• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Standards for M and E tickets?

Status
Not open for further replies.

cjp

Member
Joined
28 Jan 2012
Messages
1,059
Location
In front of a computer
Mod Note: Posts #1 - #26 originally in this thread.

Are there no standards for these electronic tickets?
There is a standard for the nice orange cards but of course even those get replaced by till roll tickets when bought on a train.
As I said earlier I will stick to my pieces of card for now thank you very much
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
Are there no standards for these electronic tickets?
There is a standard for the nice orange cards but of course even those get replaced by till roll tickets when bought on a train.
As I said earlier I will stick to my pieces of card for now thank you very much
Standards, ha, who gives a damn about those?!
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,164
Are there no standards for these electronic tickets?
Of course there are. There are formats for both m-tickets and e-tickets, in the same way there are formats for credit card sized tickets and paper roll tickets. The differences you are referring to are about delivery, in the same way as credit card sized tickets can be sent by post or collected as ToD.
 
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
359
Just to muddy waters further - I use the Trainline app regularly for similar journeys on the same route (normally radiating from Birmingham New Street) and sometimes I get an M-Ticket which needs to be downloaded and activated - other times I get an e-ticket that drops straight into my Apple Wallet.

This seems to be entirely random and no standardisation at all.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
The differences you are referring to are about delivery, in the same way as credit card sized tickets can be sent by post or collected as ToD.

There is just as much a need for the delivery method to be standardised as the actual medium being produced.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,813
Location
Scotland
There is just as much a need for the delivery method to be standardised as the actual medium being produced.
Why? People aren't locked in to any specific vendor. As long as customers are able to find an option that suits their needs then all is good.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Why? People aren't locked in to any specific vendor. As long as customers are able to find an option that suits their needs then all is good.

There are complaints earlier in the thread about the differing delivery and activation methods.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,813
Location
Scotland
There are complaints earlier in the thread about the differing delivery and activation methods.
That's different. The issues raised earlier were largely around m-ticket apps that require a data connection to open, even after the ticket has been activated, and one specific case where GWR treat e-tickets as if they are m-tickets (only accessible in their app).

There's no pressing need to force TOCs to offer the same delivery options. If TOC A choses not offer paper tickets by mail then that's their loss - if I want paper tickets I'll just order from TOC B instead.

Similarly, if TOC C allows e-tickets to be displayed in their app (or saved from the app) and TOC D doesn't display them in the app but sends them by email and allows you to show that instead, there's no problem as long as they make it clear how to use the ticket.
 
Last edited:

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
2,295
That's different. The issues raised earlier were largely around m-ticket apps that require a data connection to open, even after the ticket has been activated, and one specific case where GWR treat e-tickets as if they are m-tickets (only accessible in their app).

There's no pressing need to force TOCs to offer the same delivery options. If TOC A choses not offer paper tickets by mail then that's their loss - if I want paper tickets I'll just order from TOC B instead.

Similarly, if TOC C allows e-tickets to be displayed in their app (or saved from the app) and TOC D doesn't display them in the app but sends them by email and allows you to show that instead, there's no problem as long as they make it clear how to use the ticket.
I disagree. Part of the problem is that electronic tickets are coming with various labels and requirements for what are nominally the same product. This is leading to confusion for irregular consumers and causing them problems on train. A level of standardisation of delivery means that all get the same experience.

Meanwhile, I will continue to prefer orange card.
 

jrh2254

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2014
Messages
355
If someone buy's an e-ticket advance fare for a specific train and they don't activate it until say the guard comes round, is this against the rules?
What advantage is there in not activating the e-ticket as it expires as soon as the train reaches its destination anyway?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,164
If someone buy's an e-ticket advance fare for a specific train and they don't activate it until say the guard comes round, is this against the rules?
What advantage is there in not activating the e-ticket as it expires as soon as the train reaches its destination anyway?
An e-ticket does not require activation.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,855
Location
Yorkshire
Ok thanks. What about if its an advance m-ticket?

Really it does need to be activated beforehand - TheTrainLine offers travel insurance so technically you could probably refund it if it remained inactivated. Just like you need to collect tickets before boarding, you need to activate before boarding..
 

jrh2254

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2014
Messages
355
Really it does need to be activated beforehand - TheTrainLine offers travel insurance so technically you could probably refund it if it remained inactivated. Just like you need to collect tickets before boarding, you need to activate before boarding..
ok thanks , I had not thought of the insurance angle!
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,813
Location
Scotland
I disagree. Part of the problem is that electronic tickets are coming with various labels and requirements for what are nominally the same product. This is leading to confusion for irregular consumers and causing them problems on train. A level of standardisation of delivery means that all get the same experience.
The thing that most people don't understand is the difference between e-tickets and m-tickets - hence why I noted that TOCs need to do a better job of explaining how to use what they just sold.
 

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
The thing that most people don't understand is the difference between e-tickets and m-tickets - hence why I noted that TOCs need to do a better job of explaining how to use what they just sold.
The issue goes beyond that though. An e-ticket is something that can be shown in any format, without activation, just like an airline e-ticket can be (they have been all on e-tickets for nearly two decades at this point!). If you are given an "e-ticket" that can only be shown within one particular app then it isn't an e-ticket at all, and it's severely misleading to use that term. Unfortunately the FirstGroup TOCs somehow think that's ok, as it's the way their apps work.
 

wildcard

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
99
A couple of questions before I consider using m-tickets ( or m-tickets masquerading as e-tickets ) .
I understand the ticket has to be "downloaded" to the phone as a separate conscious action by the user - why isn't this automatic at the point payment is taken ? (i.e. confirmation of your card details )
Does activation of the ticket before boarding need a data connection. Is this app dependant - if so why ?
If no data connection is required - why do some OP's assert that a lack of a connection is the reason they couldn't display the ticket to the inspector ( and hence "not their fault" ).
As an aside barrier scanning of an e-ticket on a mobile seems highly unreliable - I don't think I have ever seen one work first time at Euston or New Street .
Personally the only time I would consider a m-ticket is as a discounted carnet type offering otherwise I will stick with cardboard.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,813
Location
Scotland
I understand the ticket has to be "downloaded" to the phone as a separate conscious action by the user - why isn't this automatic at the point payment is taken ?
Because the device you're using to purchase the ticket may not be the device you'll use to travel (e.g. buying a ticket for a journey in a month's time, but getting a new phone next week or you might want to buy tickets for more than one person's use).
Does activation of the ticket before boarding need a data connection. Is this app dependant - if so why ?
No, it does not.
If no data connection is required - why do some OP's assert that a lack of a connection is the reason they couldn't display the ticket to the inspector ( and hence "not their fault" ).
In some cases it is because the app itself refuses to open without a data connection (very poor design), but more likely for the same reason(s) that some people only date carnet tickets when they see the inspector coming.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,822
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
A couple of questions before I consider using m-tickets ( or m-tickets masquerading as e-tickets ) .

E-tickets do not require activation, they are sent as a phone-screen-sized PDF by e-mail and you can use them how you want.

With some TOCs you can also download them as M-tickets which do require activation but the original E-ticket remains valid.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,084
I can see how confusing this must be to the casual user whose experience of buying tickets online is more likely to be of event tickets. If I don't need to "activate" a ticket from WeGotTickets on my phone why would I assume that a train ticket worked differently to the one for the gig that I was travelling to?
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,813
Location
Scotland
I can see how confusing this must be to the casual user whose experience of buying tickets online is more likely to be of event tickets. If I don't need to "activate" a ticket from WeGotTickets on my phone why would I assume that a train ticket worked differently to the one for the gig that I was travelling to?
One would hope that you wouldn't need to assume - it would be made clear as part of the purchase journey that you need to activate the ticket. Most apps do, I can't speak for all of them.
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,084
One would hope that you wouldn't need to assume - it would be made clear as part of the purchase journey that you need to activate the ticket. Most apps do, I can't speak for all of them.
From working in the entertainment industry I know that customers will open a door with a "sold out" sign, walk up to the box office and stand beside another "sold out" sign to try and buy a ticket. Whatever you do to make T&Cs "clear" a significant minority will fail to see them. Better to be consistent not only across the industry but, where appropriate, between industries.
 

[.n]

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2016
Messages
708
Because the device you're using to purchase the ticket may not be the device you'll use to travel (e.g. buying a ticket for a journey in a month's time, but getting a new phone next week or you might want to buy tickets for more than one person's use).

No, it does not.
In some cases it is because the app itself refuses to open without a data connection (very poor design), but more likely for the same reason(s) that some people only date carnet tickets when they see the inspector coming.

I think with some apps you do need a data connection at time of activation (otherwise how does the "word of the day" graphic get the correct word?)

As one of the people who has previously posted, around the poorly coded apps that do not open at all without a data connection, I resent the implication you make around the connection between this and those who don't date carnets
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,813
Location
Scotland
I think with some apps you do need a data connection at time of activation (otherwise how does the "word of the day" graphic get the correct word?)
Hence the comment about poor design. TOTP (Time-based One Time Password) doesn't require a data connection.
As one of the people who has previously posted, around the poorly coded apps that do not open at all without a data connection, I resent the implication you make around the connection between this and those who don't date carnets
I suggest you re-read my post. I clearly said that some people can't open the app without a data connection and other people choose not to activate for other reasons, likely similar to how some people don't date carnets (and made it clear that there may be more than one reason).
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,855
Location
Yorkshire
E-tickets do not require activation, they are sent as a phone-screen-sized PDF by e-mail and you can use them how you want.

With some TOCs you can also download them as M-tickets which do require activation but the original E-ticket remains valid.

But some e tickets are app only e.g. TPE app.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,787
Location
Yorkshire
The new style "e-tickets" are good; you can show the barcode on any device (or on paper), the standards for them are sensible, and they do not need "activating".

My understanding is that "m-tickets" are an interim/temporary solution and that in future all tickets should be "e-tickets", can anyone confirm if that's correct?

Print@Home tickets were a disaster, as people were unfairly penalised for not printing them, and m-tickets are similarly a disaster because of issues with activation, apps, and all sorts of other nonsense.
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
3,737
The new style "e-tickets" are good; you can show the barcode on any device (or on paper), the standards for them are sensible, and they do not need "activating".

My understanding is that "m-tickets" are an interim/temporary solution and that in future all tickets should be "e-tickets", can anyone confirm if that's correct?

Print@Home tickets were a disaster, as people were unfairly penalised for not printing them, and m-tickets are similarly a disaster because of issues with activation, apps, and all sorts of other nonsense.
There's a general direction of travel to eTickets.
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
3,737
But some e tickets are app only e.g. TPE app.
Those would be m-tickets then.

Basically:
- needs an app and to be activated = m-ticket
- doesn't need an app, or to be activated, and can be popped in your Apple Wallet or just shown on screen or on paper = eTicket

The barcode's the same in both.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top