• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Let's put it to the forum: which has been the worst Secretary of State for Transport?

Which has been the worst Secretary of State for Transport?

  • Tom King

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nicholas Ridley

    Votes: 8 2.7%
  • John Moore

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Paul Channon

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cecil Parkinson

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • Malcolm Rifkind

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • John MacGregor

    Votes: 5 1.7%
  • Brian Mawhinney

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • George Young

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • John Prescott

    Votes: 17 5.7%
  • Stephen Byers

    Votes: 7 2.3%
  • Alistair Darling

    Votes: 12 4.0%
  • Douglas Alexander

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ruth Kelly

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • Geoff Hoon

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • Andrew Adonis

    Votes: 7 2.3%
  • Philip Hammond

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • Justine Greening

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • Patrick McLoughlin

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris Grayling

    Votes: 221 73.9%

  • Total voters
    299
Status
Not open for further replies.

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,383
Location
The UK
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Sceptre

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2009
Messages
187
Location
Leeds
Chris Grayling's incompetence is matched only by how bent Ernest Marples was.

Honorable mentions also include Alistair Darling (for what he did to transport projects in the north) and Tom Fraser (for the spectacular u-turn on Labour's pledge to reverse the Beeching cuts)

If you are basing that on the cancellation of electrification schemes, it's wide of the mark.
You should be blaming the NR GRIP review system for failing to deliver electrification for anything like the costs that were quoted when the schemes were authorised.
Grayling had no choice but to call a halt, until the costs were reduced to something which supports the business case.
We're still waiting (and in the meantime ordering bi-modes).

So what about the Deansgate corridor works? That TWAO has been sitting on Grayling's desk for three years (and seven days) and has made one of the headline projects in the Northern Hub into a white elephant.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,887
Location
Sheffield
So what about the Deansgate corridor works? That TWAO has been sitting on Grayling's desk for three years (and seven days) and has made one of the headline projects in the Northern Hub into a white elephant.

That may clinch the vote!
 

Chris999999

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2010
Messages
238
That may clinch the vote!
The vote is not valid because so many candidates are missing. Even Steven Norris is missing. He may not have been the worst, but someone may want to do so purely on the basis of his autobiography. Isherwood may have wanted to
 

camflyer

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2018
Messages
876
While no fan of Grayling at all, I think it's a little unfair to dump so much blame onto him personally. Most Sec of States aren't in the job long enough to understand their brief and fewer had any interest in the subject at all. Even those who seemed to care about it (remember Pescott's "integrated public transport" plans) achieved very little. There are whole systematic problems beyond who is the here today gone tomorrow minister.
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,375
Grayling knows enough to do a full 180 degree turn on things his predecessor agreed such as devolving suburban rail in London. Even London tories mostly want it but he's obsessed with petty games.

His ideology causes problems in every position he's been in - and it goes back before transport.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,087
Grayling knows enough to do a full 180 degree turn on things his predecessor agreed such as devolving suburban rail in London. Even London tories mostly want it but he's obsessed with petty games.

His ideology causes problems in every position he's been in - and it goes back before transport.
Ideology implies ideas, or ideals. I'm not sure I'd accuse him of ever having either. Idiotology perhaps!
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,672
Location
Mold, Clwyd
A bit of research Shows Paul Channon to have been jinxed. According to Wikipedia:

He just missed the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster (March 1987).
I think that event forced ferries to have accurate personal passenger lists and check-in, something that was bequeathed subsequently to Eurotunnel and Eurostar - no just hopping on the next train.

My problem is my age. Half those candidates were around before I was alive, even more before I was aware that such a person as the Secretary of State for Transport existed, and even more for me to be politically aware enough to know what they were actually doing. Thus, I can't really make an informed opinion on Malcom Rifkind, for example, let alone how competant Chris Grayling was in comparison to him.

Malcolm Rifkind was a decent Transport Sec 1990-92, shook hands with the French at Channel Tunnel breakthrough, and was a regular Caledonian Sleeper customer as a Scottish MP (as many were then).
He was pro-privatisation, but opposed splitting operations from infrastructure, which was implemented after he left the post.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,429
Nicholas Ridley for deregulation of buses alone. At least Castle tried to make our roads safer with the introduction of the Breathalyser. To be honest, it’s quite hard to find a good SOS. It’s a dumping ground for failed Ministers. This must also reflect quality of Civil Servants within Department.

Castle introduced the breathalyser (how many lives has that saved?); IIRC created the PTEs; introduced line-specific subsidies.

She was also - most unusually - a non-driver SoS.

What's not to like?
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,429
That list really underlines how poor a set of SoSs we have had over the years!

I haven't voted. When the list includes Ridley and Grayling how can one choose a single one as the worst?
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018

Andrew Nelson

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
702
While no fan of Grayling at all, I think it's a little unfair to dump so much blame onto him personally. Most Sec of States aren't in the job long enough to understand their brief and fewer had any interest in the subject at all. Even those who seemed to care about it (remember Pescott's "integrated public transport" plans) achieved very little. There are whole systematic problems beyond who is the here today gone tomorrow minister.

Part of:

 

Andrew Nelson

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
702
I'll jump in here to point out that this phrase ('bent as a nine-bob note') has two very different meanings.
  1. Dishonest
  2. Homosexual
I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine which of these definitions @James Heck means... ;)

"His retirement was not particularly dignified; he was under intensive investigation by the Inland Revenue, who had become interested in the highly irregular financial web he had spun between Britain, France and Liechtenstein".

From: https://www.conservativehome.com/th...d-up-the-1950s-and-he-made-things-happen.html
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,297
Location
Fenny Stratford
No one aspires to be transport secretary. It is either a staging post for a climb upwards, a storage post for a slide downwards or a post used to placate a supporter who needs a none job.

oh and the answer is Grayling
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,099
Location
Reading
Castle introduced the breathalyser (how many lives has that saved?); IIRC created the PTEs; introduced line-specific subsidies.

She was also - most unusually - a non-driver SoS.

What's not to like?
She approved most of the line and station closures proposed in the first Beeching report although Labour's line for the 1964 General Election was that it would stop them.

Hypocrite.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Blatantly obvious who's going to win it. What surprises me is people picking Adonis, he's the one who got the OLE ball rolling. I'd be intrigued to know why anyone would would pick him, when the rather useless Ruth Kelly and Buff Hoon were in post as a comparison. Probably be fairer to pick one from each of the parties as there will be some bias to account for.:D;)

This list of secretarial failures does highlight one thing. Instead of electing "one size fits all" MP's. Maybe instead, we should vote to elect people to run departments . I'd sooner elect someone with a clear interest in the job, not someone climbing the greasy pole or falling back down .
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
While no fan of Grayling at all, I think it's a little unfair to dump so much blame onto him personally. Most Sec of States aren't in the job long enough to understand their brief and fewer had any interest in the subject at all.
He's had quite a while in the post. It's fine to have a few screw ups in the first year but constantly for 3 years? Inexcusable IMO. Should've been sacked after the May timetable disaster.
 

Sceptre

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2009
Messages
187
Location
Leeds
She approved most of the line and station closures proposed in the first Beeching report although Labour's line for the 1964 General Election was that it would stop them.

Hypocrite.

That was Fraser. Castle approved closures too, but they started to go back down to the pre-Report mean under her.
 

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
3,217
Location
At home or at the pub
Has to be Grayling, not known as failing Grayling for nothing, he keeps his job as he's perfect stooge for the equally incompetent May, the latest bout of incompetence the awarding of a £13.8 million ferry contract to a company which had never run a ferry service and owned no ships tips the balance, plus he's been incompetent at every department he's been involved in. When he was Justice Secretary, ban on books, which was ruled illegal by the High Court, his proposed cuts to Legal Aid which saw barristers and solicitors strike for the first time in British history.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,002
Location
Yorks
She approved most of the line and station closures proposed in the first Beeching report although Labour's line for the 1964 General Election was that it would stop them.

Hypocrite.

She did get rid of Beeching before he had a chance to implement his second report, which would have seen many of our most important secondary routes run down.
 

A0wen

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,472
There can be only one answer - Prescott. Makes the bits of 6x2 at my local Wickes seem intelligent.
 

A0wen

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,472
You are the fella he punched, and I claim my five pounds!

Wrong, as it happens.

But at the time he did that, his coach was pelted with some eggs when he was visiting somewhere in Northants and the local plod took it upon themselves to prosecute said protesters. As someone rightly asked the then Chief Constable, it seems that throwing eggs is an offence whereas throwing a punch isn't, perhaps next time the protesters should have thrown a punch at the then deputy PM.

It seems senior Labour figures aren't beyond assaulting people -
"Simpson became a BBC reporter in 1970. On his very first day, the then-prime minister Harold Wilson, angered by what he saw as the sudden and impudent appearance of the novice's microphone, punched him in the stomach" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Simpson_(journalist)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top