I have some in my family, but it really would be the tail wagging the dog. And that's assuming that there's space at the western end of platform 16 etc for a bridge to "land"!

Keep it simple, focus on quick wins that benefit the majority - whilst I sympathise with inform people who struggle to get from the Harrogate to Castleford platforms I don't believe that there are sufficient to warrant spending millions of pounds and temporarily closing the western side of the station to give them a facility that wouldn't solve the bigger problems in the station (the crowds around the main entrance.

Agreed - some people need to get a grip. Easier and cheaper to put on s huttle buggy for those unable to work such as at other large stations.

The seventies footbridge doesn't seem to involve as many steps as the new one. I'm guessing a replacement would need to be a lot higher and involve more steps. (Similar situation with the new footbridge at Wakefield Westgate which is like climbing the Eiger).

But is that not because of the available space and the need to get clearance over the OHLE?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,003
Location
Yorks
Agreed - some people need to get a grip. Easier and cheaper to put on s huttle buggy for those unable to work such as at other large stations.



But is that not because of the available space and the need to get clearance over the OHLE?

All of these bridges need to have clearance over the OHLE, but the newer ones seem to require a lot more clearance than the old ones.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,738
Location
Leeds
All of these bridges need to have clearance over the OHLE, but the newer ones seem to require a lot more clearance than the old ones.

The OLE is designed around bridges that are there at the time. Where there are low bridges the catenary is low. At other places it is higher, and new bridges have to clear it.

Also special reduced clearance may be used at existing bridges but presumably not for new ones.

Incidentally this press release has appeared today.

https://www.networkrail.co.uk/feeds/new-platform-part-of-two-more-key-upgrades-for-leeds-station/

Major investment in Leeds is set to continue after schemes to improve both train journeys and the look and feel of the station were announced.

A new platform – platform zero – will be the crowning glory of a significant £161m investment in the rail infrastructure that will also see improvements to the track alignment for more efficient journeys into platforms 1-6, as well as a major upgrade to the signalling across the entire station, in a boost to train service reliability. Platforms 1-6 will also be lengthened to cater for longer trains with more seats.

Another major project, funded by the West Yorkshire Combined Authority, will see the partial pedestrianisation of New Station Street to ease congestion and improve the flow of people at the entrance of the station, with construction set to begin early next year.

The latest two announcements come hot on the heels of last month’s announcement that the dark, tired wooden ceiling panels in the South Concourse are to be replaced by a transparent, plastic roof that will allow natural light to flood the station – which is England’s second busiest outside of London.

The installation of scaffolding towers in the South Concourse starts next week and will continue until Christmas, when the removal of the existing roof will begin. Passengers are advised that space in the concourse will be reduced during the construction, and so should try to allow extra time to make their way through to the platforms or use the Southern Entrance via Dark Neville Street.

To allow space for platform zero, the number of long stay car parking spaces at Leeds will be reduced in phases from December this year until May 2019, when the long stay car park will close completely until the platform is built in 2021, with Network Rail working alongside Leeds City Council to promote alternative parking sites. Just over 100 spaces of the current 400 will be reduced by early January with the number of spaces reduced further between March and May in 2019. Contract car park spaces will remain in place.

Rob McIntosh, route managing director for Network Rail, said: “Together this trio of projects are the biggest investment in the station since Leeds First in the early 2000s, and I am delighted that they will start delivering benefits for passengers and the city as early as next autumn.

“There will inevitably be changes to peoples’ usual walking routes and routines during construction and we will do everything we can to keep people moving efficiently and safely, in eager anticipation of a noticeably improved station upon completion.”
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,003
Location
Yorks
The OLE is designed around bridges that are there at the time. Where there are low bridges the catenary is low. At other places it is higher, and new bridges have to clear it.

Also special reduced clearance may be used at existing bridges but presumably not for new ones.

Incidentally this press release has appeared today.

https://www.networkrail.co.uk/feeds/new-platform-part-of-two-more-key-upgrades-for-leeds-station/

As to your point about special clearances not being allowed for new bridges, I say 'quite'.

Glad to hear about the new platform. Hope it is fitted sympathetically around the surviving Midland Railway platform canopy on platform 1 (formerly W).
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,686
Location
west yorkshire
I can't help thinking if some of the trans pennines say one an hour each way went via Wakefield K and Castleford some of Leeds congestion would be improved. Pribably faster and great for passengers in the Castleford Wakefield area.
K
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,455
Location
UK
I see in a Christmas 'gift' NatWest have removed three of their cash points from the North concourse. Soviet style queues were already building up at the one remaining on the South concourse with any money left.

Given NatWest already own the other three, wouldn't it be nice if some of the other players in our feckless banking industry stepped in to fill the breach. Barclays, this means you.

Haven't these people heard of contactless?
Saves you having to queue up at cash machines...
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,673
Location
Another planet...
I can't help thinking if some of the trans pennines say one an hour each way went via Wakefield K and Castleford some of Leeds congestion would be improved. Pribably faster and great for passengers in the Castleford Wakefield area.
K
But that has the same problem as the far more sensible solution of just running 4tph: it means TPE can't advertise a 10min interval service between Leeds and Manchester. Besides, there's naff all in Casvegas.
 

rich-leeds

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2017
Messages
63
I see in a Christmas 'gift' NatWest have removed three of their cash points from the North concourse. Soviet style queues were already building up at the one remaining on the South concourse with any money left.

Given NatWest already own the other three, wouldn't it be nice if some of the other players in our feckless banking industry stepped in to fill the breach. Barclays, this means you.

The pod that these cash machines were located in is being removed. The similar pod further north (near Wetherspoons) was removed last week. I'm guessing this is all part of the capacity works (i.e. opening up more concourse space).
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,003
Location
Yorks
The pod that these cash machines were located in is being removed. The similar pod further north (near Wetherspoons) was removed last week. I'm guessing this is all part of the capacity works (i.e. opening up more concourse space).

Ah that is onteresting. The North concourse certainly seems to get a lot of passenger flow (rather more so than when I regularly started using it in 99/00).

Shame though. Was quite useful to get dosh out.
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,466
It might be preparatory work ahead of the concourse roof works, which will involve substantial amounts of scaffolding.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,003
Location
Yorks
It might be preparatory work ahead of the concourse roof works, which will involve substantial amounts of scaffolding.

The North concourse is the listed bit, so they won't be doing anything with that fortunately.

I'll miss BR's pine ceiling on the South concourse though. I always thought it added a Scandinavian air of sophistication to proceedings.
 

johntea

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
2,602
Those 'pods' were the biggest waste of time and money ever! A few businesses opened up in them but didn't last long at all, probably due to the sky high rent charged for essentially a very small (and presumably cold!) space...
 

class 9

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2010
Messages
955
Unless I've missed it, I can't believe there's no plans to improve the drop area/short stay car park. This area is a complete mess when busy, traffic snarls up right down Aire St and into City Square.
 

class 9

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2010
Messages
955
Also pedestrianisation of New station street I feel is misguided, where are the black &white taxis going to go? Losing the bus stops is no big loss as most buses are mostly empty and not many people joining them there, the priority should be the other side of the station.
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,466
Also pedestrianisation of New station street I feel is misguided, where are the black &white taxis going to go? Losing the bus stops is no big loss as most buses are mostly empty and not many people joining them there, the priority should be the other side of the station.

The buses are rammed during peak hour. At least four bus stops need to be reallocated and nobody appears to be bothered about rail replacement bus services. I assume Sovereign Street and Neville Street are going to be used or rising bollards put in.

The council are going to have to think carefully. If they block off the northern end of New Station Street under the hotel, they might be able to accommodate a few more bus stops but that will put a lot of movements down Mill Hill.
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,739
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
Also pedestrianisation of New station street I feel is misguided, where are the black &white taxis going to go? Losing the bus stops is no big loss as most buses are mostly empty and not many people joining them there, the priority should be the other side of the station.

The buses are rammed during peak hour. At least four bus stops need to be reallocated and nobody appears to be bothered about rail replacement bus services. I assume Sovereign Street and Neville Street are going to be used or rising bollards put in.

The council are going to have to think carefully. If they block off the northern end of New Station Street under the hotel, they might be able to accommodate a few more bus stops but that will put a lot of movements down Mill Hill.

I was just going to say many buses are well used there, as well of course as the need for somewhere for RRBs to stop at. Not everyone thinks that rail to bus connections are that important, but a lot of people do make multi-modal journeys including connecting in the centre of Leeds. Ideally the Leeds Loop road ought to be re-routed further west, allowing City Square to be more of a transport hub than a city centre rat run.
 

Allwinter_Kit

Member
Joined
12 Jul 2017
Messages
147
Given Leeds' complete lack of meaningful alternatives to the bus in terms of public transport I would say that bus/train multimodal journeys are very important for the huge numbers of folk who don't own cars or don't want to have to use them.

Better integration of the station in terms of pedestrian and bus journeys is desperately needed. It's pretty bloody terrible for one of the north's major cities and the 'Yorkshire Gateway' to have a few bus stops randomly strung out (mostly on Boar Lane) vaguely near the station and call that an interchange.

Also the pedestrian flows in the station are abysmal but without knocking the whole sorry hanger down to platform level and starting again.... That said, as a daily 1 - 5 /16 transfer passenger, extending the footbridge and avoiding the gateline scrum would definitely be welcome!
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,739
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
Scaffolding has started to go up in the Southern concourse, next to the White Rose, WH Smiths etc, possibly indicating the start of works or at least preparation for the new roof?
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,739
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
Its going to get a lot colder!

Possibly so, although before the old roof comes off I imagine there will be a lot of prep work to be done, moving the electrics, lighting, departure boards etc. But more scaffolding went up overnight around the edges of the concourse so work must be imminent.
 

johntea

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
2,602
Quite a brave move putting up all the scaffolding just before the Christmas revellers start to pile through the station! (Although I guess there won't be too many on Saturdays!)
 

EIKN

Member
Joined
19 Sep 2017
Messages
113
I assume this upgrade is for Northern's new Civity DMU and EMUs, or the Class 800.

Leeds City station is a dingy mess the train shed needs a glass roof, airport style travelators on bridges with access from each platform.

The ticket barriers are a real danger; in the event - god forbid - of a serious fire or terror incident you're not going to be able to clear platforms quick enough, so they should go.

The frontage by the bridge looks the same as it did in the 1970s.

A terrible station and terrible future plans, in my opinion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,265
I assume this upgrade is for' Northern's
New civity trains both D AND EMU, or the Class 800.
What I can't understand is why they can't simply ( off topic I know) upgrade the whole ECML to 160mph running.
Given the length of the UK and time required to slow down for a station and to reach top speed when leaving must Mean there wouldn't be much in it between HS2 And the potential upgrade being discussed of the ECML and WCML. Then we could hopefully see the class 395 Javelin by Hitachi looks near identical to the IEP But runs at 160mph.
That would give us a high speed line far sooner and way cheaper than this unpopular expensive HS2, A,B C etc.
After all even now getting on at Doncaster it's no sooner reached max speed both HST And class 91 and your nearing York, so how they expect to run 250mph + trains to Leeds without missing out the main conurbations does not make sense .
Leeds city station is a dingy mess the train shed needs a glass roof, airport style travelators on bridges with accesses from each platform.
The ticket barriers are a real danger , I. The event god forbid of a serious fire or terror incident your not going to be able to clear platforms quick enough so they should go. The frontage by the bridge looks the same as it did in the 70's.
A terriible station and terriible future plans imho.

You appear to be unfamiliar with the actual plans for HS2 and the technical reasons which prevent speed increases on existing lines. Fortunately it's dead easy with the internet to find out more about these things.
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,321
Scaffolding has started to go up in the Southern concourse, next to the White Rose, WH Smiths etc, possibly indicating the start of works or at least preparation for the new roof?
Once they get all the scaffolding up which by the looks of things will take a while
Preparation/survey work has been going on overnight for a while now. Recent rumours suggest that the Upper Crust will close and the barrier line be straightened out and lengthened, with Boots and the ticket office switching positions. How much of this is actually true remains to be seen...!
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,818
Location
Yorkshire
Please can we stay on the topic of Leeds Station Improvement.

We do not wish to prevent other matters being discussed but if anyone wishes to discuss any other subject, please use an existing thread (if there is one) or create a new one (if there isn't); any ideas/suggestions need to be made in the Speculative Ideas section, and all threads are required to have a descriptive title.

Many thanks for your understanding :)
 

Top