• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EU Referendum: The result and aftermath...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Groningen

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2015
Messages
2,866
Boris Johnson is today in court to explain his claim that 350 million Pound a week is going to Brussel.
 

SteveP29

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2011
Messages
1,009
Location
Chester le Street/ Edinburgh
Actually they probably want British people to have freedom to go anywhere and do anything just because they're British, but not to extend that right to citizens of other countries.

Every Brexiter I've spoken to in the real world expects this as a matter of right, but can't see the hypocrisy in it

Conversely, freedom of movement also has an impact on the lives of people who find house prices in their local area have become inflated due to demand versus supply, with demand having been fuelled by rising population.

Brexit or no Brexit, population is still going to rise.
The lobger we deny real climate change, the more uninhabitable deserts we'll create, forcing more and more people into the habitable areas that are left, and, due to our temperate location, we're going to see an awful lot more people being attracted this way. Plus, that's also going to be the case if we keep going to places in the Middle East and bombing the s**t out of them (Iraq, possibly soon Iran) or encouraging civil wars (Syria)
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,242
Location
No longer here
Brexit or no Brexit, population is still going to rise.
The lobger we deny real climate change, the more uninhabitable deserts we'll create, forcing more and more people into the habitable areas that are left, and, due to our temperate location, we're going to see an awful lot more people being attracted this way. Plus, that's also going to be the case if we keep going to places in the Middle East and bombing the s**t out of them (Iraq, possibly soon Iran) or encouraging civil wars (Syria)

This is indeed an inalienable truth. The problem is that population growth is largest in developing countries. How do we best intervene?
 

Adsy125

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2016
Messages
422
This is indeed an inalienable truth. The problem is that population growth is largest in developing countries. How do we best intervene?
As has been mentioned before, population growth is inevitable in developing countries, as life expectancy increases, without the corresponding decrease in children. However eventually it balances out again. This has happened in the UK, US and everywhere else. Bangladesh for example, only has a fertility rate of 2.2 children/woman.

Edit: The best way to intervene is a brexiteers nightmare, increasing foreign aid! (To speed up development of the country)
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,266
Location
St Albans
As has been mentioned before, population growth is inevitable in developing countries, as life expectancy increases, without the corresponding decrease in children. However eventually it balances out again. This has happened in the UK, US and everywhere else. Bangladesh for example, only has a fertility rate of 2.2 children/woman.

Edit: The best way to intervene is a brexiteers nightmare, increasing foreign aid! (To speed up development of the country)
In addition the per capita impact on the environment is often inversely proportionate to the birth rate. A single child born in the US or the more affluent parts of Europe probably puts more demands on the earth's resources than a family of ten in a developing nation in the African sub-continent.
So those pompously proud of restricting themselves to two children in a nuclear family in the UK sneering at a family with 10 children in sub-Saharan Africa should consider that they themselves are probably responsible for more environmental damage to the earth than that much larger family in a developing land.
 
Last edited:

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,045
Location
North Wales
To paraphrase, his / the DUP's options in order of preference would be
  • leaving unilaterally
  • remaining in the EU
  • accepting the negociated withdrawal agreement
 

Grassmoor

Member
Joined
31 May 2019
Messages
6
The problem with Brexit is everyone got their own idea of what Brexit should be but only one Brexit can happen.The whole thing is like a wheel that refuses to stop spinning no one has a plan or idea on what to do next too many promises made that are impossible in reality. Brexit will shadow British politics for many years to come even if we do leave. The subject is toxic and will change our political system for better or for the worse only time will give us the answer.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,924
Location
Nottingham
Donald Trump: sent in Nigel Farage and go for a No Deal.
Not sure why we should take advice from someone whose not-so-hidden agenda is to weaken the EU which is one of the few bodies big enough to stand up to him. Any trade deal between the UK and the Trump administration will be about as even-handed as a mouse and an elephant on a seesaw.
 

nidave

Member
Joined
12 Jul 2011
Messages
923
Donald Trump: sent in Nigel Farage and go for a No Deal.
Lots of people on twitter saying what Trump is saying is what should be done. These are the same people who told Obama he should keep his nose out of the UK's business. (Even Farage is quoted as saying the same thing about Obama)
 

404250

Member
Joined
25 May 2018
Messages
367
Trump and Obama can say whatever they like. So can Putin. We can choose to ignore them.
 

nidave

Member
Joined
12 Jul 2011
Messages
923
Trump and Obama can say whatever they like. So can Putin. We can choose to ignore them.
You miss the point. The people criticising Obama sticking his nose in where its not wanted are now paising Trump for doing the same thing.
 

404250

Member
Joined
25 May 2018
Messages
367
I'm saying either are entitled to stick their nose in - everyone can voice an opinion. Ignore the people who praise trump. People will be hypocritical - that's politics whilst it's very divided (as it is in the UK and US at present)
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,242
Location
No longer here
I'm saying either are entitled to stick their nose in - everyone can voice an opinion. Ignore the people who praise trump. People will be hypocritical - that's politics whilst it's very divided (as it is in the UK and US at present)

It's not good diplomacy to precede a state visit (that is - a visit predicated on good relations between the two nations) with political opining.

The President is here as a guest of the country and our head of state, and should behave with good grace. Sending angry tweets about Sadiq Khan and saying who he things should be the next Prime Minister are not on.
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,045
Location
North Wales
It's not good diplomacy to precede a state visit (that is - a visit predicated on good relations between the two nations) with political opining.

The President is here as a guest of the country and our head of state, and should behave with good grace. Sending angry tweets about Sadiq Khan and saying who he things should be the next Prime Minister are not on.
(Sarcasm mode on)
But surely he was invited over because we need his sage insight and guidance at this troubled time? :P
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
2,412
(Sarcasm mode on)
But surely he was invited over because we need his sage insight and guidance at this troubled time? :P
or to make us think "that Boris bloke, I wouldn't want him to be PM but then again it could be worse!"
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,150
Location
SE London
Khan was at it as well.

Well, last time, Trump made false and derogatory statements on Twitter about London. Khan would've arguably been failing in his duty as Mayor of London if he hadn't stood up to defend London and London's reputation against Trump's attacks.

This time, Trump launched into his tirade against Khan out of the blue without any apparent provocation. Surely Khan should be able to defend himself?
 

BlueFox

Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
759
Location
Carlisle
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top