• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Midlands Engine Rail - Plans Published

Status
Not open for further replies.

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,493
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Posted this in the MML Electrification thread, but it's certainly worth a look at the plan for rail upgrades in the Midlands for the next 25 years! http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/rail-news/midlands-engine-rail?dorewrite=false

Plans for £3.5bn Midlands Engine Rail launched
The Midlands Engine Rail, a £3.5bn improvement programme made up of seven projects spanning the East and West Midlands, has been launched by regional transport body Midlands Connect.

The newly-announced plans aim to include and build upon the flagship Midlands Rail Hub scheme, which was submitted to Government in June 2019 with the aim of boosting east-west connectivity.

Up to 60 locations across the UK could benefit from improved services as a result of the proposals, with Midlands Connect seeking to supercharge the region’s economy, driving sustainability, productivity and social mobility across the whole of the Midlands region.

Planned to be delivered in stages from 2022 through to completion of HS2 Phase Two, the Midlands Engine Rail will provide a much-needed capacity boost for national, local and regional rail services – creating space for 736 more passenger trains on the region’s network each day.

MER_Fact_Sheet.jpg


Over the past two years, the Midlands has seen the fastest rise in passenger numbers of anywhere in the UK. Services to Birmingham, Leicester, Coventry and many more could all see benefits from the scheme, as well as helping improve the wider UK transport network given the Midlands’ centre position.

Civic and business leaders are now calling on Prime Minister Boris Johnson to back the Midlands Engine Rail and fund the next stage of its development – with an estimated cost of £45.5m over the next three years.

Sir John Peace, chair of Midlands Connect and Midlands Engine said: “In the Midlands, more people are travelling on the railways than ever before.

“We now need investment from Government to allow our people, businesses and infrastructure to reach their full potential, and to drive a further boost in passenger numbers. Midlands Engine Rail is essential in creating a more sustainable, productive and mobile Midlands.

“Whether they live in Shrewsbury, Lincoln, Birmingham or Leicester, our communities deserve the opportunity to make greener choices, to access a world-class education and to reach the widest possible variety of career opportunities. We must create a transport network that helps our businesses to grow, not holds them back.”

“My message to the Prime Minister is clear; it’s time you made a long-overdue commitment to the future of our rail network. Ten million Midlanders are counting on you; invest in their futures, turn our vision into reality, back Midlands Engine Rail.”

Robert Nisbet, director of nations & regions at the Rail Delivery Group, which represents rail companies, added: “Millions of train journeys are made in the Midlands every week and rail companies are working together to improve services, with new and refurbished trains being introduced to run more services.

“Further investment as part of Midlands Engine Rail will improve journeys for passengers between towns and cities across the region and power economic growth by unlocking new business opportunities.”
 

Attachments

  • Midlands Engine Rail.jpg
    Midlands Engine Rail.jpg
    93.5 KB · Views: 183
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
894
Midlands Connect have published "detailed" plans for improving rail services in the Midlands:

https://www.midlandsconnect.uk/publications/midlands-engine-rail-summary/

Key Points that I can see:
  • Reinstatement of the Nuneaton "southern bypass" for 4tph Nottingham-Leicester-Coventry services.
  • Reinstatement of Bordesley chords to run extra trains into Moor Street.
  • Double-tracking Coventry-Leamington
  • Hourly Birmingham-Nottingham services using HS2 phase 2B as far as Toton
  • Bedford - Leeds services using MML to Toton then HS2 phase 2B
  • Complete electrification of MML
  • 4tph each from Derby, Leicester and Nottingham to serve Toton
  • Doubled frequency and 20 minute time saving on Derby-Crewe services
  • Extra train per hour on Birmingham-Shrewsbury plus electrification to Shrewsbury
  • Extra train per hour Nottingham-Lincoln (post HS2). No plan to grade separating Newark flat crossing.
  • No mention of Leicester-Burton line
I'm not in the industry so I'm not in a position to comment on these goals.
 

James90012

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
161
All logical stuff, except for one major missing link which is Leicester/Derby to Manchester. Perhaps MC have passed this over to Northern Powerhouse Rail to identify strategic priorities but to me it's a major omission.

Appreciate the creative thinking about HS2, as ultimately these additional services could improve the case for the scheme over and above HS2's original business case.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,302
Location
Fenny Stratford
Midlands Connect have published "detailed" plans for improving rail services in the Midlands:

https://www.midlandsconnect.uk/publications/midlands-engine-rail-summary/

Key Points that I can see:
  • Reinstatement of the Nuneaton "southern bypass" for 4tph Nottingham-Leicester-Coventry services.
  • Reinstatement of Bordesley chords to run extra trains into Moor Street.
  • Double-tracking Coventry-Leamington
  • Hourly Birmingham-Nottingham services using HS2 phase 2B as far as Toton
  • Bedford - Leeds services using MML to Toton then HS2 phase 2B
  • Complete electrification of MML
  • 4tph each from Derby, Leicester and Nottingham to serve Toton
  • Doubled frequency and 20 minute time saving on Derby-Crewe services
  • Extra train per hour on Birmingham-Shrewsbury plus electrification to Shrewsbury
  • Extra train per hour Nottingham-Lincoln (post HS2). No plan to grade separating Newark flat crossing.
  • No mention of Leicester-Burton line
I'm not in the industry so I'm not in a position to comment on these goals.

I am making the international sign for money (rubbing thumb against index and middle finger), sucking my teeth and shaking my head.
 

PartyOperator

Member
Joined
26 May 2019
Messages
166
A complete HS2 network would rather change the logic of XC so presumably most of the current long-distance services going north of Birmingham would have to be reconfigured in some way. Moor Street would obviously be a good place to terminate trains for people switching to HS2.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,963
Midlands Connect have published "detailed" plans for improving rail services in the Midlands:

https://www.midlandsconnect.uk/publications/midlands-engine-rail-summary/

Key Points that I can see:
  • Reinstatement of the Nuneaton "southern bypass" for 4tph Nottingham-Leicester-Coventry services.
  • Reinstatement of Bordesley chords to run extra trains into Moor Street.
  • Double-tracking Coventry-Leamington
  • Hourly Birmingham-Nottingham services using HS2 phase 2B as far as Toton
  • Extra train per hour on Birmingham-Shrewsbury plus electrification to Shrewsbury
So 4tph Nottingham to Cov, on top of the extra tph they want from Brum to Leicester. That is 7tph between Nuneaton to Wigston, plus a freight path. That is going to be fun on a 6 minute headway on the down. Presumably they must expect Wigston is sorted somehow.
Reinstatement of the Bordesley chords? should have fact checked that one!
Milverton to Kenilworth redoubling is pencilled in as a CP7 scheme anyway.
Presumably Brum to Nottingham is instead of the plans to go via Castle Donnington and a sped up service that way.
Not convinced Shrewsbury to Brum is 4tph worth either!
 

Sprinter107

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2019
Messages
935
The Bordesley chords cant be re instated as they never existed in the first place. It's a totally new project which will mean the closure or relocation of Bordesley station.
 

bnsf734

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2007
Messages
568
Location
Nuneaton
From what I have read about the Bordesley chords one is for the Leicester and Nottingham services to terminate at Moor Street instead of New Street.

I think the other chord is for the new service to Kings Norton via Moseley for which the stations have been financed and awaiting construction.
 

Sprinter107

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2019
Messages
935
From what I have read about the Bordesley chords one is for the Leicester and Nottingham services to terminate at Moor Street instead of New Street.

I think the other chord is for the new service to Kings Norton via Moseley for which the stations have been financed and awaiting construction.
Yes, that's the plan.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
1,829
Location
Way on down South London town
All logical stuff, except for one major missing link which is Leicester/Derby to Manchester. Perhaps MC have passed this over to Northern Powerhouse Rail to identify strategic priorities but to me it's a major omission.

Appreciate the creative thinking about HS2, as ultimately these additional services could improve the case for the scheme over and above HS2's original business case.

I thought HS3 was going to include a triangular Junction for Manchester to Sheffield trains?
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
894
Ah ok, don't know where I got the idea that they existed. Slightly less wrong every day, that's the goal!
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
894
How do these plans fit into Network Rail's and/or the Dft's planning process? I know almost nothing about it.

I assume Midlands Connect themselves have no authority to actually order works to be begin. They just plan, suggest and petition? Is that right?
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,924
Location
Nottingham
I thought HS3 was going to include a triangular Junction for Manchester to Sheffield trains?
Even at high speed going south nearly as far as Birmingham isn't going to give a sensible journey time between Manchester and Sheffield. It plans to build a sort of triangle south of Manchester so trains from Manchester via the Airport, and trains from the south via HS2, can continue on some sort of high speed line into Liverpool.
 

class26

Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
1,125
I thought HS3 was going to include a triangular Junction for Manchester to Sheffield trains?

Don`t think so. Sheffield only features on the eastern branch of HS2. From Manchester it is merely an upgraded Hope valley line I believe.
 

sharpley

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2018
Messages
244
Pipe dreams for most of the East Midlands plans unfortunately. Seems most of the East Midlands plans noted in post #2 mention connections to / from Toton which i'd be amazed get green-lit after this current HS2 review.

Hopefully a full electrification plan on the MML will be approved.
 

tomuk

Established Member
Joined
15 May 2010
Messages
1,953
There’s 3tph now (1 Fast, one semi, one all stops).
There is actually 4tph when the 2x daily London Euston runs.
The 3tph isn't the best as the semi-fast is hardly any faster than the departures are uneven.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,206
There is actually 4tph when the 2x daily London Euston runs.
The 3tph isn't the best as the semi-fast is hardly any faster than the departures are uneven.

The semi fast is much quicker than the stopper for journeys to from Wolverhampton westwards. Eastbound it’s a good spread. Westbound is more difficult, but the semi fast does go first which has helped overcrowding.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,942
So 4tph Nottingham to Cov, on top of the extra tph they want from Brum to Leicester. That is 7tph between Nuneaton to Wigston, plus a freight path. That is going to be fun on a 6 minute headway on the down. Presumably they must expect Wigston is sorted somehow.
Reinstatement of the Bordesley chords? should have fact checked that one!
Milverton to Kenilworth redoubling is pencilled in as a CP7 scheme anyway.
Presumably Brum to Nottingham is instead of the plans to go via Castle Donnington and a sped up service that way.
Not convinced Shrewsbury to Brum is 4tph worth either!

Is Milverton to Kenilworth a re-doubling or just a doubling? I never though it was double in the first place?

I also agree with you 4tph between Leicester and Coventry seems fanciful, especially as more freight is probably going to need to run via the Cross Country Route rather than the GEML where competing aspirations for 1600 tonne freight and faster passenger services on this route must be in conflict with each other? In another sense even if this wasn't the case is their sufficient demand for it anyway? 2tph maybe but not four.

Midlands Connect have published "detailed" plans for improving rail services in the Midlands:

https://www.midlandsconnect.uk/publications/midlands-engine-rail-summary/

Key Points that I can see:
  • 4tph each from Derby, Leicester and Nottingham to serve Toton
Possibly you could get close to this fairly reasonably for Derby and Nottingham.
Derby and Nottingham:-
2 Class 170 XC services
1 EMT from Matlock to Newark
1 Crewe to service extended to Nottingham (isn't it in the Abellio franchise anyway?)
All Diverted via Toton

What I did notice from their red diagrammatic map though was the absence of Derby - Crewe and Derby towards Birmingham and the linking of Matlock to East Midlands Hub. I would have said the former destinations have as much right to be on this map as Matlock.
 
Last edited:

g22

Member
Joined
5 May 2014
Messages
92
Surely Midlands Connect are talking about 2tph each direction Nottingham-Leicester-Coventry not 4tph in both directions?
 

si404

Established Member
Joined
28 Dec 2012
Messages
1,267
Surely Midlands Connect are talking about 2tph each direction Nottingham-Leicester-Coventry not 4tph in both directions?
Yes. 4tph total via the avoid-Nuneaton curve. Of course 4tph between Birmingham and Leicester, Leicester and Toton, Toton and Nottingham (plus Derby, and Northants/Beds/London services on tracks between Leicester and Nottingham) will make it all a tight fit.

What I don't get, given the maximise-usage-of-low-cost-track-upgrades-by-running-a-ton-of-trains is why only hourly for the Birmingham-Nottingham service on HS2. 2tph would surely make more sense given the importance they make about the link between the two cities.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,924
Location
Nottingham
What I don't get, given the maximise-usage-of-low-cost-track-upgrades-by-running-a-ton-of-trains is why only hourly for the Birmingham-Nottingham service on HS2. 2tph would surely make more sense given the importance they make about the link between the two cities.
Possibly capacity issues on HS2. In particular Curzon Street was sized for the base HS2 service and it's probably too late to enlarge it now.
 

si404

Established Member
Joined
28 Dec 2012
Messages
1,267
Possibly capacity issues on HS2. In particular Curzon Street was sized for the base HS2 service and it's probably too late to enlarge it now.
good point on Curzon Street. Arguably it was quite small even for the original 9tph it was due to have - especially with the gold plating the scheme has elsewhere.

I think there's space elsewhere - segregated tracks onto the eastern branch and also only 9tph each way currently proposed between the main central junction and Toton.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top