krus_aragon
Established Member
That's not too many miles away from the current provision.There's a tidal flow to the Welsh services though - you could run a few doubled up units all the way *from* Holyhead in the morning, with a single unit providing the Euston - Chester services at breakfast time - similarly, run single units south from Chester in the afternoon/evening to permit double units to run all the way *to* Holyhead at that time.
Every four hours west of Chester might then be acceptable for the middle of the day (to provide double up trains every hour south of Chester).
The current weekday service for the NW Coast is as follows:
- Three early morning departures from Holyhead to Euston
- An early morning train from Birmingham to Holyhead, which forms a 9am departure for Euston
- 8am and 9am trains from Euston to Holyhead and back, which meet the mid-day Stena and Irish Ferries sailings
- 4pm departure from Euston to Bangor, which then returns to Birmingham
- 5pm, 6pm, 7pm departures from Euston to Holyhead, stabling there overnight
My concern with doubling up everything Chester to Euston with bi-modes is that the one remaining unit wouldn't be able to match the current provision for the mid-day ferries at Holyhead.Your points about improved provision from TfW are sound for most of the coast, but Holyhead itself won't see any increases. Removing one of the current Virgin WC services would leave a lot of luggage-laden travellers changing trains at Chester for TfW's shorter trains. But if one works with the plan of doubling most Chester-Euston services (or Crewe-Euston with EMUs), then it should be possible to find the units to keep running the boat services running.
Of the remaining services, the one which (IMHO) could really do with being doubled is the 4pm (1610) departure from Euston. It's the only evening departure North Wales off-peak returns are restricted from (restriction VK), because of the lack of capacity.