• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 315 Withdrawals

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

306024

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
3,946
Location
East Anglia
Why are they getting overhauls now?

To keep them maintained perhaps? You can’t just keep a train running if it has reached its mileage or time threshold for its next major exam.

When the 9 car units are introduced on the Paddington - Hayes service the 7 car units over there can return East and replace 315s, hopefully before the 315s require further exams.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,555
Just because they require an overhaul, doesn't necessarily mean they'll get one. LO will probably withdraw them when the time to overhaul them comes.

That said, the 332s on HEx services have worked for almost 20 years without a single major overhaul (I'm led to believe).
They'll have to be careful. They need 27 units out of 31 to cover the peak service, all 17 315s and 10 317s. I think the 315s are PRM compliant but the 317s are not. Could get messy in January.
 

700007

Established Member
Joined
6 May 2017
Messages
1,195
Location
Near a bunch of sheds that aren't 66s.
They'll have to be careful. They need 27 units out of 31 to cover the peak service, all 17 315s and 10 317s. I think the 315s are PRM compliant but the 317s are not. Could get messy in January.
The 317s aren't that far off from being PRM compliant as I understand it - I must be right in thinking all of the big work (such as compliant toilets) have already been done?
 

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,377
Location
JB/JP/JW
The 317s aren't that far off from being PRM compliant as I understand it - I must be right in thinking all of the big work (such as compliant toilets) have already been done?

For LO the compliant toilets work has simply been to lock them out...
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,555
The 317s aren't that far off from being PRM compliant as I understand it - I must be right in thinking all of the big work (such as compliant toilets) have already been done?
The toilets are locked out of use on London Overground. I don't think any of the other mods have been done but they have on the 315s.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
For LO the compliant toilets work has simply been to lock them out...
which will be just as much about ataking away something that can be vandalised, about not needing to fill water tanks, clean loos etc- it is after all a metro operation.
 

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,377
Location
JB/JP/JW
which will be just as much about ataking away something that can be vandalised, about not needing to fill water tanks, clean loos etc- it is after all a metro operation.

Exactly. TfL services don't have toilets, and running a handful of trains with toilets would cause more problems than it is worth. See also the TfL Rail West class 360s.

A previous posted had pointed out that the 317s on LO had had compliant toilet works, which is (generally - the 317/7s of course did have accessible toilets, although I don't know that they met the latest specs) incorrect.
 

zn1

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2011
Messages
435
when a coded repair comes up, the unit will undergo several decisions before authority is permitted...

cost & value for money

length of service the overhaul will give - when crossrail kicks in the 315s are effectively a dead fleet..so doing Code 4s and code 6's on too many isnt cost effective as it could be the unit has its code 4 and within 4 weeks its taken off lease, sits around for a year then is scrapped, or as has happened in BR days is overhauled and within days is condemned.

full condition report ..how much longer has the unit got before its actually too expensive to keep in traffic - we do same with our cars...if repair cost exceeds its market value...we dump em...TOCS & Roscos do the same .

it could be that the unit can be kept in service by keeping it traffic with short term overhaul, effectively just a conditional change of components that need doing, a C4m - motors only, just swap motors ove C4B code 4 bogie swap, but retain allocated motors ..just to keep it traffic in for a short time..

the Fleet now will be being scruitinised by Depot engineer staff to identify which of the fleet are the worst and best...in the 315 fleet will be steadily reduced further to skeleton size ..and others stepping in, 313 could fill in happily if they are in better nick mechanically, crew training isnt too hard on them...
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,761
313 and 315 are pretty the same though arn’t they?? except the 313 are smaller with 3 coaches of course but apart from that?
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,761
Exactly. TfL services don't have toilets, and running a handful of trains with toilets would cause more problems than it is worth. See also the TfL Rail West class 360s.

The 360s still have working toilets though dont they?

What is the state of the 315s, do they have universal toilets or not since they are tfl?
 

Steve Newman

Member
Joined
2 Sep 2019
Messages
9
Location
Enfield
I have seen 28 of the 31 allocated units for the Overground Liverpool St services in the month of August. Those missing were;
315805 - Last seen 4/5/19
317708 - Last seen 12/7/19
317892 - Last seen 12/7/19
Depending how many times I use my local station, Southbury, I usually see between 26 & 28 different units each month.
It does not look like 315805 is going to be back, unless anyone knows better. Perhaps they will sub it with another Shenfield 315, similar to 315858.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
For what it is worth - and being interested in the 315's (having recalled them coming in a blaze of glory to replace the superb , but run down 306's) , I have tried to have a "last ride" on the Shenfield line (admittedly off peak) -and found just 345's in service. I quite like them to be fair.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,472
Location
Farnham
No, permanently locked out of use.
The ex HC 360 I was on the other day I actually used the disabled toilet to check my hair in the mirror. It definitely works. Also, do we know of any more confirmed 315 withdrawals?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

700007

Established Member
Joined
6 May 2017
Messages
1,195
Location
Near a bunch of sheds that aren't 66s.
For what it is worth - and being interested in the 315's (having recalled them coming in a blaze of glory to replace the superb , but run down 306's) , I have tried to have a "last ride" on the Shenfield line (admittedly off peak) -and found just 345's in service. I quite like them to be fair.
It you are trying to find XR 315s then your best bet is on a weekday. I believe all Sunday duties are done by 345s now and most Saturdays are done by 345s too (about 9 out of 11 now I think).

The ex HC 360 I was on the other day I actually used the disabled toilet to check my hair in the mirror. It definitely works. Also, do we know of any more confirmed 315 withdrawals?
Some 7 cars should be coming to the East side over the next month or so depending on how introduction of 9 cars go which means that some more 315s will be going off lease. Specific units not mentioned yet but it's looking like a handful to go.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,555
I have seen 28 of the 31 allocated units for the Overground Liverpool St services in the month of August. Those missing were;
315805 - Last seen 4/5/19
317708 - Last seen 12/7/19
317892 - Last seen 12/7/19
Depending how many times I use my local station, Southbury, I usually see between 26 & 28 different units each month.
It does not look like 315805 is going to be back, unless anyone knows better. Perhaps they will sub it with another Shenfield 315, similar to 315858.
This explains why there are always six pairs of 317s running rather than the diagrammed five. Taking on some Shenfield 315s would make sense if the 710s don't start soon. I think the 315s are PRM compliant but the 317s are not.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,555
It you are trying to find XR 315s then your best bet is on a weekday. I believe all Sunday duties are done by 345s now and most Saturdays are done by 345s too (about 9 out of 11 now I think).


Some 7 cars should be coming to the East side over the next month or so depending on how introduction of 9 cars go which means that some more 315s will be going off lease. Specific units not mentioned yet but it's looking like a handful to go.
I think weekdays there are still six pairs of 315s off peak. Presumably Saturdays will go entirely 345 if more units come over from the west side.
 
Joined
19 Dec 2018
Messages
155
LO 315805 authorised repair following derailment........ and cascade of TfL class 315's to LO to commence shortly to replace those going off lease.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,239
My last ride on a 315 was on the Shenfield Shuttle aka Shenfield ****e! Was clapped out and this was in 2011!
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
My last ride on a 315 was on the Shenfield Shuttle aka Shenfield ****e! Was clapped out and this was in 2011!
Thanks to TfL, at least from a passenger's perspective they're in better shape now than they were in 2011. For almost 40-year old units we could be doing a lot worse.
 

stu227

Member
Joined
26 Dec 2012
Messages
35
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Thanks to TfL, at least from a passenger's perspective they're in better shape now than they were in 2011. For almost 40-year old units we could be doing a lot worse.

It is incredible that they manage to make such old unites look relatively decent - and maintain them so they turn up more regularly and punctually than any previous operator. Concession v Franchise? It's certainly telling that rush hour at Brentwood sees almost exclusively 315s still rather than a 345.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
It is incredible that they manage to make such old unites look relatively decent - and maintain them so they turn up more regularly and punctually than any previous operator. Concession v Franchise? It's certainly telling that rush hour at Brentwood sees almost exclusively 315s still rather than a 345.
Not exclusively, but due to the way the units are diagrammed (specifically considering which peak services are busiest and most in need of the extra capacity of the 345s), you get them bunching up a lot - four successive services out to Brentwood could be 345s, then the next four could be 315s. Generally by taking 'first available' train my experience for the past year travelling infrequently has been 40/60 345/315, by skewing it to 'first air-conditioned train available' when travelling east from Liverpool Street (where I can easily see my options) it balances to 50/50, though sometimes use of 360s and Renatus 321s to Shenfield and back is necessary.

As it stands I think the MTIN figure for the 345s is approaching that of a pair of 315s, not quite there yet. It does show though, units that were built properly to begin with can last far beyond their original intended lifespan if they are just looked after. The same goes for the PIS system the 315s were fitted with. Perhaps as you say it's a matter for being a concession rather than a franchise or internal to TfL - certainly the C stock trains were not given anything like the same attention in the year before they were withdrawn, many of them looking like they'd already been in a scrapyard for years while still in operation. Generally TfL's 315s are immaculate - to be fair so are the 345s. Compared to the likes of TL's 700s of similar age, it's a remarkable difference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top