Rescued by 92043.
-
Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Caledonian Sleeper
- Thread starter Essexman
- Start date
Rescued by 92043.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
kingqueen
Member
I didn't, last week in the accessible room. There were some instructions on how to e.g. stow the upper bunk or extend the blasted sofa back on the bottom one, in a notice on a wall inside the wardrobe.
But this is sometimes how it is thought out. Once you’re definitely going to be an hour late on a CS service then there’s no incentive to get them there 65L if it’s cheaper to get them there 300L. It’s not ALWAYS the attitude but it’s easy to think it might be at times.
Peter Mugridge
Veteran Member
OK, I've asked someone senior... it's a software issue and it's not in every carriage; they're aware of it and it should be fixed before long.
As to the previously mentioned light on the light switch that can't be turned off - that's a legal requirement, and yes it has to be white; they aren't allowed to use red or any other colour.
kingqueen
Member
The light switch on the Night Riviera Sleeper isn't illuminated.
Probably not an issue because the door buttons are brighter than the Mastermind all-time champion, enough to see the light switch across the room.
@Peter Mugridge Interesting, thanks for the feedback! I guess that means my supposition as to how the light switch works was more or less correct! The steward seemed to have some paperwork like a snagging list that he filled in when I mentioned the broken toilet. I expect there's lots of little things being worked through (in fact the lounge car attendant said as much, but that most of them were ironed out now)
The light around the switch does cast a surprising amount of light, I wonder if it could be made a bit dimmer?
Overall I was impressed with the quality of the rolling stock and the attention to detail in the design.
I might drop CS and email with my observations, positive and negative. Do you think they would read it or would it be a waste of my time?
The light around the switch does cast a surprising amount of light, I wonder if it could be made a bit dimmer?
Overall I was impressed with the quality of the rolling stock and the attention to detail in the design.
I might drop CS and email with my observations, positive and negative. Do you think they would read it or would it be a waste of my time?
theshillito
Member
Definitely send them an email. They read every email and, worst case scenario, they filter your comments into some statistics and say "thanks for the feedback", best case scenario they do the same but address each point personally with you.
Scotrail84
Established Member
- Joined
- 5 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 2,367
Highlandspring
Established Member
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 2,777
73971
Peter Mugridge
Veteran Member
I think you'll find the level of illumination is mandated as well...
Weren't the GWR MK 3 refurbishments specified and contracted some time before the Mk5 order was placed, meaning that the regulations might have been different then?
Highlandspring
Established Member
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 2,777
Strange that there’s seemingly no “legal requirement” for light switches in hotels to be brightly illuminated at all times...
However, your hotel room isn't going 80+mph, unless you have had one too many that is!
Sam
Deafdoggie
Established Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 3,090
Different companies interpret the same rules & laws differently. Having worked in the cinema industry, the rules are simply that there is enough light for people to safely leave in an emergency. The cinema generally choose low level lighting over stairs, etc. Some landlords though insisted this meant full lighting on all aisles and doorways at all times. Usually a threat to terminate the rent brought common sense. The same rules apply but just interpreted differently.
I’ve no idea what hotel and sleeper train light rules are, but I’d be surprised if there was a specific luminous stated for switches.
I’ve no idea what hotel and sleeper train light rules are, but I’d be surprised if there was a specific luminous stated for switches.
I think there is, now, for the main light switch. Only for new builds, obviously.
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
Best take some gaffer tape with me, then...
Agreed. And as ever Roadie will tell you, if gaffer tape doesn’t fix it, you’re not using enough gaffer tape.
xotGD
Established Member
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2017
- Messages
- 6,088
To tape over your eyes to keep the light out? Other forms of eye shade are available.
adrock1976
Established Member
Are blindfolds still provided in the berths/rooms on the new stock like they were on the Mk IIIs?
kingqueen
Member
On the Night Riviera, I just hung a T-shirt over it and the back of my Wheelchair, did the job nicely
Yes, if you’re in a Club Room as it’s (sort of) the equivalent of First Class on the Mk3s. It’s in a cardboard bag with your earphones, bottle of water, and toiletries from Arran Aromatics. Same collection as on the Mk3’s, and does the job nicely.
BRX
Established Member
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 3,638
You get blindfold & earplugs even if you are in the seats.
kingqueen
Member
Wheelchair users in the accessible cabin (Mk 3) / double accessible cabin (Mk 5) on the Fort William Sleeper don't have access to the lounge car between London and Edinburgh because the train would be too long if the Fort William section had its own lounge car. So passengers share the Aberdeen lounge car between Edinburgh and London. An extra lounge car and seated car are added for the Fort William to Edinburgh section. This means Fort William section seated passengers are decanted onto the platform at Edinburgh and have to swap carriages after shunting. Also, the Fort William coaches not having their own lounge car between Edinburgh and London, Fort William customers use the Aberdeen lounge car. But they have to walk through all the Aberdeen sleeper coaches to get to it. This is obviously not accessible to wheelchair users. The result is that the Fort William sleeper is the only Caledonian sleeper train which has no accessible cabins with lounge access between London and Edinburgh.
I'm wondering if there are logistical problems with the seemingly simple solution: to put the Aberdeen lounge car at the other end of the Aberdeen section, with the Aberdeen accessible sleeper coach next to it on one side and the Fort William accessible sleeper coach next to it on the other. So both accessible sleeper coaches are next to it and wheelchair users from either can use the lounge.
I suspect there are physical limitations in the lounge cars such that wheelchair users can only get into the lounge from one end, also that it would make the logistics of shunting at Fort William logistically difficult or impossible, but I don't know so thought would ask.
The other thought is: is it potentially possible for a wheelchair user to get on the Aberdeen lounge car at 2030 in London, have a meal and a whisky then transfer to the Fort William sleeper car via Watford station platform or Crewe station platform? Have staff ready with two ramps, one at the lounge car and one at the sleeper car, and use the two or four minute dwell respectively to get off, down the platform and on again.
I booked the northbound Fort William sleeper without knowing that there's no access to the lounge car until Edinburgh. (Until a couple of days ago, the Sleeper website didn't make this clear.) I'm now really disappointed. Sitting in my room on my own with room service doesn't sound the same experience...
I'm wondering if there are logistical problems with the seemingly simple solution: to put the Aberdeen lounge car at the other end of the Aberdeen section, with the Aberdeen accessible sleeper coach next to it on one side and the Fort William accessible sleeper coach next to it on the other. So both accessible sleeper coaches are next to it and wheelchair users from either can use the lounge.
I suspect there are physical limitations in the lounge cars such that wheelchair users can only get into the lounge from one end, also that it would make the logistics of shunting at Fort William logistically difficult or impossible, but I don't know so thought would ask.
The other thought is: is it potentially possible for a wheelchair user to get on the Aberdeen lounge car at 2030 in London, have a meal and a whisky then transfer to the Fort William sleeper car via Watford station platform or Crewe station platform? Have staff ready with two ramps, one at the lounge car and one at the sleeper car, and use the two or four minute dwell respectively to get off, down the platform and on again.
I booked the northbound Fort William sleeper without knowing that there's no access to the lounge car until Edinburgh. (Until a couple of days ago, the Sleeper website didn't make this clear.) I'm now really disappointed. Sitting in my room on my own with room service doesn't sound the same experience...
jagardner1984
Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 675
In general, are rolling stock connecting doors accessible and compliant with PRM TSI ? Most I can think of would be too narrow or uneven, with the exception of the Class 700 etc.
I suppose accessibility will always be a mixture of enabling passengers to access things by themselves (appropriate height button height, grab handles etc) and support from staff to access others (platform ramps etc).
I suppose CS might argue they’ve made all efforts to provide the services in the lounge car to the accessible berths (via room service). I would approach them about it though, they always seem very helpful in their customer services.
I suppose accessibility will always be a mixture of enabling passengers to access things by themselves (appropriate height button height, grab handles etc) and support from staff to access others (platform ramps etc).
I suppose CS might argue they’ve made all efforts to provide the services in the lounge car to the accessible berths (via room service). I would approach them about it though, they always seem very helpful in their customer services.
BRX
Established Member
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 3,638
It's not the shunting at fort william that it would complicate (all that happens there is that the loco runs round) but the shunting at edinburgh.
If you are doing the return trip too then at least you should be able to have dinner in the lounge car on that journey, which is the bit with the scenery.
kingqueen
Member
In general I think only the doors required for access to the wheelchair space / berth / accessible toilet on stock, are wheelchair accessible, not other doors on a train. So that's why I'm suspecting that it is quite likely that the lounge cars, both old and new, only have wheelchair access at one end, thus making my posited formation a non-starter. But I've never been on so I can't be sure!
I've found them variable from "well intentioned" to "exceptionally helpful and pleasant" in terms of interaction, but have also sadly found that they are often somewhat hampered by convoluted access processes and inaccurate access information.
Thanks for the thoughts
I’m not sure why it would complicate the shunting. The Aberdeen portion would still be self-contained, just with the lounge in a different place.
However, there are other issues with the proposal. As already mentioned, the corridor at the “other” end of the lounge is no wider than the corridor in the sleeper carriages. There’s also the seated passengers needing to walk through the sleeper carriages to order takeaway food/drink.
It would also break the order of the half sets, meaning more shunting at Wembley before the southbound Aberdeen/Fort William half set from one night can be used on the northbound Edinburgh/Glasgow the following night. (Not an issue now of course but will be when all services have the Mk5s).
kingqueen
Member
I suspected this would be the case but didn't know. Oh well, as suspected this was a non-starter of an idea - other stuff about seated passengers having to walk further etc., shunting complexity are I guess not an issue if it doesn't make any difference to accessibility.
BRX
Established Member
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 3,638
Ignoring the issue of the seated coach - it would mean that, on arrival at Edinburgh, the accessible sleeper coach would be at the 'west' end of the FTW portion, which would mean that the FTW lounge & seats would have to be added onto that end rather than the 'east' end as at present. At the moment, the process of detaching the INV and ABD portions (done with movements from the 'west' end of Waverley) is relatively independent of the process of adding the FTW day coaches (done with movements from/to the 'east' end of Waverley).
I don't see a reason it would be impossible, but would probably mean everything took a little bit longer.
But it would either mean sleeper passengers from one portion walking through the seated coach (and the seated coach to be through-accessible by wheelchair) or (if the seated coach was marshalled at the other end of the Aberdeen portion) having the seated passengers walking through the sleeper coaches - unless... the Inverness portion was reversed to have the seats/lounge at the N end; then the Aberdeen seated passengers could walk through the Inverness seats and use the Inverness buffet. Or something!