• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Annoying jargon in railway announcements

Status
Not open for further replies.

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,294
What bugs me is the fact that "passengers" was changed to "customers" just for the sake of it and unnecessary PR
No, use of “customer” reflects that they are paying to receive a service. “Passenger” does not - they are just being carried.

If using “customer” helps drive home the message that the people who use the service are paying the wages of the staff, rather than being an inconvenience, then all the better. There is a substantial minority of railway staff who really need to get this.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,097
"Alight" - find it slightly archaic. Personally don't understand what is wrong with disembark1962
"See it, say it, sorted" :lol: - as others have said though maybe the fact I remember it suggests it serves its purpose
I also like "Alight" (one word, 2 syllables, explicit, and doesn't pretend that the train is a plane) and find that "See it, say it, sorted" grates.

"All passengers should get off here" as other connotations with the youth of today!
Like "getting off at Edge Hill" has apparently had for generations! At junior school in 1962 we were forbidden to use "get" or "got" as there was almost invariably a single word that conveyed the meaning.

In railway-speak change means leave the train, for some reason, even if there is no requirement to take any other form of transport to get to the place concerned.
No it doesn't, it means "get off here for onward travel (by rail or another mode of transport) to..." See "Alight" above!

Not used in announcements, but I wonder why the railway is so used to using 'vice'? I don't recall it being used in this context anywhere else.
Discussed on another thread recently, (must have been, as I can't see it up-thread.) Latin, apparently, but widely used in Victorian times and helped to survive by becoming railway telegraph code.
 

telstarbox

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
5,942
Location
Wennington Crossovers
I tend to use London Moorgate in PAs at stations to help let passengers on board who aren't confident/familiar travelling on trains know the train's travelling in the direction towards London.

Might sound patronising, but when you get passengers who approach you at the 'dead end' at Moorgate and ask you which end is the front of the train you can understand why.

Once 717s are in, I won't have to worry as much about the destination PAs.

I think Moorgate is the most obscure of London terminals - far less well known than say Paddington or Euston - so the confirmation is useful.
 

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,081
Location
Liverpool
In that case, 'alight' would be a more suitable term than 'change'.

As it is, I find 'alight' to be a rather pleasing, somewhat archaic-sounding word, pretty much exclusively used in respect of railway carriages and buses, and I wouldn't be surprised to find it in the modern bus and railway companies' lexicon of obsolete terms.
"Alight", as well as being archaic, must be confusing to many people whose first language is not English. I would imagine most people would think it was a warning against spontaneous combustion.
 

Rick1984

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2012
Messages
1,037
Great Northern class 387 have a horrible announcement "welcome aboard this *pause* service to..." Think the pause must be where they removed Southern or Thameslink. Sounds awful
 

Strat-tastic

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2010
Messages
1,370
Location
Outrageous Grace
Great Northern class 387 have a horrible announcement "welcome aboard this *pause* service to..." Think the pause must be where they removed Southern or Thameslink. Sounds awful

Yes, during the pause I imagine a deleted expletive and a :rolleyes: from the lady speaking.
:lol:
 

whhistle

On Moderation
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
Yes, so there is a difference.
But they essentially carry out the same job, no?
The only "significant" difference I can see is a TM instructs the driver to close the doors. A SC does it themselves.

But hey, why call people doing the same job the same thing eh?

I believe "Train Manager" was a new term when the Voyagers came in (might be wrong there though). This was around the same time a lot of job titles changed to make them sound more appealing:
Wet leisure assistant – Lifeguard
Modality manager – Nurse
Waste management and disposal technician – Bin man
Information adviser – Librarian
Direct debit and membership and professional development stock and credit administrator – Customer services administrator.
Family protection consultant – Insurance telesales worker
Investment development and research analyst – Technical helpdesk worker
Worldwide marine asset financial analyst – Accountant
Debt management officer / Field force agent – Tax collector
Coordinator of interpretive teaching – Museum tour guide
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,294
But they essentially carry out the same job, no?
The only "significant" difference I can see is a TM instructs the driver to close the doors. A SC does it themselves.

But hey, why call people doing the same job the same thing eh?

I believe "Train Manager" was a new term when the Voyagers came in (might be wrong there though). This was around the same time a lot of job titles changed to make them sound more appealing:
Wet leisure assistant – Lifeguard
Modality manager – Nurse
Waste management and disposal technician – Bin man
Information adviser – Librarian
Direct debit and membership and professional development stock and credit administrator – Customer services administrator.
Family protection consultant – Insurance telesales worker
Investment development and research analyst – Technical helpdesk worker
Worldwide marine asset financial analyst – Accountant
Debt management officer / Field force agent – Tax collector
Coordinator of interpretive teaching – Museum tour guide
Not forgetting “Train presentation team”. That’ll be the cleaners, then.
 

Deafdoggie

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2016
Messages
3,088
But they essentially carry out the same job, no?
The only "significant" difference I can see is a TM instructs the driver to close the doors. A SC does it themselves.

But hey, why call people doing the same job the same thing eh?

I believe "Train Manager" was a new term when the Voyagers came in (might be wrong there though). This was around the same time a lot of job titles changed to make them sound more appealing:

BR introduced the term "Senior Conductor" and "Train Manager". They also had "Conductor Guard" as a job, but I don't think anyone ever understood what that was! Whilst broadly all doing the same job, there are differences to grade and pay. It isn't all about the doors, not all TMs do not do doors.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
But they essentially carry out the same job, no?
The only "significant" difference I can see is a TM instructs the driver to close the doors. A SC does it themselves.

But hey, why call people doing the same job the same thing eh?

I believe "Train Manager" was a new term when the Voyagers came in (might be wrong there though). This was around the same time a lot of job titles changed to make them sound more appealing:
Wet leisure assistant – Lifeguard
Modality manager – Nurse
Waste management and disposal technician – Bin man
Information adviser – Librarian
Direct debit and membership and professional development stock and credit administrator – Customer services administrator.
Family protection consultant – Insurance telesales worker
Investment development and research analyst – Technical helpdesk worker
Worldwide marine asset financial analyst – Accountant
Debt management officer / Field force agent – Tax collector
Coordinator of interpretive teaching – Museum tour guide
I put it to you quite politely that not one of those job titles is actually true.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,214
And while we're in full pedant mode, am I the only person who gets annoyed with the announcement "We are now approaching Stockport" (or wherever) shortly before the train arrives at said station? My inner pedant wants to yell "Yes, I know, we've been approaching Stockport ever since we set off!"
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,470
But they essentially carry out the same job, no?
The only "significant" difference I can see is a TM instructs the driver to close the doors. A SC does it themselves.

But hey, why call people doing the same job the same thing eh?

I believe "Train Manager" was a new term when the Voyagers came in (might be wrong there though). This was around the same time a lot of job titles changed to make them sound more appealing:
Wet leisure assistant – Lifeguard
Modality manager – Nurse
Waste management and disposal technician – Bin man
Information adviser – Librarian
Direct debit and membership and professional development stock and credit administrator – Customer services administrator.
Family protection consultant – Insurance telesales worker
Investment development and research analyst – Technical helpdesk worker
Worldwide marine asset financial analyst – Accountant
Debt management officer / Field force agent – Tax collector
Coordinator of interpretive teaching – Museum tour guide

You missed the very best one, which was officially introduced in the 1980s, the "School Meal Supervisory Assistant"
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
1,358
Location
East Midlands
And while we're in full pedant mode, am I the only person who gets annoyed with the announcement "We are now approaching Stockport" (or wherever) shortly before the train arrives at said station? My inner pedant wants to yell "Yes, I know, we've been approaching Stockport ever since we set off!"

If we're going full pedant, then depending of the geography of the line, reversals en-route etc. for parts of the journey you might be going away from, rather than approaching Stockport at least in terms of straight-line distance... :E
 

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,081
Location
Liverpool
Alight is archaic? Really?
Well it's certainly not modern conversational English. I know 'get off' can be misinterpreted (seriously though, allowing for context?), but 'leave the train' is unambiguous.

I always think of Betjeman: 'Gaily into Ruislip Gardens/ Runs the red electric train,/ With a thousand Ta's and Pardon's/ Daintily alights Elaine.' The first word of the poem is a reminder of how quickly language becomes dated.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,973
Location
Hope Valley
Getting back to the 'c-word', I was fascinated to see it in the January 1965 Western Region timetable. [For the benefit of younger forum members, this was a seminal publication during the modernising frenzy of the Beeching era and launch of the 24-hour clock and a new timetable format that largely survives in the 'GBTT' to this day. It was published over the name of his dynamic lieutenant, Gerry Fiennes, then Western General Manager.]

The editorial page (yes, there was one) had all sorts of gushy comments:
"...the rate of improvement and modernisation has exceeded expectation, and we consider it sensible to reflect these changes in a new issue for the greater convenience of our customers."
"...re-cast of the London suburban services... with the aim of demonstrating... to the point of complete customer satisfaction."
"...for the convenience of businessmen...(sic)"
"Holidaymakers will be glad to see..."

Now I know that the 'old guard' were suspicious of such language way back then and this push-back was a feature throughout my 40+ year career in the industry from 1973 but it really isn't new.
 

whhistle

On Moderation
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
I put it to you quite politely that not one of those job titles is actually true.
*Yawn*
I mean... most people call it an example.
But seriously, unless you know ALL places those job titles could apply, I don't think you can say that.
I would also suggest that somewhere, there will be fluffed up job titles. The majority of those containing the word "manager" are along those lines.
 

David M

Member
Joined
16 Jan 2018
Messages
151
Apart from the seemingly incessant announcements on the class 385 units, my current pet hate in Scotland is at Edinburgh Waverley (I assume it applies to all stations served by LNER though).
"The next service to depart from platform 5 is the 1307 London and North Eastern Railway service to London Kings Cross".
This takes for ever and my head screams JUST SAY LNER!
 

Pakenhamtrain

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,017
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Apart from the seemingly incessant announcements on the class 385 units, my current pet hate in Scotland is at Edinburgh Waverley (I assume it applies to all stations served by LNER though).
"The next service to depart from platform 5 is the 1307 London and North Eastern Railway service to London Kings Cross".
This takes for ever and my head screams JUST SAY LNER!
Or just operate the whole network under one brand name. Like our buses down here. Doesn't matter if its Ventura, CDC or Transdev. Every bus in the exact same orange and white livery.
 

ATW Alex 101

Established Member
Joined
28 Dec 2010
Messages
2,083
Location
Ellesmere port
I heard an announcement at Crewe the last time I was there where the automated announcement was referring to a buffet car with "delicious hot and cold snacks and refreshments"... really? :s
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
Automated apologies really piss me off. They can't even be bothered to apologise in person rendering it totally condescending.
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
A railway passenger/customer fits both definitions.

TBH I don't overly mind which they use if they sort out the service. What I don't like, though, is excessive informality. I'm not the guard (or whoever)'s mate, I'm their customer.

But I think I may be a generation behind on this. I get particularly annoyed with sales calls which call me by my first name, but I bet younger people don't.

And I also find a bit of olde-worlde charm in some railway-isms (though LNR's "this train has N carriages" is a maybe a *bit* much), so as long as they're not confusing...

Agreed on the excessive familiarity with sales calls and even calls to banks, ISP etc. Starbucks....well lol let's not even get started on "I need your name for the cup" scenarios.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,603
BR introduced the term "Senior Conductor" and "Train Manager". They also had "Conductor Guard" as a job, but I don't think anyone ever understood what that was! Whilst broadly all doing the same job, there are differences to grade and pay. It isn't all about the doors, not all TMs do not do doors.

A conductor guard is a guard that takes fares. On the British network it's just common practice for a conductor to be a guard as well. They don't have to be. Apart from Paytrains guards didn't really deal with revenue until the late 80s.

If anything it's the best description for the job.

I just answer to anything, it's easier. Except when somebody insists there must be 'a manager' for them to talk to when they don't like my decisions. Getting them to understand that to all intents and purposes we don't bother with a manager and the guard in a uniform is quite literally the person in charge and there's no other wind bag to be wheeled out can be difficult.

I was asked the other week for a manager. I returned that I am it. I was then told that I must have someone in charge of me in an office and that they wanted to speak to them. They weren't impressed when I asked if they wanted to discuss my sickness record or how much annual leave I have left as they certainly aren't qualified to do my job!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top