• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Unguarded florescent tubes

Status
Not open for further replies.

Camden

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2014
Messages
1,949
Sharp glass when broken (inc occassional spontaneous shattering), and mercury contents... Is it not terribly wrong for a moving mechanical vehicle to contain these with the bars exposed?

A cover certainly gives more pleasant ambience, but surely safety ought to mandate them??
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,762
Are you sure they aren't sleeved? You can get clear plastic tubes that fit around the fluorescent tube, adding strength (and containing debris if broken) but without blocking any light.

The good ones are invisible to the eye, until you go to change the tube.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,918
Location
Nottingham
I think it's the 150/1 ones as originally installed (may have been modified since) that looked a bit vulnerable if someone was a bit slapdash in putting an over-large piece of luggage on the rack.
 

Parallel

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2013
Messages
3,937
The 150/1s are definitely unguarded. When they were with FGW, they changed the tubes from T8 or T12 to LED with a plastic tube.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,529
I hate unguarded fluorescents, make my eyes go really red and itchy.
If I do a long tube trip I have to shut my eyes as much as possible.
 

Crepello

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2018
Messages
57
The 507s/508s had open strips pre-refurb, and I'm guessing other PEP-based EMUs. Never saw a problem - they're close to the ceiling, inset from the luggage racks.

Used to commute on the old G1-G7 trams in Amsterdam - high floors so low ceilings, and open strips near the grab rails. Nearly made that mistake one time as a standee, when the tram lurched. Would say others were less fortunate over the 45+ years those great machines were in service!
 

sannox

Member
Joined
1 Mar 2016
Messages
390
The 507s/508s had open strips pre-refurb, and I'm guessing other PEP-based EMUs. Never saw a problem - they're close to the ceiling, inset from the luggage racks.

Used to commute on the old G1-G7 trams in Amsterdam - high floors so low ceilings, and open strips near the grab rails. Nearly made that mistake one time as a standee, when the tram lurched. Would say others were less fortunate over the 45+ years those great machines were in service!

Yep 314s were the same. 156s were too but Scotrail added defusers when they were refurbed with PIS in the early 2000s. Not sure what other ops did with their 156s
 

AMD

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
608
Generally not a problem, they've been there for 30 years and theft hasn't been an issue up to now. As for breakages, you have to be standing on table before something happens, at which point you shouldn't be up there.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,873
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Generally not a problem, they've been there for 30 years and theft hasn't been an issue up to now. As for breakages, you have to be standing on table before something happens, at which point you shouldn't be up there.

I don't habitually nick them, but I can reach them from the floor.
 

aleggatta

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
545
Although unguarded, I don't know of any examples that would be removable without some form of tool or vandalism
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Surely worth guarding them even if just so that we don't steal the tubes to light our homes?

People regularly nicked unguarded tungsten bulbs in days of old, only to find that railway bulbs worked on just about every voltage but 240v...

When I was a kid, practically every house I knew had at least one fluorescent tube light in it, usually in the kitchen, but they've not been common for years. How many people still have them?
 

aleggatta

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
545
Don't they all work off some sort of high-voltage, high-frequency supply, with electronics in the lighting units themselves to drive them?
Depending on the rolling stock, they will either take supplies directly from auxiliary power (say 24v or 110v DC) and the lighting ballast will kick out 230/240v AC to run the tube, or it will be run directly off 'hotel' power taking in 230v and kicking out 230v to the tube. with regards to frequency, it will be whatever frequency the ballast has been designed to kick out. Older designs used 'chokes' and starters, but these have largely been replaced as high frequency electronic ballasts have fewer failure points, and can easily incorporate an emergency battery pack if required.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,824
Location
Wilmslow
How many people still have them?

I have three of them, although most of my house hasn't been significantly modernised since it was built in 1981.

I really like them a lot, but only once I replaced the (glow plug) starters with electronic versions from Tabelek in Waterlooville. Since then (a few years) I haven't had to replace either a tube or a starter. Probably more importantly, they also now start almost instantly because the aleatoric nature of the glow plug starters has been removed.
 
Last edited:

Surreytraveller

On Moderation
Joined
21 Oct 2009
Messages
2,810
There is also the issue of unguarded fluorescents becoming projectiles in the event of a collision
 

Terry Tait

Member
Joined
31 Jul 2019
Messages
196
Years ago my girlfriend was on a CIG with her sister on the way back from her mum, two yobs were on the train at the same time and smashed the florescent lights with some sort of stick as they run through the carriage on their way out at Pevensey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top