• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern Dec 2019 Timetable Bid

Status
Not open for further replies.

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,011
Majority of the Liverpool Lime Street - Crewe (via Manchester Airport) services and vice versa seem to be omitted from RTT (I'm guessing they haven't decided on what to do about these services)?

It also looks like the service patterns for the local stations on the Airport line will be changing again.
Normally the stopping service would be a 'banker' service first on the timetables. The Castlefield corridor / Manchester Airport platform capacity looks to be a real headache for Northern & TPE.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MetroCar4058

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2014
Messages
580
Airport platform allocations look a bit of a mess. The Lime Street to Airport semi-fasts are mostly stacked on top of the TPE Cleethorpes trains, which will not fit if TPE strengthen these to 6-car double 185s as promised.

I'm sure the plan was for the TPE train to leave one unit at Piccadilly.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,937
The Southport services will all be via Bolton, with no more interworking between the Stalybridge and Alderley Edge services. The Stalybridge stoppers are still timed for a 75mph Sprinter throughout, so no credit for possible improved 769 performance under the wires between Bolton and Victoria.

I guess Northern aren't relying on the Class 769s being available. Also wasn't there a suggestion elsewhere on this bosrd that performance on diesel wasn't as good as hoped?
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,266
Location
Greater Manchester
I guess Northern aren't relying on the Class 769s being available. Also wasn't there a suggestion elsewhere on this bosrd that performance on diesel wasn't as good as hoped?
769s would be on electric between Bolton and Victoria, so would have similar performance to a 319. The Southport to Stalybridge service will be the hourly stopper between Bolton and Salford Crescent, so the 769's acceleration could cut journey time significantly and improve timetable resilience on the Bolton line.
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,266
Location
Greater Manchester
I'm sure the plan was for the TPE train to leave one unit at Piccadilly.
Right. After the morning peak, it looks as though the Cleethorpes services will have exclusive use of Platforms 9 and 10 at Piccadilly and use them alternately. So it will be possible to drop a unit at Piccadilly and pick it up on the way back in the same platform, an hour later.

In the morning peak the Cleethorpes services get an entire Airport platform, so both 185s will be able to go to the Airport.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
12,635
Location
Yorkshire
Likewise Mytholmroyd.

Oddly, Sowerby Bridge and Mytholmroyd have only recently been added to the Sunday service on York - Blackpool.

They also lose the Sunday link to Manchester - not sure how long they've had that (my memory of this line only goes back 33 years).

That's halving the service on a Sunday and reducing it by a third during the week at a rapidly growing stations, which seems odd.

This also means the first Westbound services on Sundays will be 90 minutes later, with the last Eastbound ones 50 minutes earlier.

The first service to Leeds will only be slightly later, but the last one back will be 80 minutes earlier.
 
Last edited:

Daniel Wake

New Member
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
1
It's interesting to note there is now a peak time Sheffield to York via Pontefract Baghill train at 0715 from December. That means it's now commutable to go from Pontefract to York etc.
 
Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
443
Location
Wigan
It's interesting to note there is now a peak time Sheffield to York via Pontefract Baghill train at 0715 from December. That means it's now commutable to go from Pontefract to York etc.
Good spot, sir. There does appear to be a few interesting changes in this timetable. Will be interesting to see if any more come to light before December :)
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,266
Location
Greater Manchester
Majority of the Liverpool Lime Street - Crewe (via Manchester Airport) services and vice versa seem to be omitted from RTT (I'm guessing they haven't decided on what to do about these services)?

It also looks like the service patterns for the local stations on the Airport line will be changing again.

There are also no Blackpool to Manchester Airport services loaded yet, only the Airport to Blackpools.

Conversely, there are no Hazel Grove to Blackpool services loaded, only the Blackpool to Hazel Groves.
All these services have now been loaded. The Liverpool - Airport - Crewe stoppers and the Blackpool - Hazel Groves are pretty much unchanged.

The current northbound only calls at Gatley and Burnage are dropped from the Airport to Blackpools, with the turnaround time at the Airport increased from 7 to 10 minutes.

The Airport to Barrow/Windermere service takes over the northbound calls at Burnage, which gives this station a more even 2tph service pattern in both directions. But the southbound from Barrow/Windermere, which currently calls at both Burnage and Gatley, drops the Gatley call.

The TPE Airport - Redcar Central services take over the Gatley calls in both directions, so Gatley still gets 2tph as specified in the Northern TSR.

Edit: The Airport - Blackpool service is booked into Platform 1A at the Airport, so could be strengthened to a 6-car 331 formation without platform length issues.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,937
It's interesting to note there is now a peak time Sheffield to York via Pontefract Baghill train at 0715 from December. That means it's now commutable to go from Pontefract to York etc.

Currently showing as 07:24 from Sheffield. However it arrives York at 08:48. The last departre of the day from York is 17:15. Would be sufficient to do a day's work?
 

Lanley

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2016
Messages
17
All these services have now been loaded. The Liverpool - Airport - Crewe stoppers and the Blackpool - Hazel Groves are pretty much unchanged.


I noticed that the Leyland call has been dropped on the Blackpool to Hazel Grove services yet not on the Hazel Grove to Blackpool services. Is there a specific reason for only 2 services a day to call towards Hazel Grove yet 16 call towards Blackpool?
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,033
Location
Airedale
Currently showing as 07:24 from Sheffield. However it arrives York at 08:48. The last departre of the day from York is 17:15. Would be sufficient to do a day's work?
If you work 35 hours plus lunch and within 5 minutes of the station, certainly.
Was this in the franchise spec, or has there been lobbying from nearby offices? :)
 

jawr256

Member
Joined
15 Apr 2017
Messages
132
I noticed that the Leyland call has been dropped on the Blackpool to Hazel Grove services yet not on the Hazel Grove to Blackpool services. Is there a specific reason for only 2 services a day to call towards Hazel Grove yet 16 call towards Blackpool?

In both the current and December timetables, the Blackpool North - Manchester Airport calls at Leyland southbound instead of the Blackpool North - Hazel Grove. Presumably this is to give a more even headway as the Hazel Grove service leaves Preston only nine minutes before the Manchester Victoria service which also calls at Leyland.
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
Oddly, Sowerby Bridge and Mytholmroyd have only recently been added to the Sunday service on York - Blackpool.

They also lose the Sunday link to Manchester - not sure how long they've had that (my memory of this line only goes back 33 years).

That's halving the service on a Sunday and reducing it by a third during the week at a rapidly growing stations, which seems odd.

This also means the first Westbound services on Sundays will be 90 minutes later, with the last Eastbound ones 50 minutes earlier.

The first service to Leeds will only be slightly later, but the last one back will be 80 minutes earlier.
Could it be in preparation for TPE running via the Calder Valley during the Transpennine upgrade works? Freeing up paths into Manchester?
That's a total guess, but logically that will mean changes to existing services on that line.
 

Staffordian

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
113
An unfortunate feature of the revised times for Bridlington-Hull-York and Sheffield-Pontefract-York services is that afternoon departures from Sherburn-in-Elmet towards York will be at 1241 (ex Brid), 1242 (ex Sheffield), 1541 (ex Brid), 1640 (ex Sheffield) and 1641 (ex Brid).
Is this actually feasible ? Or should we expect a few adjustments to these times between now and December ?
 
Joined
1 Feb 2018
Messages
99
I see that the Leeds to Southport service is ending. Wasn’t that a franchise commitment? Not fussed that it’s ending as I don’t think many from the calder valley stayed on past Salford.
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
I see that the Leeds to Southport service is ending. Wasn’t that a franchise commitment? Not fussed that it’s ending as I don’t think many from the calder valley stayed on past Salford.
Southport-based rabble-rousing and pig-headed insistence on having a service to Piccadilly means that the Alderley / Stalybridge trains are being extended to Southport while the Blackburn and Leeds services will terminate at Wigan.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,768
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Southport-based rabble-rousing and pig-headed insistence on having a service to Piccadilly means that the Alderley / Stalybridge trains are being extended to Southport while the Blackburn and Leeds services will terminate at Wigan.

Is that so unreasonable? I don't know how the flows compare, however *if* many people from Southport wish to travel to Piccadilly (or Oxford Road) for one reason or another, versus only a small minority of users wishing to go towards the Calder Valley, then surely there's a worthwhile case for a direct train if it avoids having to change trains or use Metrolink?

If people are used to an established direct train, which appears to have been removed more for railway operational reasons than because there’s significant local demand for the new destination, then I’d probably be a little peeved too - especially with Manchester being quite a large city centre and the distance from Victoria to the south side of the city centre being quite significant.

Obviously this falls down if significant numbers *are* remaining on the Leeds service through Manchester.
 
Last edited:
Joined
23 Apr 2012
Messages
343
Location
Greater manchester.
Is that so unreasonable? I don't know how the flows compare, however *if* many people from Southport wish to travel to Piccadilly (or Oxford Road) for one reason or another, versus only a small minority of users wishing to go towards the Calder Valley, then surely there's a worthwhile case for a direct train if it avoids having to change trains or use Metrolink?

If people are used to an established direct train, which appears to have been removed more for railway operational reasons than because there’s significant local demand for the new destination, then I’d probably be a little peeved too -





especially with Manchester being quite a large city centre and the distance from








Victoria to the south side of the city centre being quite significant.

Surely that's what Salford crescent was build for[Interchange]. Manchester city centre is quite small really, You can walk from Victoria to oxford road in 15 minutes, I am nearly 50 and


























































































Obviously this falls down if significant numbers *are* remaining on the Leeds service through Manchester.
Is that so unreasonable? I don't know how the flows compare, however *if* many people from Southport wish to travel to Piccadilly (or Oxford Road) for one reason or another, versus only a small minority of users wishing to go towards the Calder Valley, then surely there's a worthwhile case for a direct train if it avoids having to change trains or use Metrolink?

If people are used to an established direct train, which appears to have been removed more for railway operational reasons than because there’s significant local demand for the new destination, then I’d probably be a little peeved too - especially with Manchester being quite a large city centre and the distance from Victoria to the south side of the city centre being quite significant.

Obviously this falls down if significant numbers *are* remaining on the Leeds service through Manchester.

I can understand some of your comments -But wasn't Salford crescent built for interchange?. Manchester city centre isn't as large as you think, You can walk between Victoria to Piccadilly or oxford road in 15 minutes. There are also free buses outside each station to connect you to where you want to go- There isn't enough room for every service to go to Piccadilly.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,768
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I can understand some of your comments -But wasn't Salford crescent built for interchange?. Manchester city centre isn't as large as you think, You can walk between Victoria to Piccadilly or oxford road in 15 minutes. There are also free buses outside each station to connect you to where you want to go- There isn't enough room for every service to go to Piccadilly.

These points are quite valid, however if you were a Southport line user who wanted to go to Piccadilly, why would you want to bother with all this hassle potentially ten times a week for a MF commuter, for the sake of a direct service to somewhere few really want to go, either on a daily basis or perhaps at all?
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
These points are quite valid, however if you were a Southport line user who wanted to go to Piccadilly, why would you want to bother with all this hassle potentially ten times a week for a MF commuter, for the sake of a direct service to somewhere few really want to go, either on a daily basis or perhaps at all?
That wasn't the Southport argument though. The arguments were 1. We need a direct link to the airport (which is utter rubbish, so when that didn't work they moved onto... ), 2. Commuters need a direct link to the south of Manchester.
Even if 2. is true - which I don't buy, because the number of people changing at Wigan or the Crescent to get on a Picc service is not exactly huge - they've shot themselves in the foot because the via Bolton services they're getting to replace the Calder Valleys are slower, more crowded, and since May have also been less punctual.

As a Wigan - Manchester commuter, it's excellent for me because starting the Leeds in Wigan means it'll be quieter and should be more reliable, and therefore offer a pleasent, and fast, link into Victoria.

ButI still think the Southport campaign stinks of turkeys promoting Christmas.
 

BenBru

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2016
Messages
39
It's a station to be served by Northern Connect because that encompasses almost every service along the Calder Valley. As far as I'm aware this never meant such a station would be served by every passing train.

I've appended the 2017/8 of the Northern Connect stations. I'd been led to believe that all Northern Connect stations would see all services stopping.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190808_210805_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
    Screenshot_20190808_210805_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
    257.3 KB · Views: 56

Glenn1969

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2019
Messages
1,983
Location
Halifax, Yorks
Sowerby Bridge was listed as a Connect station but Mytholmroyd wasn't. But we don't know right now if Connect is still happening
 

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,011
Southport-based rabble-rousing and pig-headed insistence on having a service to Piccadilly means that the Alderley / Stalybridge trains are being extended to Southport while the Blackburn and Leeds services will terminate at Wigan.
That wasn't the Southport argument though. The arguments were 1. We need a direct link to the airport (which is utter rubbish, so when that didn't work they moved onto... ), 2. Commuters need a direct link to the south of Manchester.
Even if 2. is true - which I don't buy, because the number of people changing at Wigan or the Crescent to get on a Picc service is not exactly huge - they've shot themselves in the foot because the via Bolton services they're getting to replace the Calder Valleys are slower, more crowded, and since May have also been less punctual.

As a Wigan - Manchester commuter, it's excellent for me because starting the Leeds in Wigan means it'll be quieter and should be more reliable, and therefore offer a pleasent, and fast, link into Victoria.

ButI still think the Southport campaign stinks of turkeys promoting Christmas.
Swings and roundabouts. The parochial nature of Northern England's railways in a nutshell. Same can be about direct rail link to Manchester Airport which is held aloft as some sacred carrot.

Don't sympathise with Northern as they are a poorly run franchise but it must be frustrating when people complain about lack of direct services to Manchester Piccadilly / Victoria.

They are 15 minutes walk. There is a free bus service between both stations around the city centre. Furthermore there are two direct trains per hour. Additionally there is a tram link if the <15 minute walk to work on the other side of town is too much.

Northern shouldn't be pandering to them - as others have said - it's impossible to run all services through both Victoria / Oxford Road / Piccadilly. Pragmatism is required.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,768
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Swings and roundabouts. The parochial nature of Northern England's railways in a nutshell. Same can be about direct rail link to Manchester Airport which is held aloft as some sacred carrot.

Don't sympathise with Northern as they are a poorly run franchise but it must be frustrating when people complain about lack of direct services to Manchester Piccadilly / Victoria.

They are 15 minutes walk. There is a free bus service between both stations around the city centre. Furthermore there are two direct trains per hour. Additionally there is a tram link if the <15 minute walk to work on the other side of town is too much.

Northern shouldn't be pandering to them - as others have said - it's impossible to run all services through both Victoria / Oxford Road / Piccadilly. Pragmatism is required.

Isn’t pragmatism exactly what they’re now doing, having found a solution which allows one service to go to one and another service to the other? Albeit with extra stops which isn’t exactly ideal it has to be said, but if a majority of users on this line value the convenience then seems fair enough to me.

The same applies on parts of Southern and Southeastern with many destinations having a service to both the city and west end. Obviously here passenger volumes are several orders of magnitude higher, but reliability could probably be heavily improved by rationalising the journey opportunities, but with what degree of backlash?
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,264
... we don't know right now if Connect is still happening

Why wouldn't it? The costs are already sunk. All that remains once the new trains are delivered is to do some marketing to boost the regional routes. It might be that timetabling conflicts etc. mean the network isn't quite as extensive or the service as fast as planned, but that doesn't mean the whole thing stops.
 

BenBru

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2016
Messages
39
Why wouldn't it? The costs are already sunk. All that remains once the new trains are delivered is to do some marketing to boost the regional routes. It might be that timetabling conflicts etc. mean the network isn't quite as extensive or the service as fast as planned, but that doesn't mean the whole thing stops.

You're right, but the early anticipation isn't really showing up. New trains, staffed Northern Connect stations, faster services should all be being showcased now....it's gone so quiet on Northern Connect I have my doubts it will come to fruition in December.
 

Mogster

Member
Joined
25 Sep 2018
Messages
905
That wasn't the Southport argument though. The arguments were 1. We need a direct link to the airport (which is utter rubbish, so when that didn't work they moved onto... ), 2. Commuters need a direct link to the south of Manchester.
Even if 2. is true - which I don't buy, because the number of people changing at Wigan or the Crescent to get on a Picc service is not exactly huge - they've shot themselves in the foot because the via Bolton services they're getting to replace the Calder Valleys are slower, more crowded, and since May have also been less punctual.

As a Wigan - Manchester commuter, it's excellent for me because starting the Leeds in Wigan means it'll be quieter and should be more reliable, and therefore offer a pleasent, and fast, link into Victoria.

ButI still think the Southport campaign stinks of turkeys promoting Christmas.

Changing at Salford Crescent tends to involve a 20 to 30 minute wait for a connecting service. As the Castlefield services are infrequent they tend to be overcrowded at peak times so there’s always the possibility you won’t be able to board. Then there’s the total lack of any facilities (OK there’s some benches...) at the re-built windswept Salford Crescent... Victoria to South Manchester is a long way. As a regular traveller I’m sure you’re aware of all this though. I don’t think existing West Lanc’s commuters asking for the direct services to Castlefield they are used to is as unreasonable as you keep insisting.

Anyway with Northern’s repeated cancellations of station stops and sometimes whole services beyond Wigan I’m amazed anyone from West Lanc’s is still attempting to use the service... Leaving peak Southport services at Wigan I’m sure these a decrease in through passengers now. “I’m using my car from next week” conversations are regularly overheard...
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,264
You're right, but the early anticipation isn't really showing up. New trains, staffed Northern Connect stations, faster services should all be being showcased now....it's gone so quiet on Northern Connect I have my doubts it will come to fruition in December.

I have no more information than anyone else, but Northern cannot afford another botched launch.

If I was them I wouldn't be marketing Northern Connect yet. I'd wait until all the new trains are in service and teething troubles ironed out, then get the timetable working with faster services. And then, and only then, would I launch Northern Connect as a brand.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,239
Extra Sunday services should take priority. To be fair, Northern does already have a pretty good Monday to Saturday timetable, at least in my neck of the woods.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top