• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cricket

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Pakenhamtrain

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,017
Location
Melbourne, Australia
If you're going to more than one Ashes test, don't buy a programme second time around. The Edgbaston & Old Trafford issues were absolutely identical apart from the cover and page 3. Like a mug, I bought both for £6 a go and didn't realize till I got home.
Our programs are match specific for the Ashes. It has match recaps from the last tests.
Im sure the player articles are the same for each though.

Chances are they do them in similar vein to the AFL record. All 9 games have the same content except the match specific stuff in the middle and the occasional special front cover.
 

stantheman

On Moderation
Joined
17 Nov 2017
Messages
338
Should have been 5 0 to us if it wasn’t for these Australians
Seriously their bowlers ar3 far too good , as I predicted
God help us down under and please replace Joe Root with s good batsman
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,641
Location
Redcar
Yep well played Australia. Some good bowling and a batting line up that just isn't up to the task has cost us dearly here. Though really these could easily be called Smith's Ashes as he's been the difference. Without his innings at Edgbaston that may well have gone our way (or been a draw) and his innings here was 100% the key to Australia's victory.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,078
Should have been 5 0 to us if it wasn’t for these Australians
Seriously their bowlers ar3 far too good , as I predicted
God help us down under and please replace Joe Root with s good batsman
No, replace Root as captain and drop him to his preferred position, no. 4. Then get a pair of opening batsmen, and a no. 3, that might see Root coming in when at least 20 overs have been bowled and there's at least 60 on the board. Root has been enormously let down by the vastly overrated Trevor Bayliss and the eccentric selections of Ed Smith and co.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,078
Cut it a bit fine. A win is a win though.
I think you're being a bit hard on your team there: IF they hadn't declared their first innings and IF they'd been able to enforce the follow on then it would probably have occurred sooner. A composite best team from the two sides might only include four England players.
 

muddythefish

On Moderation
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
1,575
They were talking on TMS about if you could choose, would you pick a World Cup win or an Ashes victory.

The obvious answer to that question, is why not both ?

It seems to me the England management did make a choice at the beginning of 2019 and chose to concentrate on the World Cup, because England going into the Ashes series looked woefully under-prepared for the the long form of the game and still in party mode after the World Cup triumph.

Bayliss and Smith have to carry the can for the Ashes defeat because the team hasn't looked right from the first Test. Losing Anderson was a big blow but some of the selections, such as county No 5 Roy opening the batting, did not make sense.

The many dropped catches also showed a team under-prepared and not working properly.

Root needs to go back to No 4 and preferably be replaced as captain.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,017
Location
Melbourne, Australia
I think you're being a bit hard on your team there: IF they hadn't declared their first innings and IF they'd been able to enforce the follow on then it would probably have occurred sooner. A composite best team from the two sides might only include four England players.
I doubt we would have enforced the follow on. Lyon bowled way to straight. The moment he put it outside off things happened.

Bit of bravery involved bowling Labuschagne

https://www.news.com.au/sport/crick...h/news-story/1a06053740aeff67bd096660ba012d56
This coming from someone whose lasting legacy is bowling a ball to second slip.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,276
Location
Fenny Stratford
No, replace Root as captain and drop him to his preferred position, no. 4. Then get a pair of opening batsmen, and a no. 3, that might see Root coming in when at least 20 overs have been bowled and there's at least 60 on the board. Root has been enormously let down by the vastly overrated Trevor Bayliss and the eccentric selections of Ed Smith and co.

It seems to me the England management did make a choice at the beginning of 2019 and chose to concentrate on the World Cup, because England going into the Ashes series looked woefully under-prepared for the the long form of the game and still in party mode after the World Cup triumph.

The ECB focused on the World Cup not just this year but since the terrible performance in the last world cup. Bayliss has improved the white ball team no end. Sadly, the focus on red ball cricket has been lacking and we are seeing the result of that in this series: The test team came into the Ashes series woefully under prepared and lacking focus with a less than settled line up, some odd selections and especially at the top of the order, a lack of quality and application.

Yep well played Australia. Some good bowling and a batting line up that just isn't up to the task has cost us dearly here.

England let Australia get away, again, by being poor in both 1st innings.

Though really these could easily be called Smith's Ashes

He is a cheat and should not be playing. Needs to be said. Warner can play because he is rubbish. And a cheat.

( and it REALLY annoys me that such a great player allowed a culture of systematic cheating to build up in his team. He CLEARLY doesn't need to cheat FFS!)
 

Old Yard Dog

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2011
Messages
1,480
Our programs are match specific for the Ashes. It has match recaps from the last tests.
Im sure the player articles are the same for each though.

Chances are they do them in similar vein to the AFL record. All 9 games have the same content except the match specific stuff in the middle and the occasional special front cover.

Having rechecked, only pages 1 (the cover), 3-5 and 7-9 differed between the Edgbaston and Old Trafford issues. The other 93 pages (2, 6, 10-100) were identical.

Unfortunately I am one of those sad people who have to buy a programme for every game I go to, football, cricket, RL, RU, ice hockey, basketball or whatever (unless the same programme is used for two or more matches) - so I did feel a bit cheated. My house is now seriously overstuffed. So I'm quite relieved I only have to buy scorecards for county championship and one-day cup matches - but feel obliged to fill these in, even though I would never deface a football programme. Am I one of the few people left who still fill in scorecards?
 

Pakenhamtrain

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,017
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Having rechecked, only pages 1 (the cover), 3-5 and 7-9 differed between the Edgbaston and Old Trafford issues. The other 93 pages (2, 6, 10-100) were identical.

Unfortunately I am one of those sad people who have to buy a programme for every game I go to, football, cricket, RL, RU, ice hockey, basketball or whatever (unless the same programme is used for two or more matches) - so I did feel a bit cheated. My house is now seriously overstuffed. So I'm quite relieved I only have to buy scorecards for county championship and one-day cup matches - but feel obliged to fill these in, even though I would never deface a football programme. Am I one of the few people left who still fill in scorecards?
In AFL records I have two big boxes full of every game I've been too. I've gone to about 250 games of footy in the last 10 odd years
I gave up trying to fill in the scores years ago!
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,078
4 England selections in a joint team is generous surely !
Burns, Root, Stokes and Broad or Archer, depending on the pitch and their mood on the first morning! Case for Bairstow rather than Paine, but Wade might be first choice keeper. Second thoughts, delete Broad as all the Aussie tailenders would score more runs than him these days.
 

Arglwydd Golau

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2011
Messages
1,421
Burns, Root, Stokes and Broad or Archer, depending on the pitch and their mood on the first morning! Case for Bairstow rather than Paine, but Wade might be first choice keeper. Second thoughts, delete Broad as all the Aussie tailenders would score more runs than him these days.

If we're having a fantasy team Broad would be in, he has been excellent, never mind that he doesn't score many runs these days. Paine not Bairstow, and Paine would be captain anyway. Bairstow shouldn't even be in the England team , Foakes is a better 'keeper and Bairstow suffers from the same problem as Roy (together with a big ego)
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,078
If we're having a fantasy team Broad would be in, he has been excellent, never mind that he doesn't score many runs these days. Paine not Bairstow, and Paine would be captain anyway. Bairstow shouldn't even be in the England team , Foakes is a better 'keeper and Bairstow suffers from the same problem as Roy (together with a big ego)
One version of my team would, actually, accord pretty well with yours, perhaps with Paine as non-playing captain, so a XII really! I'm all for Foakes too, and I don't understand why Sam Curran hasn't played.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,078
Sir Geoffrey Boycott and Sir Andrew Strauss are two of Theresa May's beneficiaries in her resignation Honours List. If you accept the principle of Honours, then I wouldn't disagree with those two choices.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
As for the Ashes, how much different would it have been if Sir James Anderson had bowled in all the games at his average?

I wouldn't have thought it would have made any difference. Not when you consider that none of our openers were likely to have capitalised on it.
 

kermit

Member
Joined
2 May 2011
Messages
592
*cough* unfortunate incident & conviction with former partner *cough*
Interviewed by Martha Kearney on Radio 4, in response to criticism from the Chief Exec of Women's Aid, he said "I don't give a toss about her, love."
In a weird coincidence, I don't give a toss about Geoffrey Boycott. Spooky!
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,276
Location
Fenny Stratford
Interviewed by Martha Kearney on Radio 4, in response to criticism from the Chief Exec of Women's Aid, he said "I don't give a toss about her, love."
In a weird coincidence, I don't give a toss about Geoffrey Boycott. Spooky!

that is hardly a suprise ( either way lol)
 

Cletus

Established Member
Joined
11 Dec 2010
Messages
2,230
Location
Dover
Couple of England changes for the 5th test - Curran and Woakes in for Roy and Overton. Stokes batting only.
 

Top