sjpowermac
Established Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2018
- Messages
- 1,989
I would think this refers to the introduction of two rakes of Mk3 stock as an interim measure.Well someone was a bit unrealistic in the PR department.
I would think this refers to the introduction of two rakes of Mk3 stock as an interim measure.Well someone was a bit unrealistic in the PR department.
I would think this refers to the introduction of two rakes of Mk3 stock as an interim measure.
I’ve learned lots from the thread this week, especially that promising to increase capacity, whilst in reality decreasing it, is actually to be seen as a successBecause TPE are getting new trains, new trains will solve everything!
I think you'll find that it didn't really go swimmingly well. Loads of dead-end classes, unreliability, stacks of money wasted, etc, etc.How did the railways manage in the late 1950s when 1,000s of new diesel units and locos, of many different classes, were introduced into service in just a couple of years, and when that form of traction was completely new to most lines and most of the workforce? If it had gone on at today's rate the last batch of Met-Cam DMUs would just about be entering service now.
I think you'll find that it didn't really go swimmingly well. Loads of dead-end classes, unreliability, stacks of money wasted, etc, etc.
Those are the words of Visit Northumberland, not TPE.“220 brand new state-of-the-art intercity trains will be introduced between 2017 and 2020”
Those are the words of Visit Northumberland, not TPE.
Actually the text is quite different. The Leeds Chamber of Commerce text says:The same text is in the West Yorkshire document. Where do you think they got it from?
Leeds Chamber of Commerce said:44 new state of the art intercity trains, 220 new carriages by 2019
I did. And it doesn't say “220 brand new state-of-the-art intercity trains will be introduced between 2017 and 2020” anywhere.Actually it is the same. Read under “Key benefits in your region”.
Ok mate let me highlight the number of times it mentions 2017 introduction.
Does anyone have a link to a franchise agreement with dates? I think unless we do then it’s all speculation.
There’s a copy here:
https://assets.publishing.service.g..._data/file/767851/tpe-franchise-agreement.pdf
There’s mention of ‘leasing’ IC100 (what later became Nova 3) from 02.11.2017 but I would think ‘leasing’ and ‘introducing’ would be two separate concepts.
View attachment 64156
The version linked to has the actual introduction dates redacted:
View attachment 64157
Though there is some useful information about Class 185 handback (does this give some clues?) on page 251
View attachment 64158
I think we might need a forum lawyer to decipher the late delivery information on page 212!
View attachment 64159 View attachment 64160
I think it says that if TPE try to save money by not introducing new stock in a timely fashion then they have to pay up. I doubt with the current situation they are saving money, so nothing to pay. (Happy for anyone more versed on contract law to correct that one, I nearly fell asleep reading it!).
My admiration to the folk trying to deal with this all round!
And the mk.5's are hardly untested - what was Velim for otherwise?
Nothing more than running around at 100mph and having beers in the evening.
All 195/331/397s and Mk 5as have been thoroughly tested there, but were they doing start/stop runs simulating stopping at stations, back up to 60/70mph and then braking again to simulate real world conditions? Doubt it b
You also have the question the competence of Freightliner and ROG who were contracted to do the commissioning, what experience have they had regarding testing brand new to the UK stock?
Also, the 802s seem to have had a very long testing window, considering they are fundamentally similar to the GWR 802s, one would expect a shorter testing period for them than the other fleets. Yes, infrastructure issues have delayed the introduction on the East Coast, but as far as I know not one of the new fleets has had any normal driver or guard trained on them.
Quite so on all the points you make.Yes, the introduction dates for the new trains were redacted, however I believe the document states that the mk.3's had to be in "unrestricted passenger service" by 1 April 2017. That's over two years since extra capacity was supposed to be in service.
There were some right gems in that TPE document. When I got to the bit where it stipulated the length of time for LED lighting to come on in vending machines I gave upI love the instance on keeping to public sector contracts / franchise agreements on here. If only you all knew just how often these are badly researched, drawn up and understood by Whitehall officials. If you think the delays to rolling stock are bad, you should see some of the ones I have knowledge of in my job! I wouldn't trust some contract writers there to draw up a contract for delivering newspapers, let alone hundreds of millions of pounds of trains! This is why private companies so often seem to get away with delays!
I have posted this before, but for reference this was the originally envisaged timescale - Nova 3 into service Summer 2018, all in service by Winter 2018/19. Slippage is to be expected, certainly.
All 195/331/397s and Mk 5as have been thoroughly tested there, but were they doing start/stop runs simulating stopping at stations, back up to 60/70mph and then braking again to simulate real world conditions? Doubt it b
In regards of Freightliner, I have been involved in testing, commissioning, new fleet introductions, etc for around 15 years. I have been involved in the introduction of the 185s, 350/3, 350/4, class 97/3's and ERTMS, NR DBSO. Trsting of upgrades with 323, 90s, etc. The Freightliner team on the Mk5a and originally on the 397s are again experienced testing drivers and again I trained them on the 185s when they tested those. A number of them have just come off 4 years f testing and commissioning the 379s. In Velim we only had access to driving on 1 day only and on that day comments where made. Since then we have worked very closely with the different companies when we have raised an issue. Unfortunately new trains are software driven and a very minor change to one thing alerts others that can then csusecother issues. For example the system was looking for the brake to release in a certain timescale, when an alteration was made the setting was out by milliseconds which would cause a fault to be shown. This was worked through and sorted. The Freightliner drivers and riding inspector are very competent and experienced in the testing and have more experience in loco hauled knowledge and issues with them than the final operator will have. May I ask what is your experience in testing, commissioning of new stock especially with a manufacturer new to the British market?Nothing more than running around at 100mph and having beers in the evening.
All 195/331/397s and Mk 5as have been thoroughly tested there, but were they doing start/stop runs simulating stopping at stations, back up to 60/70mph and then braking again to simulate real world conditions? Doubt it b
You also have the question the competence of Freightliner and ROG who were contracted to do the commissioning, what experience have they had regarding testing brand new to the UK stock?
Also, the 802s seem to have had a very long testing window, considering they are fundamentally similar to the GWR 802s, one would expect a shorter testing period for them than the other fleets. Yes, infrastructure issues have delayed the introduction on the East Coast, but as far as I know not one of the new fleets has had any normal driver or guard trained on them.
Anyone have any info on progress or are we just like kids moaning 'are we nearly there yet' and squabbling with the person next to us?