• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TPE Scotland/Bolton/Manchester. How to stop commuters boarding?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
To start with until they twig. The concerns are with the early-hours commuters who do the trip daily, it won't take them long to work out a get-around! During the day when there's many fewer pax - not letting on a literal handful would be pretty miserable of TPE.

Most people won't. There are a number of VTs from Euston in the evening peak that stop set-down-only at MKC, and there are not manual ticket checks for every VT departure at Euston (though it's most these days). You only see at most one or two having "been a bit cheeky" and getting off when you board at MKC going north.

There is a "fairness" argument of ignoring the odd few, but in reality they won't cause a problem. The point of it is to stop them being crowded out to the point passengers to Scotland can't board, and to stop 13/14 operations being adversely affected by said crowds trying to board/alight through end doors. One or two doesn't cause a problem.
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,298
That might well do a good job, although it would introduce at Bolton a different culture to what they are used to. As said above, Bolton is very "turn up and go". You'd have to introduce checks to ensure that only TPE tickets were being used. That puts pressure on staff and passengers.
Definitely so. The ECML between any of Darlington/Durham/Newcastle is served by any of TPE, XC, and LNER. The ticket combinations available include off-peak, anytime and advance/specified train only, as well as TPE-only and XC-only of the 2 former options.
One of the issues with this approach is confusion created by operator-specific ticket validity and implications on dwell times at Piccadilly. It works in Newcastle because most services either start from a terminal platform or have a booked 10-15 minute stop, which provides plenty of time for the guard to make announcements regarding validity. They are very, very clear about what is and isn't valid and complete thorough ticket checks upon departure. However, enforcing this on a booked 2 minute stop at P14 would be nigh-on impossible.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Surely it's enforced by flogging a new ticket when you do the ticket check? The TOC get their money, the passenger maybe learns their lesson - no problem?
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,217
People getting the Glasgow bound train with the plan to alight at Bolton are of course running the risk that the train could be diverted and they would have no entitlement to compensation should they end up at Preston . They would also be liable for paying to get themselves back from Preston . If there is any problems on the route from Manchester to Preston via Chorley then the first thing TPE will do is divert these services via chat moss and onto the WCML at Golborne junction which only leaves them to arrange forward transport for passengers boarding at Bolton .

Of course anyone getting the Airport bound train from Bolton isnt really exposed to the same risk , but apart from in the morning peak are the numbers of passengers from Bolton going to present an issue ?
I thought an idea mooted was to path a Northern service immediately in front of the TPE to soak up commuters.
Until one morning when the Northern service is cancelled , delayed or short formed and then you have a platform full of passengers who have been unable to board who try to board the next train .

Surely it's enforced by flogging a new ticket when you do the ticket check? The TOC get their money, the passenger maybe learns their lesson - no problem?
I can just see the story in the local papers now , or the raft of report forms from staff verbally abused or assaulted for trying to enforce this .
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,261
Location
Greater Manchester
The biggest problem with enforcing the restrictions will not be at Bolton but on Piccadilly P14 in the evening peak (xx26 departures). Amidst all the chaos of overcrowding, red lines, "shouters" and Scotland passengers with suitcases trying to get to their reserved seats.

It will not be feasible to try to get the Bolton passengers to wait in the lounge, because a Northern service to Blackpool via Bolton is scheduled into P14 straight after the TPE.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,020
Location
here to eternity
Although they are shown as set down only in the timetable, and they won't wait for people and you cannot get a travel on them, I would dispute that boarding these trains is in any way 'unofficial' given that they are displayed on departure boards on the platform as available trains to London Liverpool Street!

They must have come to the conclusion that to try and enforce the set down only rule at this location is more bother than it's worth - they need those services in and out of the platform as quickly as possible given the congested nature of the line there.

There is only 1tph of this now, but staff have always been very big on enforcing it. If you try, expect the guard to see you and the train will not depart until you are found (or they give up). I remember once staff going through a train to find someone who had boarded (they were shouting about it as they did), they kept quiet and got away with it.

Going the other way the Euston barrier staff will not let you through with a ticket to Watford.

The set down only rule at Motherwell in BR days was also rigerouslly enforced
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,298
Surely it's enforced by flogging a new ticket when you do the ticket check? The TOC get their money, the passenger maybe learns their lesson - no problem?
So just add further barriers to rail travel and screw the passenger, who in an equivalent situation say the week/month beforehand would have been entirely innocent? The lesson learnt by the passenger will be to drive into Manchester next time if they've ended up paying for 2 tickets and been told off by the guard. Some of the car parks on the outskirts are ridiculously cheap, especially on the wasteland only just behind Victoria.
Until one morning when the Northern service is cancelled , delayed or short formed and then you have a platform full of passengers who have been unable to board who try to board the next train .
So service distruption. Maybe the long distance passengers can cope with 20 minutes of Bolton passengers on their service. There seems to be a notion that TPE Scottish/Cumbrian passengers have an exclusive entitlement to a standee-free and commuter-free service for the final 20 minutes into/out of Manchester.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
So just add further barriers to rail travel and screw the passenger, who in an equivalent situation say the week/month beforehand would have been entirely innocent? The lesson learnt by the passenger will be to drive into Manchester next time if they've ended up paying for 2 tickets and been told off by the guard. Some of the car parks on the outskirts are ridiculously cheap, especially on the wasteland only just behind Victoria.

Fundamentally segregation of InterCity and local flows makes sense. There are many ways it is done internationally, but there are more countries that do it than don't do it, most far more strictly than the UK. Compulsory reservations is one, different ticketing is another. I just don't see an issue with it on this flow. There should be commuter EMUs for the commuters.

Of course in a sensible world Greater Manchester would have an integrated rail, bus and tram ticketing system, with no "train tickets" sold from Manchester to Bolton at all, simply TfGM tickets for use on the mode(s) of your choosing. These would not be valid on IC trains, of which this is one.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
So just add further barriers to rail travel and screw the passenger, who in an equivalent situation say the week/month beforehand would have been entirely innocent? The lesson learnt by the passenger will be to drive into Manchester next time if they've ended up paying for 2 tickets and been told off by the guard. Some of the car parks on the outskirts are ridiculously cheap, especially on the wasteland only just behind Victoria.

So service distruption. Maybe the long distance passengers can cope with 20 minutes of Bolton passengers on their service. There seems to be a notion that TPE Scottish/Cumbrian passengers have an exclusive entitlement to a standee-free and commuter-free service for the final 20 minutes into/out of Manchester.
But if we are going to make a railway fit for purpose, long-distance trains being used by commuters, or vice-versa, don't always work. Not for TOCs, not for passengers, not for passenger comfort.
 

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,236
But if we are going to make a railway fit for purpose, long-distance trains being used by commuters, or vice-versa, don't always work. Not for TOCs, not for passengers, not for passenger comfort.
But TPE carries commuters from Huddersfield and Dewsbury to Leeds and from Newton-le Willows to both Manchester and Liverpool, even though there are slower alternatives. And what about Penrith - Carlisle or Wigan - Warrington, where there are no local services?
 

Fawkes Cat

Established Member
Joined
8 May 2017
Messages
2,976
Am I right in understanding that we're talking about trains running Scotland - (various places) - Bolton - Piccadilly - Airport and back again? Because if so there is a difference for the long distance travellers.

Heading North, the passengers from Manchester to Glasgow presumably want to sit down all the way - but without any restriction, they'll be fighting Bolton commuters for their seats until the train gets to Bolton.

Going south, our long distance travellers are already sitting down by the time the train gets to Bolton. A seated passenger won't be particularly inconvenienced by commuters standing in the aisle next to them.

So it is the North-bound flow that - somehow - will need controlling. So we're talking about boarding control in Manchester, and alighting control in Bolton.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
But TPE carries commuters from Huddersfield and Dewsbury to Leeds and from Newton-le Willows to both Manchester and Liverpool, even though there are slower alternatives.

TPE proper is more a regional express operation than an IC one. Really the only "proper" IC they have is the Scottish service under discussion.

And what about Penrith - Carlisle or Wigan - Warrington, where there are no local services?

That is a quirk of the system, but nobody is proposing barring those passengers from it because, unlike Bolton, there is no alternative service.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
So it is the North-bound flow that - somehow - will need controlling. So we're talking about boarding control in Manchester, and alighting control in Bolton.

And that way round just sticking a "u" on Bolton solves it completely (if you want to put enough uncertainty up the commuters, occasionally run it non-stop to Preston with an alternative running just behind for those from Bolton). For passengers doing Airport-Bolton there is the Blackpool service.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
3,527
They'll just not advertise the service as stopping at Bolton.

Some will be in the know and will get on, but many won't especially if another Bolton service is following behind, which is quite likely.

No need for all this over the top talk as if some here are deliberately going to go out of their way to board and alight at Bolton just to make a point.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,152
And that way round just sticking a "u" on Bolton solves it completely (if you want to put enough uncertainty up the commuters, occasionally run it non-stop to Preston with an alternative running just behind for those from Bolton). For passengers doing Airport-Bolton there is the Blackpool service.
So how do you tell me at Manchester Airport not to board that train which is going to my destination (Bolton)? Also, if it gets conveniently diverted via Wigan, if pax for Bolton ARE allowed on at MIA, what do they do when it gets diverted?
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,152
They'll just not advertise the service as stopping at Bolton.
Some will be in the know and will get on, but many won't especially if another Bolton service is following behind, which is quite likely.
No need for all this over the top talk as if some here are deliberately going to go out of their way to board and alight at Bolton just to make a point.
As alluded to above, towards Manchester isn't necessarily the problem, it's Manchester - Bolton where those bound for further north might not get a seat until Bolton - however wouldn't they be able to reserve a seat when buying their long-distance ticket/
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
5,484
Location
Sheffield
Heading North, the passengers from Manchester to Glasgow presumably want to sit down all the way - but without any restriction, they'll be fighting Bolton commuters for their seats until the train gets to Bolton..

The issue is that Manchester to Scotland passengers want to be able to get on the train without and not be prevented from doing so because the train is full of people going to Bolton.

When the Scotland trains were diverted via Wigan they initially called there and again overcrowding was a problem (but at least The Shouters hadn't appeared then). The Wigan stop was subsequently taken out of most TPE service but that was no major problem as Wigan has frequent Virgin trains to Scotland.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,219
Location
West of Andover
The issue is that Manchester to Scotland passengers want to be able to get on the train without and not be prevented from doing so because the train is full of people going to Bolton.

When the Scotland trains were diverted via Wigan they initially called there and again overcrowding was a problem (but at least The Shouters hadn't appeared then). The Wigan stop was subsequently taken out of most TPE service but that was no major problem as Wigan has frequent Virgin trains to Scotland.

Wigan is slightly difference than Bolton, that TPE provided at the time the only fast service between Manchester & Wigan, the alternatives were a mix of all-stops & semi-fasts via Hindley [both via Bolton & via Swinton] where you never quite knew what was going to pop up (142/150 or 156) compared to the non-stop 185/350 (which also had air conditioning). Stand for ~ 25 minutes on a 350 or stand for ~ 45 minutes on a 142 calling everywhere, take your pick. Since TPE stopped serving Wigan there was an hourly Northern service (previously Blackpool, now Barrow/Windermere)

Bolton on the other hand has 7 (?) services an hour to Manchester of which all bar 1 are fast to Salford, so there isn't much of a journey time penalty for Bolton passengers to have to wait for the next available service
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
So how do you tell me at Manchester Airport not to board that train which is going to my destination (Bolton)? Also, if it gets conveniently diverted via Wigan, if pax for Bolton ARE allowed on at MIA, what do they do when it gets diverted?

Because it's not a train for local journeys within Greater Manchester. There are others you can use. The same argument applies to Picc.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,152
Because it's not a train for local journeys within Greater Manchester. There are others you can use. The same argument applies to Picc.
.
In the next hour the departures from MIA are (I have emboldened the ones that go through Bolton)

19:29 Preston (Lancs) On time 4A Detailsfor the 19:29
19:39 Blackpool North On time 1A Detailsfor the 19:39
19:47 Middlesbrough On time 2A Detailsfor the 19:47
19:50 Liverpool Lime Street On time 3B Detailsfor the 19:50
19:53 Cleethorpes On time 3A Detailsfor the 19:53
19:59 Manchester Piccadilly On time 2A Detailsfor the 19:59
20:05 Wilmslow On time 3A Detailsfor the 20:05
20:10 Preston (Lancs) On time 1A Detailsfor the 20:10
20:19 York

So in the next hour there's one direct train and the others require a change, Two would be Cleethorpes and Middlesborough which are "not a train for local journeys within Greater Manchester" yet would be used by those wanting to change at Picc!
 

vlad

Member
Joined
13 May 2018
Messages
749
Most people won't. There are a number of VTs from Euston in the evening peak that stop set-down-only at MKC, and there are not manual ticket checks for every VT departure at Euston (though it's most these days). You only see at most one or two having "been a bit cheeky" and getting off when you board at MKC going north.

I've travelled on one of those trains once. The display boards in London and on the train said first stop Stoke, as were the guard's announcements. As I hadn't looked at the timetable I didn't realise it also stopped at Milton Keynes so it worried me a bit when we did stop!

Plenty of people got on but I didn't see anyone get off.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
3,604
How about passengers with longer distance tickets to Bolton who change at Manchester for their last leg. Will their tickets be valid?
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,096
How about passengers with longer distance tickets to Bolton who change at Manchester for their last leg. Will their tickets be valid?
No, because their local journey might well prevent someone else getting their train for Scotland. There are other options for Bolton, nothing else for Scotland.
I have had exactly the same problem not being able to get on TPE trains coming west from Leeds: the journey ends up taking an hour longer (or more if connections don't work later in the day) just because the train is crammed with people who can't be arsed to wait for a stopper to Dewsbury or Huddersfield.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
The solution here, as with Reading, is to provide choices and options. Commuters will generally get the next fast train and won't care who runs it. They'll only make a beeline for the express if the alternatives are worse.

Trying to enforce pick-up/set-down won't work if the train is the most attractive one for commuters. The solution is a crowd-busting fast train 5mins before the TPE. Start it at Bolton so commuters will definitely go for it as they'll get a seat. Same in the evening.

If a train is very popular there's usually a reason. And carrots work better than sticks.
 

option

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2017
Messages
636
As alluded to above, towards Manchester isn't necessarily the problem, it's Manchester - Bolton where those bound for further north might not get a seat until Bolton - however wouldn't they be able to reserve a seat when buying their long-distance ticket/

but should customers have to fight their way to their seats?
Or what if a commuter decides to sit down in a reserved seat?

I suppose they could state 'reservations only' on the screens at Manchester.
 

iain-j

Member
Joined
2 Jul 2015
Messages
76
Location
Musselburgh
TPE already do a similar thing with Edinburgh Waverley - Manchester Airport service, where in none of the departure boards in the Waverley or the on-board announcements on the train itself list it as stopping at Haymarket with Lockerbie being the first announced stop. For the return service none of the boards or announcements at Haymarket make any mention of it stopping there, except for a rare occasion where a Haymarket - North Berwick service was now starting at Edinburgh Waverley and that passengers should get on the TPE that was arriving so they could get through to Waverley.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Trying to enforce pick-up/set-down won't work if the train is the most attractive one for commuters. The solution is a crowd-busting fast train 5mins before the TPE. Start it at Bolton so commuters will definitely go for it as they'll get a seat. Same in the evening.

That would be all very well, but Castlefield is full and they don't want to go to Victoria.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
That would be all very well, but Castlefield is full and they don't want to go to Victoria.

Then there's your answer as to why restrictions don't work.

"Oh you're a commuter, so you have to get the stopper to somewhere you don't want to go" isn't quite the advertising slogan I'd go for.
 

strangemonk

Member
Joined
10 Jun 2019
Messages
61
*Not sure which section so I'll drop it in here*
https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/new...n-again-but-commuters-will-not-be-allowed-on/



Presumably there will be no timetabled departure and signs will say "This train should not be boarded" or something?

So when these trains call at Bolton to drop off, how can passengers be prevented from joining? If they got on, with a BON/MAN ticket, unless it's a specific advance then what can a guard/conductor do?

I suppose they can state BON>MAN tickets "not valid on this service" but how would they cope with Manchester Wayfarers etc? And those ticketed to the airport but simply alight at Piccadilly and disappear?

As one of the commenters mentioned,

Are TPE trying to create more problems than they are trying to solve? Are there any other examples in the country? In the 90's the then TOC running Airport/Piccadilly/Bolton/Preston in the wee small hours (0120 ish) said it was set down only at Piccadilly - but many like myself got on at Picc so eventually they decided it was a pointless restriction.

On my shielas when we have stratford in for pick up at the station it wont be advertised so no one will be expecting to board only drop off when when we arrive from LST for pick up the departure board advertises the next service typically being a train going to LST
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top