In "normal" times, with a governing party with a good working majority, what use is the Westminster parliament?
Finally, you get it. Being a member of the EU isn't about getting our own way all the time. Sometimes we have to do what's in the best interest of the group.
The concept of right and left is an outdated paradigm as both "sides" lead to the individual becoming subservient to the state and it's apparatus, these days it's "Freedom or Tyranny"
Evidence?
Crow was a not a Labour member, or even a Labour supporter.
Speaking of anti-democratic we have the PM, his advisor Dominic Cummings, the leader of the House Of Commons, the House Of Lords and the Royal Family. I don't recall voting for any of them.
Which is just ridiculous and a construct of the right wing (Or whatever you want to call them) press. I refer to freedom or tyranny in this case .
For example?
Greenwich doesn't have it so bad as it's within the London bubble, the government has heard of it and some of them probably even live there so the chances are that Westminster will take account of the needs of places like Greenwich. That's much less likely for Oldham or Kirkcaldy or Armagh or Port Talbot, which have probably done better out of Brussels than out of Westminster in recent years.
Ahh yes, but they are not the paymasters
You ask the likes of Mogg in private what laws he would want repealed and there is probably a long list, although nothing that either doesn't affect the man on the street negatively or doesn't both make him shed loads of cash and allows him to hide it for tax purposes.
The only Mogg I want having a say at No. 10 is Larry!
Well I'd say it does, and we do have some opportunity to change them if we don't like a proposal. I can't offhand think of any that I'd consider bad for the UK - in fact the EU has far less influence than Westminster on our daily lives or responsibility for the pretty dire status of some regions - but would welcome any thoughts from others.
Before Erdogan and even in his early years in power Turkey seemed to be following the path of most Balkan nations towards peace with its neighbours and alignment with European legal norms that would eventually lead to membership. This is no longer then case but I'm not sure whether it's because Turkey decided it would never be allowed in due to not having a "Christian culture" so might as well stop trying, or because Erdogan decided that he wanted to do things that weren't compatible with membership. It's the sort of situation where an inner and outer circle of EU members might help, with the outer circle less involved in political and financial integration but still integrated economically.
Like most "hard man" leaders it has all been a blatant power grab - right down to the super-easy, barely an inconvenience "attempted coup" that gave him an excuse to get rid of military people who weren't loyal enough.
The problem is of course like many "official" talks it's all behind closed doors still a simple internet search does provide clues - here is just one I found
Yes you're quite correct but does one need to be a member of the Labour party to be "Left Wing" ?
Not sure you understand how the UK system works
The concept of freedom or tyranny has been around for far longer then a "right wing" press.
wikipedia and its entry on tyranny
Erdogan trying to rebuild the Ottoman Empire, Putin trying to rebuild the Russian Empire (and very happy to play the part of Tsar of all the Russias), right-wing Tories thinking they still live in the British Empire .... Where does it go next? Is there anyone looking to rebuild the Habsburg Empire — or even the Holy Roman Empire?
So I presume you're entirely happy for our elected representatives to exercise their judgment and reject a Brexit that's damaging to our national interest.
Good time to be a builder of gunboats.
What was the age limit then ? possibly not depending and of course that vote was about membership of the EEC which was a completely different kettle of fish
