Killingworth
Established Member
I mean referenda in general. The chaos that this one has caused by being too vague for something so complex might convince some future politicians that they simply aren't worth having, particularly as they are not legally binding.
So to hold a referendum the power calling such a vote needs to be sure they'll get at least 60% voting one way or the other on at at least a 50% turnout. Otherwise chaos, confusion, and potential civil war is likely Let's get a bill through parliament to ensure that applies to any such future votes calling for any constitutional changes.
Wait a minute. If the government was so sure, in most cases there'd be no need for a ballot. Perhaps a slight revision to the bill. No second referendum on the same subject for at least 5 years.