tigerroar
On Moderation
RTT says that the Highlander went via Falkirk this morning yet not long after leaving Edinburgh there was a heavy clunking noise and I'm certain it went over the Forth Bridge. Is RTT wrong?
Yes, both of these things would seem good ideas (sittings and or pre booking a meal).It does seem that a good way to avoid all of this would indeed be to have "sittings" (as many other international trains do, e.g. the Canadian) and to have people incentivised in some way to prebook their meal online (which means they can load the right amount of everything).
RTT says that the Highlander went via Falkirk this morning yet not long after leaving Edinburgh there was a heavy clunking noise and I'm certain it went over the Forth Bridge. Is RTT wrong?
RTT says the Fort William portion went to Glasgow via Bathgate, the Inverness portion went via Falkirk unless RTT is wrong
I'm sure the reality gap between CS marketing and the actual service delivery experienced by passengers will, if not resolved before too long, stack up problems for SERCO.
Yes, good point, tho the Lowlander's later start might mean there is reduced demand for meals etc before people head to berths, meaning the obv heavy staff workload in the post boarding time window is a little less on that service?The idea of extra staff who only work between Euston and Preston, and presumably North of Edinburgh, seems reasonable. After all the drivers swap there.
Wouldn't work so well on the Lowlander
well, that's the prob with forums like this - inc my own comments I accept, where you focus on the points where it could be done better, but overall it's great. My comments were mostly copied /adapted from my feedback responses to CS survey - yet for the final score questions - would I recommend it and how would I score it overall and compared with alternatives, I gave v high scores, because overall IMHO it is great and anyone who likes train travel should do it if they can.I must admit I have no reason to travel to Scotland, but if I did I don't think I would use the CS service based on the comments here. Poor check-in service, late departures, lack of space in the lounge cars, not being able to order food, or no hot food provisions, poor ride on brand new stock, and toilets that don't work (again something you wouldn't expect on new rolling stock).
Someone mentioned flying. I think If I needed to get to Glasgow for a morning appointment i would opt for the short flight via Easyjet rather than taking the sleeper, and saving myself £55 in the process. Someone also mentioned the "experience" being sold and it's been marketed like a cruise or hotel room on wheels, but at £100 for a basic single berth I would expect a decent service, which doesn't happen according to the stories in this thread
Last week on the highlander with an ECML diversion I was in the bar car, train left slowly, stopped at wembley (?) sidings for 15 mins or so, then eventually slowly restarted apparently to most, heading back towards Euston. This caused mass confusion to many in the bar
The other part of the 'journey experience' that is a problem is 'space management' in the lounge car.
I'm sure you have it correct.
Last week on the highlander with an ECML diversion I was in the bar car, train left slowly, stopped at wembley (?) sidings for 15 mins or so, then eventually slowly restarted apparently to most, heading back towards Euston. This caused mass confusion to many in the bar, but staff too busy to explain, and (thankfully IMHO), no pointless tannoy announcements to tell people what was going on, as we were all to schedule as per RTT info. I explained to the people sitting opposite me - but I must have been speaking loud enough for other nearby tables to hear - that the train had to be cleared of Euston, was now reversing onto another route across north london and then heading north, and it didn't matter as we all had beds to sleep in comfortably and the only issue to concern oneself about was where we were in the morning, not where we were now! A lady sitting a table or so away was most grateful for the info and said, 'you should have been making a public announcement'.
It seemed to me that if the train was not going forwards at speed some sort of collective panic was at risk of setting in!!
Maybe twitter has a role, but what's the point in tweeting some remote customer service centre, who can't do anything more than is already being done to get to the destination on time? If you have a time sensitive reason for arrival then surely you would have the good sense to simply find a member of staff (it's generously staffed after all, compared with an OPO commuter train!) tell them, and get some advice, which I'm sure they would do their best to offer.
On one occasion heading north to Inverness the "priority to first-class" rule was strictly enforced - and the staff appeared to be very reluctant to allow people to share a table with strangers (I did share with a couple who turned up later but was asked more than once if it was all right for me), so the lounge seemed pretty empty but people were still being turned away.
Heading south from Aberdeen on another trip I'd booked breakfast in the lounge and was told I had half an hour to eat it and vacate my table as it was needed for others, this despite the fact I thought I'd booked a fairly late breakfast and there seemed to be plenty of spaces available.
On a positive point of accuracy, the two issues of the new boarding process and an overwhelmed Highlander lounge are not unconnected since one of the benefits of taking the hosts off the doors is to put two staff in the lounge ahead of departure.
This has improved speed of service quite a bit.
Whilst I think that space management in the lounge cars on the northbound Highlander is desirable, I think that discouraging people from sharing tables with strangers is bizarre.
The same happens on long distance Amtrak services but there is a separate lounge carInterestingly on the Canadian you are allocated to share in the restaurant car - no choice in the matter, you sit where you are told.
Interestingly on the Canadian you are allocated to share in the restaurant car - no choice in the matter, you sit where you are told.
Is there a customer panel / user group or similar where these things can be raised with the CS Management in a formal manner?
What proportion of the total passengers can fit in the lounge at once? (Assuming strangers can share a table)
They can't even deal with customer service, nevermind suggestions...
amusing that the mantra of 'not sharing' berths gets extended to tables....surely the whole point of a convivial atmosphere relates to chatting to people you don't know!Last time I travelled hardly anyone noticed! One woman was confused by all the North London Line stations we passed through, however, as they were closer to her home than London Euston.
I've noticed some form of space management happen a couple of times (which isn't bad considering from personal experience there's a 50-50 chance the lounge will be out-of-use).
On one occasion heading north to Inverness the "priority to first-class" rule was strictly enforced - and the staff appeared to be very reluctant to allow people to share a table with strangers (I did share with a couple who turned up later but was asked more than once if it was all right for me), so the lounge seemed pretty empty but people were still being turned away.
Heading south from Aberdeen on another trip I'd booked breakfast in the lounge and was told I had half an hour to eat it and vacate my table as it was needed for others, this despite the fact I thought I'd booked a fairly late breakfast and there seemed to be plenty of spaces available.
there is enough space, but it's hard to place the food anywhere and then manage to sit in a good place to eat it whilst the food, plate etc are in a convenient position, mainly as no seat in room.I quite like the idea of food being served to you in yourberthroom if there was enough space.