James James
Member
- Joined
- 29 Jan 2018
- Messages
- 426
Oh no
The televisions with their stupid repetitive noisy and unwanted announcements make me regret stepping onto the HEX every time I've taken it.
-
Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Great Western Railway Heathrow Express Class 387 Refittment and Service Updates
- Thread starter RailWonderer
- Start date
- Status
The televisions with their stupid repetitive noisy and unwanted announcements make me regret stepping onto the HEX every time I've taken it.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
Wilts Wanderer
Established Member
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 2,488
Really?! What I’m hearing is that December might be ambitious, let alone this summer. AIUI there’s only one 769 unit in existence so far?Trailfinder
Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 84
I assume you haven't been outside on the north side of the station by the canal.
I also suggest if you want a taxi, the best place to go is to the rank outside the Hilton at the top of the ramp on Praed Street
Nearer units 9+10 in conversion AIUI
4 have escaped Brush so far
GWR also have a 319 for initial familiarisation at Reading.
Wilts Wanderer
Established Member
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 2,488
There’s also the slight minor detail that a 769 cannot keep the timings operated currently on the North Downs route. Between Reading and Gatwick we’re talking about a 3-4 minute shortfall on the fast service, and up to 7-8 minutes on the all-stations Redhill services. (The skip-stop workings are somewhere in between.) The electric sections are short and not in the ‘hilly’ areas, so there is little/no clawback of time compared to that lost under diesel running.
Network Rail is not likely to agree to a major timetable rewrite at short notice, as-per current industry stance regarding risk, workload and readiness.
If a 769 operates on the current timetable this side of December I will eat the GBTT, without ketchup.
Clarence Yard
Established Member
- Joined
- 18 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 2,494
That’s what Railsys says but there has been considerable doubt expressed by all potential operators about what is being said by that system as regards point to points on diesel. People are expecting something akin to a cl.150 or in the case of the north downs, a cl.165/0.
This is beginning to look like a rerun of the class 66 timing saga so getting hold of a unit and doing some proper timing trials looks like the best way for sorting it in the long term.
However, for planning purposes, in the absence of hard info, NR, GWR and others are having to stick to the Railsys figures. Not helped either by having to revert to 2 TPH late in the December 2019 bidding process either.
This is beginning to look like a rerun of the class 66 timing saga so getting hold of a unit and doing some proper timing trials looks like the best way for sorting it in the long term.
However, for planning purposes, in the absence of hard info, NR, GWR and others are having to stick to the Railsys figures. Not helped either by having to revert to 2 TPH late in the December 2019 bidding process either.
The thread for GWR 769 discussion:
https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/gwr-class-319-769-information-discussion.174866/
https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/gwr-class-319-769-information-discussion.174866/
northernbelle
Member
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2018
- Messages
- 680
Not quite the full story - the spare 387s are being freed up by a combination of:
- Pause in Basingstoke, Oxford & TV branches electrification (use of Turbos/769s/802s instead)
- Additional order of 7 Class 802s permitting use of 800s on through Paddington-Newbury-Bedwyn services (instead of split service of 387s to Newbury + Turbo shuttles)
- New order of 769s replacing a mixture of Turbo and 387 operated services
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 31,437
But then again, hadn’t the 387 fleet numbers already changed from the original number in the franchise agreement to account for both the altered Newbury/Bedwyn traction policy and the removal of all the intended 365s?
But I think most of us agree that Crossrail must have been accounted for, rather than being treated as a surprise bonus...
Wilts Wanderer
Established Member
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 2,488
Thanks Clarence Yard for the useful insight.
Of all the things Crossrail could be described as, 'surprise bonus' isn't one of them!
Of all the things Crossrail could be described as, 'surprise bonus' isn't one of them!
3973EXL
Established Member
- Joined
- 2 Feb 2017
- Messages
- 2,446
387131 being hauled to Ilford by 37608
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/K97295/2019/05/12/advanced
Ilford - Reading CAPED
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O05137/2019/05/12/advanced
Or light to Leicester RUNS
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/R50183/2019/05/12/advanced
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/K97295/2019/05/12/advanced
Ilford - Reading CAPED
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O05137/2019/05/12/advanced
Or light to Leicester RUNS
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/R50183/2019/05/12/advanced
Last edited:
Class455
Established Member
- Joined
- 19 May 2016
- Messages
- 1,396
Any idea when the first unit will be released?
December EIS is the current plan.
The first pair (130/140) have had their cosmetic/interior works done at Ilford, and are awaiting a (new) path back to Reading. ETCS fitment should be done over the summer with testing and driver training late summer into Autumn.
Deepgreen
Established Member
"Televisions"?? Why on earth are these thought necessary for such a short journey?
Kite159
Veteran Member
It will probably be like the TVs fitted to the current stock which play adverts & display useful information
I've just seen a picture of the livery, but it looks a bit odd.
Not sure if I like it. Quite dull.
Here is the link to the image from Facebook (no account needed):
https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=fa7d5935316742f10b697b4b1b4a94c7&oe=5D62C89B
And the original post (account needed):
https://www.facebook.com/groups/300842016662071/permalink/2322515961161323/
Not sure if I like it. Quite dull.
Here is the link to the image from Facebook (no account needed):
https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=fa7d5935316742f10b697b4b1b4a94c7&oe=5D62C89B
And the original post (account needed):
https://www.facebook.com/groups/300842016662071/permalink/2322515961161323/
fgwrich
Established Member
They could have painted the cab roof! It does look a little bizarre leaving that in green. On the whole thought, it doesn't look too bad.
cactustwirly
Established Member
Personally I prefer the current livery on the 332s
How many units are expected to be completed before the December timetable change?
Surely GWR can't release all 10 units without shortforms in the Thames Valley?
There are barely enough units for 8 car operation atm.
How many units are expected to be completed before the December timetable change?
Surely GWR can't release all 10 units without shortforms in the Thames Valley?
There are barely enough units for 8 car operation atm.
causton
Established Member
This has already been covered in post #28.
cactustwirly
Established Member
Hmm I remain unconvinced.
Well if we have loads of 4 car 387s running around, then I hope GWR is held to account.
If there truly was enough slack in the fleet, then we wouldn't have rammed 4 car units running around (there's about 3 booked 4 car diagrams atm, that really ought to be 8 car)
Last edited:
Theres plenty of slack in the diagrams. There’s routinely 3 or even 4 spare units per day. Unit availability isn’t the only reason for running 4 car trains.
Unit requirements drop from 39 to 36 from next week, freeing up another 3 sets for mods. Mostly by introducing a 6 car Turbo onto off peak mainline suburban duties; but efficiencies have been gleaned elsewhere.
Unit requirements drop from 39 to 36 from next week, freeing up another 3 sets for mods. Mostly by introducing a 6 car Turbo onto off peak mainline suburban duties; but efficiencies have been gleaned elsewhere.
It does look pretty good and classy yes.
And I’m sure the remaining green bit will be removed.
Kite159
Veteran Member
Looks odd seeing a HEX unit without it being covered with adverts for some communications company
700007
Established Member
Slightly off topic but not enough to warrant a new thread, what's the diagram for the 6-Turbo?
Reliablebeam
Member
- Joined
- 14 Jun 2017
- Messages
- 247
I'd be interested to know which diagrams myself, so I can avoid the 'pleasure', got quite used to the superior 387's. I'm a bit astonished we're losing new electric trains to be backfilled by the old noisy diesel junk I'd hoped we were shot of. This should not be allowed.
It’s only short term until December when Crossrail takes over the Readings, seating capacity is theoretically almost the same between a 6 car 165 and an 8 car 387.
Turbo should be on:-
0712 Reading - Paddington
0821 Paddington - Didcot
1003 Didcot - Paddington
1142 Paddington - Reading
1248 Reading - Paddington
1357 Paddington - Didcot
1532 Didcot - Paddington
1712 Paddington - Reading
The current PM Peak Turbo stopper (1755 Paddington - Reading) goes over to 8 car 387 operation.
cactustwirly
Established Member
The big question is, will it actually be a 6 car unit in practice?
Noticed that a few Oxford and Gatwick Airport services have been 2 car vice 3 car lately
It’s scheduled to be a 6 car (2x3) - with no Bedwyns the Turbo fleet should have an easier time of things from next week. 2 vice 3 happens occasionally; but really not as often as you’re inferring.
I'd agree with that, bar the booked Sunday 2 car it is pretty unusual to see one on the North Downs.
- Status