• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ASLEF push for more female and BAME drivers

Status
Not open for further replies.

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,251
Location
Fenny Stratford
Do you own a business or have you worked in a senior position in one? Do you think there may be a reason that nearly all big employers (I can't actually thunk of one that doesn't) say diversity is good for their business? Are they all in on some huge conspiracy do you think, or maybe it does actually bring some benefits after all?



Brunel existed in a different time and if you can't see the difference in employment landscapes and attitudes between Victorian England and 2019 then I can't really help you.

I’m glad a little more reason has entered into this thread, as I was wondering where it was all heading.

I agree that any proposals around this will not take the form of social engineering with recruitment quotas and so on, as the Cheshire Police case clearly shows that any such policy would be in itself discriminatory. However, there is a lot that can be done to encourage more applications from under-represented sections of society, and I’m sure that this is the sort of thing that ASLEF have in mind.

Unless, of course, the reason they don't want to be Train Drivers is because it is seen as White/Male/Racist/Sexist/ and not family friendly.

sensible posts. Some correspondents would do well to consider them!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

O L Leigh

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2006
Messages
5,611
Location
In the cab with the paper
A friend of mine would probably wear your balls for earrings if she heard you call her a 'lady driver'.

Everyone gets the benefit of the doubt from me, so it's always ladies and gentlemen until I discover otherwise. ;)

Clearly there shouldn't be any distinction, as a driver is a driver is a driver no matter how they identify themselves. However, for the purpose of this discussion gender is sadly pertinent.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
My impression is that a woman joining the footplate almost has to be as much "one of the lads" as the men, and if they don't have a backbone and a bit of fire about them they tend to find it a bit intimidating.
If they don’t have a backbone and a bit of fire about them, though, will they be able to stand up to Control when it’s all kicking off and they’re trying to get them to do something that they shouldn’t, or to the signalman when they’re given a dubious instruction? Rightly or wrongly, you do need a bit of something about you to be able to do the job.

I don’t think for a minute that anyone should have to prove themselves in the messroom, though, and indeed there are plenty of quieter folk at our place who largely keep their own company quite happily, and that’s in a messroom that can be pretty raucous at times.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,747
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
If they don’t have a backbone and a bit of fire about them, though, will they be able to stand up to Control when it’s all kicking off and they’re trying to get them to do something that they shouldn’t, or to the signalman when they’re given a dubious instruction? Rightly or wrongly, you do need a bit of something about you to be able to do the job.

I don’t think for a minute that anyone should have to prove themselves in the messroom, though, and indeed there are plenty of quieter folk at our place who largely keep their own company quite happily, and that’s in a messroom that can be pretty raucous at times.

Good post.

I don’t think the “messroom culture” should be a major turn-off for anyone. Certainly in the places I’ve known there’s plenty of people who keep themselves to themselves. Anyone who turns up on time, doesn’t catch spares and isn’t obnoxious will fit in just fine. By contrast people who develop a noticeable pattern of blowing out on weekends or nights will not fit in, especially at smaller depots where it will be rather more conspicuous.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,431
Location
UK
If they don’t have a backbone and a bit of fire about them, though, will they be able to stand up to Control when it’s all kicking off and they’re trying to get them to do something that they shouldn’t, or to the signalman when they’re given a dubious instruction? Rightly or wrongly, you do need a bit of something about you to be able to do the job.

This is part of the problem. Being able to challenge the Signaller is a product of training and not determined by ones sex.

It's that perception that we, as Drivers, need to be dominant males to be successful is a perception that needs to change.

Any Driver should be able to challenge an instruction.

I'm sure you are not suggesting that women are somehow more submissive and wouldn't challenge and I totally understand that confidence is part and parcel of the role but it shouldn't be about having a backbone or a bit of fire in the belly. It should, and is, about being a professional Driver. I certainly believe that not enough of us stop and challenge. Two wrong routes recently at our place could have been resolved is the Driver challenged the route when they weren't sure.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
4,923
Maybe people from ethnic minorities / women don't want to be train drivers?
There's nothing wrong with that.

Maybe they haven't even thought about it because it is a stereotypical male job where the vast vast majority of employees are white male, and there is a certain preconception about the workplace culture that puts off minorities from that? The exact same is the case for my career, and whilst there is nothing specifically stopping women / minorities applying, it very much has a certain image which does put those groups of people off. And in some cases that image is all too true.

Good post.

I don’t think the “messroom culture” should be a major turn-off for anyone

In an ideal world it shouldn't be, but if it is then something is wrong and that culture needs to change IMO. Again talking from my experience in my career.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,747
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
This is part of the problem. Being able to challenge the Signaller is a product of training and not determined by ones sex.

It's that perception that we, as Drivers, need to be dominant males to be successful is a perception that needs to change.

Any Driver should be able to challenge an instruction.

I'm sure you are not suggesting that women are somehow more submissive and wouldn't challenge and I totally understand that confidence is part and parcel of the role but it shouldn't be about having a backbone or a bit of fire in the belly. It should, and is, about being a professional Driver. I certainly believe that not enough of us stop and challenge. Two wrong routes recently at our place could have been resolved is the Driver challenged the route when they weren't sure.

I’m not sure something as mundane as challenging a wrong route is necessarily the issue. More of a problem would be when someone has a manager or such barking at them to do something which is dangerous, or perhaps something’s gone wrong and there’s pressure from all directions coming simply to “get this bloody train moving”. The Peckham detrainment incident springs to mind as an example of the latter.

People can make rash decisions in this situation. I would agree however that having a solid character in this respect isn’t really related to gender. Knowledge of rules and the like is important, but so is to at least some extent having a personality that’s not going to crack the moment there’s an element of pressure applied.
 

DanDaDriver

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
338
I’m not sure something as mundane as challenging a wrong route is necessarily the issue. More of a problem would be when someone has a manager or such barking at them to do something which is dangerous, or perhaps something’s gone wrong and there’s pressure from all directions coming simply to “get this bloody train moving”. The Peckham detrainment incident springs to mind as an example of the latter.

People can make rash decisions in this situation. I would agree however that having a solid character in this respect isn’t really related to gender. Knowledge of rules and the like is important, but so is to at least some extent having a personality that’s not going to crack the moment there’s an element of pressure applied.

And that’s partly what the MMI checks for.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
This is part of the problem. Being able to challenge the Signaller is a product of training and not determined by ones sex.

It's that perception that we, as Drivers, need to be dominant males to be successful is a perception that needs to change.

Any Driver should be able to challenge an instruction.

I'm sure you are not suggesting that women are somehow more submissive and wouldn't challenge and I totally understand that confidence is part and parcel of the role but it shouldn't be about having a backbone or a bit of fire in the belly. It should, and is, about being a professional Driver. I certainly believe that not enough of us stop and challenge. Two wrong routes recently at our place could have been resolved is the Driver challenged the route when they weren't sure.
In agreement with bramling, I wasn’t thinking of something as clear-cut as a wrong route (there’s not much of an argument to be had!) as something like an instruction from Control that seriously contravenes the Rule Book, in one of those moments where they’re all mega stressed, the passengers are contemplating rebellion and the driver’s stuck in the middle trying to keep it all together and get the job done safely. The gender of the driver is irrelevant - what matters is the ability of the driver to rise to the occasion and act correctly under pressure. That is indeed...
...partly what the MMI checks for.
Are women less likely to pass the various stages of psychometric testing than men? I genuinely don’t know - I think the stats would make interesting reading.

The current approach seems sensible anyway, targeting recruitment to try to get more women to apply and then give everyone the same chance from then on. I’m all for making reasonable adjustments to accommodate those in the grade who need it (their “lifestyle choices”, as I’ve often heard it referred to, are what will pay our pensions in the future). How far should we go to accommodate those entering the grade though? If there’s a successful push along those lines, there’ll come a point where there just isn’t enough work that fits into “childcare friendly hours”, even before considering the effect on those who aren’t accommodated. It’s a difficult one.

The culture in the messroom - as I say above, I’m not at all sure that anything needs to change, and indeed I think it’d be counter-productive. It’s largely a happy ship at our place, in no small part down to the fact that pretty much everyone gets on with each other and can have a good laugh without causing offence whilst also leaving those in relative peace who want to be left in peace. How could you even change that, short of somehow policing messrooms? Personally, I don’t think I could stand spending hours in the messroom in near-silence, with everyone scared to speak in case they’re judged to have over-spoken by some arbitrary observer after the event...
 

DanDaDriver

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
338
Back when I was a shunter we shared a messroom with traincrew. The guys who I was trained by were old hairy a**ed b*****ds who cut their teeth in the era of loco hauled coaching stock, hooking off and on all day and the pub opposite the station being the de facto messroom.

When the first female shunter started I was wondering what was gong to happen. And I have to say they could not have been any more pleasant to her, (and subsequent women after.) Nothing drastically altered with the exception of the decline in mucky VHS’ being left lying about the place.

Whilst we’re on the subject I hope there’s going to be a push to attract more women into the shunting and fitting grades as well.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,853
Location
Plymouth
Unless, of course, the reason they don't want to be Train Drivers is because it is seen as White/Male/Racist/Sexist/ and not family friendly.

Maybe, just maybe, they want to be Drivers, they just don't want to work for the railway.
Being a train driver can NEVER be family friendly for everyone it is part and parcel of the career choice. Making the job family friendly for some and not others is extremely unfair for those left to do the graveyard shifts and is arguably discriminatory
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,853
Location
Plymouth
At my particular depot a female train driver has gone on record (local radio) calling train drivers "pale , male ,and stale". Can u imagine if the boot was on the other foot what an outcry comments such as these would cause!
 

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,504
At my particular depot a female train driver has gone on record (local radio) calling train drivers "pale , male ,and stale". Can u imagine if the boot was on the other foot what an outcry comments such as these would cause!
Spot on.
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
Honestly who cares what gender/race drivers are as long as the positions are filled with competent individuals?
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
At my particular depot a female train driver has gone on record (local radio) calling train drivers "pale , male ,and stale". Can u imagine if the boot was on the other foot what an outcry comments such as these would cause!

Maybe she should be sacked for her clearly discriminatory views?
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
She's got a point though! :D

No she doesn't. It wouldn't be tolerated on the other foot would it? If a male said that about a female majority he would be sacked for such views. Can't have it both ways, its either tolerated or not!

My industry is riddled with this nonsense i.e. trying to make life at sea family friendly and encouraging more women at the expense of others. As if life at sea can in anyway be family friendly unless you're talking about day/short trip vessels! The very notion of selective hiring based on gender or race is counterproductive and is,itself bigoted and discriminatory.
 

bionic

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2013
Messages
883
No she doesn't. It wouldn't be tolerated on the other foot would it? If a male said that about a female majority he would be sacked for such views. Can't have it both ways, its either tolerated or not!

My industry is riddled with this nonsense i.e. trying to make life at sea family friendly and encouraging more women at the expense of others. As if life at sea can in anyway be family friendly unless you're talking about day/short trip vessels! The very notion of selective hiring based on gender or race is counterproductive and is,itself bigoted and discriminatory.

Straight white males accusing women of discrimination when they speak out about inequality are completely missing the point.
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
Straight white males accusing women of discrimination when they speak out about inequality are completely missing the point.

The terminology your using is exactly the problem. There is no inequality here, simply people not choosing a certain career path. If they were actively being discriminated against then fair enough, they aren't it's down to life choice.
 

deltic

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Messages
3,211

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
Well said - as soon as privileged white males face competition they immediately claim they are under attack. London Reconnections had an informative piece on gender issues in transport which is well worth a read at https://www.londonreconnections.com/2019/mind-the-gender-gap-the-hidden-data-gap-in-transport/

As i said it's the use of language such as "privileged white males" that's the issue, you are singling out a particular sector of the population. The workforce is not to blame for the lack of job attractiveness or others life choices. There is no "competition" as you put it apart from the job market. The best person for the job is what matters here and not some characteristic.

Please explain your definition of "privileged"?
 

OneOffDave

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2015
Messages
453
In this context privilege refers to the fact that certain sectors of a population don't encounter the same barriers to equal participation and opportunities as others. In western societies it is white able-bodied males that encounter the fewest barriers. This is not to say that all men in these groups have it, but on the whole they are statistically less likely to encounter discrimination than the rest of the population.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,853
Location
Plymouth
I'm just not sure it really is harder for women.
A colleague at my depot was telling me how he applied for another job with another toc a couple of years ago. Said colleague had an unblemished driving record and sickness record plus experience driving intercity trains, yet the job went to a female with an abysmal sickness record, several incidents including a spad and no "intercity" experi3nce. And the male colleague was in my opinion (relatively) employable, I'm sure he said he has a degree so interviews etc shouldn't be an issue. It smacks of positive discrimination in my view....
 

OneOffDave

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2015
Messages
453
I'm just not sure it really is harder for women.
A colleague at my depot was telling me how he applied for another job with another toc a couple of years ago. Said colleague had an unblemished driving record and sickness record plus experience driving intercity trains, yet the job went to a female with an abysmal sickness record, several incidents including a spad and no "intercity" experi3nce. And the male colleague was in my opinion (relatively) employable, I'm sure he said he has a degree so interviews etc shouldn't be an issue. It smacks of positive discrimination in my view....

So your anecdote outweighs all the data on gender inequality in the workplace. Good to know it's all sorted then.
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
In this context privilege refers to the fact that certain sectors of a population don't encounter the same barriers to equal participation and opportunities as others. In western societies it is white able-bodied males that encounter the fewest barriers. This is not to say that all men in these groups have it, but on the whole they are statistically less likely to encounter discrimination than the rest of the population.

I find the term damaging and insulting.The idea that some how people like me have got to where they are today through privilege and not through ability or hard work is disgusting. I would go as far to say that's its basically sore loser talk!

I know of many cases in the companies I've worked for where promotions or jobs have had females/other races/sexualities actively promoted above the "privileged white males". Many of the individuals of these characteristics were totally useless. Funny how you don't hear the "privileged" males on the radio making such statements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top