• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 442s - Now at the end of the road and to be withdrawn permanently

Status
Not open for further replies.

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,396
Then lease 2 of those 6 to SWR as a pair of Christmas trees for the 18, especially if spares for the older systems are going to be harder to find?
Or strip all 6 now as that would take up less space...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

trainmania100

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2015
Messages
2,567
Location
Newhaven
Apologies if mentioned before but does anyone have confirmation of which 6 are stored (or the 18 that are being refurbed) Thanks
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,191
Just spotted a 5 car at St Denys.... so much for not running as single units!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,413
Are you certain of that? I was told no 5s at all to protect the network in case one sat down.
The track access application only mentions that they will operate as 10 car pairs to remove performance risks caused by splitting and joining. Nothing in there about the risks of single units running about and failing.
 
Last edited:

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,191
I will bow to others more in depth knowledge. Any idea why the unit did a shunt at St Denys? Appears it was RT at Beovis Valley, then went into P4 at St Denys, followed by a shunt on the UF, and next reported nearly 50 mins down.
 

mchd2000

Member
Joined
2 Dec 2018
Messages
84
Have the Company Council approved the 442s yet, or is there still a very long list of problems preventing them from entering passenger service.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,935
Have the Company Council approved the 442s yet, or is there still a very long list of problems preventing them from entering passenger service.

The first pair of units were signed off on Monday so that particular issue with that 10 car has been resolved. However there remains a Network Rail issue that has only come to light this week and is being tackled currently.
 

mchd2000

Member
Joined
2 Dec 2018
Messages
84
The first pair of units were signed off on Monday so that particular issue with that 10 car has been resolved. However there remains a Network Rail issue that has only come to light this week and is being tackled currently.
Oh ok, thanks for the update. Do you know where the Network Rail route restrictions are by any chance?
 

southern442

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
2,197
Location
Surrey
Whilst the leasing companies will let them be leased for a peppercorn rent the cost to overhaul is just too prohibitive for stock of that age especially now newer stock is coming off lease. Just remember the best 18 were chosen from the 24 and they are already sadly massively late.

The average age of a train is 30-40 years, think the line Pompey CIGs were withdrawn after 33 years (1972 to 2005). The PIGs are now 32 years old with 52 year old traction equipment. If the SWR franchise was coming up now with the stock available now its highly unlikely 442s would be chosen.
I thought they were getting re-tractioned?
 

Dren Ahmeti

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2017
Messages
550
Location
Bristol
How come SWR have been allowed to complete training runs on the 442s with this many route restrictions - do they relate to specific lines which can be avoided when outside of normal operation?
As far as I can remember, some of the restrictions are to do with which lines they can run on, which means that we’ll probably be seeing a lot of either 1Qxx or 1Xxx headcodes as a “do not route off path” or 9xxx to remind the signaller to not path them differently.
 

WA_Driver

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2015
Messages
148
Location
London
How come SWR have been allowed to complete training runs on the 442s with this many route restrictions - do they relate to specific lines which can be avoided when outside of normal operation?

They avoided running the trains on the routes where the restrictions apply
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,935
They avoided running the trains on the routes where the restrictions apply

However there is currently an issue in the London area, where they have run on test but there is now a concern over a potential wrong routing - this is being worked through.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,413
what routes are they restricted to travel on?
I think in this context they're talking about the specific details of overall routes, such as crossovers or passing or stopping at specific platforms. They were never 'go anywhere' for platforming at Waterloo in their previous use with SWT.

As a hypothetical example, suppose they could generally use the main line between Bournemouth and Waterloo, and the fast pair on the four track section, then a route restriction might stop them crossing fast to slow somewhere during problems. so they'd have to have special treatment - or not run at all...

...Having said that, it's still difficult to believe that any problems can't be overcome, given their previous use.
 

sleeper fan

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jun 2019
Messages
99
aha that makes sense...got the wrong end of the stick. Anyone think they would return to any Waterloo to Weymouth workings at some stage even if its just once a day? If they did what services would you guys think they would be best on?
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,935
aha that makes sense...got the wrong end of the stick. Anyone think they would return to any Waterloo to Weymouth workings at some stage even if its just once a day? If they did what services would you guys think they would be best on?

No because Waterloo to Weymouth services split and join at Bournemouth with the detached unit working back to London on a different service. For that reason you need all the units running this service group to be compatible with each other else you would pretty quickly have a 442 trying to attach to a 444.

For this reason 442 have not been re-cleared beyond Poole.
 

sleeper fan

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jun 2019
Messages
99
that's a big shame but understandable...why does Poole always get the good stock. If there was enough power beyond Poole then the 442s could run as 10 cars to Weymouth. It might have already been said but why are they not running as 5 cars anywhere. despite this could a single 442 run to Weymouth in an emergency?
 

sleeper fan

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jun 2019
Messages
99
Anyway is there any update on the door problem? Could we see them in service by the end of the month?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top