• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern coupling 158s and 153s

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,336
I don't believe Northern have any 143s. As as I understand it, the 140 quantities of network Pacers are split up to their 3 TOCs as follows:

Northern - 102 Pacers (79 142s, 13 2-car 144s, 10 3-car 144s)
Transport for Wales - 30 Pacers (15 142s, 15 143s)
Great Western Railway - 8 Pacers (8 143s only)

There used to be 143s at Newcastle, but they moved to the South West & South Wales before (or soon after) the "great sell-off" by John Major.
 

anamyd

On Moderation
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,011
Thank you both.
All network Pacers had the entry/exit seperator bar removed and a wheelchair space added in the 90s, once the engines, transmissions and doors had been changed. 144012 is the only RVAR/PRM-TSI compliant Pacer. It was deemed uneconomical to modify any others, which is why they're going in 2020.

Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations
Persons with Reduced Mobility - Technical Specifications for Interoperability
 
Last edited:

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,773
Location
Glasgow
All network Pacers had the entry/exit seperator bar removed and a wheelchair space added in the 90s, once the engines, transmissions and doors had been changed. 144-012 is the only RVAR/PRM-TSI compliant Pacer. It was deemed uneconomical to modify any others, which is why they're going in 2020.

Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations
Persons with Reduced Mobility - Technical Specifications for Interoperability

I can understand them not progressing with it, can't be cheap and of all the units you could make properly accessible a Pacer is likely one of the most awkward.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,917
Location
Lancashire
In recent years, the Blackpool North to Carlisle DalesRail Summer Sunday service has been a 153+2 Car 158, no idea why a 3 car 158 was never allocated
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
In recent years, the Blackpool North to Carlisle DalesRail Summer Sunday service has been a 153+2 Car 158, no idea why a 3 car 158 was never allocated

Is there one available within the diagrams ? 158+153 Combos are used on the Normal S & C services so no different
 

anamyd

On Moderation
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,011
Don't think I've ever seen or heard
of a 170 coupled up to a Pacer?
Pacer+170 formations can run ECS only, I think due to some electrical incompatibilities.

Pacer+158 or 150/153+170 formations are the furthest apart that can run in passenger service
 
Last edited:

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,773
Location
Glasgow
Pacer+170 formations can run ECS only, I think due to some electrical incompatibilities.

Pacer+158 or 150/153+170 formations are the furthest apart that can run in passenger service

You can couple a Pacer to a Sprinter and a Sprinter to a 170, so why not a 170 to a Pacer?
 

anamyd

On Moderation
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,011
You can couple a Pacer to a Sprinter and a Sprinter to a 170, so why not a 170 to a Pacer?
It's some electrical wiring incompatibility in the couplers apparently - hopefully someone who knows exactly what it is sees this! Again it only prevents such formations working passenger services; they can still do ECS runs.
 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,287
Location
N Yorks
I thought there was a problem coupling 158/159's to pacers because of the angle the couplers on tight curves. Something to do with the carriage length of the 158 (23m) and the short wheelbase of the pacer
 

anamyd

On Moderation
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,011
I thought there was a problem coupling 158/159's to pacers because of the angle the couplers on tight curves. Something to do with the carriage length of the 158 (23m) and the short wheelbase of the pacer
Northern coupled a 142 to a 158 for passenger service without a problem! And I forgot about 159s, so read 158 as 158/159 (though I don't believe Pacer/159 multiple working is very realistic due to their areas)
 

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,287
Location
N Yorks
Northern coupled a 142 to a 158 for passenger service without a problem! And I forgot about 159s, so read 158 as 158/159 (though I don't believe Pacer/159 multiple working is very realistic due to their areas)
used to be a Paignton -Waterloo working- plenty of pacers west of Exeter. Werent they called Skippers in the far SW?
 

anamyd

On Moderation
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,011
used to be a Paignton -Waterloo working- plenty of pacers west of Exeter. Werent they called Skippers in the far SW?
I believe so. GWR have 8 143s, I was thinking that actually.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,773
Location
Glasgow
It's some electrical wiring incompatibility in the couplers apparently - hopefully someone who knows exactly what it is sees this! Again it only prevents such formations working passenger services; they can still do ECS runs.

I just wonder how such an incompatibility can only effect Pacers+170s and not Pacers+Sprinters or Sprinters+170s. Just seems strange somehow.
 

anamyd

On Moderation
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,011
I just wonder how such an incompatibility can only effect Pacers+170s and not Pacers+Sprinters or Sprinters+170s. Just seems strange somehow.
I get what you're saying, but I just don't know the exact reason!
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,647
Location
Another planet...
I seem to recall a 142 spare in Huddersfield sidings was used to drag a TPE 170 which had been involved in a fatality at Deighton, would have been around 2008/2009.
 

anamyd

On Moderation
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,011
I seem to recall a 142 spare in Huddersfield sidings was used to drag a TPE 170 which had been involved in a fatality at Deighton, would have been around 2008/2009.
totally doable on things like that :) Edit: the 142 dragged the 170?! :lol: I acknowledge it was a fatality :(
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,647
Location
Another planet...
totally doable on things like that :) Edit: the 142 dragged the 170?! :lol: I acknowledge it was a fatality :(
A particularly sad story that one (not that they aren't all sad, of course), as IIRC it was a woman suffering from post-natal depression. :frown:

Can totally understand the TPE driver not wanting to move the unit to the sidings themselves under those circumstances, though there may have been a mechanical issue as well.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,759
What i find fascinating about 153s at northern is their being joined up for what looks like every service as the new 153 livery spreads across 2 units.

Is their a need for a 158 coupling?
 

themiller

Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,062
Location
Cumbria, UK
Just found this photo which is from a degraded slide. The date is 23 October 1992 at Manchester Piccadilly. My notes say that it’s 57483 & 52751.
 

Attachments

  • 5A83810D-58A7-4251-B555-04D4F70AFBED.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 86

Parallel

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2013
Messages
3,935
wow, really...? did not know that! would love to see some photos or video of that!!!
It used to happen on FGW/GWR too on occasion. The Paignton school train was once booked 3 x 143 but it was formed of 2 x 143 + a 158 on more than one occasion!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top