• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Chelsfield and Knockholt

Status
Not open for further replies.

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,407
Location
Back office
Travelling down to Orpington this evening, I spotted notices displayed by Southeastern stating the following;

"Please remember Oyster and other contactless payment cards are not valid on Southeastern services beyond Orpington"

This conflicts with information published by National Rail and TfL, which suggest that Chelsfield and Knockholt stations are in Zone 6 and within the Oyster/CPC area.

Sources
http://content.tfl.gov.uk/london-rail-and-tube-services-map.pdf
https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/London_Rail_Tube_0519.pdf

Which is correct in this instance?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
3,737
Knockholt and Chelsfield are both in Zone 6.

The Southeastern notice might be a reference to services that, after Orpington, are next stop Sevenoaks. There are frequently announcements on these services that "Oyster / Contactless are not valid beyond Orpington, and users will need to alight, tap out, buy a ticket and board a following service".
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
7,870
Location
Crayford
Travelling down to Orpington this evening, I spotted notices displayed by Southeastern stating the following;

"Please remember Oyster and other contactless payment cards are not valid on Southeastern services beyond Orpington"

This conflicts with information published by National Rail and TfL, which suggest that Chelsfield and Knockholt stations are in Zone 6 and within the Oyster/CPC area.

Sources
http://content.tfl.gov.uk/london-rail-and-tube-services-map.pdf
https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/London_Rail_Tube_0519.pdf

Which is correct in this instance?
Oyster and contactless are valid as far as Knockholt. Were the notices you saw on a train which ran fast from Orpington to Sevenoaks?
 

jnjkerbin

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2012
Messages
842
Location
Down south
Use these trains quite a lot - on services which are non-stop to beyond Knockholt after Orpington, the announcements you mention play on arrival at Orpington. However, on trains which do stop at Knockholt, they make a similar announcement saying Knockholt is the last station just before arrival there. If I remember correctly (though I may be wrong) the actual announcement is '... are not valid on this service...' (my bold) which is of course correct.
 

Joe Paxton

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2017
Messages
2,465
For what it's worth, both Chelsfield and Knockholt very much do have Oyster/CPC validators, and have done since January 2010 (when Oyster PAYG expanded onto NR in London).

Like others have said, the notices will have been about fast services that don't stop at these two stations.
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,407
Location
Back office
Knockholt and Chelsfield are both in Zone 6.

The Southeastern notice might be a reference to services that, after Orpington, are next stop Sevenoaks. There are frequently announcements on these services that "Oyster / Contactless are not valid beyond Orpington, and users will need to alight, tap out, buy a ticket and board a following service".

Oyster and contactless are valid as far as Knockholt. Were the notices you saw on a train which ran fast from Orpington to Sevenoaks?

For what it's worth, both Chelsfield and Knockholt very much do have Oyster/CPC validators, and have done since January 2010 (when Oyster PAYG expanded onto NR in London).

Like others have said, the notices will have been about fast services that don't stop at these two stations.

All,

Thank you for confirming that Chelsfield and Knockholt are in Zone 6 and Oyster and CPC can be used at those stations.

"Please remember Oyster and other contactless payment cards are not valid on this service beyond Orpington" would convey the right message on trains running fast from Orpington to a station beyond Knockholt. It's an interesting strategy to choose to display an untrue statement, where a clear and simple correct statement could have been used.
 
Last edited:

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
7,870
Location
Crayford
Just got off a GA service to Bishops Stortford at Broxbourne. As we arrived there was an announcement saying that Oyster and contactless are not valid beyond Broxbourne on this service. Looks like this is a standard style of message, which is no bad thing.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,087
An aside, really, but Knockholt and Chelsfield were drawn into the new Greater London area from Kent in 1965 and, in the case of the former, many of the inhabitants were unhappy with the redrawing of the boundaries. In 1969 Knockholt went back into Kent. and one effect was the losing of their once week mobile library service provided by the London Borough of Bromley. I was an assistant on it at the time and I remember telling a lady that as it would be our last call she couldn't take more books out: she was most indignant, but someone else told me she'd been prominent in fighting for the change! Our driver, very old Orpington and no lover of the upper middle classes, loved it!
 

adrock1976

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2013
Messages
4,450
Location
What's it called? It's called Cumbernauld
An aside, really, but Knockholt and Chelsfield were drawn into the new Greater London area from Kent in 1965 and, in the case of the former, many of the inhabitants were unhappy with the redrawing of the boundaries. In 1969 Knockholt went back into Kent. and one effect was the losing of their once week mobile library service provided by the London Borough of Bromley. I was an assistant on it at the time and I remember telling a lady that as it would be our last call she couldn't take more books out: she was most indignant, but someone else told me she'd been prominent in fighting for the change! Our driver, very old Orpington and no lover of the upper middle classes, loved it!

Regarding the reference to the Borough of Bromley, I read somewhere many years ago that the street signs do not mention London at all (as you would get with London Borough of Lambeth etc), which suggests to me that they want to be part of London, but not really wanting to be there.

Also, was it the Borough of Bromley that had objected to and thwarted the then Greater London Council's plans for a flat fare on the London Underground, with the reason being that London Underground does not serve anywhere in the Borough of Bromley at all?
 

Surreytraveller

On Moderation
Joined
21 Oct 2009
Messages
2,810
Regarding the reference to the Borough of Bromley, I read somewhere many years ago that the street signs do not mention London at all (as you would get with London Borough of Lambeth etc), which suggests to me that they want to be part of London, but not really wanting to be there.

Also, was it the Borough of Bromley that had objected to and thwarted the then Greater London Council's plans for a flat fare on the London Underground, with the reason being that London Underground does not serve anywhere in the Borough of Bromley at all?
Same with Croydon. People in Croydon, particularly in the south of the borough, still believe that they are in Surrey. In a similar vein to Knockholt, Farleigh and Hooley were moved into Greater London in 1965, but were moved back into Surrey. I think a similar thing happened in the Horley / Gatwick area too, between West Sussex and Surrey (might have been one of the border villages in that area)
 

Weary Walker

Member
Joined
12 May 2011
Messages
52
From memory, Horley, Charlwood & Gatwick were all listed in the 1972 Local Government act as moving from Surrey to Sussex.
But these provisions weren't due to take effect until 1974
In the meantime the voters of Charlwood & Horley complained and got those bits of the act suspended/cancelled so that they never transferred.
Gatwick (& Lowfield Heath) were transferred, more precisely the boundary was redrawn.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,260
Location
West of Andover
Sorry to bump an old thread but I noticed this on Friday when I alighted from a Sevenoaks stopper at Orpington, that the on board announcements was suggesting that Orpington was the last station where oyster & contactless cards were valid, even though it called at Chelsfield & Knockholt.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
7,870
Location
Crayford
Sorry to bump an old thread but I noticed this on Friday when I alighted from a Sevenoaks stopper at Orpington, that the on board announcements was suggesting that Orpington was the last station where oyster & contactless cards were valid, even though it called at Chelsfield & Knockholt.
Do you know which train it was? I'd report it to Southeastern if I'd heard it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top