That's great. Thankyou for the explanation.
Not everyone on here is a trainee driver with an instructor to askIf in doubt, ask your Instructor/Mentor/Manager.
Asking your Instructor always be your first option. That's what they are there for.
No problem.
Not everyone on here is a trainee driver with an instructor to ask
If you know you are following something slower just ease off the power and sit behind it on greens.
Unfortunately this only works on big mainlines.
In some urban areas the signals will rarely, if ever, show green during the peaks due to the frequency of services. This does add a great deal of risk,
but the drivers simply have to be more vigilant to restrictive aspects and constantly monitoring signals and speed (and yes, many of them do find this very draining).
I thought on a line with trains of different top speeds and braking curves, some of the drivers would ignore the double yellows, treating them as greens.It is more of an urban driving technique as that's where you tend to get the most restrictive aspects. When out on the mainline with higher speeds and huge signal sections you tend to run on green or are able to run past a single yellow at 60mph
It's that risk which we are trying to eliminate. It's a good defensive driving technique and you tend to know when to use it and when to close up. The skill is to make that decision when to use a defensive technique and where you need to accept the risk and deal with it.
Which is why there are so many incidents. It isn't a case of being more vigilant. If anything, that tends to work against you because of the increased workload. Yes you are more aware and you increase your non technical skills but you balance that by using this kind of driving technique.
I though on a line with tr
I thought on a line with trains of different top speeds and braking curves, some of the drivers would ignore the double yellows, treating them as greens.
I am thinking of somewhere like the fast lines out of Euston when there was a mix of 100/110 mph loco hauled trains and 90moh EMU's (312's?) with EPB brakes. The EMUS could stop from a yellow, while the loco hauled trains would need to start braking at a double yellow. This caused a problem with AWS in that the EMU driver would be constantly cancelling AWS warnings and may inadvertently miss the single yellow.
but TfL operate trains with similar braking, acceleration and max speed. very different from national rail.You’ve sort of answered your own question, as “ignoring” a double yellow leads to the risk of missing the relevance of a single yellow should one crop up, with no distinct AWS to make it stand out. I’d imagine this is even worse on those few parts where there can be more than one double yellow aspect applicable to a given red aspect - as on the Electric lines into Liverpool Street (anywhere else?).
This is why multi-aspect signalling isn’t wonderful for dense suburban applications, as signal spacing and headways cause undesirable features to arise. LU (apart from the north end of the Met Line) does things differently, with repeaters only provided where sighting requires them, which means drivers generally run on greens, however this becomes less feasible as speed increases. Whilst two LU lines do have a mix, I don’t think it’s really good practice to mix the two setups, as it introduces risks. On LU that risk is generally mitigated by full-speed overlaps and trainstops.
They weren't asking as an enthusiast. They clearly stated they were a Trainee. The best advice I can give for a Trainee, is to ask their Instructor. Do you suggest that they get driving advice from a forum ?
but TfL operate trains with similar braking, acceleration and max speed. very different from national rail.
They weren't asking as an enthusiast. They clearly stated they were a Trainee. The best advice I can give for a Trainee, is to ask their Instructor. Do you suggest that they get driving advice from a forum ?
That’s what I mean, whilst the LU setup works for metro-type operations, it doesn’t work so well on a more mixed application. However, the more densely worked sections of NR do err more towards the LU attributes, which makes NR signalling less ideal, but as with all things in engineering it’s all about establishing a compromise.
Reminds me of when I commuted on the GEML, sitting at the front of the train and hearing the buzzer going for every signal, and very rarely the bell for a green.If you don’t believe me, watch this video which shows just how close the signals are spaced, partlcularly in the Bow Jcn-Stratford-Maryland area.
I wonder if the definition of "chasing signals" in this thread is somewhat blurred?as a experienced driver you will never ever chase any thing as that suggests you are approaching out off control to some extent
you will off course proceed in a safe often single yellow /red fashion
most train driving is fully automatic with the out off routine requiring perhaps 15- 20% off your attention
cautions and reds should be very relaxed as they are often a frequent day to day situation but most off your brain power should be there for the odd break down on unfortunate situation
Since we're on this subject, can drivers here give their opinion on what the introduction of C-DAS will mean for your practice in these cases.
I don't think C-DAS, (as opposed to the plain unconnected version which just works off the working timetable) has actually been introduced anywhere in the UK mainline, has it? I think Chiltern were looking at being the first ones to do it, but this might be out of date by now, or I might be misremembering entirely.I haven't used it yet but speaking to other Drivers I don't hear many positives.
For me personally I believe that every little helps and it it adds to my job or helps reduce my workload in some way then I'd happily support it. Driver aids must support the Driver and work in an intuitive and helpful way. I'd also say that it shouldn't be mandated and allow for flexibility in performing the job rather than becoming another restriction.
You'd support it if it "adds to your job" or "helps reduce my workload" (my bolds) - mutually-exclusive, surely?I haven't used it yet but speaking to other Drivers I don't hear many positives.
For me personally I believe that every little helps and it it adds to my job or helps reduce my workload in some way then I'd happily support it. Driver aids must support the Driver and work in an intuitive and helpful way. I'd also say that it shouldn't be mandated and allow for flexibility in performing the job rather than becoming another restriction.
The helpful response would have been to state the meaning and suggest confirming with trainer, etc. That way, everyone may learn and the spirit of the forum is upheld.They weren't asking as an enthusiast. They clearly stated they were a Trainee. The best advice I can give for a Trainee, is to ask their Instructor. Do you suggest that they get driving advice from a forum ?
Not everyone on here is a trainee driver with an instructor to ask
There are no holes in this argument, it's just flaking paint.
The helpful response would have been to state the meaning and suggest confirming with trainer, etc. That way, everyone may learn and the spirit of the forum is upheld.
It can be a tricky one to judge and certainly not one that can be taught easily.