My point against you remains valid. At no point did I argue against your opinion on Horsburgh, my argument against you was your suggestion that there is a basis for investigation or challenge.This is not a surprise.
WLCs tender, though poor practice, remains 100% legal and transparent. From the opening advert of the tendering process it is clearly stated that it is 90% price, 10% quality. If Horsburgh are winning it on that criteria, having been advertised at that point there is not basis for challenge. This is how they have also won many contracts with Falkirk and Edinburgh councils. The tendering process is extremely regulated, and the entire process has to be open to scrutiny. If you have any basis to believe that undue process has been done you are legally entitled to request information through the Freedom of Information act.