• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Annoying jargon in railway announcements

Status
Not open for further replies.

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,081
Location
Liverpool
I'm sure this is a topic which keeps cropping up. But ever since passengers have been manipulated into being customers, the infiltration of commercial management-speak into official railway announcements seems to continue.

A common theme seems to be a denial that railways are railways. 'Airline' seating is an example. Another one that struck me today (but I have been aware of for some time) is the noun 'service' in place of 'train'. I mean the nonsense of 'the next service is out of service' . What on earth is wrong with saying 'the next train is out of service'?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,359
And I still consider myself a passenger, not a 'customer', as all railway companies seem to think we are.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,600
If you want to go back to being passengers with no rights other than a vague promise you might get to where you're going at some stage in the future then crack on.

Being a customer doesn't prevent you from being a passenger *but* it is good at getting staff to focus a little more on looking after you rather than having you as an inconvenient distraction on board a train that will be travelling about with or without your presence.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,420
Airline (style) seating is a pretty long-standing thing from BR days. What’s the obvious alternative?

“Arriving into” really grinds my gears...
 

306024

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
3,946
Location
East Anglia
‘Congestion’. Hate it. Just sounds like a more modern form of ‘operating difficulties’.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,033
Location
here to eternity
"We are due to arrive at XXX at approximately 15.00".

No, there is no approximately about it, we are due to arrive there at exactly 15.00 as per the timetable!
 

bunnahabhain

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,070
I'm probably a little unusual by my announcements use "Guard" and not "Senior Conductor", and "Passenger" instead of "Customer". A friend was on my train the other day and commented when I used "Lancaster Castle" and "Carlisle Citadel" as well.
 

tom73

Member
Joined
24 Apr 2018
Messages
211
A person intending to travel by train has to engage in a retail transaction in order to procure the documentation allowing him/her to use the train and is therefore a (paying) customer.
The Train Operating Company is providing a service in the form of a train. If said train is delayed/cancelled then the service being provided by the operator is delayed/cancelled.
The term "airline seat or seating" refers specifically to airline style seat or seating as in the type of row by row seating used on a commercial aircraft.
The term "station stop" refers to a scheduled stop at a station as opposed to any other kind of cessation of movement by the train operating the service which typically has several calling points.
"We are due to arrive at (destination) at approximately (time) is an honest statement that takes into account unexpected delay en route which may cause the train to be a little late at its destination. On my last southbound LNER journey, my journey was delayed by a late running slow moving Northern Rail service in front of us making my scheduled arrival time back in London no longer reasonably definite but approximate.
What is wrong with people on here? Seems this whole thread thus far is devoted to nit picking.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
See it. say it. sorted! seems a bit daft but I have to admit memorable as it should be so a bit of a paradox there.
 

Fred26

Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,107
Staff not using the 24-hour clock, either in announcements or when talking to passengers face-to-face.
 

pitdiver

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2012
Messages
1,076
Location
Nottinghamshire
What annoys me is the expression " Final Destination" The destination is always the last stop so why say final. Some TOCs use the expression final stop which mskes more sense to me anyway.,
 

Deafdoggie

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2016
Messages
3,086
A person intending to travel by train has to engage in a retail transaction in order to procure the documentation allowing him/her to use the train and is therefore a (paying) customer.
The Train Operating Company is providing a service in the form of a train. If said train is delayed/cancelled then the service being provided by the operator is delayed/cancelled.
The term "airline seat or seating" refers specifically to airline style seat or seating as in the type of row by row seating used on a commercial aircraft.
The term "station stop" refers to a scheduled stop at a station as opposed to any other kind of cessation of movement by the train operating the service which typically has several calling points.
"We are due to arrive at (destination) at approximately (time) is an honest statement that takes into account unexpected delay en route which may cause the train to be a little late at its destination. On my last southbound LNER journey, my journey was delayed by a late running slow moving Northern Rail service in front of us making my scheduled arrival time back in London no longer reasonably definite but approximate.
What is wrong with people on here? Seems this whole thread thus far is devoted to nit picking.

I couldn't agree more! Some people just want to find fault with everything. I would rather be a customer than a passenger. It is called "Customer Service" for a reason. A passenger is just a statistic, "Passenger numbers are down". I too have never understood the annoyance of some people at using an approximate time for arrival. Until the train actually arrives, surely it can never been certain what exact time it will be. If anything is wrong, it is those who say "The train will be arriving at ..."

What annoys me is the expression " Final Destination" The destination is always the last stop so why say final. Some TOCs use the expression final stop which mskes more sense to me anyway.,

Not all destinations are final, some services operate a circular service, so the initial destination is not the final destination, as it loops round to head back a different way.
 

fairysdad

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2010
Messages
928
Location
London, Surrey... bit of a blur round here...
A friend was on my train the other day and commented when I used "Lancaster Castle" and "Carlisle Citadel" as well.
Arguably, that's just as bad given that those aren't the station names. Now, to be fair, it is probable that a lot of passengers will realise what you mean, but if you have somebody who isn't local, doesn't have knowledge of the local area or its history, have been told they need to alight your service at a station called 'Carlisle', and hear you announce 'Carlisle Citadel' - it's quite possible that they will assume that 'Carlisle Citadel' is a suburban station and thus miss their station (or be very close to it if, when you pull into the station, they notice that it's not a suburban station and the main one).
 

trentside

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
14 Aug 2010
Messages
3,337
Location
Messroom
Staff not using the 24-hour clock, either in announcements or when talking to passengers face-to-face.

I always use the 24-hour clock in announcements, and try to when talking to passengers, but you’d be surprised how often people don’t understand it...
 

talltim

Established Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
2,454
The time the train is due to arrive somewhere is fixed by the timetable. The time it is expected to arrive may vary according to circumstances and thus could be approximate.
 

bunnahabhain

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,070
Arguably, that's just as bad given that those aren't the station names. Now, to be fair, it is probable that a lot of passengers will realise what you mean, but if you have somebody who isn't local, doesn't have knowledge of the local area or its history, have been told they need to alight your service at a station called 'Carlisle', and hear you announce 'Carlisle Citadel' - it's quite possible that they will assume that 'Carlisle Citadel' is a suburban station and thus miss their station (or be very close to it if, when you pull into the station, they notice that it's not a suburban station and the main one).
Nobody can hear them anyway, the volume is bust and you only get a bing bong.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,429
I'm probably a little unusual by my announcements use "Guard" and not "Senior Conductor", and "Passenger" instead of "Customer". A friend was on my train the other day and commented when I used "Lancaster Castle" and "Carlisle Citadel" as well.

Ah, but did you use Preston North Union?

:D
 

dtaylor84

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2013
Messages
128
The time the train is due to arrive somewhere is fixed by the timetable. The time it is expected to arrive may vary according to circumstances and thus could be approximate.
Maybe it's due to arrive at 1459½ according to the working timetable, so "approximately 1500" would be correct.
 

westv

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2013
Messages
4,217
I've often heard "final approach" used when coming into Kings Cross. That's an aviation term.
 

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,081
Location
Liverpool
I've often heard "final approach" used when coming into Kings Cross. That's an aviation term.
The best spoof of this sort of thing is the Merseyrail guard who will say things like 'our cruising altitude is approximately one metre'. Re airline seats, I suppose there are few alternatives to the term (except bus seats?), but it isn't very accurate since most actual airline seats face the direction of travel, rather than only 50%. I don't like them anyway.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,600
A customer is someone who uses your business.
A passenger is a customer with specific additional legal rights over and above those any customer has.

The modern day passenger cum customer has far more rights than a BR era passenger ever did.

Consequently for me they are both. Unless you're Caledonian Sleeper who call them guests :lol:
 

andythebrave

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2009
Messages
480
Location
In the Marston Vale
I'm probably a little unusual by my announcements use "Guard" and not "Senior Conductor", and "Passenger" instead of "Customer". A friend was on my train the other day and commented when I used "Lancaster Castle" and "Carlisle Citadel" as well.
Good on you. Also the peated version of your username is a fine tipple.
 

eusd

Member
Joined
12 May 2015
Messages
23
Passenger is the old fashioned term. You are paying for the railway service, therefore you are a customer.
Whatever will people find to complain about next.
 

Brush 4

Member
Joined
25 Nov 2018
Messages
506
All the non railway language criticisms are valid. We are passengers in trains stopping at stations. The arrival time is set in the timetable, no point in having it if that isn't the case. Railways and airlines are different. Also boarding passes are for planes, tickets are for trains, no need for both. The train terminates at a terminus, not a terminal, which are found at airports.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top