• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

December 2019 Timetable Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
780
1505, 1535 & 2005 are indeed new trains but I thought the plan was to go 4tph throughout the day on Waterloo - Reading? In fact the lack of 1950 means that some stations will go an hour between trains. Personally I think 4tph is unnecessary throughout the day, and the short turnrounds at both ends of the line would reduce resilience to the slightest of delays, which is precisely why Stagecoach introduced the current timetable pattern.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,418
A quick look at SWR Waterloo - Reading service, shows the same 2tph timetable as now. Has the 4tph timetable been dropped or postponed until a later date?
Certainly seems no obvious change. I was looking specifically at the Southampton area, and nothing obviously new appears there either.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,935
1505, 1535 & 2005 are indeed new trains but I thought the plan was to go 4tph throughout the day on Waterloo - Reading? In fact the lack of 1950 means that some stations will go an hour between trains. Personally I think 4tph is unnecessary throughout the day, and the short turnrounds at both ends of the line would reduce resilience to the slightest of delays, which is precisely why Stagecoach introduced the current timetable pattern.

There will be a 19.50 WAT-RDG as now. We are way ahead of timetable confirmation and there will be missing/incorrect trains etc
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
689
It appears now that SouthEastern schedules for Dec 19 have been uploaded and are now visible.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,855
Location
Yorkshire
Will the TfW extra loco hauled services have the same level of First Class catering as the current Gerald?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,418
Do you have a link/source to this? (tried searching online to no luck :oops: )
I believe what is being meant here is that sites such as realtimetrains and opentraintimes can now be searched for services after the change date.

You aren’t going to find timetables as such for quite a while...
 

Staffordian

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
113
The latest TOC’s with Dec 19 times on RTT are Greater Anglia (LE) and TfL Rail(XR) which includes half hourly services Paddington to Reading.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
38,993
Location
Yorks
I wonder, will Network Rail relent and let Northern have their 23:30 Leeds to Doncaster on a Saturday night ?
 

arb

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2010
Messages
412
Looking at Greater Anglia, some Norwich to Cambridge trains extended to Stansted are in there, including calls at Waterbeach in the evening peak:
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/L46780/2019/12/23/advanced
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/L41833/2019/12/23/advanced

They generally have the same time slot as now, give or take a few minutes, when doing Norwich to Stansted, but are quite often approx 20 minutes later than now when doing Stansted to Norwich.

The 1822 Cambridge to Ely shuttle, one of my favourite trains for commuting home, has gone :( This is presumably to make room for what was the 1811 Cambridge to Norwich, which now comes from Stansted and departs Cambridge at 1830.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,961
Location
East Anglia
Been told via my MP that Greater Anglia will be going hourly on Sundays on Ipswich to Cambridge line with "other timetable changes which were delayed from May 2019"
I owe you an apology. It appears that according to Realtime Trains not only is Ipswich-Cambridge going hourly on Sundays but so is the East Suffolk line. Most Norwich-Cambridge services will be extended to/from Stansted Airport daily which has amazed me. No driver training has taken place so it must be with crew changeovers at either Ely or Cambridge. Really need to get these Stadlers up & running & watching with interest to see if the first one makes into traffic tomorrow aftervthe failed start last week.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,961
Location
East Anglia
To add to the above Norwich-Lowestoft also goes hourly on Sundays (currently Summer only) which means Ipswich-Peterborough is the only Anglia local route that's now not hourly on a Sunday. A total contrast to 15 years ago.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
Looking at Greater Anglia
...

...they’ve added another minute of timetable padding between Cambridge and Tottenham Hale. Currently 56 minutes, was 55 not so long ago, now 57 from December, on the hourly ‘fast’ (or 69, was 68, now to be 70, on the hourly ‘slow’). Aren’t improvements great? :(

Plus I see the 1814 ‘gap’ from Cambridge North remains - currently due to the usual xx14 to Liverpool Street being missed out this one hour, it means there is nothing going south from Cambridge North between 1755 and 1831, which is very unhelpful in the evening peak. Looks like this isn’t going to be fixed in December :(
 
Last edited:

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,937
...

...they’ve added another minute of timetable padding between Cambridge and Tottenham Hale. Currently 56 minutes, was 55 not so long ago, now 57 from December, on the hourly ‘fast’ (or 69, was 68, now to be 70, on the hourly ‘slow’). Aren’t improvements great? :(

Plus I see the 1814 ‘gap’ from Cambridge North remains - currently due to the usual xx14 to Liverpool Street being missed out this one hour, it means there is nothing going south from Cambridge North between 1755 and 1831, which is very unhelpful in the evening peak. Looks like this isn’t going to be fixed in December :(

I think you will find Cambridge is the problem here - 1H80 simply cannot get into one of the through platforms to get to Cambridge North.
 

Mariner16

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2018
Messages
106
Location
No
The Barton-on-Humber line has not been included as part of EM. Can we read anything into this about the transfer date being pushed back again?

EMR/ Abellio are still awaiting info from Network Rail with regards to the transfer of this route
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
I think you will find Cambridge is the problem here - 1H80 simply cannot get into one of the through platforms to get to Cambridge North.

In which case it would be nice if someone mitigated the issue. Eg. there are two ECS Ely->Cambridge moves during this gap at Cambridge North, one GA and one GN. Seems like one of those could run in service.

As it is, this 37 minute gap in southbound services from CMB is the longest gap between trains all day. And it is right in the peak :(
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
...

...they’ve added another minute of timetable padding between Cambridge and Tottenham Hale. Currently 56 minutes, was 55 not so long ago, now 57 from December, on the hourly ‘fast’ (or 69, was 68, now to be 70, on the hourly ‘slow’). Aren’t improvements great? :(

It's because the (current) xx04 Liverpool Street needs to start back from Cambridge North, as Platforms 2/3 at Cambridge are too short for the new [longer] GA units.

Coming from Cambridge North means using Platform 7 (or 8). That requires an extra {1/2} adjustment on the running tome from Cambridge to Shepreth Branch due to the long 15mph run out of Platform 7 until you get clear of Hills Road bridge. Plus the distance to cover is physically longer than starting from Platform 2/3. Especially slow at 15mph for a train 240m long...

Which means an xx.04 departure must become earlier, and no chance of finding an extra half-minute anywhere else on West Anglia to balance it out.

The inevitable consequence of more, longer trains fitting together on an unchanged network.
 
Last edited:

arb

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2010
Messages
412

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
It's because the (current) xx04 Liverpool Street needs to start back from Cambridge North, as Platforms 2/3 at Cambridge are too short for the new [longer] GA units.

Coming from Cambridge North means using Platform 7 (or 8). That requires an extra {1/2} adjustment on the running tome from Cambridge to Shepreth Branch due to the long 15mph run out of Platform 7 until you get clear of Hills Road bridge. Plus the distance to cover is physically longer than starting from Platform 2/3. Especially slow at 15mph for a train 240m long...

Which means an xx.04 departure must become earlier, and no chance of finding an extra half-minute anywhere else on West Anglia to balance it out.

The inevitable consequence of more, longer trains fitting together on an unchanged network.

Perhaps that does it for the 'fasts', but they're also adding this extra minute padding to the 'stoppers', which already start at Cambridge North, and are already generally booked for platform 8. Comparing on RTT, looks like a minute is being added for them between Shelford and Whittlesford, for whatever reason. Maybe they think extra time in needed there, but eg. looking at the performance of the 'stoppers' on that section yesterday, it doesn't appear to be.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
The Greater Anglia ECS move that you're referring to is, I think, for the train that currently forms the 18:22 from CBG to ELY. That train is being axed in December (according to the current info in RTT), and the ECS move is changing to go into the sidings, rather than to a platform, at CBG.

Compare http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/L73762/2019/12/02/advanced (current timetable) with http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/L47465/2019/12/23/advanced (new timetable).

Ah. Well, it would have worked up until December, though that would be beyond the scope of this thread now :)
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
689
Perhaps that does it for the 'fasts', but they're also adding this extra minute padding to the 'stoppers', which already start at Cambridge North, and are already generally booked for platform 8. Comparing on RTT, looks like a minute is being added for them between Shelford and Whittlesford, for whatever reason. Maybe they think extra time in needed there, but eg. looking at the performance of the 'stoppers' on that section yesterday, it doesn't appear to be.

(my bolding). Which services are you referring to - specificaly? The '2H's'? I don't see any padding in the AM peak 2H services, once past Cambridge - apart from the engineering minute before Standsted North's Jn. (except 2H17, the 0848 ex-cambridge having a minute pathing at Standsted North Jn and the engineering moved back to Elsenham.

It might be worth concidering that the TPRs have been amended for the Dec 19 tt change, in so far as:
5 Running Times, Margins and Allowances 5.1 Sectional Running Times 5.1.3 New and Revised Sectional Running Times SRT changes are being included in Anglia Timetable Planning Rules 2020 Version 3.0 and will be sent to all TPR Forum participants. Summary of the changes: EA 1011 SRTs in Shenfield area reviewed

EA 1012 SRTs in Europa Junction area reviewed

EA 1161 SRTs amended for Class 365 & 700 Cambridge to Shepreth Branch Junction Class 153 SRTs removed between Cambridge and Ely Dock Junction

EA 1162 SRTs added for King's Lynn Siding

EA 1470 SRTs split to include Coke Ovens Junction

EA 1560 SRTs which omit mandatory timing point March West Junction removed
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
(my bolding). Which services are you referring to - specificaly? The '2H's'? I don't see any padding in the AM peak 2H services, once past Cambridge - apart from the engineering minute before Standsted North's Jn. (except 2H17, the 0848 ex-cambridge having a minute pathing at Standsted North Jn and the engineering moved back to Elsenham.

I'm looking at the 2H offpeaks/weekends for the 'standard' service. I'd expect minor variations in the peaks.

Eg. 2H35 today with 2H35 on 23rd December. The WTT for December seems to be missing the inter-minute granularity, which makes comparison a little more difficult - but the latter leaves Cambridge one minute earlier, and from Whittlesford onwards they match. In both cases they are due to leave from the 7/8 island at CBG.

The same pattern is repeated, as far as I can see, throughout the M-F off-peaks, and all weekend.
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
689
I'm looking at the 2H offpeaks/weekends for the 'standard' service. I'd expect minor variations in the peaks.

Eg. 2H35 today with 2H35 on 23rd December. The WTT for December seems to be missing the inter-minute granularity, which makes comparison a little more difficult - but the latter leaves Cambridge one minute earlier, and from Whittlesford onwards they match. In both cases they are due to leave from the 7/8 island at CBG.

The same pattern is repeated, as far as I can see, throughout the M-F off-peaks, and all weekend.
Ahh, Off-Peak. Yeah, i can see that now - departing 1 earlier from Cambridge, with 1/2 minute longer SRT (Sectional Running Time) to Sheopreth Branch Jn, and an additonal 1/2 minute dwell time added at Whittlesford Parkway station, to depart as per the current Timetable.

It's because the (current) xx04 Liverpool Street needs to start back from Cambridge North, as Platforms 2/3 at Cambridge are too short for the new [longer] GA units.

Coming from Cambridge North means using Platform 7 (or 8). That requires an extra {1/2} adjustment on the running tome from Cambridge to Shepreth Branch due to the long 15mph run out of Platform 7 until you get clear of Hills Road bridge. Plus the distance to cover is physically longer than starting from Platform 2/3. Especially slow at 15mph for a train 240m long...

Which means an xx.04 departure must become earlier, and no chance of finding an extra half-minute anywhere else on West Anglia to balance it out.

The inevitable consequence of more, longer trains fitting together on an unchanged network.
So, as @Ianno87 saidth, above, the additional 1/2 minute has been incorporated into the SRT (or at least it doesn't go downstream to the Open Data Feed(s) and onto RTT.
[As an aside, i can't currently check OpenTrainTimes as it no longer lets me view the individual schedules for some reason].
*I always thought the {adjustment} time was displayed - perhaps i am wrong - happy to concede, and apologies for dragging the thread on longer - when i perhaps should have looked closer.

In both cases they are due to leave from the 7/8 island at CBG.
Its worth noting the the {1/2} minute adjustment, for the Dec 19 timetable is an addition to the Train Planning Rules, and is not present in the current timetable, so there is no requirement at the moment to have it.
Although, today's
2H21 + 25 + 29 + 41 + 45 departed 1 Early from Cambridge, as were marked as on time at Shepreth Branch Jn (rather 1/2 minute early).
2H21 - http://charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail/train/15195653/30/07/19
2H25 - http://charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail/train/15195657/30/07/19
2H39 - http://charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail/train/16599576/30/07/19
2H41 - http://charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail/train/15194117/30/07/19
2H45 - http://charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail/train/15194118/30/07/19
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Its worth noting the the {1/2} minute adjustment, for the Dec 19 timetable is an addition to the Train Planning Rules, and is not present in the current timetable, so there is no requirement at the moment to have it.
-

I swear it certainly used to be in TPRs? Perhaps removed in 2018, but turns out its useful to have after all...
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
689
I swear it certainly used to be in TPRs? Perhaps removed in 2018, but turns out its useful to have after all...
This is screengrab of May 19:
May 19 - Cambridge sec. 5.3.png
This is screengrab of Dec 19:
Dec 19 - Cambridge sec. 5.3.png
I can't see anything listed in the May 19 commentary accompaniment to the TPRs (but that doesn't mean much!) ;)

As for usefulness... agreed! When was the Cambridge south throat worked on? Presumably the amended SRT / rules is a consequence of some work?

The {1 1/2} to be added for plt 7+8 to the Down Main is consistent though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top