• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 710 LO

simple simon

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
651
Location
Suburban London
For me these new trains are 'as expected'. As a general theme neither especially good nor bad. It was already known that they would have tube train style seating, similar to the 345's, air-conditioning, rock hard seats, etc.

I noted both Euston - Watford and GOBLIN route maps above the passenger doors.

The passenger information system uses the similar horrible 'new style English' as the Class 345's. I wish the messages were differently worded, were they scripted by someone from overseas? USA? - I much preferred what I heard on Northern Rail services in Yorkshire.

I am astonished that the USB power sockets are only at the coach ends, it means that for many passengers the choice will be between being seated or using the USB - only a lucky few passengers with longish cables will be able to use USB power and remain seated, hoping that standing passengers on a swaying train do not fall against the USB sockets and damage the cables / sockets / hurt themselves.

I prefer the multi user space to be at the train ends, rather than in the middle - which is often more crowded. That said, it also makes space for more rush hour crush loads. I think its Taiwan where they even have trains with end coaches that are dedicated to standing passengers - instead of folding seats there are handrails!

I can see mothers with children in pushchairs and bikers using these spaces, and arguments if passengers want to use the USB. I wanted to get a good view of the area near the cab but almost as soon as the train doors opened (at Barking) a schoolboy dashed in and took one of the seats. I think that for my internal photos I need to see one of these trains at Gospel Oak, as they will be less busy and have better light coming in through the windows.

These trains are supposed to have wifi - anyone tested it?

The only feature that I especially like is the on-train information displays; these the same as those on the TFL Rail trains and are sorely needed to replace the old fashioned orange LED displays on the S Stock trains - especially the S7's on the Circle, District and Hammersmith & City lines which have two different sets of paper route maps that often confuse unwary visitors (even a single S7 map showing these three lines would represent a vast improvement on the awful present situation!)

What the new Class 710 trains do not have are end doors at the train driver's cabs. This is not an issue for most services, but as far as I am aware it makes them illegal for routes that have single bore tunnels - the law that bans trains without end doors explains why the Class 717 trains on the route via the Northern City Line have emergency evacuation end doors and also why the Metropolitan Railway had to cancel its planned deep level tube tunnels relief lines (and three new stations) from the Kilburn area below Edgware Road to the enlarged station called Edgware Road.This law also affected the DLR when the Bank branch was built. I am baffled how this law does not seem to affect Watford DC line services which also pass through single bore tunnels.


A few still image photos can be found at this Twitter link:
https://twitter.com/citytransportin/status/1132049379928543233

I've also made a short YouTube film, apologies its a little rough, especially at first - I was taking still images with one camera and video with my camcorder at the same time. I was also somewhat peeved as a train travelling in the opposite direction should have arrived first!

 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Ethano92

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2017
Messages
415
Location
London
The passenger information system uses the similar horrible 'new style English' as the Class 345's. I wish the messages were differently worded, were they scripted by someone from overseas? USA? - I much preferred what I heard on Northern Rail services in Yorkshire.

They're voiced by Emma Highnett, same as the 378s, 345s and London Buses. I doubt TFL didn't script the announcements themselves.

I think the 'new English' style is simply so the information that can fit on the LCD screens without it becoming a scrolling screen like on the 700s can also be announced. It's not what we are used to but makes sense rather than all the waffle, the NY subway have had these minimal announcements for some time although there's are really cutting it fine at times.

These trains are supposed to have wifi - anyone tested it?

The WiFi worked really well for me.

One thing I'll note is I am yet to see status updates on 345s or 710s, when will they come about?
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
2,764
What the new Class 710 trains do not have are end doors at the train driver's cabs. This is not an issue for most services, but as far as I am aware it makes them illegal for routes that have single bore tunnels - the law that bans trains without end doors explains why the Class 717 trains on the route via the Northern City Line have emergency evacuation end doors and also why the Metropolitan Railway had to cancel its planned deep level tube tunnels relief lines (and three new stations) from the Kilburn area below Edgware Road to the enlarged station called Edgware Road.This law also affected the DLR when the Bank branch was built. I am baffled how this law does not seem to affect Watford DC line services which also pass through single bore tunnels.

I don't think it is a "law" as such, it will depend on a risk assessment of the individual route. Some single bore tunnels are still wide enough to allow side access in an emergency. Plus I think it would depend on the length of the tunnels as well, Moorgate or ELL trains spend far more time in tunnels than a DC train does.
 

aswilliamsuk

Member
Joined
10 Jul 2016
Messages
173
I thought it was notable, getting 710269 back from Gospel Oak to Barking on the 1455 2G50, that the aircon was not half as cool as it was on the first day - and created a pleasant atmosphere.

With less people on this service compared to the first run, too, it was also possible to note that they feel an awful lot less cluttered than the 378s.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,380
The 378s do have evacuation doors in the driver's can I am pretty sure?
Yes they do. It’s why they are transferring 6 of them to ELL duties, and replacing them with the 6 x 5 car 710s that are on order specifically for use as replacements on the NLL/WLL...
 

AlanFry1

Member
Joined
17 Nov 2011
Messages
662
One question - when are customers on the Lea Valley Lines also getting the free month service for the lack of 710s, same as the GOBLIN line? I assume not this year as its unlikely these will be in service this year on our line if at all? Esp with 720/745 delays?
 

theking

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2011
Messages
626
Why would customers on the lea valley lines get free travel they still have their existing stock.
 

Ted172

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2018
Messages
98
Location
West Midlands
One question - when are customers on the Lea Valley Lines also getting the free month service for the lack of 710s, same as the GOBLIN line? I assume not this year as its unlikely these will be in service this year on our line if at all? Esp with 720/745 delays?

Why would customers on the lea valley lines get free travel they still have their existing stock.

I would assume that passengers who use the Lea Valley Lines will not get a months free travel as actually had enough trains to operate without having to dramatically change the timetable.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,380
Why would customers on the lea valley lines get free travel they still have their existing stock.
Exactly, the free travel must surely be to compensate for the massive gaps in the day to day timetable over a long period. They wouldn’t compensate just for lateness of new trains if the normal timetable still ran, as on the Lea valley.
 

AlanFry1

Member
Joined
17 Nov 2011
Messages
662
I'm sure it was mentioned in the Geoff Marshall video and has been rumoured on Twitter too? Think it's more about the fact LLL users have been suffering with numerous short forming on the countries oldest commuter rolling stock. Would be a reasonable gesture from TFL, especially if the things about 317s in 2020 are true.
 

plcd1

Member
Joined
23 May 2015
Messages
788
I'm sure it was mentioned in the Geoff Marshall video and has been rumoured on Twitter too? Think it's more about the fact LLL users have been suffering with numerous short forming on the countries oldest commuter rolling stock. Would be a reasonable gesture from TFL, especially if the things about 317s in 2020 are true.

I'm sure it was NOT mentioned in Mr Marshall's video in terms of the West Anglia routes (solely references the GOBLIN). There have been no timetable cuts or a 50% loss of service or three years of endless disruption on those routes as there has been on the GOBLIN. I agree that rolling stock reliability varies widely on West Anglia and does lead to short forms in the peaks but it's nothing on the scale of what GOBLIN users have had to tolerate. There is a wider question as to why, after apparently having had £2m spent on the WA fleet (source TfL's own tweets), that Arriva and Bombardier still have such problems with those trains. TfL are not able to make financial gestures like the one you suggest.
 

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,362
The service has definitely been better - but it's definitely the GOBLIN that has suffered the most. Hugely unlikely any subsidised services will be offered. The service is generally consistent on the West Anglia routes, and even with short forms a reasonable service has been run on the worst of days.

Hopefully with the Class 710s finally being introduced it will improve. I also agree that the rolling stock quality and reliability varies wildly, with somewhat lacking evidence of any substantial improvements to the inherited rolling stock. However, we do now have the ex-TfL Rail unit back in service and I observed this yesterday running on its own.

As you say, it would be a reasonable gesture from TfL. However, it is worth remembering that it is actually Bombardier who are financing the month's free travel, and its hugely unlikely that they would do this for the West Anglia routes as well, when the services have remained, on the whole, the same.

All that said though - I still feel shortchanged somewhat from Bush Hill Park and Enfield Town with only a 30-minute frequency in the off peak and on weekends - the 4-car unit I was on today was full and standing by Bruce Grove and the same on the return. I'd love to see an improvement to this when the new trains come, although at least the capacity increase of the new units will be something.
 

20atthemagnet

Member
Joined
1 Feb 2019
Messages
202
Location
England
I'm sure it was mentioned in the Geoff Marshall video and has been rumoured on Twitter too? Think it's more about the fact LLL users have been suffering with numerous short forming on the countries oldest commuter rolling stock. Would be a reasonable gesture from TFL, especially if the things about 317s in 2020 are true.

All these things must happen on my days off. Short forms on Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford lines are seldom. Reliability for 315s are still near the top for Miles per Technical Incident in the country. The only issues we now face is the peak drags longer than under GA. Trains that were previously half full under GA/NX are now full and standing up until at least 8.30pm now. The splits from 8 to 4 after the peak now happen too early for the new level of passengers carried.

The service has definitely been better - but it's definitely the GOBLIN that has suffered the most. Hugely unlikely any subsidised services will be offered. The service is generally consistent on the West Anglia routes, and even with short forms a reasonable service has been run on the worst of days.

Hopefully with the Class 710s finally being introduced it will improve. I also agree that the rolling stock quality and reliability varies wildly, with somewhat lacking evidence of any substantial improvements to the inherited rolling stock. However, we do now have the ex-TfL Rail unit back in service and I observed this yesterday running on its own.

As you say, it would be a reasonable gesture from TfL. However, it is worth remembering that it is actually Bombardier who are financing the month's free travel, and its hugely unlikely that they would do this for the West Anglia routes as well, when the services have remained, on the whole, the same.

All that said though - I still feel shortchanged somewhat from Bush Hill Park and Enfield Town with only a 30-minute frequency in the off peak and on weekends - the 4-car unit I was on today was full and standing by Bruce Grove and the same on the return. I'd love to see an improvement to this when the new trains come, although at least the capacity increase of the new units will be something.

That 30 minute frequency becomes a 2min headway by the time that train gets to Bethnal Green..by time you mix in the the LST bound Chingford booked to pass in front, that Follows an airport that follows a Hertford or Cambridge, all of which have cross in perfect unison at Bethnal green north junction, other wise the outbound LST- chingford has to wait. You get where im going... There is no space for any more services on WA. The LO peak frequency is achieved by GA altering a number of their airport/cambridge/hertford/King Lynn/Broxbourne services so everyone can squeeze in. The timings havent changed much since they looked after the whole WA. The only way to increase freq off peak would be to cut short the london bound trip at sisters/hackney. Been suggested and thrown out many times. This is the reason LO went for longtitudinal seating on WA aswell because scope for an increase in frequency is so bleak unless the whole WA goes back to the drawing board, which is highly unlikely.

What we all should be worrying about (WA side) is electronic coupling being successful and what sort of issues will arise from issues there. Doesn't sound too promising with progress this slow. Then short forms will undoubtedly get much much worse.
 
Last edited:

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,362
All these things must happen on my days off. Short forms on Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford lines are seldom. Reliability for 315s are still near the top for Miles per Technical Incident in the country. The only issues we now face is the peak drags longer than under GA. Trains that were previously half full under GA/NX are now full and standing up until at least 8.30pm now. The splits from 8 to 4 after the peak now happen too early for the new level of passengers carried.

Agreed. Short forms have not been too bad of late anyway, and a few of the LO Twitter staff do post the short forms on the page, so its generally quite easy to avoid. I definitely do think though it would really help if we were able to have the 8 car service for a little bit longer in the peak and it would really help to take some of the increased passenger load.

That 30 minute frequency becomes a 2min headway by the time that train gets to Bethnal Green..by time you mix in the the LST bound Chingford booked to pass in front, that Follows an airport that follows a Hertford or Cambridge, all of which have cross in perfect unison at Bethnal green north junction, other wise the outbound LST- chingford has to wait. You get where im going... There is no space for any more services on WA. The LO peak frequency is achieved by GA altering a number of their airport/cambridge/hertford/King Lynn/Broxbourne services so everyone can squeeze in. The timings havent changed much since they looked after the whole WA. The only way to increase freq off peak would be to cut short the london bound trip at sisters/hackney. Been suggested and thrown out many times. This is the reason LO went for longtitudinal seating on WA aswell because scope for an increase in frequency is so bleak unless the whole WA goes back to the drawing board, which is highly unlikely.

What we all should be worrying about (WA side) is electronic coupling being successful and what sort of issues will arise from issues there. Doesn't sound too promising with progress this slow. Then short forms will undoubtedly get much much worse.

It is a shame but I do forget that things get quite hectic at Bethnal Green, with most of my journeys not going that far in the peak usually. I think the option for longitudinal seating was definitely the right one in this instance to make sure that there's enough space in the coming years for any scope in increased passenger numbers.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,932
All these things must happen on my days off. Short forms on Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford lines are seldom. Reliability for 315s are still near the top for Miles per Technical Incident in the country. The only issues we now face is the peak drags longer than under GA. Trains that were previously half full under GA/NX are now full and standing up until at least 8.30pm now. The splits from 8 to 4 after the peak now happen too early for the new level of passengers carried.



That 30 minute frequency becomes a 2min headway by the time that train gets to Bethnal Green..by time you mix in the the LST bound Chingford booked to pass in front, that Follows an airport that follows a Hertford or Cambridge, all of which have cross in perfect unison at Bethnal green north junction, other wise the outbound LST- chingford has to wait. You get where im going... There is no space for any more services on WA. The LO peak frequency is achieved by GA altering a number of their airport/cambridge/hertford/King Lynn/Broxbourne services so everyone can squeeze in. The timings havent changed much since they looked after the whole WA. The only way to increase freq off peak would be to cut short the london bound trip at sisters/hackney. Been suggested and thrown out many times. This is the reason LO went for longtitudinal seating on WA aswell because scope for an increase in frequency is so bleak unless the whole WA goes back to the drawing board, which is highly unlikely.

Not sure a major re-write would be necessary in the immediate term. Should Crossrail go into the tunnel quicker than expected it may be possible to 'create' a platform on the west side by moving GE services across to the ELs at Bow Jn and GA West Anglia services run Fast Line to Main Line and so allowing additional TfL services on the Sub Lines towards Enfield and Cheshunt.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,168
Should Crossrail go into the tunnel quicker than expected it may be possible to 'create' a platform on the west side by moving GE services across to the ELs at Bow Jn and GA West Anglia services run Fast Line to Main Line and so allowing additional TfL services on the Sub Lines towards Enfield and Cheshunt.

It isn’t.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,030
They're voiced by Emma Highnett, same as the 378s, 345s and London Buses. I doubt TFL didn't script the announcements themselves.

I think the 'new English' style is simply so the information that can fit on the LCD screens without it becoming a scrolling screen like on the 700s can also be announced. It's not what we are used to but makes sense rather than all the waffle, the NY subway have had these minimal announcements for some time although there's are really cutting it fine at times.
The same style is used on the Berlin S Bahn. It's well suited to urban services with frequent stops.
 

700007

Established Member
Joined
6 May 2017
Messages
1,195
Location
Near a bunch of sheds that aren't 66s.
All these things must happen on my days off. Short forms on Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford lines are seldom. Reliability for 315s are still near the top for Miles per Technical Incident in the country. The only issues we now face is the peak drags longer than under GA. Trains that were previously half full under GA/NX are now full and standing up until at least 8.30pm now. The splits from 8 to 4 after the peak now happen too early for the new level of passengers carried.

The short forms have calmed down since 858 came into service but they do still happen. The issue isn't so much the 315s as it is the 317s that are terrible in reliability. Part of the issue I have noticed is it tends to be the loaned GA units that tend to not have much slack in regards to spares. Normal to see them short formed.
 

plcd1

Member
Joined
23 May 2015
Messages
788
I wouldn't write the idea off so quickly. Esp with STAR due to start, LO I would imagine to eventually extend Stratford services in the near future northbound too..

There is no money for any of this. TfL have battened down the hatches on just about everything rail wise barring the commitments it can't get out of - namely some level of Overground service enhancement and the Riverside extension. It has kicked any level of West Anglia enhancement into the long grass - FOI'd documents referenced on this forum show that. When money is very tight this is a standard LT and now TfL response. TfL can't even afford essential upgrades to the tube any more and that is always going to come before anything that might be considered for the Overground. It remains to be seen how well STAR performs given the lack of housing development in the Meridian Water area and the collapse of Haringay council redevelopment plans that might have affected the Northumberland Park area.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,266
Because that would cause problems with the AC only versions if they were converted to dual voltage.

The numbering sequence takes account of the (cheap) options TfL had in the original contract only some of which they took up. If they want to increase the ELL frequency above 2 extra Palace services they will have to buy more stock for NLL to release some 378s. It also probably take inot account stock needed to double up some of the NLL services as 2x4car with new stock.
The original order was 31 AC only (101 to 131), 24 options (x32 to x55), 14 dual voltage (256 to 269) i.e. a continuous sequence

In the end they ordered 9 extra from the options 3 x 4car DV and 6x 5car DV but we can't be entirely sure on the final numbers for those. Wikipedia quotes numbers above the original sequence for those...
I would expect any additional dual-voltage orders to be numbered downwards from 255. Likewise any additional AC only sets would be numbered 132 upwards. Be interesting to see if the 5-car sets get numbered in a separate sub-class to differentiate them (710547-552?)?
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I would expect any additional dual-voltage orders to be numbered downwards from 255. Likewise any additional AC only sets would be numbered 132 upwards. Be interesting to see if the 5-car sets get numbered in a separate sub-class to differentiate them (710547-552?)?
That would be the logical approach - the wiki page seems to suggest otherwise, but that info may not be in the source, I don't own that publication to check.
 

20atthemagnet

Member
Joined
1 Feb 2019
Messages
202
Location
England
The short forms have calmed down since 858 came into service but they do still happen. The issue isn't so much the 315s as it is the 317s that are terrible in reliability. Part of the issue I have noticed is it tends to be the loaned GA units that tend to not have much slack in regards to spares. Normal to see them short formed.

a 4 car only now, Diagrammed.
 
Last edited:

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
2,764
I would expect any additional dual-voltage orders to be numbered downwards from 255. Likewise any additional AC only sets would be numbered 132 upwards. Be interesting to see if the 5-car sets get numbered in a separate sub-class to differentiate them (710547-552?)?

I suspect in 10 years time all the dual voltage units will end up being extended to 5 cars if they aren't already, so probably no need to keep the numbering separate.
 

Jonny

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,562
I suspect in 10 years time all the dual voltage units will end up being extended to 5 cars if they aren't already, so probably no need to keep the numbering separate.

I thought four cars was the maximum on the GOBLIN, at least in normal service for the Gospel Oak ^bay^, and that dual voltage units were normally used on those.
 

plcd1

Member
Joined
23 May 2015
Messages
788
I thought four cars was the maximum on the GOBLIN, at least in normal service for the Gospel Oak ^bay^, and that dual voltage units were normally used on those.

Correct. AIUI the contract with Bombardier includes options both for more complete trains and also extra cars for lengthening existing trains. How valid those options remain is anyone's guess. I think the last I read about possible enhancement on the GOBLIN is that TfL's longer term preference was to go for enhanced frequency with 4 car units. Lengthening is probably a very long way off on the GOBLIN because of the capital cost of dealing with the known difficult locations. The one location that may become troublesome, other than Barking, is Blackhorse Road (BHO) where the volume of interchange / waiting passengers causes congestion. IMO an opportunity was missed during the blockades to modestly widen the platforms at Blackhorse Road and possibly attend to the footbridge's width and that of the stairs. If peak traffic grows again once the service has stabilised then BHO will be a problem.
 

Top