• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Driver's Ear Protection

Status
Not open for further replies.

choochoochoo

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2013
Messages
1,215
I saw a Train Operator wearing earmuff ear defenders whilst they were driving, and I don't blame them for doing so.

But I was wondering if this is officially sanctioned as I'd have thought it would impact the ability to hear audible cab warnings.

Not to mention making it difficult to use the phone to signaller/line controller.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,762
not sure about ear muffs but ear disposable ear plugs are provided on request.
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883
There's no AWS on the underground and the equivalent of the DSD and vigilance (deadman / OPO alarm) does not work in the same way, so theres not really any vitally important in-cab warnings you could miss while wearing them.
 

DavyCrocket

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
616
There's no AWS on the underground and the equivalent of the DSD and vigilance (deadman / OPO alarm) does not work in the same way, so theres not really any vitally important in-cab warnings you could miss while wearing them.

On Automatic lines there are audible tones relating to speed that are relevant. The radio also has group calls which are broadcast.
However, most of these ear protectors only dampen continuous loud sounds, so the in cab may still be heard
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,164
Location
Somewhere, not in London
There's no AWS on the underground and the equivalent of the DSD and vigilance (deadman / OPO alarm) does not work in the same way, so theres not really any vitally important in-cab warnings you could miss while wearing them.

There is however the PEA (Passenger Emergency Alarm) tones (Squark Box) that need to be audible.
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883
There is however the PEA (Passenger Emergency Alarm) tones (Squark Box) that need to be audible.

They only cancel background noise so you'd definitely hear that. LU issue the plugs so it's clearly perfectly acceptable to wear them. Makes the hearing test for drivers a bit pointless though if you can pass it and then wear ear defenders! :D
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,164
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Maybe they should concentrate a bit more on actually reducing the noise in the cabs and saloons.

It's actually difficult to hold a conversation on the Central Line sometimes with how loud it is in the saloon, let alone the cab when I could barely even hear myself think, let alone shout
 

choochoochoo

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2013
Messages
1,215
Maybe they should concentrate a bit more on actually reducing the noise in the cabs and saloons.

It's actually difficult to hold a conversation on the Central Line sometimes with how loud it is in the saloon, let alone the cab when I could barely even hear myself think, let alone shout

I await the day that tfl get sued by a long term commuter who suffered hearing loss.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,849
Location
St Neots
As the passenger is there by choice this won’t get anywhere. It’s the same for public at live events.

I don't know whether it has legal merit — but there is definitely an argument that there is no choice but to use the tube, on pain of unemployment.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,650
I don't know whether it has legal merit — but there is definitely an argument that there is no choice but to use the tube, on pain of unemployment.
Not usually, you had a physical choice, you could use a bus, or move closer etc etc. I see the argument but it’s not something that I think would have any weight behind it. Obviously the rules are completely different for staff. Exposure levels on the underground are high and long, I’m surprised it’s not compulsory to wear ear protection on some routes as the noise levels exceed the threshold and exposure time considerably. Maybe there are some grandfather rights or similar that TfL are excluded from this. I’d actually be interested to know.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
As the passenger is there by choice this won’t get anywhere. It’s the same for public at live events.

And the back of tickets/booking Ts and Cs often have a reminder about the damage loud music can cause buried in the small print.
 

choochoochoo

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2013
Messages
1,215
And the back of tickets/booking Ts and Cs often have a reminder about the damage loud music can cause buried in the small print.

This is why LU should really be warning passengers that they need to protect their ears. LU know the risks but aren't highlighting them to those who choose to use their service.
 

some bloke

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2017
Messages
1,561
LU should really be warning passengers that they need to protect their ears.

Yes, and LU should say which parts of lines may pose a risk, and/or give indications of noise levels.
Then people have the choice whether to travel by other means.

The idea that "the passenger is there by choice" ignores the fact that people may not know the risk until it's too late.
There's no particular reason why someone could be expected to know what levels of exposure risk hearing damage.

Also people may, perhaps not unreasonably, assume that if there are no notices there is no risk.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,391
Location
0035
I’ve never been on a train where the noise levels are unbearable.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,391
Location
0035
I’m not convinced, I think people like to exaggerate.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,164
Location
Somewhere, not in London
I’ve never been on a train where the noise levels are unbearable.
I'd say that any unacceptable level is too high rather than unbearable. And a lot of the Central Line around the east end particularly are unacceptably loud to the point I have to shout to be heard by someone in the next seat.
 

choochoochoo

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2013
Messages
1,215
The 22:25 BBC London news just did another article on this.

LU still think the noise levels are ok !
 

LeeLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,462
Location
London
I don't find it to be a problem apart from occasionally on the "new" end of Jubilee line. A few times it has been awfully loud between Canada Water and North Greenwich, making my ears hurt. It must be one of the loudest metro lines in the world.
 

Tube driver

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
118
Not sure why you’d think the cab is any quieter. The cab doors don’t seal any better than in the saloons and it can be bl**dy loud over certain sections. It is certainly a bone of contention among drivers and the issue is raised constantly.

LUL offer ear bud thingies for drivers (many drivers supply their own ear defenders) but you risk not hearing radio messages coming over the in-cab speaker (which can be hard to hear under normal circumstances let alone with ear protection in).
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,849
Location
St Neots
Not sure why you’d think the cab is any quieter. The cab doors don’t seal any better than in the saloons and it can be bl**dy loud over certain sections. It is certainly a bone of contention among drivers and the issue is raised constantly.

LUL offer ear bud thingies for drivers (many drivers supply their own ear defenders) but you risk not hearing radio messages coming over the in-cab speaker (which can be hard to hear under normal circumstances let alone with ear protection in).

I use my Bose QC35 headphones in the passenger saloon. They're designed to noise-cancel in an aircraft cabin but they work wonders on the really noisy tube sections too.

I wonder whether the radio equipment allows the use of standard 3.5mm/6.3mm plugs? A driver could even attach a small Bluetooth convertor to such a standard socket, and not worry about trailing wires.
 

Tube driver

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
118
Connect radio has no connection points for other equipment to be attached and besides, no electronic devices should be on whilst driving. (Interesting point on noise cancelling earphones and whether it would be classed as an electronic device or not. I imagine it’s a no though as its all to easy to play music or whatever and it doesn’t look good to the general public who’ll think we’re listening to music and not just cancelling the noise).
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,849
Location
St Neots
Interesting point on noise cancelling earphones and whether it would be classed as an electronic device or not. I imagine it’s a no though as its all to easy to play music or whatever and it doesn’t look good to the general public who’ll think we’re listening to music and not just cancelling the noise

You'd have to paint the earcups orange. :D
 

Rogmi

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
89
At one time, LU used to issue ear defenders on request. These were the normal "proper" headphone shape, not buds. They were designed to blank out a lot of the noise but still allow the normal cab sounds (radio, alarms, etc.) to be heard.

Ear plugs were also available on request

I didn't like either sort, but they did keep some of the "wheel squeal" noise down to a reasonable level.

Normal headphones were not allowed because they didn't meet the specification and could block / muffle the cab sounds. Using mp3 players in the cab was banned anyway. Some 12 years ago, there was talk of trialling ear defenders that would allow mp3 players to be used, but I don't think anything came of that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top