matt_splat
Member
- Joined
- 19 May 2012
- Messages
- 897
I heard a rumor that first may have loaned some drivers from BOS to CT Plus to help them out does any one know if this is true?
This is what Iv been told.I heard a rumor that first may have loaned some drivers from BOS to CT Plus to help them out does any one know if this is true?
No this is not true.I heard a rumor that first may have loaned some drivers from BOS to CT Plus to help them out does any one know if this is true?
It may be overkill though I have seen some decent loads to UWE from town (not surprisingly).Having the M1 every 10 mins until midnight is overkill, I haven’t seen more then 5 people on 1 bus at a time !
Just made a return trip only far as UWE arriving at 17:30 and 20-30 students boarded here. Yes a 20 min frequency is more then plenty after 1900 in the evening.It may be overkill though I have seen some decent loads to UWE from town (not surprisingly).
It is early days but every 10 mins at night does look challenging.
It would have worked better with only every 20 mins between U.W.E and Cribbs in the eveningIt may be overkill though I have seen some decent loads to UWE from town (not surprisingly).
It is early days but every 10 mins at night does look challenging.
One thing to note is not all passengers are aware of that Metrobuses only stop at Metrobus stops only and one passenger did try to attempt to board by pulling their arm out at a non Metrobus stop in Bradley Stoke and the driver drove pass.
The Webbs Wood stops can be confusing for those unused to bus travel. The southbound stop is north of the roundabout and is used also by the T1, 3B and 73. On the opposite side of the road there is a stop which is served by northbound T1, 73 and 3Bs, but NOT the m1. The northbound m1 stop is hidden away south of the roundabout and is NOT served by the 73 and 3B. So for a trip north, which for most destinations might be convenient by either a m1, T1 or 73, you have to make a choice of which stop you use and hope the next bus that comes along will one that stops there! I would have placed the northbound metrobus stop north of the roundabout, but I'm sure there must be a logical reason for putting it on the south side?People putting their hands out to board at non MetroBus bus stops happened a couple of times on my first journey on it on Sunday. Fortunately for them the driver stopped for them and the other member of staff onboard explained that it was not a MetroBus bus stop, but they'd let them on today. But people will need to learn that MetroBus does not stop at all the normal bus stops along the routes they take! And they need to find out/locate where their nearest MetroBus stops are. Good on that driver on the service you were on for just driving past.
Is the Southbound stop still physically two stops about 5 yards apart, a traditional flagged stop and then *immediately* the metrobus stop?The Webbs Wood stops can be confusing for those unused to bus travel. The southbound stop is north of the roundabout and is used also by the T1, 3B and 73. On the opposite side of the road there is a stop which is served by northbound T1, 73 and 3Bs, but NOT the m1. The northbound m1 stop is hidden away south of the roundabout and is NOT served by the 73 and 3B. So for a trip north, which for most destinations might be convenient by either a m1, T1 or 73, you have to make a choice of which stop you use and hope the next bus that comes along will one that stops there! I would have placed the northbound metrobus stop north of the roundabout, but I'm sure there must be a logical reason for putting it on the south side?
The old bus stop flag is still there, but as the iPoint and displays in the shelter show details for all routes I think you could say the stop has officially moved a few yards.Is the Southbound stop still physically two stops about 5 yards apart, a traditional flagged stop and then *immediately* the metrobus stop?
The Webbs Wood stops can be confusing for those unused to bus travel. The southbound stop is north of the roundabout and is used also by the T1, 3B and 73. On the opposite side of the road there is a stop which is served by northbound T1, 73 and 3Bs, but NOT the m1. The northbound m1 stop is hidden away south of the roundabout and is NOT served by the 73 and 3B. So for a trip north, which for most destinations might be convenient by either a m1, T1 or 73, you have to make a choice of which stop you use and hope the next bus that comes along will one that stops there! I would have placed the northbound metrobus stop north of the roundabout, but I'm sure there must be a logical reason for putting it on the south side?
I meant stop on the north side of the roundabout instead of the south side. I agree, the m1 shouldn't stop on both sides. The south side stop is very close to Great Meadow anyway. My point was you can't see the northbound stop from the southbound one, whereas the 73 and T1 stop more or less opposite, and very visible to passengers catching an m1 into town, who might therefore assume that was where northbound buses would stop.I don't think it's a big deal as only locals will use these stops. The M1 only stops at designated stops, whereas the T1 will probably stop at all stops, northbound that will mean both sides of thel roundabout. I wouldn't say the northbound M1 stop is hidden away, after all it has an well lit bus shelter and iPoint, the northbound 73/3B stop only has a stop sign.
I take your point that the stops can't be opposite each other, and need to be staggered because of the road layout. It would have been better to have a separate bus lane approaching the north side of the roundabout for southbound buses. However, we're now stuck with the present arrangement. The irony is that there is a bus lane south of Great Meadow which is probably much longer than necessary - does traffic really tail back that far, even in the peaks? Perhaps the resources used for that would have been better employed building two short bus lanes at Webbs Wood and Great Meadow southbound metrobus stops.The Metrobus stops are staggered at this part of the route for obvious traffic reasons. The roads are too narrow (despite there being plenty of grass areas to the side where the Tram line was once planned) for 2 buses to be stopped side by side, no other traffic could pass. Bus stop turnout's were dismissed as not required as the buses would not be stationary for too long, but that was probably assuming M1 only and not the additional T1 (pay onboard with longer dwell times) as well.
The south side stop (northbound) is very close to Great Meadow *southbound*.The south side stop is very close to Great Meadow anyway.
Yes. Very yes. Often back beyond Great Meadow, sometimes beyond Webbs Wood.The irony is that there is a bus lane south of Great Meadow which is probably much longer than necessary - does traffic really tail back that far, even in the peaks?
There was a short report about Metrobus last week on ITV News West Country. Mentioning that many people have mentioned that it's all well and good about these new Metrobus services, but they don't run through the areas they live! James Freeman mentioned that within 18 months there should be more Metrobus services up and running. Would be surprised if so, but we'll see.
Anyone got any good idea for new Metrobus services?
Yes, depends what is meant by more Metrobus services. More services under the Metrobus banner is much easier than more services with dedicated facilities (without all these people are now suggesting they wont object if it's suggested that road space is scarified for bus lanes in there areas).I know - I live near Radstock and I’m fuming
Of course, the new maps show the missing link from Long Ashton P&R to Hengrove via Highridge so that will come as well as the BPW link.
I’d sooner see the X8 Nailsea to Bristol become a Metrobus route and see it use the Ashton Vale/Ave infrastructure as a quick addition.
Perhaps also Kingswood - Emerson’s - Southmead - call it the M18??
Scarified? You roughing it?Yes, depends what is meant by more Metrobus services. More services under the Metrobus banner is much easier than more services with dedicated facilities (without all these people are now suggesting they wont object if it's suggested that road space is scarified for bus lanes in there areas).
I'd imagine that, for most journeys, the existing X8 route is quicker! And no need for guided buses. However m8 does sound like a nice number for advertisers! (Out for the night with my m8!)
I think the next metrobus services will be in no particular order:
1) Long Ashton - Hengrove Park
2) City Centre - Thornbury (Basically a slightly upgraded T1! With a few improvements between Aztec West and Thornbury)
3) Bristol Parkway - Emersons Green (Will be extended to Cribbs once the extension is up and running)
4) Bristol Bus Station - Weston-super-Mare
5) Hengrove Park - Cribbs Causeway (Via Filton)
Then the next batch will be dependent on the A4 - A37 link.
The metrobus extension from U.W.E - Parkway - Filton Airfield - Cribbs CausewaySuggestions 1-4 could be possible yes. But suggestion 5 of another Hengrove Park-Cribbs Causeway service. When there's already the M1 Metrobus and the 75 & 76. Not sure about that. I presume when you say via Filton, it would run via Gloucester Road the same as the 75? And which route do you think it would take between Hengrove Park and Centre?
The metrobus extension from U.W.E - Parkway - Filton Airfield - Cribbs Causeway
The original idea of Metrobus was that it's high frequency with traffic priority available, Redland has always struggled as an area to serve both because of the local roads and the percentage of bus users. Plus it has a rail service. Given the, reduced, levels of service recently I cant see it getting new services in the near future.I'd like to see some new Metrobus services introduced that serve areas of Bristol that are currently poorly served by bus services, or areas where the only services are ones that go such a long way round. For instance Redland. Between Redland and Broadmead the 9 and 72 go such a long twisty turny way round, which takes even longer when there is a lot of traffic about. There could be a new cross-city Metrobus service that runs non-stop between Lewins Mead and Redland Station via Cheltenham Road and Zetland Road. Then from there continues up Redland Road and onto Coldharbour Road and Kellaway Avenue, with limited stops along these roads. Then from Kellaway Avenue..... not sure! But just an idea of a new service that I'd like to see.
The original idea of Metrobus was that it's high frequency with traffic priority available, Redland has always struggled as an area to serve both because of the local roads and the percentage of bus users. Plus it has a rail service. Given the, reduced, levels of service recently I cant see it getting new services in the near future.
I can imagine the council meeting!Can't help but agree with you. Doesn't really fit the premise for metrobus.
I know there's a parallel rail line but I might have thought Keynsham to Bristol might be another corridor that they could upgrade relatively easily. You have a significant amount of existing Bath Road bus lane. There are some bottlenecks to sort out - the junction with West Town Lane, inbound through Briz village (past the Fame school), Bath Hill (outbound - not certain how you solve that), and worst by the Paintworks where I got stuck on Monday morning. Perhaps they should have got some s106 money from the developers of Somerdale and used it to improve bus priority to/from Keynsham as a pre-emptive measure rather than wasting it on the 636, carting fresh air around. Just a thought.