• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New trains for East Midlands Franchise

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Jozhua

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2019
Messages
1,856
Just spotted my first EMR liveried vehicle, a double decker bus! Seen brifly out of the window heading round the Park Square roundabliut in Sheffield. Mainly white (with a dirty roof!), a purple train on the side and various writing. Can't seem to find a pic on the web.

Well if they're using 180's they'll probably end up using it a lot, and not for staff information!
 

A0wen

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,469
I don't think Abellio have any plans to barrier Wellingborough, Kettering and Corby though.

Maybe not - but the only possible fare evasion would be between Wellingborough and Corby - all the stations that the 360s will be calling at further south - Bedford, both Lutons and St Pancras all have barriers - so any evaders will likely be picked up there.

In reality a guard could change unit at each station stop - which would further limit any possible fare evasion.
 

londonmidland

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Messages
1,829
Location
Leicester
I wonder if the new livery on the 360’s will retain that ‘box like’ look on the front of it, or if it will be more rounded, so it’ll end up looking more like a 185?
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
587
I hope they will be 10 or 12 coach sets.
Nothing worse than lots of 4 and 5 coach sets using up the finite route capacity, particularly south of Bedford.
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,060
Location
Macclesfield
I hope they will be 10 or 12 coach sets.
Nothing worse than lots of 4 and 5 coach sets using up the finite route capacity, particularly south of Bedford.
Given that either of those train lengths would be too long for the platforms at St Pancras, assuming that 25/26 metre AT-300 vehicles are being ordered, I strongly suspect that you're going to be disappointed.
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
727
Hitachi have been awarded the contract for the new bi-mode trains for 2022

Obviously subject to official confirmation this is a good step forward, and seems lower risk than the unproven Bombardier offer. I'm hoping they work pretty much out of the box.

Assuming 9*26m sets?
This gets you to just under 240m which is the spec for MML platforms.

Will there be any reduced length units because 2 coupled 5*26m trains would be too long, but great news for capacity of all 9-cars. Simplifies diagramming too I guess, which must be painful for EMT as they have 5 different intercity train variants in quite a small fleet

A real loss for Bombardier though.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,453
Location
UK
9 x 26m seems to be pretty standard if they aren't going for shorter formations to double up.

The problem with that is that some services at St Pancras share platforms, the timetable will require work to shuffle things around in order to fit an all 9 car fleet.
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
727
I would expect a full timetable recast anyway to be honest.

Agree the timetable is a bit of a mess. The opening of Corby and EM Parkway messed it up. The Thameslink recast in 2018 further ruined it and as above, having 5 different train variants is massively suboptimal.

Plus an 803(?) On electric will probably be minutes quicker between St Pancras and Wigston, especially compared to the 8-car HSTs

Was there anything released about how many train sets EMR would procure? I'm guessing that with the Corby electrics factored in, the requirement will be for around 20 sets?
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
3,995
Obviously subject to official confirmation this is a good step forward, and seems lower risk than the unproven Bombardier offer. I'm hoping they work pretty much out of the box.

Assuming 9*26m sets?
This gets you to just under 240m which is the spec for MML platforms.

Will there be any reduced length units because 2 coupled 5*26m trains would be too long, but great news for capacity of all 9-cars. Simplifies diagramming too I guess, which must be painful for EMT as they have 5 different intercity train variants in quite a small fleet

A real loss for Bombardier though.

If its Hitachi then it will be a variant of 800s and 802s because they will need to have an extra engine to match Meridian timings on diesel (part of the franchise specifications). Its a blow to Bombardier but Hitachi have very little work for Newton Aycliffe from next year and this order would be a life line. Bombardier has very little capacity at Derby for the next 2-3 years and new models are much more prone to delays entering service.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,858
Location
Plymouth
The problem with that is that some services at St Pancras share platforms, the timetable will require work to shuffle things around in order to fit an all 9 car fleet.
Or maybe some of GWRs 5 car 802s could be sent to mml with some 9 car 802s built for gwr
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,200
Curious what the plan is for Long Eaton and Beeston now - assuming uniform 9 car sets some people will have to walk a very long way down the train.
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,223
If it's Hitachi, then I'm sure they'll have offered two options:

1. The standard 80x design with engines mapped to produce as much power as practical, with the knowledge that they would need more intensive maintenance. This would probably still miss the target journey times on diesel, but not by so much as a standard IEP timing would. This could mean going for 9-car sets with all 7 intermediate vehicles being powered, but there would be no fundamentally new carriage types like powered driving cars or intermediate pantograph/transformer vehicles.
2. A custom design likely involving major changes throughout the train. If you want to have half-set capability, you have real problems if you just replace the pantograph/transformer driving vehicle with a powered one as then you could end up with two pantographs very close together. You'd probably have to put the pantograph and transformer onto an intermediate vehicle.

The reduced flexibility of option 1 (full-length sets) and possibly missing the journey time targets has to be weighed against the increased costs of option 2. If you're a ROSCO, why would you want option 2? You'd have a custom fleet designed solely for a relatively short-term requirement which is liable to be dispensed with well before their service life is up. You'd be betting heavily against extra electrification in future, which is a rather bold strategy.
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,200
Full 9 car sets also wouldn't fit in the terminating platform at Nottingham either, but I think that would probably be mitigated by the Liverpool to Norwich split.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,884
Location
Nottingham
Do 80x have a 25kV bus within the unit? If so then the pantographs could be each end and the transformer anywhere. However there's still the problem of getting two short sets into St Pancras. Two 4-car would fit, each one would probably match the seats in a 5-car Meridian, and assuming Corby trains take the Bedford and Wellingborough passengers the total numbers on the semi-fasts might not be many more at the end of the franchise than they are now. A 4-car with three engines would probably be a bit down on acceleration compared to a Meridian, but perhaps with electrification to Market Harbrough that doesn't matter so much now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top