route:oxford
Established Member
- Joined
- 1 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 4,949
So you don’t need a wiper off the main line!!!??? Not like it never rains in its current location, is it?
Bit of Rain X and you don't windscreen wipers on a car either.
So you don’t need a wiper off the main line!!!??? Not like it never rains in its current location, is it?
The fact that there is only one headlamp cluster on the B end bugs me (as well as the fact they only use the marker which is paler than the yellow paint!). Also it should be outlined in black.
I wonder if a window band like on the 230s would make it look slightly less horrifying?
To take that argument to its logical conclusion, why bother making anything look good at all?It's a technical exercise, why bother with the expense of making it look good to enthusiasts when it's to show the industry that the tech works?
I don't understand this project at all. From what i can gather it is a DVT with a JCB engine in it which drives a hydraulic pump connected to one motorbogie. This engine kicks in when pulling away of whatever and provides more power? Is that right?
Serious question though, as I'd rather forgotten about this one - clearly this is an R&D project but what's the ultimate aim - conversion of existing multiple units with energy storage? Conversion of a fleet of DVTs when the rest of the Mk4s are scrapped? I see the value in all forms of traction power research but I'm curious about where this would go from here.You don't understand the continuing need for research & development? Or something else?
I know you love your noisy 'beast' diesels but the rest of the world is trying to move on.
You don't understand the continuing need for research & development? Or something else?
I know you love your noisy 'beast' diesels but the rest of the world is trying to move on.
No i don't understand the project as in what they are trying to do. Is it a locomotive? An energy storage unit or both? And yes i do love my Diesels, any problem with that?
No i don't understand the project as in what they are trying to do. Is it a locomotive? An energy storage unit or both? And yes i do love my Diesels, any problem with that?
Google provides the simple answer, it's to store anergy lost during braking which can then be used to aid acceleration and/or reduce power usage while accelerating. http://www.artemisip.com/sectors/rail/
Why do you feel the need to be so aggressive when replying? Not just this post, there have been others.And yes i do love my Diesels, any problem with that?
Why do you feel the need to be so aggressive when replying? Not just this post, there have been others.
Why do you feel the need to be so aggressive when replying? Not just this post, there have been others.
Just asking if there is a problem. The fact that we are using messages instead of words results i
I am not being aggressive at all.
Thirded. It may well be accidentally, but posting a personal opinion, especially one as simplistic as something being 'good' or 'bad', and then when quizzed on it, asking 'is there a problem?' does come across as provocative.I'd agree with 43096 .your post does come across as aggressive. Maybe you didn't mean to be, but it does look it.
Chiltern Railways. The original intent is stated in the opening post of this thread:More on topic - has there been any formal announcement regarding where the technology developed by Artemis is intended to be used? A quick search didn't come up with anything obvious.
Although clearly the timeframe has slipped somewhat...BRITAINs Railway Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) has confirmed that Chiltern Railways will participate in a three-month testing programme of an alternative hybrid traction system as part of the powertrain competition, which is funded by RSSB and led by Artemis Intelligent Power (AIP).
AIP will initiate and lead testing of the new solution on a Chiltern Railways mark 3 driving vehicle trailer (DVT) in December 2017.
If it doesn't have an engine, then it would need a locomotive for it to be able to run. (Unless the storage is charged up before a wheel is turned).Ah I see, dunno how I managed to miss that - so the intent is presumably to increase the efficiency of their loco hauled sets. It makes me wonder why the diesel generator is needed though?
I largely agree and the DVT is an easy platform to modify.I think it's a one-off technology demonstrator more than a definite plan to convert more DVTs. It may well be that Chiltern are being paid by RSSB to release the DVT to the project, and were happy to be associated with an innovation scheme. As I said earlier, I think it's most likely to be deployed on future DMUs making frequent stops, and as Chiltern have a reasonable-sized DMU fleet that's not getting any younger they are presumably interested in technology that can make for more efficient DMUs in the future. Artemis have previously done a smaller installation (supplying hydraulic power to auxilliary systems rather than traction) on a Scotrail Turbostar.
Yes, it just seemed odd to go to the length of making a secondary cab and fitting an engine if neither would be applicable to the final intended product - would have been easier to borrow another loco I would have thought. There clearly is intent for this to be usable as a standalone source of motive power rather than just operate with an existing LHCS rake.If it doesn't have an engine, then it would need a locomotive for it to be able to run. (Unless the storage is charged up before a wheel is turned).
from another utube video it is the brake discs on one bogie needing to wear in if it was the too and fro quiet runYes, it just seemed odd to go to the length of making a secondary cab and fitting an engine if neither would be applicable to the final intended product - would have been easier to borrow another loco I would have thought. There clearly is intent for this to be usable as a standalone source of motive power rather than just operate with an existing LHCS rake.
Some interesting noises coming from the test unit, is that dragging brakes or is it actually part of how it operates?
Looking in this video:Are there any official sources stating what JCB engine is in this project?
Looking in this video:
I grabbed the following pic of the engine:
Scanning through the JCB OEM engines at https://www.jcb.com/en-gb/request-b...50&tab=0&jcb_content=cta-range-link-1-compact, it looks like this one: https://ai-engines.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Ecomax-4.4L-108kW-145hp-Stage-IV-T4-IPU.pdf
If it is, it's an Ecomax 4.4L 108kW (144hp) Stage IIIB T4i IPU.
I largely agree and the DVT is an easy platform to modify.
My suspicion is that it is aim at being able to turn the locomotive (68) engine off longer in Marylebone and Moors Street by running the compressors and other auxiliaries from the stored energy with generator there if there isn't enough, the bigger step would be in moving the train in the station areas?