Our programs are match specific for the Ashes. It has match recaps from the last tests.If you're going to more than one Ashes test, don't buy a programme second time around. The Edgbaston & Old Trafford issues were absolutely identical apart from the cover and page 3. Like a mug, I bought both for £6 a go and didn't realize till I got home.
England 191-8, so halfway there, lads
No, replace Root as captain and drop him to his preferred position, no. 4. Then get a pair of opening batsmen, and a no. 3, that might see Root coming in when at least 20 overs have been bowled and there's at least 60 on the board. Root has been enormously let down by the vastly overrated Trevor Bayliss and the eccentric selections of Ed Smith and co.Should have been 5 0 to us if it wasn’t for these Australians
Seriously their bowlers ar3 far too good , as I predicted
God help us down under and please replace Joe Root with s good batsman
I think you're being a bit hard on your team there: IF they hadn't declared their first innings and IF they'd been able to enforce the follow on then it would probably have occurred sooner. A composite best team from the two sides might only include four England players.Cut it a bit fine. A win is a win though.
I doubt we would have enforced the follow on. Lyon bowled way to straight. The moment he put it outside off things happened.I think you're being a bit hard on your team there: IF they hadn't declared their first innings and IF they'd been able to enforce the follow on then it would probably have occurred sooner. A composite best team from the two sides might only include four England players.
4 England selections in a joint team is generous surely !
No, replace Root as captain and drop him to his preferred position, no. 4. Then get a pair of opening batsmen, and a no. 3, that might see Root coming in when at least 20 overs have been bowled and there's at least 60 on the board. Root has been enormously let down by the vastly overrated Trevor Bayliss and the eccentric selections of Ed Smith and co.
It seems to me the England management did make a choice at the beginning of 2019 and chose to concentrate on the World Cup, because England going into the Ashes series looked woefully under-prepared for the the long form of the game and still in party mode after the World Cup triumph.
Yep well played Australia. Some good bowling and a batting line up that just isn't up to the task has cost us dearly here.
Though really these could easily be called Smith's Ashes
Our programs are match specific for the Ashes. It has match recaps from the last tests.
Im sure the player articles are the same for each though.
Chances are they do them in similar vein to the AFL record. All 9 games have the same content except the match specific stuff in the middle and the occasional special front cover.
Am I one of the few people left who still fill in scorecards?
In AFL records I have two big boxes full of every game I've been too. I've gone to about 250 games of footy in the last 10 odd yearsHaving rechecked, only pages 1 (the cover), 3-5 and 7-9 differed between the Edgbaston and Old Trafford issues. The other 93 pages (2, 6, 10-100) were identical.
Unfortunately I am one of those sad people who have to buy a programme for every game I go to, football, cricket, RL, RU, ice hockey, basketball or whatever (unless the same programme is used for two or more matches) - so I did feel a bit cheated. My house is now seriously overstuffed. So I'm quite relieved I only have to buy scorecards for county championship and one-day cup matches - but feel obliged to fill these in, even though I would never deface a football programme. Am I one of the few people left who still fill in scorecards?
Burns, Root, Stokes and Broad or Archer, depending on the pitch and their mood on the first morning! Case for Bairstow rather than Paine, but Wade might be first choice keeper. Second thoughts, delete Broad as all the Aussie tailenders would score more runs than him these days.4 England selections in a joint team is generous surely !
Burns, Root, Stokes and Broad or Archer, depending on the pitch and their mood on the first morning! Case for Bairstow rather than Paine, but Wade might be first choice keeper. Second thoughts, delete Broad as all the Aussie tailenders would score more runs than him these days.
One version of my team would, actually, accord pretty well with yours, perhaps with Paine as non-playing captain, so a XII really! I'm all for Foakes too, and I don't understand why Sam Curran hasn't played.If we're having a fantasy team Broad would be in, he has been excellent, never mind that he doesn't score many runs these days. Paine not Bairstow, and Paine would be captain anyway. Bairstow shouldn't even be in the England team , Foakes is a better 'keeper and Bairstow suffers from the same problem as Roy (together with a big ego)
He won't be "sir" round these parts!Arise Sir Geoffrey (and not before time!)
As for the Ashes, how much different would it have been if Sir James Anderson had bowled in all the games at his average?
Sir Geoffrey Boycott and Sir Andrew Strauss are two of Theresa May's beneficiaries in her resignation Honours List. If you accept the principle of Honours, then I wouldn't disagree with those two choices.
Arise Sir Geoffrey (and not before time!)
Interviewed by Martha Kearney on Radio 4, in response to criticism from the Chief Exec of Women's Aid, he said "I don't give a toss about her, love."*cough* unfortunate incident & conviction with former partner *cough*
Interviewed by Martha Kearney on Radio 4, in response to criticism from the Chief Exec of Women's Aid, he said "I don't give a toss about her, love."
In a weird coincidence, I don't give a toss about Geoffrey Boycott. Spooky!
Australia have won the toss and will be bowling first.
Cue meet rack.