• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is the Midland Mainline considered an "InterCity" route?

Status
Not open for further replies.

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,870
Location
Plymouth
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ohgoditsjames

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
379
Location
Sheffield & Shipley
Sheffield to London is intercity, Nottingham to London is intercity, Derby to London is intercity, Leicester to London is intercity.

I hate the attitude of “the MML isn’t a true intercity mainline” because that’s the exact reason why the MML has been neglected for so long and always gets overlooked/forgotten about.

The MML has been in dire need of some love for years, new 9 car/full length trains are the least that it deserves.
 

cnjb8

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2019
Messages
2,127
Location
Nottingham
Sheffield to London is intercity, Nottingham to London is intercity, Derby to London is intercity, Leicester to London is intercity.

I hate the attitude of “the MML isn’t a true intercity mainline” because that’s the exact reason why the MML has been neglected for so long and always gets overlooked/forgotten about.

The MML has been in dire need of some love for years, new 9 car/full length trains are the least that it deserves.
I completely agree. EM is developing to be a major economic area with growing urban populations. It doesn't help that EM Airport has a station connected to it by a minivan, or that non-compliant trains will still run after 2020.
 

ohgoditsjames

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
379
Location
Sheffield & Shipley
I completely agree. EM is developing to be a major economic area with growing urban populations. It doesn't help that EM Airport has a station connected to it by a minivan, or that non-compliant trains will still run after 2020.

To add to that, Sheffield will see a huge amount of office space built within the next few years as Grade A office take up within the city is at an all time high and there are countless number of residential schemes for the city centre providing thousands of new homes in the pipeline too (at least 5 of those will be above 32 storeys) With the new Heart of the city 2 scheme there will be around 700,000 sqr ft of office space built and West Bar square with another 750,000 sqr feet plus the additional office building that has just been approved for the Digital Campus.

Let’s not forget that the MML has a number of excellent universities on it too.
 

cnjb8

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2019
Messages
2,127
Location
Nottingham
The fact that people think that EM to London isn't intercity is unbelievable.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,870
Location
Plymouth
We never seem to learn from our mistakes. The fact that people think that EM to London isn't intercity is unbelievable. Theirs a 3 hour drive from Nottingham, probably the same on a train.
Errr 1 hour 45 mins on average London to Nottingham, not really what I'd call intercity.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,947
Location
East Anglia
Errr 1 hour 45 mins on average London to Nottingham, not really what I'd call intercity.
Intercity wasn't always about length of journey. It did just what it said, linked cities (generally to/from London) on reasonably fast comfortable trains.
 

ohgoditsjames

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
379
Location
Sheffield & Shipley
Errr 1 hour 45 mins on average London to Nottingham, not really what I'd call intercity.

What an utterly bizarre and quite frankly absurd statement. The fastest journey from York to Kings Cross is 1hr 47 minutes, does that mean York to London isn’t “intercity”
either?

Whether you like it or not, the MML is a major intercity mainline, it connects major cities to each other and the capital.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,788
Location
Yorkshire
Intercity wasn't always about length of journey. It did just what it said, linked cities (generally to/from London) on reasonably fast comfortable trains.
Indeed; Gatwick Express used to be part of InterCity. And Norwich to London is perhaps comparable with Nottingham to London.
 

Mitchell Hurd

On Moderation
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
1,647
To be honest, I think if the Midland Mainline wasn't considered an InterCity route then the HST's wouldn't have probably been introduced in I believe 1978 (I'm 26 but I know quite a bit).
 

squizzler

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2017
Messages
1,903
Location
Jersey, Channel Islands
I've not used the MML but get the impression it is more 'intercity' in character than Cross Country. Which I regard as an intercity operator also.
 

John Webb

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Messages
3,069
Location
St Albans
The MML certainly was "Intercity". Before electrification southwards from Bedford, St Albans City station had 'Intercity' trains stopping there for many years and it was possible to get direct from St Albans to Nottingham, Derby, Sheffield, Manchester and Glasgow among other destinations.
 

sharpley

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2018
Messages
244
Surely InterCity means just that... connecting large cities with a reasonably fast and frequent train service. Certainly wouldn't call it a local or suburban route. Obviously not as long as the WCML, ECML or GWML but that should be irrelevant.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,785
Location
Glasgow
Errr 1 hour 45 mins on average London to Nottingham, not really what I'd call intercity.

I don't see how journey time affects whether a route is InterCity or not, London-Inverness is about 8 hours and surely that is InterCity?

My view is its the type of train and more so the on-board facilities that determines a trains category (ie First Class, catering, more long-distance suited seating layout etc).
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
38,990
Location
Yorks
Surely the test of whether a route is InterCity, is whether it was in the InterCity timetable, which was published into the early noughties I think.

(Yes, the MML was, obviously).
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,785
Location
Glasgow
Surely the test of whether a route is InterCity, is whether it was in the InterCity timetable, which was published into the early noughties I think.

(Yes, the MML was, obviously).

Or the National Rail Highspeed guide, which I think was its privitisation era successor.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
38,990
Location
Yorks
Or the National Rail Highspeed guide, which I think was its privitisation era successor.

Ah, I didn't see that one. It was still IC when I had it (even though it was a few years after privatisation).

The InterCity guide was a useful companion in my university days !
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,286
To be honest, I think if the Midland Mainline wasn't considered an InterCity route then the HST's wouldn't have probably been introduced in I believe 1978 (I'm 26 but I know quite a bit).
HSTs on the MML started in 1982.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,759
Indeed. For a while it was INTERCITY Anglia & Gatwick.
And the Signallers, although BR, were part of the InterCity Anglia/Gatwick set up, and all had InterCity Uniforms, smart they were too ! (still have my tie :) )
 

Speedbird96

Member
Joined
12 Nov 2016
Messages
62
Yes, the Midland Main Line is definitely an intercity route; just like CrossCountry, Great Eastern etc. and even the Edinburgh/Glasgow to Aberdeen/Inverness are now advertised as intercity.

Errr 1 hour 45 mins on average London to Nottingham, not really what I'd call intercity.

What an absurd comment! Might as well disregard London Euston to Birmingham fasts as that takes less time. :rolleyes:
 

nottsnurse

Member
Joined
1 May 2014
Messages
275
Surely this must be some kind of wind-up?

The Nottingham/Derby Metropolitan area has a population of >1.5 million alone. Add in the populations on Sheffield, Leicester and Leeds (the MML goes to Leeds after all) and it is quite frankly laughable that anyone would question whether the MML is an Intercity route!

Ireland has a service it calls 'Intercity', yet Dublin has a population <2 million (the Greater Dublin Area) and none of its destinations cities have populations anywhere approaching those of cities on the MML. Does this mean Irish Intercity isn't really Intercity?
 

squizzler

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2017
Messages
1,903
Location
Jersey, Channel Islands
My view is its the type of train and more so the on-board facilities that determines a trains category (ie First Class, catering, more long-distance suited seating layout etc).

I agree that the existence of first class the current best indicator as to whether a train can be regarded as 'intercity' standard. In which case the MML counts, as eventually will the Transport to Wales service to Manchester, a DMU service with (shock horror!) doors at thirds along the coaches.
 
Last edited:

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,947
Location
East Anglia
I agree that the existence of first class the current best indicator as to whether a train can be regarded as 'intercity' standard. In which case the MML counts, as eventually will the Transport to Wales service to Manchester, a DMU service with (shock horror!) doors at thirds along the coaches.
As did MML, Hull Trains & Anglia with class 170s covering IC services complete with 1st class & buffet counter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top