• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 170s/185s to Irish Rail?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
3,744
Triple 158s would be better. Order new third rail bi-modes for SWR and send the 159s up to provide the extra stock needed.

You beat me to it. If there are enough of them I'd send the 185s to either Southern or SWR, allowing 171s and / or 159s to be used in the north, Scotland or Wales, where the ability to couple with sprinter classes would be useful.

(171s would need new couplers, but that's presumably trivial as they've been changed before)
 

Tynwald

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2016
Messages
179
Sorry to say, the cost of regauging would be phenomenal, what new wheelsets and even bogies, plus maybe more. utter rubish.
 

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
3,744
The ROSCOs will have to be very careful in case their trains get stuck in Eire without a customer, nor a return plan.

I doubt anyone would send a train to Ireland without "a customer" on the off-chance! (There is only one customer in Ireland of course)
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,589
Location
East Anglia
Sorry to say, the cost of regauging would be phenomenal, what new wheelsets and even bogies, plus maybe more. utter rubish.

In October and November Irish Rail stated publicly that these things would not be a barrier and work to convert them could and would be carried out.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,783
Location
Scotland
Sorry to say, the cost of regauging would be phenomenal, what new wheelsets and even bogies, plus maybe more. utter rubish.
Which is cheaper and would be available sooner: new trains or new bogies?
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
The problem is fitting more trains through Birmingham - the lines look pretty busy to me.

Indeed there's only so much you can do with the existing infrastructure and you're quite right that all routes in and out of Birmingham need to be longer which is key to improving services NOT more trains.

I am quite aware that Train Planners try to compromise demand with supply ie they know which services should be 6 car operated in the case of the Cross City line but they also know which services can get away with being 3 car operated.

However saying that there is only so many trains that they have to play with so they have to ensure they make the best use of their resources, the fact remains that if Ireland is able to offer a better deal for the Class 185s for example then it's a no brainer for any ROSCO to agree to the deal then have a temporary deal of 12 to 18 months for a UK TOC to use them then uncertainly of what to do next with them.

I know that if I was in the shoes of any ROSCO faced with that, I wouldn't think twice about a deal involving Ireland as I would sign ASAP!

However Ireland could still go with new built ie CAF or Stadler for example who I'm sure would be only too happy to build trains for Ireland.
 

DT611

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
464
Sorry to say, the cost of regauging would be phenomenal, what new wheelsets and even bogies, plus maybe more. utter rubish.

Yeah TBH i thought the same given it's multiple units involved rather then coaches which have been regauged and sent over to ireland before ( The mk3 international set and in the late 80s early 90s, irish rail did a swap of some of their scrapped c-class (original 201 class) locos with a uk scrap dealer for some mk2s in return) but irish rail don't seem to think it's a major job so perhapse it's not as complicated as one would think.
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,589
Location
East Anglia
Indeed there's only so much you can do with the existing infrastructure and you're quite right that all routes in and out of Birmingham need to be longer which is key to improving services NOT more trains.

However Ireland could still go with new built ie CAF or Stadler for example who I'm sure would be only too happy to build trains for Ireland.

The plan is to have new build trains to come on stream 2024, but capacity is realistically needed in early 2020 and by 2024 there's likely to be extra capacity needed still over anything that they potentially get from the UK as well as the potential of having to replace almost 80 EMU cars which will be approx 40 years old, despite the fact they have been very well refurbished in 2006.

There there is the plan to convert some of the commuter lines to DART which will also need new stock, so it's quite likely that any DMUs going over to Ireland will be needed post 2024.
 

DT611

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
464
Indeed there's only so much you can do with the existing infrastructure and you're quite right that all routes in and out of Birmingham need to be longer which is key to improving services NOT more trains.

I am quite aware that Train Planners try to compromise demand with supply ie they know which services should be 6 car operated in the case of the Cross City line but they also know which services can get away with being 3 car operated.

However saying that there is only so many trains that they have to play with so they have to ensure they make the best use of their resources, the fact remains that if Ireland is able to offer a better deal for the Class 185s for example then it's a no brainer for any ROSCO to agree to the deal then have a temporary deal of 12 to 18 months for a UK TOC to use them then uncertainly of what to do next with them.

I know that if I was in the shoes of any ROSCO faced with that, I wouldn't think twice about a deal involving Ireland as I would sign ASAP!

However Ireland could still go with new built ie CAF or Stadler for example who I'm sure would be only too happy to build trains for Ireland.

Ireland is going to be going with new build stock along with this potential lease, some EMUS and bi-modes. However new build will of course take a few years to come on stream, and we are cronically short of stock as it is (we actually have been for a long time if i'm honest)
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,783
Location
Scotland
However new build will of course take a few years to come on stream, and we are cronically short of stock as it is (we actually have been for a long time if i'm honest)
To be accurate, we have the wrong mix of stock rather than an out and out shortage - witness two year old Class 707s looking for a new home, 319s being converted to hybrid configuration, etc.
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,589
Location
East Anglia
To be accurate, we have the wrong mix of stock rather than an out and out shortage - witness two year old Class 707s looking for a new home, 319s being converted to hybrid configuration, etc.

He's talking about from an Irish Rail perspective.
 

DT611

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
464
To be accurate, we have the wrong mix of stock rather than an out and out shortage - witness two year old Class 707s looking for a new home, 319s being converted to hybrid configuration, etc.

Hiya, apologies for my comment not being clear. I was actually refering to ireland having a cronic shortage of stock in my comment.
Agreed about the 707s though. It is a complete waste them not having a home, but i'm sure one will be found for them. The conversion of 319s to diesel while not as good as more new build, is in itself actually not a bad idea on the face of it. If it actually works it would kill a couple of birds with 1 stone really, give them and possibly other similar aged or slightly older electric multiple units no longer needed for electric services a potential new lease of life until they are actually life expired, allows pure DMUS to be cascaded elsewhere and possibly removes the diesel shortage, and kills off the railbuses (which should have been gone years ago tbh)
 
Last edited:

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
916
Has this been confirmed? I know some of us over here in ireland who follow railway matters have had a feeling for a long time that keeping 22000s on the heuston side only was a likely aspiration or even the plan, but nothing has ever been confirmed for definite, but i wouldn't be surprised if that turns out to be true..

I live in Dublin myself and know several IR staff that mentioned this to me about 2 months ago.

Any UK units would be based in Drogheda and kept on east coast/Sligo duties.

It would make driver training, maintenance and diagramming simpler.
Some of the staff are not happy (as usual).

One other rumour doing the rounds is that almost all of the Sligo services could go back to 29000 units as early as late Jan to free up a few 22000. The situation on the peak trains to/from Heuston is that bad apparently.
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
916
Sorry to say, the cost of regauging would be phenomenal, what new wheelsets and even bogies, plus maybe more. utter rubish.

New bogies, fitting IR signalling eqt. Thats it. Remember the leasing company had no issue with costs when the 9 car 222s were supposed to be heading our way.

I doubt they would change coupler heights. They would not be able to couple to other IR units but could still be rescued by a loco if needed.
 

DT611

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
464
I live in Dublin myself and know several IR staff that mentioned this to me about 2 months ago.

Any UK units would be based in Drogheda and kept on east coast/Sligo duties.

It would make driver training, maintenance and diagramming simpler.
Some of the staff are not happy (as usual).

One other rumour doing the rounds is that almost all of the Sligo services could go back to 29000 units as early as late Jan to free up a few 22000. The situation on the peak trains to/from Heuston is that bad apparently.

thanks for the information.
If true, 29s being put back on sligo services again is very bad news especially for the users of connolly suburban services as they are hugely over-crowded as well and those 29s off those services means quite a loss of capacity.
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
916
thanks for the information.
If true, 29s being put back on sligo services again is very bad news especially for the users of connolly suburban services as they are hugely over-crowded as well and those 29s off those services means quite a loss of capacity.

Apparently thats why the new Sligo line timetable is the way it is. My flatmate travels home to his parents in Sligo and hates the new timetable. He has said he will start driving up if it does go over to 29000!
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,132
Give the Irish the 442 fleet, fit them with the bogies from their scrapped MkIII squadron, convert to push-pull and use whatever GE diesels they've got left
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
916
Give the Irish the 442 fleet, fit them with the bogies from their scrapped MkIII squadron, convert to push-pull and use whatever GE diesels they've got left
A few problems there..

All the bogies are gone, Ireland has no GE locos, they are GM. And the only locos that have HEP (class 201) are banned from the two routes that the imported stock is to be used on.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,078
A few problems there..

All the bogies are gone, Ireland has no GE locos, they are GM. And the only locos that have HEP (class 201) are banned from the two routes that the imported stock is to be used on.

And the HEP on those locos was abandoned due to the wear and tear that using it caused!

But yes, apart from all of that.....
 

DT611

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
464
Apparently thats why the new Sligo line timetable is the way it is. My flatmate travels home to his parents in Sligo and hates the new timetable. He has said he will start driving up if it does go over to 29000!

Yeah tbh he likely won't be the only one deciding to take an alternative form of transport should 29s come back to being regular on the line again. that will be the least of IE'S worries though as the connolly suburban passengers are already annoyed enough with the fall out of the issues caused by the 10 minute dart.

Tbh i'd be surprised if the timetable was specifically changed back just to facilitate reintroducing 29 running as actually 29s running the previous time table would in itself be quite an increase in capacity even where replaceing a double ICR and it would mean less 29s been taken from the suburbans to run it compared to the existing time table. the reason some services were cut in the first place was due to the recession so i'd be surprised if a return to a 2 hourly service wasn't on the cards at some stage but i may be wrong.
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
916
I am not sure about the whole timetable but was told that was the alleged reason for putting the old 18.00 to Sligo back to 19:00 (as you know it goes a few mins later but people always call it "the 6 o'clock" ).
It added a extra service to Longford and would allow a 29000 to do a early peak out and back to Maynooth and then form the 19:15 to Sligo.

How much truth is in that, I don't know but its the first time I have ever seen the Sligo train not leaving around 18:00.

I know it was musical chairs sometimes as people would board before the seat reservation came up. And you always get people that refuse to move.
 
Last edited:

DT611

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
464
I am not sure about the whole timetable but was told that was the alleged reason for putting the old 18.00 to Sligo back to 19:00 (as you know it goes a few mins later but people always call it "the 6 o'clock" ).
It added a extra service to Longford and would allow a 29000 to do a early peak out and back to Maynooth and then form the 19:15 to Sligo.

How much truth is in that, I don't know but its the first time I have ever seen the Sligo train not leaving around 18:00.

ah i see. certainly longford on it's own merrits justifies an extra and later service so i'd well believe that a timetable change took place to facilitate that.
 

PomWombat

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2018
Messages
116
Not really. We are short of budget DMUs like 150s not regional DMUs like the 170s and 185s. The 769s are going to run services currently run by Pacers and 150s. 185s are tailored to the routes they are currently operating and are not suitable for long term use for other operators. Northern might benefit from using 185s for a few months after the PRM deadline but if they need more regional stock it is much better value to order extra 195s, which is why they have recently ordered 3 more.

Northern are losing 30% of their fleet capacity, as their budget Pacer DMUs get scrapped. And that capacity is being replaced by decent, speedy, regional units in the 195.

The next step will be replacing the 150's ... but if they can't use things like the 170 and 185 to cascade down, what are they actually going to replace them with? They're starting to look top-heavy in the balance between regional and local.

Is something like Porterbrook's Flex experiment intended to make the 170 more usable on stopping services?

Or will the DfT's target of bi-mode force the next franchisee to take on another large batch of new units, with no real option for cascading down that low?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,644
Location
Redcar
Let's stick to the topic. We have plenty of threads to hash out the various other rolling stock conundrums that plague the network. The future of Northern's fleet is definitely not the topic of this thread!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top