• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

West Coast Partnership: Awarded to First Trenitalia

Status
Not open for further replies.

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
Plenty of room. When VTWC looked at it a few years ago, they were looking at a location further down the southern end of platforms 3 and 4.
*Intake of breath*
Doable though the distance for passengers to walk! Might need to look at travelators!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
They walk down there to board First Class anyway don't they?


Yeah they would be down that end anyway - think they use that area just for their onboard catering storage anyway
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,759
So much negativity in this thread.

1. The DfT do not get involved with TOC-specified rolling stock, end of. DfT influence ends with the capacity requirements set out at ITT stage.
So the DofT weren’t involved in the hitachi high speed train program for GWR and East Coast then???

Also their are passengers in the UK who have no other means of transport except the train, even if its just to get to some places so to generalise that everyone always has a second choice of transport if the train service is worse than it was before is just pure speculation
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Also their are passengers in the UK who have no other means of transport except the train, even if its just to get to some places so to generalise that everyone always has a second choice of transport if the train service is worse than it was before is just pure speculation

Quite like your first sentence as for the vast majority, the bus will be the only mode of transport and not the train and lets be honest people who do not have another mode of transport such as pedal cycle or car or motorcycle will generally not live in very remote places with no public transport
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,751
Repeat after me:
I must not read the Daily Mail.
I must not read the Daily Mail.
And repeat after me:

I must not read the guardian

I must not read the guardian


That's enough politics now
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,316
exactly what happens at Runcorn. And what used to be the case at Stoke.

If there's a first class lounge to wait in then people are likely to arrive more than a 5 minutes before their train. As such plenty of time to recover from a walk along the platform of ~200m. If walking more than that is a problem then ask for passenger assistance.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,759
Quite like your first sentence as for the vast majority, the bus will be the only mode of transport and not the train and lets be honest people who do not have another mode of transport such as pedal cycle or car or motorcycle will generally not live in very remote places with no public transport
The buses dont go everywhere what about those who have no choice but relying on the train? We cant all avoid awful train companies
 

Jurg

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2017
Messages
199
And repeat after me:

I must not read the guardian

I must not read the guardian


That's enough politics now
You must not read the Guardian either if you think they write positive things about Jeremy Corbyn
 

Red1980

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2019
Messages
296
Could say the same about COV and BHI but yet they still are.

No you couldn't really. Pretty much every TOC calling at those stations stops there.
I think I mentioned in another post that for at least the last 10 years there has been nothing Virgin like about the service as it just plods on daily. If that deteriorates you know it will be down to management change, I imagine most current staff will be disappointed as Virgin must be one of the more humane employers on the network. First appear to have a fairly positive 22 year culture to grapple with , and to screw this up when the franchise is engaged to HS2 (wedding not booked yet)I can't imagine the DFT will want the aggro or bad PR.

That's because it's not been Virgin for years. Let's be honest it's stagecoach!
 
Last edited:

Red1980

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2019
Messages
296
I think I mentioned in another post that for at least the last 10 years there has been nothing Virgin like about the service as it just plods on daily. If that deteriorates you know it will be down to management change, I imagine most current staff will be disappointed as Virgin must be one of the more humane employers on the network. First appear to have a fairly positive 22 year culture to grapple with , and to screw this up when the franchise is engaged to HS2 (wedding not booked yet)I can't imagine the DFT will want the aggro or bad PR.

I think you need to define "humane" there too. The disappointment you speak of may be wide of the mark as well. From the contacts I have and from what I've heard there's been an inevitably over this for a while..... I do think you need to venture away from this " it's Virgin" approach mate.....it isn't and hasn't been for some time.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
No you couldn't really. Pretty much every TOC calling at those stations stops there.


That's because it's not been Virgin for years. Let's be honest it's stagecoach!

Very pleased to hear that TOCs calling at International and Coventry do indeed stop there...
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
The buses dont go everywhere what about those who have no choice but relying on the train? We cant all avoid awful train companies

And neither do the trains and I feel you are now clutching at straw to make whatever point you were trying to make - none of which has anything to do with FirstTrenitalia winning the West coast - as their trains dont go everywhere either.
 

Red1980

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2019
Messages
296
It's very important. But saying it shouldn't be a west coast thing because such and such amount stop there doesn't really work. Especially when there's actually plenty of virgin services stopping there.
 

TrainTube

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2018
Messages
487
Maximum is not that high Motherwell-Glasgow (80-90 iirc), and the calls would likely go into the slower via Birmingham services than the Euston fasts. Even if they went into the fasts I don't see about 3 mins making much of a difference to passengers really.
If they went on the Birmingham services I wouldn't have a problem. I would recommend they introduce an hourly service to Blackpool calling at Warrington Wigan Preston Lancaster, then the fast Glasgow could only call at Warrington Preston and Carlisle. Oxenholme and Penrith both get fast TPE trains, people headed for London could change at Preston. Warrington has an absurdly small amount of services for the Town it is, so that would benefit them. The Glasgow service would be 10 mins shorter, meaning it would be around 4h 20 mins, around the same as LNER to Edinburgh, and considering Edinburgh is closer to London that is an achievement.
 

TrainTube

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2018
Messages
487
There is no way a Motherwell call will reduce the time by 10 minutes and the maximum speed between the two is 90mph anyway.
Timetabling wise, maybe not. Reality wise, I think so. More than not I reckon delayed Scotrail services will cause Virgin *First* trains to run slower.
 

class26

Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
1,125
If they went on the Birmingham services I wouldn't have a problem. I would recommend they introduce an hourly service to Blackpool calling at Warrington Wigan Preston Lancaster, then the fast Glasgow could only call at Warrington Preston and Carlisle. Oxenholme and Penrith both get fast TPE trains, people headed for London could change at Preston. Warrington has an absurdly small amount of services for the Town it is, so that would benefit them. The Glasgow service would be 10 mins shorter, meaning it would be around 4h 20 mins, around the same as LNER to Edinburgh, and considering Edinburgh is closer to London that is an achievement.

LNER to Edinburgh is mainly going to 4 hours dead when the new, accelerated timetable comes out
 

3141

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2012
Messages
1,771
Location
Whitchurch, Hampshire
Quite like your first sentence as for the vast majority, the bus will be the only mode of transport and not the train and lets be honest people who do not have another mode of transport such as pedal cycle or car or motorcycle will generally not live in very remote places with no public transport

Possibly true, but mainly because not very many people live in "very remote places with no public transport" to start with.

Last week I spent a few days in Winsford, Somerset. Three buses a day, plus one more during school terms. I was talking to somebody who doesn't have a bike or any kind of motorised vehicle. If she needs to go to the doctor she has to catch the bus with a long wait in Dulverton before she can come back, or if she is lucky she may get a lift. A journey to London requires careful planning. In such situations talk about "choice" between modes of transport is unrealistic.
 

TrainTube

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2018
Messages
487
LNER to Edinburgh is mainly going to 4 hours dead when the new, accelerated timetable comes out
Of course, forgot that the Azuma will decrease the journey times. That will seriously compete with air travel now.
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,100
Location
SE London
If they went on the Birmingham services I wouldn't have a problem. I would recommend they introduce an hourly service to Blackpool calling at Warrington Wigan Preston Lancaster, then the fast Glasgow could only call at Warrington Preston and Carlisle. Oxenholme and Penrith both get fast TPE trains, people headed for London could change at Preston. Warrington has an absurdly small amount of services for the Town it is, so that would benefit them. The Glasgow service would be 10 mins shorter, meaning it would be around 4h 20 mins, around the same as LNER to Edinburgh, and considering Edinburgh is closer to London that is an achievement.

You might want to check the location of Lancaster on a map. And in the light of what you discover, you might want to review your recommendation that I've bolded!

I don't think Oxenholme and Penrith people would be particularly happy at your suggestion that they see fewer services and also have to change to get to London. In my experience, Oxenholme in particular sees quite a bit of traffic to London - including people from Windermere who already have to change once at Oxenholme - you'll be making them change twice.
 

DenmarkRail

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2016
Messages
665
Will there be any short term changes to the Stafford services? I'm aware that there will be some slight changes from HS2 opening, however what are the plans before this?
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,100
Location
SE London
As a user of South Western railway, its a shame that First are taking over Virgin. When first took over the south western franchise, I was quite happy as south west trains needed a change. But so far First haven't delivered much, some Desiros have a different interior, many of the 159s have new livery but old interior, and the 442s planned for May 2018 still haven't gone into service yet.

How much of that is SWR's fault though? As I understand it, a lot of what they wanted to deliver turned out not to be possible due electrical supply capacity and other issues that turned up that were NR's responsibility.

Virgin on the other hand was a good operator, and I think First might ruin its legacy. The new idea of calls at Motherwell is not a good idea, Motherwell already gets some morning and afternoon services, calling at Motherwell will make the service slower by at least 10 minutes, as I doubt the Pendolinos will go over 100mph between there and Glasgow, and the calls will have to fit in with Scotrail suburban services.

I'm sure I recall reading various discussions about Virgin on these forums in the past in which quite a few people suggested that maybe the reason the West Coast franchise appeared well run was because it was operationally a lot simpler than most other franchises, rather than because of Virgin per se. Strange how this narrative seems to change as soon as Virgin no longer have the franchise. (Personally, I don't know and offer no opinions on which version is correct).

Also, I'm sure I also recall various complaints about Motherwell being heavily short-changed by losing most of its London services when the Virgin high frequency timetable came in. Since I believe Motherwell would serve as a railhead for quite a large population area, and in my experience the Virgin Pendolinos aren't massively crowded north of Carlisle, I'd have thought that adding a Motherwell stop ought to be good in terms of providing more journey opportunities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top