• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern Class 195: Construction/Introduction Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aivilo

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2014
Messages
646
Location
Surrey
It's actually a pig to get out of from a drivers perspective as the ladder is tucked under the body
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
It's actually a pig to get out of from a drivers perspective as the ladder is tucked under the body

Does look quite a tricky climb down from cab to track level on the Class 195, as you say the steps are tucked away and the initial step is quite high compared to a Class 221.
Both about the same to platform level.

tn_gb-northern-class195 (2).jpg Bombardier_Virgin_Supervoyager_Class_221_No_221142_(-125113751).jpg
 

lammergeier

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2017
Messages
506
The set up is more akin to the 220 which has a body mounted ladder and as such is more awkward for access/egress than the bogie mounted 221.
 

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
The set up is more akin to the 220 which has a body mounted ladder and as such is more awkward for access/egress than the bogie mounted 221.

Never even thought about Class 220 with body mounted steps. Spot on! Never get on and off them, cab wise. :rolleyes:

So yep more akin the 195.

Bombardier_Cross_Country_Voyager_Class_220_No_220008_(-125113281).jpg
 

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
Is everything good now between unions ASLEF/RMT and Arriva over these units and has a proper training package been worked out now for Drivers and Guards?
 

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
Training has resumed

Good training has resumed, testing has resumed so come on Northern let's get some 195s into service where needed and lets get rid of some of the crap (142s for starters) that Northern passengers have had to put up with for years longer than they should have.
Really frustrating that nobody seems that bothered how long these things are taking to be introduced.
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
Good training has resumed, testing has resumed so come on Northern let's get some 195s into service where needed and lets get rid of some of the crap (142s for starters) that Northern passengers have had to put up with for years longer than they should have.
Really frustrating that nobody seems that bothered how long these things are taking to be introduced.
As has been pointed out several times, by several people, they cannot enter service until the internal coupler defect has been rectified. Lots of people are very bothered indeed - not least Northern - but making them safe for passenger use, not to mention training enough crews to operate the things, takes however long it takes.
 

EE Andy b1

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2013
Messages
1,212
Location
CLC
Yes we know about the vehicle fixed coupler defects and these should be getting rectified on later build sets then retrofitting to the earlier builds which are again being used for training. When the later modified units arrive get them into service first then modify the others. Should be enough train crews trained up by then to get some into service where they are needed.
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,298
Take a quick look through their profile page, and it's a reasonable conclusion that the poster is a driver who's clued-up with what happens in the industry. The answer to the rest of your query is probably commercially sensitive.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Take a quick look through their profile page, and it's a reasonable conclusion that the poster is a driver who's clued-up with what happens in the industry. The answer to the rest of your query is probably commercially sensitive.

I congratulate you on not giving a sarcastic or equally rude reply back to the poster. I wouldn’t give them any response for asking like that.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,855
Location
Yorkshire
I congratulate you on not giving a sarcastic or equally rude reply back to the poster. I wouldn’t give them any response for asking like that.

I digress. Some people are just straight talking and don't employ much in the way of rhetoric.
 
Last edited:

Aivilo

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2014
Messages
646
Location
Surrey
Internal. Similar to the stack issues on the 769 the coaches need to be slightly further apart. Probably doesn't take a genius to work out what has been put on place
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Internal. Similar to the stack issues on the 769 the coaches need to be slightly further apart. Probably doesn't take a genius to work out what has been put on place

I did think they looked very close together, very much like square-ended UIC stock. But then Pendolinos are the same. Is it the actual coach ends that are fouling? I thought it was coupler bar against body because the slot it moves in isn't quite wide enough.
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,045
Location
North Wales
I did think they looked very close together, very much like square-ended UIC stock. But then Pendolinos are the same. Is it the actual coach ends that are fouling? I thought it was coupler bar against body because the slot it moves in isn't quite wide enough.
I'm speaking with no insider knowledge, but if the coupler bar were too short, that could mean that the coach ends were fouling against each other on tight curves. A longer coupler (along with the flexibility of the corridor connection) could overcome that, if it were the case.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
I'm speaking with no insider knowledge, but if the coupler bar were too short, that could mean that the coach ends were fouling against each other on tight curves. A longer coupler (along with the flexibility of the corridor connection) could overcome that, if it were the case.
From what we've managed to gather, the gap on the mounting brackets is too small, not the bar.
 

37201xoIM

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2016
Messages
337
For what it's worth, I understand that the December 2019 Calder Valley timetable is based on 195s working the Leeds - Man Vic and Leeds - Man Vic - Chester services plus the York - Blackpool, though not the LDS - Dewsbury - Calder - MCV - Wigan nor those not serving the Upper Valley. And it seems that the sectional running times take account not only of the LSIs that have been delivered west of Bradford but also of the improved performance of the 195s (so there are JT improvements between Leeds and BDI)...

So we had better keep our fingers crossed that enough are serviceable by then, or there will be, ahem, "challenges"!
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,092
Rumour is September for these to be out in passenger service. Will try to confirm soon
I have heard from Monday 1st July it is hoped to have a 195 in passenger service on at least 1 Barrow to Manchester Airport diagram. Likely 06.47 from Barrow. Whether or not this will happen or if this is the 1st 195 in passenger service remains to be seen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top